NationStates Jolt Archive


If the "bad guys" could...

Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 20:47
If the "bad guys" could vote in the US, who would they vote for?

If the "bad guys" could eliminate all "liberals" or all "conservatives", who would they kill off first?

Do "the bad guys" find "liberals" of "conservatives" most disgusting?
Pyotr
23-10-2006, 20:52
First and foremost, I don't think they would care.

They would probably try and keep bush in the white house, seeing as how his ham-fisted foreign policy has been a boon to terrorists around the world. Increasing their support from the local population without having to do those pesky community development projects or hand food out to starving people for propaganda.
Gauthier
23-10-2006, 20:54
First and foremost, I don't think they would care.

They would probably try and keep bush in the white house, seeing as how his ham-fisted foreign policy has been a boon to terrorists around the world. Increasing their support from the local population without having to do those pesky community development projects or hand food out to starving people for propaganda.

Let's not forget OBL's personal 2004 campaign ad on behalf of Dear Leader.
The Psyker
23-10-2006, 20:54
Well,considering their opinions on things like womens rights, gays, seperation of church and state, and civil liberties, probably liberals.
Beethoveny
23-10-2006, 20:56
Who exactly are the bad guys pray tell? Bit vague.
JuNii
23-10-2006, 20:56
If the "bad guys" could vote in the US, who would they vote for?

If the "bad guys" could eliminate all "liberals" or all "conservatives", who would they kill off first?

Do "the bad guys" find "liberals" of "conservatives" most disgusting?

well... who are the "Bad Guys"? Most Liberals consider the Conservatives to be the Bad Guys, and most Conservatives find the Liberals to be "the Bad Guys"

Republicans/Democrats/Independants

Liberals/Conservatives

Homosexuals/Heterosexuals

there are no "Good Guys" or "Bad Guys" only differing view, opinions, and methods.
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 20:57
First and foremost, I don't think they would care.

They would probably try and keep bush in the white house, seeing as how his ham-fisted foreign policy has been a boon to terrorists around the world. Increasing their support from the local population without having to do those pesky community development projects or hand food out to starving people for propaganda.

That's a fascinating proposition.

..but it sounds more like YOUR opinion than theirs.
Pyotr
23-10-2006, 20:57
Who exactly are the bad guys pray tell? Bit vague.

Terrorists, particularly the islamic type.
Cannot think of a name
23-10-2006, 20:58
Is it really the best idea or worth the time to make decisions about our leaders based on what the 'bad guys' want?
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 20:58
Well,considering their opinions on things like womens rights, gays, seperation of church and state, and civil liberties, probably liberals.

Would your answer be on the "who would they find more disgusting" question?

If so,.. I agree.
IL Ruffino
23-10-2006, 20:59
The left.
Ultraextreme Sanity
23-10-2006, 21:00
Then why did they start an offensive designed to influence the US elections so the democrats could get in? I mean they want the US to leave so they can have a Jihadist paradise in Iraq and the Democrats want to leave...so what do you think...you do know they do their own propaganda right ? If not Just watch CNN they run it for them .


Personally I think I'd get my bag limit plus before they got me...whomever these bad guys may be ....:D


Meet the new boss same as the old boss....


BTW ...I am still waiting for my peace dividend from winning the cold war .

Checks in the mail ?
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 21:00
Who exactly are the bad guys pray tell? Bit vague.

Pick "YOUR" biggest "bad guy".

If you choose "Bush et al", that is perfectly acceptable, and tells me precisely where you're coming from.
The Psyker
23-10-2006, 21:00
Would your answer be on the "who would they find more disgusting" question?

If so,.. I agree.

And because they are the ones they find most disgusting they are the ones they would get rid of first.
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 21:01
well... who are the "Bad Guys"? Most Liberals consider the Conservatives to be the Bad Guys, and most Conservatives find the Liberals to be "the Bad Guys"

Republicans/Democrats/Independants

Liberals/Conservatives

Homosexuals/Heterosexuals

there are no "Good Guys" or "Bad Guys" only differing view, opinions, and methods.

Silly people.

The "bad guys", who can't presently vote in the US, are "THE TERRORISTS".
JuNii
23-10-2006, 21:02
Silly people.

The "bad guys", who can't presently vote in the US, are "THE TERRORISTS".

ahh... then they would vote for those that would further their agenda. whomever that will be.
Farnhamia
23-10-2006, 21:02
Where's MeansToAnEnd when we need him?
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 21:03
Is it really the best idea or worth the time to make decisions about our leaders based on what the 'bad guys' want?

It is indicative of what those who mean us harm would prefer to deal with.

Since they have a tendency toward choosing enemies that are as weak as possible, that give ME, perhaps not you, information as to whom to choose to deal with our enemies.
Ultraextreme Sanity
23-10-2006, 21:03
Why not just kill all the infidels and let Allah sort them out ? I thought thats the plan anyway . "Inshallah"
Ultraextreme Sanity
23-10-2006, 21:04
Where's MeansToAnEnd when we need him?


looking for idiots to pick cotton on his farm I suppose .
Dosuun
23-10-2006, 21:07
The "bad guys" wouldn't bother voting. They'd just walk into a crowd and start shooting.
Cannot think of a name
23-10-2006, 21:10
It is indicative of what those who mean us harm would prefer to deal with.

Since they have a tendency toward choosing enemies that are as weak as possible, that give ME, perhaps not you, information as to whom to choose to deal with our enemies.

Never heard of Brer Rabbit?
The Psyker
23-10-2006, 21:13
It is indicative of what those who mean us harm would prefer to deal with.

Since they have a tendency toward choosing enemies that are as weak as possible, that give ME, perhaps not you, information as to whom to choose to deal with our enemies.

Ah, so you think they will target the liberals too since they are the ones strong enough to advocate that we don't abbandon our values for temporrary security.
Barbaric Tribes
23-10-2006, 21:19
My most favored bad guys wouldn't deal in voting. They'd be rabble rousing in the local halls untill they gained political power through force. Then they'd indimidate anyone who opposed their climb to the top with physicall brutality. Once close to the top they'd eliminate anyone in their way, then burn down a really significant building or blow it up, blame it on communists, terroists, or jews, then proceed to build a massive war machine to attempt to dominate the world.:mp5:
Insignificantia
23-10-2006, 21:37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insignificantia
It is indicative of what those who mean us harm would prefer to deal with.

Since they have a tendency toward choosing enemies that are as weak as possible, that give ME, perhaps not you, information as to whom to choose to deal with our enemies.

Never heard of Brer Rabbit?

Oooo,.. that's very good..! :)

They're SO clever, those terrorists,.. and they have a HUGE supply of tar..!!
Bovolia
23-10-2006, 21:45
Well,considering their opinions on things like womens rights, gays, seperation of church and state, and civil liberties, probably liberals.


First of all, calling a homosexual a "gay" is like calling a black person a "******". And second of all, if conservatives always whine about how everything in the constitution is sacred and should be left as is, why do they hate separation between church and state? That is in our constitution. Joining church and state is a theocratic belief. And Mr. President, I know your vocabulary isn't that profound so I'll explain; "theocracy" is a type of government in which a certain religion rules the laws and peoples within that nation. So, if one of the amendments in our "untouchable" constitution is "FREEDOM OF RELIGION", why do conservatives want to push Christianity on Americans?
Also, one thing that pisses me off in this country is that the government thinks they have a right to say who can get married and who can't. There is extensive research that has been done that proves sexual orientation is genetic! Scientists took two pregnant rats, gave them sonograms, one baby was a boy, the other, a girl. They injected testosterone into the uterus of the the pregnant rat with a girl, and estrogen and feremones into the uterus of the mother with the boy. After those babies matured and became sexually active, they preferred mating with rats of the same sex. So if three goldigging sluts can not love Hugh Hefner and marry him for his fortune, why can't two men or two women who love eachother and want the best for eachother get married? People might say,"well it says in the bible that gay marriage is wrong." Well tell this to our barbaric, war mongering president. It says in the Bible to not wage war on someone that does not want war with you. Iraq had absolutely NOTHING to do with this war and still Bush went half-assed at Al-Qaida and LIED to us saying he found weapons of mass destruction. We never found them. Now tell me, how is it that our technology is so great that we can nuke a fly on a picnic table from 3000 miles away and hit it precisely, and not find huge warehouses supposedly filled with bombs in a tiny ass country? Because Bush needed an excuse to capture Sadaam. I AM THROUGH! HEY BUSH!:upyours:


"Let's impeach the president."--- Neil Young
Laerod
23-10-2006, 21:49
I can't shake the feeling that the term "bad guys" is a whole social experiment to discover what enemy we are thinking of when someone says "bad guys".
The Psyker
23-10-2006, 21:55
First of all, calling a homosexual a "gay" is like calling a black person a "******". None of the homosexuals I know have ever seemed to have a problem with it, seems more arround the level of calling an African-American black, than calling them a "******," I would think "fag" or "faggot" would be closer to that.And second of all, if conservatives always whine about how everything in the constitution is sacred and should be left as is, why do they hate separation between church and state? That is in our constitution. Joining church and state is a theocratic belief. And Mr. President, I know your vocabulary isn't that profound so I'll explain; "theocracy" is a type of government in which a certain religion rules the laws and peoples within that nation. So, if one of the amendments in our "untouchable" constitution is "FREEDOM OF RELIGION", why do conservatives want to push Christianity on Americans?
Also, one thing that pisses me off in this country is that the government thinks they have a right to say who can get married and who can't. There is extensive research that has been done that proves sexual orientation is genetic! Scientists took two pregnant rats, gave them sonograms, one baby was a boy, the other, a girl. They injected testosterone into the uterus of the the pregnant rat with a girl, and estrogen and feremones into the uterus of the mother with the boy. After those babies matured and became sexually active, they preferred mating with rats of the same sex. So if three goldigging sluts can not love Hugh Hefner and marry him for his fortune, why can't two men or two women who love eachother and want the best for eachother get married? People might say,"well it says in the bible that gay marriage is wrong." Well tell this to our barbaric, war mongering president. It says in the Bible to not wage war on someone that does not want war with you. Iraq had absolutely NOTHING to do with this war and still Bush went half-assed at Al-Qaida and LIED to us saying he found weapons of mass destruction. We never found them. Now tell me, how is it that our technology is so great that we can nuke a fly on a picnic table from 3000 miles away and hit it precisely, and not find huge warehouses supposedly filled with bombs in a tiny ass country? Because Bush needed an excuse to capture Sadaam. I AM THROUGH! HEY BUSH!:upyours:


"Let's impeach the president."--- Neil YoungAs for the rest of this I don't see what it has to do with my opinion that the "bad guys" would dislike the liberals more due to their hatered of the things liberals advocate.
Insignificantia
24-10-2006, 19:56
I can't shake the feeling that the term "bad guys" is a whole social experiment to discover what enemy we are thinking of when someone says "bad guys".

You're exactly correct, of course!

So, what comes to mind for YOU, at the phrase "bad guys",.. and any suggestions you could offer as to how to use that knowledge "against" you would be gratefully appreciated..?

Thanks for your assistance. :)

-Iakeo
Delator
24-10-2006, 20:17
If the "bad guys" could vote in the US, who would they vote for?

If the "bad guys" could eliminate all "liberals" or all "conservatives", who would they kill off first?

Do "the bad guys" find "liberals" of "conservatives" most disgusting?

Now you've gone and done it...you've opened the door to the Ninth Circle of Hell.

I hope your proud of yourself! *shakes fist*

Not serious! : )
Sumamba Buwhan
24-10-2006, 20:49
when you said bad guys I immediatly thought you meant felons in prison

I doubt they care for Dems or Reps because to them they are both "the man" and furthermore I doubt they could care less about politics in general more often than not.
Ultraextreme Sanity
24-10-2006, 21:31
when you said bad guys I immediatly thought you meant felons in prison

I doubt they care for Dems or Reps because to them they are both "the man" and furthermore I doubt they could care less about politics in general more often than not.


I thought they meant rappers .vanilla ice and such...or whatever he is today..or bad lip syncing pop stars....or all the people who go on reality tv shows.

Thats whats on my list ....