NationStates Jolt Archive

Oh, this would be too good. Practically no chance she'd actually go to jail over this, but just the idea that she could actually be held accountable for her actions (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-111anncoulter,0,4502849.story?coll=sfla-news-palm) as though she were some average person instead of the slanderous hose-beast she is is just too much to hope for.
WEST PALM BEACH -- Conservative columnist Ann Coulter has refused to cooperate in an investigation about whether she voted in the wrong precinct, so the case will likely be turned over to state prosecutors, Palm Beach County's elections chief said Wednesday.

Elections Supervisor Arthur Anderson said his office has been looking into the matter for nearly nine months, and he would turn over the case to the state attorney's office by Friday.



LocalLinks
Coulter's attorney did not immediately return a telephone message Wednesday and her telephone number in Palm Beach is unpublished. A message left for Tara Gilbride, a publicist for Coulter's publisher, The Crown Publishing Group, owned by Random House Inc., was also not immediately returned.

Anderson's office received a complaint in February that Coulter allegedly voted in the wrong precinct during a Feb. 7 Palm Beach town council election. Since then, Anderson said he has made repeated attempts to resolve the matter with Coulter and her attorney but has been rebuffed.

Anderson said an initial letter was sent to Coulter on March 27 requesting that she clarify her address for the voting records ``or face the possibility of her voter registration being rescinded.''

Three more letters were sent to Coulter and her attorney over the next several months, but she has yet to respond with the information requested, Anderson said.

In July, Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because he complained Anderson had given details to the media. Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.

Knowingly voting in a wrong precinct is a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison, said Mike Edmondson, a spokesman for the state attorney's office in West Palm Beach.

Edmondson said his office generally reviews such cases, then turns them over to local authorities for a full investigation that could result in an arrest if intent is proven.
I wonder if she'll be on tv to confront these charges in the next couple of days? I look at it as a win-win. If she's on tv, someone will ask her about it. Even Colmes, wimpy as he is, probably wouldn't pass up this kind of chance. And if she stays off tv, well, she's off tv, and that's a net good on its own.

Let's look at this 'fishy' stuff again.

Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because he complained Anderson had given details to the media.

Giving details to the media? Why would they do that, why can't they just go down there and talk?

Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.

Asked to correspond in person and was denied? Since when cant a citizen and their representative go down to the city hall and represent themselves and their case to the government workers and offices?

Riiight. Can’t do an exploratory session in person, face to face, write an agreement and sign it? Why not, what political motivation is going on here?

And here we are, reading about the details in the media, something done July, reported in November just before elections are to take place (and Coultier isn't even a politician) and we are suppose to believe what?

OBVIOUSLY the media IS being leaked information,...

Nice :rolleyes:

Not too familiar with the area, are you? Palm Beach isn't exactly a liberal haven.

What's that got to do with it? Leaking information to the media for what purpose?

Not too familiar with the area, are you? Palm Beach isn't exactly a liberal haven.

Is this the same prosecutor who went after Limbaugh?

Is this the same prosecutor who went after Limbaugh?

Honestly, I don't know. I live well south of there, so I'm only vaguely familiar with the area.

Let's look at this 'fishy' stuff again.

Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because he complained Anderson had given details to the media.

Giving details to the media? Why would they do that, why can't they just go down there and talk?

Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.

Asked to correspond in person and was denied? Since when cant a citizen and their representative go down to the city hall and represent themselves and their case to the government workers and offices?

Riiight. Can’t do an exploratory session in person, face to face, write an agreement and sign it? Why not, what political motivation is going on here?

And here we are, reading about the details in the media, something done July, reported in November just before elections are to take place (and Coultier isn't even a politician) and we are suppose to believe what?

OBVIOUSLY the media IS being leaked information,...

Nice :rolleyes:Looking at the article again, I suspect that Coulter was miffed because the complaint was public in the first place, not because of any subsequent leaks. I'm always on the lookout for stories like this, and this is the first I've heard of it since the original story months ago.

Looking at the article again, I suspect that Coulter was miffed because the complaint was public in the first place, not because of any subsequent leaks. I'm always on the lookout for stories like this, and this is the first I've heard of it since the original story months ago.


Exactly my point... why now? What week is this that causes stories like this to come out? (With leaked information as well...apparently)

Honestly, I don't know. I live well south of there, so I'm only vaguely familiar with the area.

Really, the only thing that surprises me is that I haven't heard of this...and it's not like Coulter's shy...I would have expected a rant to the effect of 'they go after me, but they let dead people vote". Or something like that.

Probably just another politcally motivated prosecution (the timing is a bit suspicious, no ?). Having said that, if she did 'knowingly' break the law, well, I guess I can't defend her on that...

Maybe she's doing 'research for her next book'. Yeah, that's the ticket !!!!;)

Really, the only thing that surprises me is that I haven't heard of this...and it's not like Coulter's shy...I would have expected a rant to the effect of 'they go after me, but they let dead people vote". Or something like that.


LOL :p

Exactly my point... why now? What week is this that causes stories like this to come out? (With leaked information as well...apparently)

It is somewhat suspicious, and if it is the same guy who went after Limbaugh it isn't inconceivable that we have a liberal-bias prosecutor doing his part to get the Dems. in office.

They are sending her letters to clarify her address? Well, there's the problem, she just isn't getting them because she fucking lied.

They are sending her letters to clarify her address? Well, there's the problem, she just isn't getting them because she fucking lied.

LOL :p

It is somewhat suspicious, and if it is the same guy who went after Limbaugh it isn't inconceivable that we have a liberal-bias prosecutor doing his part to get the Dems. in office.

Hold on a sec--Limbaugh decidedly broke the law. The only reason he's not in jail is because he's very wealthy and connected--crackheads don't get deferred prosecution because they're broke motherfuckers who don't know anybody, not because they're any more guilty. If anything, Limbaugh's political connections kept him out of the trouble he deserved to be in.

Now let me say of Coulter--the article notes that this is a felony that includes up to 5 years in jail, if they can prove intent on vote fraud. They probably can't, and I doubt they'll try, because it would be a stretch at best. I was laughing at this because it's more of a class issue for me. Coulter has a sense of entitlement that's common among the wealthier among us, and I like to see that sense shattered whenever possible. That's she's a psychotic bitch who makes conservatism look bad is just sauce for the goose.

Oh, this would be too good. Practically no chance she'd actually go to jail over this, but just the idea that she could actually be held accountable for her actions (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-111anncoulter,0,4502849.story?coll=sfla-news-palm) as though she were some average person instead of the slanderous hose-beast she is is just too much to hope for.

I wonder if she'll be on tv to confront these charges in the next couple of days? I look at it as a win-win. If she's on tv, someone will ask her about it. Even Colmes, wimpy as he is, probably wouldn't pass up this kind of chance. And if she stays off tv, well, she's off tv, and that's a net good on its own.
Please, Santa, please. It would be some of the best television in years. I want it more than I can say -- and I don't even care what the outcome is -- I just want to watch the feeding frenzy. Every time I look at that harpy I start daydreaming about having a pool full of pet sharks that I could drop her into. Frikkin sharks, yeah. With frikkin laser beams. Attached to their frikkin heads.

Hold on a sec--Limbaugh decidedly broke the law. The only reason he's not in jail is because he's very wealthy and connected--crackheads don't get deferred prosecution because they're broke motherfuckers who don't know anybody, not because they're any more guilty. If anything, Limbaugh's political connections kept him out of the trouble he deserved to be in.
True.

Now let me say of Coulter--the article notes that this is a felony that includes up to 5 years in jail, if they can prove intent on vote fraud. They probably can't, and I doubt they'll try, because it would be a stretch at best. I was laughing at this because it's more of a class issue for me. Coulter has a sense of entitlement that's common among the wealthier among us, and I like to see that sense shattered whenever possible. That's she's a psychotic bitch who makes conservatism look bad is just sauce for the goose.

I do realize shes batshit insane, and I realize she may very well be in violation of the law, what I'm questioning is the timing of the investigation/court case

I do realize shes batshit insane, and I realize she may very well be in violation of the law, what I'm questioning is the timing of the investigation/court caseI'm assuming--and I have to do this because there's precious little detail in the story--that the Elections Supervisor wanted to get this handled earlier and couldn't, and that the statute of limitations to do something was coming close. Now that's a big assumption and it also assumes that the Election Supervisor was working in good faith--also a potential stretch. But Coulter certainly strikes me as the sort of person who would rather claw her eyes out than be forced to explain herself.

bump

I do realize shes batshit insane, and I realize she may very well be in violation of the law, what I'm questioning is the timing of the investigation/court case

what timing?

yes its a few days before the midterm election but she's not running for anything. it cant have an effect on any race.

the more likely thing is that he wants to put public pressure on her to cooperate. she is on notice that she cant ignore that he is going to prosecute her if she doesnt start talking.

the more she drags is out, the more she deserves an actual punishment. she is not above the law because she is famous. at some point it becomes an issue of equal justice and she has to end up on the wrong end of it.

She's ducking anyone who might ask her some uncomfortable questions (http://atrios.blogspot.com/2006_10_29_atrios_archive.html#116247631656887689). Apparently, she was on Paula Zahn's show last night, but she forced Zahn to cancel the person she was supposed to appear with--Sam Seder of Air America. Wonder why Coulter didn't want to be on the same show as Seder? *strokes chin thoughtfully*

the legitimacy of the prosecution aside....

lets test her like they used to test witches. tied her up and put her in a sack. then throw her in a lake. if she sinks - she's innocent. if she floats, she's guilty and should be burned at the stake.

She's ducking anyone who might ask her some uncomfortable questions (http://atrios.blogspot.com/2006_10_29_atrios_archive.html#116247631656887689). Apparently, she was on Paula Zahn's show last night, but she forced Zahn to cancel the person she was supposed to appear with--Sam Seder of Air America. Wonder why Coulter didn't want to be on the same show as Seder? *strokes chin thoughtfully*

Wow, what a controlling bitch. She goes on someone else's show and makes demands on who else gets to be there with her? Wow, that's a new level. Just.. wow. Like, level 61 bitch.

Wow, what a controlling bitch. She goes on someone else's show and makes demands on who else gets to be there with her? Wow, that's a new level. Just.. wow. Like, level 61 bitch.

It's apparently not that unusual if you're a big enough star. I can't quit figure out how Coulter qualifies under that determination, however.

It's apparently not that unusual if you're a big enough star. I can't quit figure out how Coulter qualifies under that determination, however.

It may not be unusual, but it's bitchy nonetheless, no matter who does it.

I could honestly care less whether Coultergeist is convicted or even charged, frankly. I don't care whether she voted in the wrong precinct so long she didn't vote more than once. This really is a non-issue; more of a personal stab at someone who frankly earned the contempt she's receiving.

We honestly have more important problems than Coultergeist's choice of voting locations. Better that we point out the blatant falsehood of her assertions and the illogic of her logic. I'd like to see her revealed as the charletan she is rather seeing her convicted of a crime. The real crime is her assault on American intelligence.

"Sauce for the goose," "bat-shit insane" and "level 61 bitch" (LMAO!!!) I knew I liked this forum for a reason! Thanks for the new buzzwords (HA!) :p

Please, Santa, please. It would be some of the best television in years. I want it more than I can say -- and I don't even care what the outcome is -- I just want to watch the feeding frenzy. Every time I look at that harpy I start daydreaming about having a pool full of pet sharks that I could drop her into. Frikkin sharks, yeah. With frikkin laser beams. Attached to their frikkin heads.

Then you know she'd only escape moments after you left and entrusted her murder to the sharks and then blow up your secret hideaway.

She's ducking anyone who might ask her some uncomfortable questions (http://atrios.blogspot.com/2006_10_29_atrios_archive.html#116247631656887689). Apparently, she was on Paula Zahn's show last night, but she forced Zahn to cancel the person she was supposed to appear with--Sam Seder of Air America. Wonder why Coulter didn't want to be on the same show as Seder? *strokes chin thoughtfully*

If I reached the level where I had the luxury of picking and choosing whom appeared on a show with me, I would probably opt not to have some squeaking prick that disagreed with me too.
Do you want to be able to state your views and opinions, or have someone yell over you and ridiclue everything you say, wether its right or wrong ?
Given that luxury, I'd only go where I looked best. I also wouldnt walk in to a trap, where I could expect to be set up or even pied in teh face.

I would appear, however, if I was allowed to fight the opposing pundit, with one blunt object of our choice.

In fact, I believe this close to elections, it should be mandatory that "pundits" have to fight until submission. Who the fuck are pundits, anyway ?
Do they really speak for you or me? No- they piss gasoline on fires,whip things up to a fever pitch and they PROFIT while you and I are at each other's throats for no fucking reason.

In the real world- I might actually live right next door to a bleeding heart liberal AND I DONT EVEN KNOW IT. We get along fine.

*start of rant*

"Sauce for the goose," "bat-shit insane" and "level 61 bitch" (LMAO!!!) I knew I liked this forum for a reason! Thanks for the new buzzwords (HA!) :p


Seriously, this forum is full of shit like that. Just hang around for a minimum of about two months and you'll pretty much double your vocabulary with mostly insults.

If I reached the level where I had the luxury of picking and choosing whom appeared on a show with me, I would probably opt not to have some squeaking prick that disagreed with me too.
Do you want to be able to state your views and opinions, or have someone yell over you and ridiclue everything you say, wether its right or wrong ?
Given that luxury, I'd only go where I looked best. I also wouldnt walk in to a trap, where I could expect to be set up or even pied in teh face.

I would appear, however, if I was allowed to fight the opposing pundit, with one blunt object of our choice.

In fact, I believe this close to elections, it should be mandatory that "pundits" have to fight until submission. Who the fuck are pundits, anyway ?
Do they really speak for you or me? No- they piss gasoline on fires,whip things up to a fever pitch and they PROFIT while you and I are at each other's throats for no fucking reason.

In the real world- I might actually live right next door to a bleeding heart liberal AND I DONT EVEN KNOW IT. We get along fine.

*start of rant*

A: I don't think anyone should have any control over who appears on a show with them. They can know who's coming, and can decline to appear if they don't want to be on there with them, but it's just fucking rude and makes you seem like a spoiled brat when you do something like force the host to cancel some other guest because of your preferences.

B: If I knew someone opposite my political views were to be on a show, I'd enjoy it. I enjoy defending my ideas, especially when people who are watching can learn from it. It's only those who are insecure about their facts and their ideas that they can't tolerate any kind of questioning of their intellect.

B: If I knew someone opposite my political views were to be on a show, I'd enjoy it. I enjoy defending my ideas, especially when people who are watching can learn from it. It's only those who are insecure about their facts and their ideas that they can't tolerate any kind of questioning of their intellect.

I think you're aware that in here, on talk shows and in general these days, people of opposing view points dont get together, discuss and make statements-then politely listen while the other makes a statement- And then one admits that maybe they DO see an alternative to what they believed- they yell over each other, call names and make snarky,snyde low blow comments-then bray like jackasses til the "host" interrupts for a very important commerical for head ache roll on cream or a very serious chase in LA.
There is no more intelligent exchange or consideration of ideas- its just finding fault-all destructive criticism., non concstructive and nothing is repaired or created.

Its a mire-a total cesspool. And this is even before we consider the outright LIES that are being put out there.

I'm not speaking for one side or the other right now. It all disgusts me.

I think you're aware that in here, on talk shows and in general these days, people of opposing view points dont get together, discuss and make statements-then politely listen while the other makes a statement- And then one admits that maybe they DO see an alternative to what they believed- they yell over each other, call names and make snarky,snyde low blow comments-then bray like jackasses til the "host" interrupts for a very important commerical for head ache roll on cream or a very serious chase in LA.
There is no more intelligent exchange or consideration of ideas- its just finding fault-all destructive criticism., non concstructive and nothing is repaired or created.

Its a mire-a total cesspool. And this is even before we consider the outright LIES that are being put out there.

I'm not speaking for one side or the other right now. It all disgusts me.

I know it happens, but I'd rather have more discussion than less, even if only a portion of each discussion is actual discussing.

I know it happens, but I'd rather have more discussion than less, even if only a portion of each discussion is actual discussing.

I'm going to vote for "Pundit Submission Match".

I'm going to vote for "Pundit Submission Match".

Coulter would win a lot of those, mainly because most people she'd go up against wouldn't want to touch her skanky ass. ;)

Then you know she'd only escape moments after you left and entrusted her murder to the sharks and then blow up your secret hideaway.
Don't I know it. That fucking, indestructible, screeching, harpy-assed cow* -- how the hell did she get into our lives? Why do we know who she is? Goddammit. Who do I have to fucking sell my fucking soul to to be rid of her?**














* Little known ancient Babylonian she-monster

** What Dr. Evil's staff meetings really sounded like.

Who is Ann Couler.

Who is Ann Couler.Ann Coulter is an insane, rabid right-wing political pundit.

Who is Ann Couler.
I misspelled and couldn't edit. :(

Ann Coulter is an insane, rabid right-wing political pundit.

yeah. i know who Ann Coulter is. I asked about Ann Couler

* Little known ancient Babylonian she-monster

much like the gorgontaur, the creature with the body of a woman, a head of a bull and hair of snakes.

Oh, this would be too good. Practically no chance she'd actually go to jail over this, but just the idea that she could actually be held accountable for her actions (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-111anncoulter,0,4502849.story?coll=sfla-news-palm) as though she were some average person instead of the slanderous hose-beast she is is just too much to hope for.

I wonder if she'll be on tv to confront these charges in the next couple of days? I look at it as a win-win. If she's on tv, someone will ask her about it. Even Colmes, wimpy as he is, probably wouldn't pass up this kind of chance. And if she stays off tv, well, she's off tv, and that's a net good on its own.
Probably the worst thing that could happen to her is to become disenfranchised just like all those poor folks that were cut off by Kathleen Harris. Could you imagine what she would feel like if she could no longer vote for her boys? :D

Not too familiar with the area, are you? Palm Beach isn't exactly a liberal haven.

Uh...yes it is. Palm Beach is very old and Jewish...aka, VERY democrat.

Uh...yes it is. Palm Beach is very old and Jewish...aka, VERY democrat.

Nice. Care to support that supposition?

Nice. Care to support that supposition?

Palm Beach County

Presidential
Candidate Vice Presidential
Candidate Political
Party Popular Vote
John Kerry John Edwards Democratic 328,687 60.35%
George W. Bush Richard Cheney Republican 212,688 39.05%
Ralph Nader Peter Camejo Reform 1,568 0.29%
Other (+) - - 1,679 0.31%

http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/

Everyone (who lives in Florida) knows that the Tri-County area, or Dade, Broward and Palm are HEAVILY Democrat, and West Palm Beach is notorious for its old Jewish democrats, who are terrible drivers.

Its just something every Floridian knows.

much like the gorgontaur, the creature with the body of a woman, a head of a bull and hair of snakes.
There's someone else that reminds me of, but I don't want to flame famous people who aren't here.
















It's Bey Buchanan.