Multiland
15-10-2006, 14:07
I only wanted responses from English people, about whether nudity should be legal in ENGLAND. For those who don't know, legal basically means "allowed by law" and illegal means "against the law". Please read this post before responding:
Should nudity be legal? Please read before replying...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bearing in mine that there are many things that offend people (religion being a major one to people of certain religions - eg. the statement that "Christ is the Son of God" being offensive to muslims and the statement that "Jesus is a mere prophet" being offensive to Christians... etc etc etc) so something being offensive is not really a great reason to ban it (otherwise virtually everything would be banned), bearing in mind the fact that it doesn't HARM people (it simply offends them), and bearing in mind the fact that IF it shocks people, it;s usually those people who have been brought up to be ashamed of their God-given bodies, and it's only temporary shock, and bearing in mind the fact that Adam and Eve were naked at first and neither they nor God had any problem with it UNTIL THEY SINNED (and bearing in mind the fact that when they tried to cover themselves, they only used leaves, which would not cover them properly at all and still left Eve topless, and bearing in mind that "There is an ambiguity in the original Hebrew text over the word translated here as naked. It may be: eromim which means to be naked, without clothes, or
arumim which means the uncovering of deceptions [and that] Genesis and the rest of the Torah was written using only consonants, with no letters or signs indicating vowels. Thus "eromim" and "arumim" appear the same in the Hebrew text, as rmm." [ http://www.religioustolerance.org/nu_bibl.htm ] so therefore when it's mentioned that Adam and Eve try to hide their "nudity" (as translated from the Hebrew "rmm"), the original Hebrew could have just as easily have been translated to say that Adam and Eve try to hide their deception (as translated from the same Hebrew "rmm"), which would make more sense as it would not suggest that nudity is fine at first but later a bad thing, and bearing in mind the following three potential interpretations of "Genesis 3:10-11: God called for Adam, who replied: "I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself." God answered: "Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?"":
1. Some interpret that passages as implying that Adam and Eve had once lived a sinless life. But after eating the fruit, their thoughts became selfish. They lost their unconditional, pure love for each other and began to look upon their partner as sex objects -- as a body to exploit in order to satisfy their sexual appetite. Their clothing might have been intended to protect themselves from the other.
2. Some suggest that the act of covering of their body was a metaphor. It symbolized their real need to try to hide their sin from God.
3. Some feel that Adam and Eve were so embarrassed by their nudity that they had to create clothes to hide their genitals. However, that interpretation seems unlikely, because Adam and Eve would have been used to seeing each other naked continually since Eve was created. They would hardly suddenly become embarrassed in each other's presence.
and bearing in mind the fact that paedophiles attack kids who are wearing clothes, and that if someone is of the mind to sexually attack a kid they are going to do it (if they get the chance and are not prevented or stopped) regardless of whether the kid is wearing clothes or not, so there is no more likelihood of a pervert attacking a nude kid than a clothed kid, and bearing in mind that those who go to nudist clubs have often made remarks along the lines of "it teaches kids not to be ashamed of their bodies" and so encourages high self-esteem, and bearing in mind taht we don't cover babies up and that we are created naked by God (who, if He had a problem with it, would almost certainly have us born clothed as it is not beyond his power),
should nudity be legal?
Should nudity be legal? Please read before replying...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bearing in mine that there are many things that offend people (religion being a major one to people of certain religions - eg. the statement that "Christ is the Son of God" being offensive to muslims and the statement that "Jesus is a mere prophet" being offensive to Christians... etc etc etc) so something being offensive is not really a great reason to ban it (otherwise virtually everything would be banned), bearing in mind the fact that it doesn't HARM people (it simply offends them), and bearing in mind the fact that IF it shocks people, it;s usually those people who have been brought up to be ashamed of their God-given bodies, and it's only temporary shock, and bearing in mind the fact that Adam and Eve were naked at first and neither they nor God had any problem with it UNTIL THEY SINNED (and bearing in mind the fact that when they tried to cover themselves, they only used leaves, which would not cover them properly at all and still left Eve topless, and bearing in mind that "There is an ambiguity in the original Hebrew text over the word translated here as naked. It may be: eromim which means to be naked, without clothes, or
arumim which means the uncovering of deceptions [and that] Genesis and the rest of the Torah was written using only consonants, with no letters or signs indicating vowels. Thus "eromim" and "arumim" appear the same in the Hebrew text, as rmm." [ http://www.religioustolerance.org/nu_bibl.htm ] so therefore when it's mentioned that Adam and Eve try to hide their "nudity" (as translated from the Hebrew "rmm"), the original Hebrew could have just as easily have been translated to say that Adam and Eve try to hide their deception (as translated from the same Hebrew "rmm"), which would make more sense as it would not suggest that nudity is fine at first but later a bad thing, and bearing in mind the following three potential interpretations of "Genesis 3:10-11: God called for Adam, who replied: "I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself." God answered: "Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?"":
1. Some interpret that passages as implying that Adam and Eve had once lived a sinless life. But after eating the fruit, their thoughts became selfish. They lost their unconditional, pure love for each other and began to look upon their partner as sex objects -- as a body to exploit in order to satisfy their sexual appetite. Their clothing might have been intended to protect themselves from the other.
2. Some suggest that the act of covering of their body was a metaphor. It symbolized their real need to try to hide their sin from God.
3. Some feel that Adam and Eve were so embarrassed by their nudity that they had to create clothes to hide their genitals. However, that interpretation seems unlikely, because Adam and Eve would have been used to seeing each other naked continually since Eve was created. They would hardly suddenly become embarrassed in each other's presence.
and bearing in mind the fact that paedophiles attack kids who are wearing clothes, and that if someone is of the mind to sexually attack a kid they are going to do it (if they get the chance and are not prevented or stopped) regardless of whether the kid is wearing clothes or not, so there is no more likelihood of a pervert attacking a nude kid than a clothed kid, and bearing in mind that those who go to nudist clubs have often made remarks along the lines of "it teaches kids not to be ashamed of their bodies" and so encourages high self-esteem, and bearing in mind taht we don't cover babies up and that we are created naked by God (who, if He had a problem with it, would almost certainly have us born clothed as it is not beyond his power),
should nudity be legal?