NationStates Jolt Archive


California Proposition Review

Cryptic Knight
29-10-2006, 04:53
California Proposition Review

Proposition 1A: Transportation Funding Protection. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. Summary: Protects transportation funding for traffic congestion relief projects, safety improvements, and local streets and roads. Prohibits the state sales tax on motor vehicle fuels from being used for any purpose other than transportation improvements. Authorizes loans of these funds only in the case of severe state fiscal hardship. Requires loans of revenues from states sales tax on motor vehicle fuels to be fully repaid within the three years. Restricts loans to no more than twice in any 10-year period. Fiscal Impact: No revenue effect or cost effects.


Proposition 1B Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. Summary: This act makes safety improvements and repairs to state highways, upgrades freeways to reduce congestion, repairs local streets and roads, upgrades highways along major transportation corridors, imporves siesmic safety of local bridges, expands public transit, helps complete the state's network of car pool lanes, reduces air pollution, and improves anti-terrorism security at shipping ports by providing for a bond issue not to exceed $19,925,000,000. Fiscal impact: State costs of approximately $38.9 billion over 30 years to repay bonds. Additional unknown state and local operations and maintenance costs.


Propostition 1C Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006. Summary: For the purpose of providing shelters for battered women and their children, clean and safe housing for low-income senior citizens; homeownership assistance for the disabled, military veterans, and working families; and repairs and accessibility improvements to apartment for families and disabled citizens, the state shall issue bonds totaling $2,850,000,000 paid from exisiting state funds at an average annual cost of $204,000,000 per year over the 30 year life of the bonds. Requires reporting and publication of annual independent audited reports showing use of fund, and limits administration and overhead costs.



Proposition 1D Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006. This $10,416,000,000 bond issue will provide needed funding to relieve public school overcrowding and to repair older schools. It will improve earthquake safety and fund vocational educational facilities in public schools. Bond funds must be spent according to strict accountability measures. Funds will also be used to repair and upgrade exisiting public college and university buildings and to build new classrooms to accommodate the growing student enrollment in the California Community Colleges, the University of California, and the California State University.



Proposition 1E Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006 Summary: This act rebuilds and repairs California's most vulnerable flood control structures to protect homes and prevent loss of life from flood-related disasters, including levee failures, flash floods, and mudslides; it protects California's drinking water supply system by rebuilding delta levees that are vulnerable to earthquakes and storms; by authroizing a $409 billion dollar bond act. Fiscal Impact; State costs of approximately $8 billion over 30 years to repay bonds. Reduction in local property tax revenue of potentially up to several million dollars annually.



Proposition 83:Sex Offenders, Sexually Violent Predators.Summary: Increases penalties for violent and habitual sex offenders and child molesters. Prohibits residence near schools and parks. Requires GPS monitoring of registered sex offenders. Fiscal Impact: Net State operating costs within ten years of up to a couple of hundred million dollars annually.



Proposition 84 Water Qualitity, Safety and Supply, Flood Control, Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements, Bonds, Initiative Statue. Summary: Funds Water, flood control, natural resources, park and conservation projects by authorizing $5,388,000,000 in general obligation bonds. Emergency drinking water safety provisions. Fiscal Impact: state cost of $10.5 billion over 30 years to repay bonds. Reduced local property tax revenues of several million dollars annually. Unknown state and local operations and maintenance costs, potentially tens of millions annually.



Proposition 85 Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Summary: Amends California Constitution prohibiting abortion for unemancipated minor until 48 hours after physician notifies minor's parent/gaurdian, except in medical emergency or with parental waiver. Mandates reporting requirements. Authorizes monetary damages against physicians for violation.



Propostition 86 Tax on Cigarettes, Initiative Consitutional Amendment and Statute. Summary: Imposes additional $2.60 per pack excise tax on cigarettes and indirecty increases taxes on other tobacco products. Provides funding for various health programs, children's health coverage, and tobacco-related programs. Fiscal Impact: Increase in excise tax revenues of about $2.1 billion annually.



Proposition 87 Alternative Energy, Research, Production, Incentives, Tax on California Oil Producers, Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statue: Summary: Establishes $4 billion program to reduce petroleum consumption through incentives for alternative energy education and training. Funded by tax on California oil producers. Fiscal Impact: State Oil Tax Revenues of $225 million to $485 million annually for alternative energy programs totaling $4 billion. State and local revenue reductions up to low tens of milllions of dollars annually.



Propostition 88 Education Funding, Real Property Parcel Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Summary: imposes $50 tax on each real property parcel to provide additional public school funding for kindergarten through grade 12. Exempts certain elderly, disabled homeowners from tax. Use of funds restricted to specific educational purposes. Fiscal Impact: State parcel tax revenue of roughly $450 million annually, allocated to school districts for specified education programs.



Propostition 89 Political Campaigns, Public Financing, Corporate Tax Increase, Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limits, Initiative Statute. Summary: Provides that eligible candidates for state elective office may receive public campaign funding. Increases tax on corporations and financial institutions by 0.2 percent to fund program. Imposes new campaign contribution/expenditure limits. Fiscal Impact: Increased revenues (primarily from increased taxes on corporations and financial institutions) totaling more than $200 million annually to pay for the public financing of political campaigns.



Proposition 90 Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Summary: Bars State/local government from condemning or damaging private property to promote other private projects, uses. Limits government's authority to adopt certain land use, housing, consumer, environmental, workplace laws/regulations. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual goverment costs to pay property owners for losses to their property associated with new laws and rules, and for property acquisitions.


Any thoughts and stances?
Chellis
29-10-2006, 05:43
All I know is, if prop 86 passes, I'm visiting my grandma in nevada more(and smuggling out a large number of cartons on my way out)
Wallonochia
29-10-2006, 05:54
Any thoughts and stances?

I think you guys have a hell of a lot of proposals. We only have 5 here this year, and we had 2 or 3 last year.
Greater Trostia
29-10-2006, 05:55
All I know is, if prop 86 passes, I'm visiting my grandma in nevada more(and smuggling out a large number of cartons on my way out)

Bring me back some too. Spirits.
Not bad
29-10-2006, 08:02
Prop 1A and 1B, definitely for. I like driving on good well maintained roads.CalTrans has had their budget underhandedly sloughed off into the general fund for so long that Im not sure they will immediately remember how to maintain roads with more than band aids and promises.

Against 1C. It helps every swingin dick in the State except me with obtaining a house.

Oddly enough I dont even have school kids but Im still for 1D. I oughta have a stern talk with myself for believing that a better education for everybody else's yard apes is in my best interest, but I believe it is so Im for 1D.

1E kinda pisses me off so Im against it. It is Arnies pet prepare-for-the-big-bad-upcoming-disaster proposition, and Im all for being prepared for most forseen disasters, and preventing or minimising their damage. The thing is that he is so desperately worried about the God damned Delta possibly overflowing it's levies that he hasnt bothered to earmark a fucking dime to the dam which was judged to be the most likely to catastrophicly fail soon and which has a previously undiscovered active fault line riunning straight through it's now leaking center. He will let the Feds deal with THAT flood problem. That dam is about 40 miles upstream of me. So I dont really think that he has his heirarchy of flood risks sorted enough to risk that kind of money on.

As much as I enjoy seeing the public distress sexual criminals as much and as often as possible I think that there is too much of a window for abuse by individuals in our justice system for me to endorse 83.

For Prop 84 see prop 1E

Prop 86 is just another sleazy assed sin tax and is beneath contempt. I fart in the authors general direction and flick boogers upon his greedy revenue harvesting Nannyness.

Prop 87 is an asshatish bill which will accomplish exactly the opposite of what it is supposed to do. No matter how many times I see crap like this I still have the time to be disappointed by it.

88 seems harmless enough, which concerns me. I need to look into this more before Im sure it is harmless enough to endorse.

Prop 89. HELL NO! This is just a way that Republicans and Democrats can both spend our money to campaign and party on while making sure that no third party will meet their criteria for campaign funding. HELL NO!

Prop 90 I couldnt be more for this if there were two of me.
Not bad
29-10-2006, 08:07
I think you guys have a hell of a lot of proposals. We only have 5 here this year, and we had 2 or 3 last year.

There are a lot more than usual here. Usually when a proposal is on the ballot it means that our congressmen were too worried about public opinion to vote on it themselves.
Dissonant Cognition
29-10-2006, 09:49
Any thoughts and stances?

Proposition 1A: Transportation Funding Protection.

Yes.

Proposition 1B Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006.

No.

Propostition 1C Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006.

No.

Proposition 1D Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2006.

No.

Proposition 1E Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006

No.

Proposition 83:Sex Offenders, Sexually Violent Predators.

No.

Proposition 84 Water Qualitity, Safety and Supply, Flood Control, Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements, Bonds, Initiative Statue.

No.

Proposition 85 Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

No.

Propostition 86 Tax on Cigarettes, Initiative Consitutional Amendment and Statute.

No.

Proposition 87 Alternative Energy, Research, Production, Incentives, Tax on California Oil Producers, Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statue

No.

Propostition 88 Education Funding, Real Property Parcel Tax. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

No.

Propostition 89 Political Campaigns, Public Financing, Corporate Tax Increase, Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limits, Initiative Statute.

No.

Proposition 90 Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Yes.
Pledgeria
29-10-2006, 10:40
I voted yes on 90, but I don't think I voted yes on any of the others. (It's late, and I'm tired, so I can't be sure, but I doubt it.) Some of the bond measures sound good, except the state can't seem to unload the bonds that have already been authorized for sale on similar issues. I don't want to seem like I'm for bad highways or bad schools, but I'm not going to vote to authorize billions the state might not be able to pay back.