Green israel
26-10-2006, 18:30
I already know how all the israli-bashers will come from their holes and attack those articles without even read them.
Unfortunally there isn't translation for other article of this publisher about the refugees. those some of her main points:
in the 20th century more than 40 milions people forced to leave their houses in transfers, wars and populaces replacements. there aren't thousands of organizations for them and nobody call for "their right to return to their homes", simply because they aren't palastinians. there are many milions of people who forced to leave thier homes because of political changes and new borders.
the number of palastinians who deproted in 48 is between 600,000 to 800,000. similar to the number of jewish who deported from the arab states. the small just-born jewish state absorbed populace greater than her former populace. the arab populace which were much larger and richer never did the same."
in every other place in the world it is accepted fact that "right of return" will cause more conflict and never-ending bloodship. until it came to israel. band of international organizations do only one thing: world-wide propoganda which try to increase the problem of the palastinians refugees.
other organizations are more direct: they want forcing israel (and only israel) to accept the return of the refugees). some may support it from unknowladgement or honesty, but others because they don't want solution or peace. as one of arrafat advisor said: "the right of return is the winning card which mean the end of israel".
many milions in the world forced to leave their homes. nobody of them is refugee. this title kept only for the palastinians.
the double standart start but wasn't finished in the fact that there are 2 organizations for refugees:United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) for all the world and supposed to help the refugees start new lives and stop become refugees, and United Nations Relief and Works Agency(UNRWA) which deal only with palastinians because of UN decision and immortalization of their state. dozens of milions of people stopped being refugees because of UNHCR, even one palastinian didn't stopped to be refugee because of UNRAH. they just increase each year.
even the definition of refugees is different. for palastinians it is "anyone who their usual home was in palestina between june 46 and may 48", which included all the foriegn worker which come to the area in the start of 1946.
other refugees had to prove many conditions in order to get help.
one more crucial difference: when it happened in other places, only the man himself count as "refugees" and stop being refugee when he get citizenship of other state. however, the palastinians pass this titles to their families and their next generations, and he count as refugee even if he minister in jordan or very rich.
john mirashaimer (SP?) published harsh and almost anti-semitic article against israel and for "the right of return". the same person who become the hero of the radical left published at 93 in the new-york times article about the balkans in which he support transfer ("ethnically homogeneous states must be created." "Creating homogeneous states would require transferring populations and drawing new borders."
transfer supporter will love those statements but that isn't the purpose. we want equality in the global rules.
the determining that every state as the right to keep religious or ethnically homogeneous states, and that refugees who live already in place were they are belong to the religious or ethnically majority has no "right of return". it mean that although the west bank were part of the historycal jewish homeland it doesn't give the jewish right to be their, and the palastinians had no right to return to israel although this is their historycal homeland.
the opposition to any "right of return" came also from "the right to self determination". if you accept "the right of return" only for the palastinians you take "the right to self determination" from the jewish. only from the jewish.
israel already helped to solve the refugee problem when it absorbed the jewish refugees. now, it is the reponsibiliy of the arab and muslim world as the international comunnity to solve the problem of the plastinians.
when the world will stop his double-standart the palastinian sufferness will start to decrease. for them and for the peace, this day better come.
dozens of refugees were absorbed in places where their nation or religion are the majority. now it is time for the arab world to absorb the palastinians refugees.
now for the other articles which were written by ben-dror yemini:
http://orendo.googlepages.com/warcrimes
http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/483/521.html
Unfortunally there isn't translation for other article of this publisher about the refugees. those some of her main points:
in the 20th century more than 40 milions people forced to leave their houses in transfers, wars and populaces replacements. there aren't thousands of organizations for them and nobody call for "their right to return to their homes", simply because they aren't palastinians. there are many milions of people who forced to leave thier homes because of political changes and new borders.
the number of palastinians who deproted in 48 is between 600,000 to 800,000. similar to the number of jewish who deported from the arab states. the small just-born jewish state absorbed populace greater than her former populace. the arab populace which were much larger and richer never did the same."
in every other place in the world it is accepted fact that "right of return" will cause more conflict and never-ending bloodship. until it came to israel. band of international organizations do only one thing: world-wide propoganda which try to increase the problem of the palastinians refugees.
other organizations are more direct: they want forcing israel (and only israel) to accept the return of the refugees). some may support it from unknowladgement or honesty, but others because they don't want solution or peace. as one of arrafat advisor said: "the right of return is the winning card which mean the end of israel".
many milions in the world forced to leave their homes. nobody of them is refugee. this title kept only for the palastinians.
the double standart start but wasn't finished in the fact that there are 2 organizations for refugees:United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) for all the world and supposed to help the refugees start new lives and stop become refugees, and United Nations Relief and Works Agency(UNRWA) which deal only with palastinians because of UN decision and immortalization of their state. dozens of milions of people stopped being refugees because of UNHCR, even one palastinian didn't stopped to be refugee because of UNRAH. they just increase each year.
even the definition of refugees is different. for palastinians it is "anyone who their usual home was in palestina between june 46 and may 48", which included all the foriegn worker which come to the area in the start of 1946.
other refugees had to prove many conditions in order to get help.
one more crucial difference: when it happened in other places, only the man himself count as "refugees" and stop being refugee when he get citizenship of other state. however, the palastinians pass this titles to their families and their next generations, and he count as refugee even if he minister in jordan or very rich.
john mirashaimer (SP?) published harsh and almost anti-semitic article against israel and for "the right of return". the same person who become the hero of the radical left published at 93 in the new-york times article about the balkans in which he support transfer ("ethnically homogeneous states must be created." "Creating homogeneous states would require transferring populations and drawing new borders."
transfer supporter will love those statements but that isn't the purpose. we want equality in the global rules.
the determining that every state as the right to keep religious or ethnically homogeneous states, and that refugees who live already in place were they are belong to the religious or ethnically majority has no "right of return". it mean that although the west bank were part of the historycal jewish homeland it doesn't give the jewish right to be their, and the palastinians had no right to return to israel although this is their historycal homeland.
the opposition to any "right of return" came also from "the right to self determination". if you accept "the right of return" only for the palastinians you take "the right to self determination" from the jewish. only from the jewish.
israel already helped to solve the refugee problem when it absorbed the jewish refugees. now, it is the reponsibiliy of the arab and muslim world as the international comunnity to solve the problem of the plastinians.
when the world will stop his double-standart the palastinian sufferness will start to decrease. for them and for the peace, this day better come.
dozens of refugees were absorbed in places where their nation or religion are the majority. now it is time for the arab world to absorb the palastinians refugees.
now for the other articles which were written by ben-dror yemini:
http://orendo.googlepages.com/warcrimes
http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/483/521.html