NationStates Jolt Archive

Please don't let this crazy bitch be your senator.


PLEASE.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15490609/

She's publicly stated she doesn't believe in separation of church and state, and that to elect anyone who's not a christian is to elect sin into office. She grew up a rich little bitch and is now married to a rich bastard - she's never known any kind of poverty, at all. She tries to make herself look like a victim because her campaign staff keeps leaving her because she yells at them and throws hissy fits when something small happens.

Before he became the first of three campaign managers to quit, Jim Dornan programmed his cellphone to play the theme song from "The Exorcist" when Harris called.

For fuck's sake.


Oh and this was the stupid whore in charge of the 2000 recount. It is to laugh.

Regardless of who she's running against, vote for her opponent. Multiple times if possible. And try and get some dead relatives and neighbours to vote too. And your pets.

Regardless of who she's running against, vote for her opponent. Multiple times if possible. And try and get some dead relatives and neighbours to vote too. And your pets.

She's roughly 26 points behind her opponent and she hasn't even CONSIDERED the idea of her not winning, and has gone so far as to say she could be the first woman president.

I'd go the step further and hope that someone caps this bitch.

I live in Florida (Jacksonville). As an atheist I will, of course, not be voting for Harris. But I do side with her actions during the 2000 recount. I am far from a Republican, but that whole thing was Gore and the DP pitching a fit, trying to get a recount they wanted.

I don't expect to be voting for Harrisn not sure who I'll be voting for. I'm really undecided on who to vote for, man am I in trouble.

As for governor, I'm pretty sure I'll be voting for Crist. I still need to do some pretty extensive research.

I don't expect to be voting for Harrisn not sure who I'll be voting for. I'm really undecided on who to vote for, man am I in trouble.

As for governor, I'm pretty sure I'll be voting for Crist. I still need to do some pretty extensive research.

As long as it's not Jeb.

I live in Florida (Jacksonville). As an atheist I will, of course, not be voting for Harris. But I do side with her actions during the 2000 recount. I am far from a Republican, but that whole thing was Gore and the DP pitching a fit, trying to get a recount they wanted.

I'm fairly certain turning this thread into a "the recount was stupid" thread would be counterproductive, and we'd never actually get anywhere.

Florida, America's wang. Go figure they have some interesting politics.

I'm fairly certain turning this thread into a "the recount was stupid" thread would be counterproductive, and we'd never actually get anywhere.

Then you shouldn't have brought it up in the OP.

Then you shouldn't have brought it up in the OP.

I didn't bring up the subject of whether or not it should've happened, I'm giving you a history of what she's been in charge of.

I didn't bring up the subject of whether or not it should've happened, I'm giving you a history of what she's been in charge of.

Yes, but by refering to her as the 'stupid whore' in charge of the recount, you made your opinion of the recount well known, as well as implying that it should be considered a negative in evaluating her as a potential candidate.

I was merely expressing my equal dislike of her as a person and politician, while disagreeing with you that the recount actions were a negative. Thus proving that you don't have to be a Democrat or a Shrub-hater to think that Harris is a douche.

Yes, but by refering to her as the 'stupid whore' in charge of the recount, you made your opinion of the recount well known, as well as implying that it should be considered a negative in evaluating her as a potential candidate.

I was merely expressing my equal dislike of her as a person and politician, while disagreeing with you that the recount actions were a negative. Thus proving that you don't have to be a Democrat or a Shrub-hater to think that Harris is a douche.

I call her the stupid whore in charge of the recount because she's a stupid whore and she was in charge of the recount. She can most readily be identified as "that stupid whore that was in charge of the recount", as opposed to just "that stupid whore" or "the florida secretary of state" - more people know about the recount than those that know florida even has a secretary of state.

And I know you don't have to be a democrat or shrub-hater to think she's a douche, but it helps.

In terms of GOP candidates, there's an easy system to divide up how everyone's doing. You can look at everyone's poll numbers over the first week or so of October to get a good idea of how they will do.

Ahead in the polls - Can't lose. The GOP candidate would have to club a baby seal and kick a puppy down an elevator shaft on national TV to lose. And even then, the Dems would find a way to lose.

Down by 4 points or less - Probably still a winner. Especially if you're an incumbent or in a red state.

Down by 5-9 points - Toss-up. The Dems have started a great losing tradition, but this is a bit to make up in a month. Look for the candidate to campaign dirty and sling as much mud as possible.

Down by 10-19 points - It's a tough spot, but victory is possible. Dig up every bit of dirt you can on your opponent and his/her party. Make outrageous claims about them. Use every logical fallacy you can.

Down by 20 points or more - Karl Rove couldn't win you this one, pal. You're fucked, and you're about to lose to a Democrat. Retire from politics and go get a job at a dry cleaners. Oh, and change your name and get a nose job. No point in having people recognize you as a disgraced politician who actually managed to lose to a Democrat.

Lose by 25 points - Shame. Horrible shame. Laughable, pathetic shame. Go-join-the-circus shame. Your name is mud now.

Katherine Harris is in that second-to-last range right now and could end up in the join-the-circus level in November. Ha ha.

Anyone live in Florida?
no.

nobody does.

florida does not exist.

it's an illusion (though a very big one).

no.

nobody does.

florida does not exist.

it's an illusion (though a very big one).

I know that. It's just a front for the mythical land of Xanth.

She's roughly 26 points behind her opponent and she hasn't even CONSIDERED the idea of her not winning, and has gone so far as to say she could be the first woman president.

I'd go the step further and hope that someone caps this bitch.

She takes the term over confidence to whole new levels.

She takes the term over confidence to whole new levels.

She takes the term psycho christian white bitch to a whole new level.

She takes the term psycho christian white bitch to a whole new level.

Now that's a bit of a derogatory comment. Racist and sexist. Libel....

Please don't let this crazy bitch be your senator.


PLEASE.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15490609/

She's publicly stated she doesn't believe in separation of church and state, and that to elect anyone who's not a christian is to elect sin into office. She grew up a rich little bitch and is now married to a rich bastard - she's never known any kind of poverty, at all. She tries to make herself look like a victim because her campaign staff keeps leaving her because she yells at them and throws hissy fits when something small happens.

Before he became the first of three campaign managers to quit, Jim Dornan programmed his cellphone to play the theme song from "The Exorcist" when Harris called.

For fuck's sake.


Oh and this was the stupid whore in charge of the 2000 recount. It is to laugh.

oh dear...
*pities florida*

Now that's a bit of a derogatory comment. Racist and sexist. Libel....

Learn your law. Opinion is not defamation.

I award you no points.

Now that's a bit of a derogatory comment. Racist and sexist. Libel....

Not if it's true. :p

Not if it's true. :p

That's the point, opinion can never be objectively true or objectivley false, it is not defamation

Now that's a bit of a derogatory comment. Racist and sexist. Libel....

Well, gee whiz...the term here is "psycho Christian white bitch." let's break that down.

Psycho - debatable. After all, she's getting her ass handed to her on a plate and she still thinks she's winning. Good political thinking, sure. Rational, not really.

Christian - I don't think she will deny that she's a Christian.

White - She's white, OK? She's not black or red or purple.

Bitch - Again, subjective. Comments like "Electing anyone who isn't a Christian will lead to legislating sin" or whatever she said isn't quite Coulter-esque but borders on "bitch." And just so we don't think I'm being sexist here, plenty of men say stupid things; we just call them "assholes."

That's two descriptors that are dead-on and two that are very possible. Derogatory, sure. Racist, marginally. Sexist, not really. Libel? Not a chance. Your statement is less accurate than the one you decry. Therefore, you lose. Have a nice day.

It's fun when technicality tears people limb from limb. :3

Heh, that article is, if not comedy gold, comedy silver.

Katherine Harris, who is trying to become a U.S. senator, says she is writing a tell-all about the many people who have wronged her. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to: the Republican leaders who didn't want her to run, the press that has covered her troubled campaign, and the many staffers who have quit her employ, whom she accuses of colluding with her opponent.

She is vague about what, precisely, makes her a victim, but she says she has it all documented.

Almost something like TDS or the Onion.

I know that. It's just a front for the mythical land of Xanth.

*Insert cheering for Xanth here*

*Insert cheering for Xanth here*

Rah!

Heh, that article is, if not comedy gold, comedy silver.



Almost something like TDS or the Onion.

TDS?

Im in florida. Hurricane Charley Ground-Zero.

Katherine Harris botched the recount, just like she was supposed to do. That's why the Republicans PROMOTED her afterwards.

I usually take a lot of time reading about the candidates, as I am not usually a party voter, but an issue voter.

But my issue this time is getting Republicans out of office. Im voting Dem all the way.

I agree with Nancy Pelosi, it's a waste of time to impeach Bush, et al. Better to just make them Lame Ducks and move on.

Oh, and lucky me, Foley was from my district.

Im in florida. Hurricane Charley Ground-Zero.

Katherine Harris botched the recount, just like she was supposed to do. That's why the Republicans PROMOTED her afterwards.

I usually take a lot of time reading about the candidates, as I am not usually a party voter, but an issue voter.

But my issue this time is getting Republicans out of office. Im voting Dem all the way.

I agree with Nancy Pelosi, it's a waste of time to impeach Bush, et al. Better to just make them Lame Ducks and move on.

Oh, and lucky me, Foley was from my district.

Yar, agreed with everything.

Please don't let this crazy bitch be your senator.


PLEASE.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15490609/

She's publicly stated she doesn't believe in separation of church and state, and that to elect anyone who's not a christian is to elect sin into office. She grew up a rich little bitch and is now married to a rich bastard - she's never known any kind of poverty, at all. She tries to make herself look like a victim because her campaign staff keeps leaving her because she yells at them and throws hissy fits when something small happens.

Before he became the first of three campaign managers to quit, Jim Dornan programmed his cellphone to play the theme song from "The Exorcist" when Harris called.

For fuck's sake.


Oh and this was the stupid whore in charge of the 2000 recount. It is to laugh.

Let's see. Crazy bitch, rich bastard, never known poverty (as insult), victim, hissy fits,for the sake of fuck, stupid whore.


Id vote for her simply because someone like you from another state is campaigning against her.

I like republicans.

Let's see. Crazy bitch, rich bastard, never known poverty (as insult), victim, hissy fits,for the sake of fuck, stupid whore.


Id vote for her simply because someone like you from another state is campaigning against her.

That's got to be the worst reason for voting for anyone I've ever seen. You should be ashamed. No wonder this country's going to hell in a handbasket, you vote based on petty ego wars.

Let's see. Crazy bitch, rich bastard, never known poverty (as insult), victim, hissy fits,for the sake of fuck, stupid whore.


Id vote for her simply because someone like you from another state is campaigning against her.

Wow that makes no sense.

Wow that makes no sense.

He makes perfect sense.

That's got to be the worst reason for voting for anyone I've ever seen. You should be ashamed. No wonder this country's going to hell in a handbasket, you vote based on petty ego wars.

That has to be the worst reasonto say the country is going to hell in a handbasket. Shame on you. It's an embarassment to share a forum with such pettiness.

That has to be the worst reasonto say the country is going to hell in a handbasket. Shame on you. It's an embarassment to share a forum with such pettiness.

Cute. Well, if you're so embarassed about being on this forum, you know where you can go. ;)

Cute. Well, if you're so embarassed about being on this forum, you know where you can go. ;)

Not your house, I wouldnt be caught dead there.

He makes perfect sense.

Well let's see:

Let's see. Crazy bitch, rich bastard, never known poverty (as insult), victim, hissy fits,for the sake of fuck, stupid whore.


Id vote for her simply because someone like you from another state is campaigning against her.

A: I believe she's crazy, and she acts like a bitch to her campaign staff. Hence, crazy bitch.

B: Rich - the article said it first - bastard (who else would be able to tolerate a bitch like that but a bastard?). Hence, rich bastard.

C: "Never known poverty" - and because of it is a spoiled brat who throws "hissy fits" at her staff for ten minutes straight when she doesn't get what she wants.

D: "Fuck's sake" - for the sake of fuck, fuck being an expression of grief over someone like her ever making it this far in politics.

E: Stupid - she still thinks she's going to win - whore - you got me here, I just called her a whore as an insult because I have no respect for her whatsoever.


So other than the 'whore' part, he has nothing to be indignant about, therefore voting for her just because I called her a whore makes no sense.

Well let's see:



A: I believe she's crazy, and she acts like a bitch to her campaign staff. Hence, crazy bitch.

B: Rich - the article said it first - bastard (who else would be able to tolerate a bitch like that but a bastard?). Hence, rich bastard.

C: "Never known poverty" - and because of it is a spoiled brat who throws "hissy fits" at her staff for ten minutes straight when she doesn't get what she wants.

D: "Fuck's sake" - for the sake of fuck, fuck being an expression of grief over someone like her ever making it this far in politics.

E: Stupid - she still thinks she's going to win - whore - you got me here, I just called her a whore as an insult because I have no respect for her whatsoever.


So other than the 'whore' part, he has nothing to be indignant about, therefore voting for her just because I called her a whore makes no sense.

He'd do it out of spite.

D: "Fuck's sake" - for the sake of fuck, fuck being an expression of grief over someone like her ever making it this far in politics.

.


I'll bet you throw the most interesting funerals ever.

Not your house, I wouldnt be caught dead there.

Oh, I don't know. Maybe you would be.

Oh, I don't know. Maybe you would be.

How?

How?

Illegal breaking and entering, for example.

How?

By killing you and bringing the body to his house?

Illegal breaking and entering, for example.Ive already said I wont go there. It's bad enough you put up a thinly veiled threat without Szanth helping you out as in the post above.

By killing you and bringing the body to his house?


See? I knew there was something a bit "off" about your views.

Ive already said I wont go there. It's bad enough you put up a thinly veiled threat without Szanth helping you out as in the post above.

I'm not making threats. And you didn't say you wouldn't go to my house, you said you wouldn't be "caught dead there."

I'm just having some petty ego contest. I thought you liked that sort of thing? At least we're just chatting, and it's not like the political leadership of a state or nation is dependent on whether I feel like spiting you.

Ive already said I wont go there. It's bad enough you put up a thinly veiled threat without Szanth helping you out as in the post above.

My threat wasn't thinly veiled at all, I dunno what -you're- smoking. :p

I'm not making threats. And you didn't say you wouldn't go to my house, you said you wouldn't be "caught dead there."

I'm just having some petty ego contest. I thought you liked that sort of thing? At least we're just chatting, and it's not like the political leadership of a state or nation is dependent on whether I feel like spiting you.

OMG the political leadership of a state or nation could hinge on a conversation? Who's conversation might this hinge upon? Mine?

My threat wasn't thinly veiled at all, I dunno what -you're- smoking. :p

Do keep up, GT's threat was thinly veiled. You upped the ante.

OMG the political leadership of a state or nation could hinge on a conversation?

It could hinge on voters. Those voters might vote not based on political decision-making, but on "Neener neener neener! You don't like X, so I'll vote for X! LOLZ!"

It could hinge on voters. Those voters might vote not based on political decision-making, but on "Neener neener neener! You don't like X, so I'll vote for X! LOLZ!"


They might also vote based upon fear of threats to their lives. Which do you think is more likely to affect the vote? Which is worse?

They might also vote based upon fear of threats to their lives.

Irrelevant and a strawman.

Irrelevant and a strawman.

Why irrelevant? You did it in this very thread. Are you made of straw?

Why irrelevant? You did it in this very thread. Are you made of straw?

Oh, I threatened to kill someone unless they voted the way I wanted? Interesting. What other delusions do you have to tell us?

Oh, I threatened to kill someone unless they voted the way I wanted? Interesting. What other delusions do you have to tell us?

What was the reason for you to say that I would be killed ?

Regardless of who she's running against, vote for her opponent. Multiple times if possible. And try and get some dead relatives and neighbours to vote too. And your pets.

I agree whole heartedly.

What was the reason for you to say that I would be killed ?

Mine was a conditional and hypothetical statement, applicable to anyone, stating that someone might indeed be "caught dead" at my house if they were breaking and entering into it, despite the common-use/apparent meaning of the phrase "wouldn't be caught dead" as "would never." In fact, this is as much a bit of irony on the phrase "wouldn't be caught dead" as it is a continuation of the petty ego contest (viz a viz wordplay) you and I are indulging in.

Now I am done hijacking this thread, but if you want to continue go ahead - I think my point, such as it was, has already been conceded by you not long after it was made.

What was the reason for you to say that I would be killed ?

That was me. :p

If I was old enough to vote for her, I would. JUST BECAUSE all the NS leftists hate her, which means she probably a good candidate.

If I was old enough to vote for her, I would. JUST BECAUSE all the NS leftists hate her, which means she probably a good candidate.

Again, that's an idiotic reason.

All of the "NS leftists" hate Hitler too, does that mean Hitler's a good candidate? Nevermind - don't answer that one.

Mine was a conditional and hypothetical statement, applicable to anyone, stating that someone might indeed be "caught dead" at my house if they were breaking and entering into it, despite the common-use/apparent meaning of the phrase "wouldn't be caught dead" as "would never." In fact, this is as much a bit of irony on the phrase "wouldn't be caught dead" as it is a continuation of the petty ego contest (viz a viz wordplay) you and I are indulging in.

Now I am done hijacking this thread, but if you want to continue go ahead - I think my point, such as it was, has already been conceded by you not long after it was made.


Now look who is delusional. And murderous. You scare me a little and Im fearless.

Again, that's an idiotic reason.

All of the "NS leftists" hate Hitler too, does that mean Hitler's a good candidate? Nevermind - don't answer that one.

Depends...but before I answer this, we have to ask ourselves, why would Hilter be running for Florida?:eek: :confused:

Now look who is delusional. And murderous. You scare me a little and Im fearless.

I looked, and I see you're taking this about as seriously as a wet fart. Run along.

Depends...but before I answer this, we have to ask ourselves, why would Hilter be running for Florida?:eek: :confused:

It's called a hypothetical situation. You know, conjecture? Mainly to expose the idiocy of the logic you used. I hope I don't have to recap that logic, it gets really tiring arguing with people who conviniently forget what they themselves just wrote a few moments ago.

I looked, and I see you're taking this about as seriously as a wet fart. Run along.


Will you threaten to kill me again if I dont do as you say?

That is one thing I do take to heart.

Will you threaten to kill me again if I dont do as you say?

That's a loaded question since to answer it I would have to acknowledge that I threatened to kill you in the first place, which is obviously untrue.

That is one thing I do take to heart.

What is, a wet fart?

Florida politics aren't nearly as nutty as Texas politics. Sure, when I lived there the legislature took an inordinate amout of time voting for the state dirt (sugar sand)
But they didn't have one entire party flee the state to avoid a vote. Then try to get the national guard go get them.

That's a loaded question since to answer it I would have to acknowledge that I threatened to kill you in the first place, which is obviously untrue.



What is, a wet fart?

Since you dont admit it, you dont retract it, so it's up to moderators to decide.

I live in Florida, but I'm too young to vote this year. My parents are voting against her, though.

Depends...but before I answer this, we have to ask ourselves, why would Hilter be running for Florida?:eek: :confused:

Well, the answer to that is obvious: He got tired of running that toll-booth in Miami with Elvis.

Since you dont admit it, you dont retract it, so it's up to moderators to decide.

Oh, well since you don't admit you're a rapist, you don't retract it, therefore you're guilty! POLICE! ;)

When I read that she loves Israel, I was embarrassed. I am an Israel supporter. I have even considered obtaining Israeli citizenship. Frankly, I would prefer her to be an anti-Semite - that way, we wouldn't be associated with her.

I'm voting for her.

I've met her, she's a nice lady and a good speaker and communicator. Works for me, and she's a Christian, numero deus.