NationStates Jolt Archive


Post to Loser ratio (P:L)

Icovir
21-10-2006, 19:11
What's your post count? Using that, I will determine your rating in life.

Or, in my absense, someone else can do it for me.

Please do NOT take this seriously. Thank you.
Zilam
21-10-2006, 19:14
4823
Not bad
21-10-2006, 19:14
What's your post count? Using that, I will determine your rating in life.

Or, in my absense, someone else can do it for me.

Please do NOT take this seriously. Thank you.

I am at 5500 ish I think.

Determine my rating in life while I make some calculations based upon your post count.
Chandelier
21-10-2006, 19:26
1,157, including this post.
New Xero Seven
21-10-2006, 19:31
It's quality over quantity, silly! :p
Vault 10
21-10-2006, 19:34
Less than yours... loser! :lol:
Icovir
21-10-2006, 19:36
Calculating the data... Results will show next post.

But I can tell Not bad that my post rating is gonna be good :)
Pyotr
21-10-2006, 19:37
around 2,000. Which I understand to be quite small....
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
21-10-2006, 19:38
I have no posts, therefore what you are currently reading does not, in fact, exist. But since it doesn't exist, it cannot claim that it doesn't exist, and then there is no evidence to the contrary of your visual perceptions.
Doubting something that you see without any reason is a sign of madness, and so the post must exist. If it exists, then its claim to nonexistence must exist, and so that claim must be true (as it is supported by all available evidence), and therefore neither the post nor the claim exist.
But if neither the post nor the claim exist, then they have no logical reason not to exist, so they must. But if they do, then they don't, and if they don't they should, but could they?
The answer is "Yes", but only so long as the answer is "No."
Ifreann
21-10-2006, 19:40
It'll say just to the right of this post. If you can't find it yourself, well then you're far too stupid to be doing any kind of maths ;)
Ifreann
21-10-2006, 19:41
I have no posts, therefore what you are currently reading does not, in fact, exist. But since it doesn't exist, it cannot claim that it doesn't exist, and then there is no evidence to the contrary of your visual perceptions.
Doubting something that you see without any reason is a sign of madness, and so the post must exist. If it exists, then its claim to nonexistence must exist, and so that claim must be true (as it is supported by all available evidence), and therefore neither the post nor the claim exist.
But if neither the post nor the claim exist, then they have no logical reason not to exist, so they must. But if they do, then they don't, and if they don't they should, but could they?
The answer is "Yes", but only so long as the answer is "No."

I dub this to be Schroedinger's post. It both exists and does not. And is rather confusing. :confused:
IL Ruffino
21-10-2006, 19:44
14,910
Icovir
21-10-2006, 19:45
MMKAY!

0-248 posts = Uber cool person.

249-500 posts = You have a life, but neglect it.

501-1,000 posts = Please, I would like to have fries with that.

1,000-4,500 posts = Wow.

4,500 posts and beyond = GO POST UBER GEE EH WHY NUB

Individual (and thus more indepth) ratings comming up.
Zilam
21-10-2006, 19:45
14,910

Loser ;)
IL Ruffino
21-10-2006, 19:47
I have no posts, therefore what you are currently reading does not, in fact, exist. But since it doesn't exist, it cannot claim that it doesn't exist, and then there is no evidence to the contrary of your visual perceptions.
Doubting something that you see without any reason is a sign of madness, and so the post must exist. If it exists, then its claim to nonexistence must exist, and so that claim must be true (as it is supported by all available evidence), and therefore neither the post nor the claim exist.
But if neither the post nor the claim exist, then they have no logical reason not to exist, so they must. But if they do, then they don't, and if they don't they should, but could they?
The answer is "Yes", but only so long as the answer is "No."

One second please..

Total Posts: 5,795 (10.19 posts per day)

:)
IL Ruffino
21-10-2006, 19:48
Loser ;)

It's La Dame's fault!
Andaluciae
21-10-2006, 19:48
<------Post Count

I might advise that you build the duration factor into it. I've been around forever, so naturally I'll have loads of posts.
HotRodia
21-10-2006, 19:59
MMKAY!

0-248 posts = Uber cool person.

249-500 posts = You have a life, but neglect it.

501-1,000 posts = Please, I would like to have fries with that.

1,000-4,500 posts = Wow.

4,500 posts and beyond = GO POST UBER GEE EH WHY NUB

Individual (and thus more indepth) ratings comming up.

Since this looks like it's going to go downhill really fast, given that oh so clever hidden line that baits anyone with a postcount over that limit...road closed, folks.

NationStates Forum Moderator
HotRodia