NationStates Jolt Archive


I now understand the 10th dimension...

Rhaomi
13-10-2006, 00:25
...and no, I'm not being a pompous ass. Just see what I've seen, and you too can fathom the depths of the universe.

Clicky (http://www.tenthdimension.com/flash2.php).

Watch the above flash animation, and, in just under twelve minutes, you'll be able to fathom the entire nature of reality and existence in all possible universes, timelines, and conditions as contained in a single tenth-dimensional point.

Point, line, split, fold, point, line, split fold...

You'll get it when you watch the video. :)
Dobbsworld
13-10-2006, 00:30
It's been posted here before, but I applaud it nonetheless.
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 00:33
Seems a rather simplistic take on the subject. Didn't even bother to demonstrate a 4D object as it appears in a 3D world. It could've at least shown an unfolded hypercube.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 00:44
Seems a rather simplistic take on the subject. Didn't even bother to demonstrate a 4D object as it appears in a 3D world. It could've at least shown an unfolded hypercube.

Well, the intent of this animation was to inform on a subject to those who may not understand it. I assume it was designed to be simplistic, just to provide a simple understand to those who know nothing about it. Such as me. I actually somewhat understand what the dimensions(Beyond the third, of course) are and mean, in the basics.

Now, had they gone and done a complete and total explanation, with all of the complexities, I doubt it would make any sense at all.
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 00:49
Well, the intent of this animation was to inform on a subject to those who may not understand it. I assume it was designed to be simplistic, just to provide a simple understand to those who know nothing about it. Such as me. I actually somewhat understand what the dimensions(Beyond the third, of course) are and mean, in the basics.

Which is why it should have included an unfolded hypercube, because the illustrations provided aren't going to help people without any knowledge of the subject understand it.
Call to power
13-10-2006, 00:51
so if I was a flat Lander I could see through peoples clothes?
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 00:52
so if I was a flat Lander I could see through peoples clothes?

Damned if I know. The animation explained nothing, and I have no idea where my copy of Flatland is.
Andaluciae
13-10-2006, 00:54
so if I was a flat Lander I could see through peoples clothes?

Through would be a tough word to describe it. It would be something akin to seeing an image on a PET scan, an infinitely thin slice of the inside of the persons body. Sure, you could see through the clothes, but the bits through first, would be gone nearly instantaneously before you could really pick anything up.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 00:55
Which is why it should have included an unfolded hypercube, because the illustrations provided aren't going to help people without any knowledge of the subject understand it.

How does an unfolded hypercube apply to this? I have an idea, but don't really think it pertinent to understand the very(bare bones) basics of string theory.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 00:57
so if I was a flat Lander I could see through peoples clothes?

I would imagine no, since there is no depth to a flatlander, I'm not sure you would be able to see much at all(Unless you are flatlander in the 3D world, but meh, this is just conjecture with my limited understanding of the issue). Of course, I'm not terribly sure
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 01:05
How does an unfolded hypercube apply to this? I have an idea, but don't really think it pertinent to understand the very(bare bones) basics of string theory.

It's one of the simplest ways to comprehend the fourth dimension.
The Scandinvans
13-10-2006, 01:05
You humans I in fact live in the 283nd dimension.
Keruvalia
13-10-2006, 01:08
I understand the 5th Dimension. Especially that whole thing about their beautiful, their beautiful ballooooon.
MeansToAnEnd
13-10-2006, 01:19
Which is why it should have included an unfolded hypercube, because the illustrations provided aren't going to help people without any knowledge of the subject understand it.

Actually, it is quite easy to understand if you have no prior knowledge of the subject. I, for example, had no clue what the 5th through the 10th dimensions were before watching this. However, I now understand the basics outlined in that animation.
Pyotr
13-10-2006, 01:23
What are the negative number dimensions like?

*head explodes*
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 01:37
It's one of the simplest ways to comprehend the fourth dimension.

Care to explain? Not trying to be a jackass or anything, but I'm not terrible sure.
German Nightmare
13-10-2006, 01:45
I don't think I want to click on that link at this time of the day (02:45 at night) for my brain will surely melt if I did...

*bookmarks*
Montacanos
13-10-2006, 01:52
Head: *boom*
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 02:02
Care to explain? Not trying to be a jackass or anything, but I'm not terrible sure.

Unfolded Cube - http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/6066/cubeunfoldeduo8.gif
Unfolded Hypercube - http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/2691/unfoldedhcubezf2.gif
Katurkalurkmurkastan
13-10-2006, 02:02
Well, the intent of this animation was to inform on a subject to those who may not understand it. I assume it was designed to be simplistic, just to provide a simple understand to those who know nothing about it. Such as me. I actually somewhat understand what the dimensions(Beyond the third, of course) are and mean, in the basics.

Now, had they gone and done a complete and total explanation, with all of the complexities, I doubt it would make any sense at all.

To be fair, it doesn't matter how you explain it, String Theory is the wackiest thing since sliced bread. How many versions are we up to? 8?
Pyotr
13-10-2006, 02:04
Cube stuff

That doesn't really explain anything, it just makes it more confusing, so what would a hypercube look like???
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 02:12
That doesn't really explain anything, it just makes it more confusing, so what would a hypercube look like???

The human brain is physically incapable of imagining a hypercube. The closest that can be managed is unfolding it into the 3rd Dimension or taking a cross-slice of it. The unfolding part is easier to comprehend. The cross slice screws with your mind.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 02:19
The human brain is physically incapable of imagining a hypercube. The closest that can be managed is unfolding it into the 3rd Dimension or taking a cross-slice of it. The unfolding part is easier to comprehend. The cross slice screws with your mind.

Well, I know what an unfolded hypercube is, however my question is how an unfolded hypercube is the simplest way to understand the fourth dimension. I don't want to know what one is, just how, specifically, it pertains to the subject at hand.
Frisbeeteria
13-10-2006, 02:22
Where's the mystery? Just follow Buckaroo Banzai to the eighth dimension (http://www.figmentfly.com/bb/q47.html), and keep going for two more. Simple.
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 02:24
Well, I know what an unfolded hypercube is, however my question is how an unfolded hypercube is the simplest way to understand the fourth dimension. I don't want to know what one is, just how, specifically, it pertains to the subject at hand.

An unfolded hypercube is the simplest way to understand a hypercube. A hypercube is the simplest representation of the 4th Dimension, just as a cube is the simplest representation of the 3rd dimension, a plane the second, a line the first, and a point the zeroth.
Pyotr
13-10-2006, 02:25
The human brain is physically incapable of imagining a hypercube. The closest that can be managed is unfolding it into the 3rd Dimension or taking a cross-slice of it. The unfolding part is easier to comprehend. The cross slice screws with your mind.

Well, that just explains everything dunnit'?

Damn You MindFuck Physics!!!!:mad:
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 02:27
An unfolded hypercube is the simplest way to understand a hypercube. A hypercube is the simplest representation of the 4th Dimension, just as a cube is the simplest representation of the 3rd dimension, a plane the second, a line the first, and a point the zeroth.

I feel this is going in circles...

Okay, why is a hypercube the simplest representation of the 4th? I need more than just saying that it is, I want to know what makes it the simplest representation.
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 02:30
Okay, why is a hypercube the simplest representation of the 4th? I need more than just saying that it is, I want to know what makes it the simplest representation.

For starters, it's really the only representation of the 4th dimension that exists.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 02:34
For starters, it's really the only representation of the 4th dimension that exists.

Okay... why? How does it represent it? And, more importantly, how would you be able to simplify it so that the layman(such as I) could understand what you are talking about. Not everyon has an intimate knowledge of quantum physics.
Katurkalurkmurkastan
13-10-2006, 02:41
Lines are not the only way to represent dimensions. There are easier ways than lines, using symbols like colours. So a one dimensional line with two colours, now has two dimensions: length, and colour gradient. likewise, a hypercube in one way can be imagined as a cube that has a colour gradient. If you take the colour gradient as representative of time, you have a sortof hypercube. Sortof.
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 03:01
Lines are not the only way to represent dimensions. There are easier ways than lines, using symbols like colours. So a one dimensional line with two colours, now has two dimensions: length, and colour gradient. likewise, a hypercube in one way can be imagined as a cube that has a colour gradient. If you take the colour gradient as representative of time, you have a sortof hypercube. Sortof.

Ah. That kinda makes sense. However, it would have difficult to represent this, at all, in a five minute, bare-bones, explanation, I would think.
CthulhuFhtagn
13-10-2006, 03:18
How does it represent it?
...
Because it's a four dimensional object...
Dodudodu
13-10-2006, 03:37
Anyone else content with being a flatlander?

*Raises hand.*
Seangoli
13-10-2006, 03:45
...
Because it's a four dimensional object...

I was looking for a definition along the lines that Katurk said, not "It is because it is". Oh well, my question was answered.