NationStates Jolt Archive

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene. It's getting out of contol; we need to enforce free speech in this country. This is the root reason why "free speech zones" were constructed -- not to squash free speech but to improve it. Without them, these violent "protesters" would drown out all other voices in their quest to subject America to their views. Here's a 2-minute clip on the disgraceful behavior of these ultra-liberals -- I believe O'Reilly puts it best.

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?100506/100506_views_oreilly&OReilly_Factor_Talking_Points&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points&-1&Opinion&164&&&new

This isn't going to end well, I'm afraid. *sigh*

Midgets intimidate me.

I'm not sure why, does anybody know?

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene. It's getting out of contol; we need to enforce free speech in this country. This is the root reason why "free speech zones" were constructed -- not to squash free speech but to improve it. Without them, these violent "protesters" would drown out all other voices in their quest to subject America to their views. Here's a 2-minute clip on the disgraceful behavior of these ultra-liberals -- I believe O'Reilly puts it best.

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?100506/100506_views_oreilly&OReilly_Factor_Talking_Points&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points&-1&Opinion&164&&&new

Free speech zones, you mean like the fenced in areas the RNC used during their stay in NYC in 04? I thought that was cute.

This isn't going to end well, I'm afraid. *sigh*

Yeah when you make that many assumptions it never does...

I had a firy post to reply but figured it is better to not engage someone without a good point

Man....*Puts on firefighter suit*


Looks like I'll be ready to put out the forum fire.


Anyway, to MeansToAnEnd:


NO SHIT!

Midgets intimidate me.

I'm not sure why, does anybody know?

Beacuse they're at the right height to headbutt you in the gonads.

Trilby63;11782995']Beacuse they're at the right height to headbutt you in the gonads.

Aaaaah. It all makes sense.

Now what's the difference between midgets and dwarves again?

Free speech zones = greater freedom of speech? :confused:

Does any extreem opinion want to allow people to speek against it? right or left?

This was a disgrasefull display by students ... nothing more then that

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene. It's getting out of contol; we need to enforce free speech in this country. This is the root reason why "free speech zones" were constructed -- not to squash free speech but to improve it. Without them, these violent "protesters" would drown out all other voices in their quest to subject America to their views. Here's a 2-minute clip on the disgraceful behavior of these ultra-liberals -- I believe O'Reilly puts it best.

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?100506/100506_views_oreilly&OReilly_Factor_Talking_Points&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points&-1&Opinion&164&&&new

and the extreme christian right you represent are reknowned for defending free speech?

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL

Aaaaah. It all makes sense.

Now what's the difference between midgets and dwarves again?

There's no midget race in Dungeons & Dragons. :p

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL

Then how shall he grow and prosper? Say you aint trolist are you?

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views.

Neither does the extreme right, goofy. They're called the "extreme" left and right for a reason. The "common sense" left, as I will now take to calling them, believes in free speech for everyone, no matter how stupid and inane it is. I could dig up plenty of angry right-wing protests if I needed to, including some that accuse liberals of supporting terrorism. The idea that I, as a liberal, support terrorism is, quite possibly, the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

Then how shall he grow and prosper? Say you aint trolist are you?

I've tried chasing him away with Anti-Troll Holy Water, but it doesn't work....:(

Is this abut the Columbia University thing? Didn't we already do this dance in another thread?

I've tried chasing him away with Anti-Troll Holy Water, but it doesn't work....:(

Now that's just silly. Trolls aren't undead, so holy water has no effect on them. We need magical weapons to prevent the troll's regeneration.

Yeah, I'm taking a D&D bend in this thread. :D

Well he does have a point - many so-called US left-wing liberals nowadays are so anti-liberal (e.g. advocating silencing certain groups) that it's almost funny.

MeanstoanEnd does have a point though. Many people (not all) don't know how to take opposing views, so they'll say stupid shit like "You're a terrorist" or "Your a right winger!" etc. So yea, MeanstoanEnd does have a point.

Now that's just silly. Trolls aren't undead, so holy water has no effect on them. We need magical weapons to prevent the troll's regeneration.

Yeah, I'm taking a D&D bend in this thread. :D

Damnit! I didn't think of it that way!

*Rumages about for weaponry*

Ok! I got my Mace of Pwnage!

While your ignorance of constitutional law is astounding, lemme fill you in.

The first amendment provides for one thing, that the government shall not limit your speech by law. That is what free speech is. It says NOTHING at all about whether or not I can drown you out by yelling louder.

You have every right to say what you want to say. And I have every right to yell and scream at the top of my lungs to drown you out. Free speech means that there shall be no law limiting what you say, not that I have to in any way respect what you're saying. It works both ways. Want the freedom to make your statement? Then i have the freedom to make mine louder than yours.

MeanstoanEnd does have a point though. Many people (not all) don't know how to take opposing views, so they'll say stupid shit like "You're a terrorist" or "Your a right winger!" etc. So yea, MeanstoanEnd does have a point.

and in doing so it is an exercise of their free speech.

Well he does have a point - many so-called US left-wing liberals nowadays are so anti-liberal (e.g. advocating silencing certain groups) that it's almost funny.

That's because anyone the right wingers hate are referred to as "liberal" they use it as a catch all slur.

You have every right to say what you want to say. And I have every right to yell and scream at the top of my lungs to drown you out. Free speech means that there shall be no law limiting what you say, not that I have to in any way respect what you're saying. It works both ways. Want the freedom to make your statement? Then i have the freedom to make mine louder than yours.
Isn't it a bit hypocritical for a liberal in favour of civil liberties to argue that an opposing individual/group's liberties be stripped? I think this is what he means.

That's because anyone the right wingers hate are referred to as "liberal" they use it as a catch all slur.
And vice-versa, they get called fascists. The problem is that many of these extremists are actually self-proclaimed liberals - it is the hypocrisy that is funny.

Isn't it a bit hypocritical for a liberal in favour of civil liberties to argue that an opposing individual/group's liberties be stripped? I think this is what he means.

Ummm I'm gonna go out on a limb here and suggest, ummmm unless of course that the opponents POv is just plain wrong!;)

Damnit! I didn't think of it that way!

*Rumages about for weaponry*

Ok! I got my Mace of Pwnage!


Great, I've got my Rod of Lordly Might.

Oh, wait...that's um...something else in my hand...

Move along! Nothing to see here!

>.>

<.<

Isn't it a bit hypocritical for a liberal in favour of civil liberties to argue that an opposing individual/group's liberties be stripped? I think this is what he means.

Someone here is arguing that an opposing group's liberties be stripped?

Isn't it a bit hypocritical for a liberal in favour of civil liberties to argue that an opposing individual/group's liberties be stripped? I think this is what he means.

I couldn't get the thing to play, so I'm not 100% sure what it's about. Can you tell me specifically what this is about, and what group the "liberals" are advocating be stripped of their rights?

Great, I've got my Rod of Lordly Might.

Oh, wait...that's um...something else in my hand...

Move along! Nothing to see here!

>.>

<.<

Ok, I've rolled a 22 and 16, so that gives me +20 for my 'orgasmic cry' and +25 for a 'purple hammer blow'. Your mage is dead.

Someone here is arguing that an opposing group's liberties be stripped?
I am referring to self-proclaimed liberals who cannot stand opposing views - for instance, that fascists be silenced simply because their views conflict with said liberal's. And vice-versa, of course. In the second case though it isn't as odd. One self-proclaimed liberal NS poster I have in mind did actually say something to this effect.

I couldn't get the thing to play, so I'm not 100% sure what it's about. Can you tell me specifically what this is about, and what group the "liberals" are advocating be stripped of their rights?

They're in favour of limiting the advancement of non-human races, like gnomes and dwarves, in certain character classes, which I find, frankly, appalling. :p

Ok, I've rolled a 22 and 16, so that gives me +20 for my 'orgasmic cry' and +25 for a 'purple hammer blow'. Your mage is dead.

I'm pretty sure I get a saving throw... :p

I am referring to self-proclaimed liberals who cannot stand opposing views - for instance, that fascists be silenced simply because their views conflict with said liberal's. And vice-versa, of course. In the second case though it isn't as odd. One self-proclaimed liberal NS poster I have in mind did actually say something to this effect.

Please give me an example, and if this isn't related to the OP's link then this seems to be an off topic aside. Please provide something that shows "liberals" doing this?

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene. It's getting out of contol; we need to enforce free speech in this country. This is the root reason why "free speech zones" were constructed -- not to squash free speech but to improve it. Without them, these violent "protesters" would drown out all other voices in their quest to subject America to their views. Here's a 2-minute clip on the disgraceful behavior of these ultra-liberals -- I believe O'Reilly puts it best.

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?100506/100506_views_oreilly&OReilly_Factor_Talking_Points&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points&-1&Opinion&164&&&new

And you're somehow surprised by this? The left has always advocated freedom of speech ... as long as you agree with them. :(

Great, I've got my Rod of Lordly Might.

Oh, wait...that's um...something else in my hand...

Move along! Nothing to see here!

>.>

<.<

LOL!!!

Please give me an example, and if this isn't related to the OP's link then this seems to be an off topic aside. Please provide something that shows "liberals" doing this?
I will not name names - it is specifically a liberal tendency I have encountered. "Liberal" in quotation marks indeed - for more than one reason. Now, either you learn that on NS posts do not always strictly deal with the OP or you complain pointlessly.

An example: http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=2079

I will not name names - it is specifically a liberal tendency I have encountered. "Liberal" in quotation marks indeed - for more than one reason. Now, either you learn that on NS posts do not always strictly deal with the OP or you complain pointlessly.

I have seen a republican advocate that all non christians in america either be forcably converted or deported. Is this a typical republican viewpoint? There are assholes on either side.

And you're somehow surprised by this? The left has always advocated freedom of speech ... as long as you agree with them. :(

Yeah because any extreem political group is the beacon of freedom of speach:rolleyes:

There are plenty of "leftists" on this forum that prove your steriotyping incorrect

I have seen a republican advocate that all non christians in america either be forcably converted or deported. Is this a typical republican viewpoint? There are assholes on either side.
...hence I say these kind "liberals" should not even call themselves as such. They are hypocrites of the highest magnitude. For a republican who advocates that, it'd depend on whether or not they stand by civil liberties in general.

...hence I say these kind "liberals" should not even call themselves as such. They are hypocrites of the highest magnitude. For a republican who advocates that, it'd depend on whether or not they stand by civil liberties in general.

perhaps I should say "conservative" as the main conservative mantra is small government, less private intrusion, and doing such would certainly violate the tenants of conservative ideology just as trying to limit anyone's freedom of speech would violate liberal ideology.

Yeah because any extreem political group is the beacon of freedom of speach:rolleyes:

There are plenty of "leftists" on this forum that prove your steriotyping incorrect
Thank you, Upward Thrust, for smiting the stupid so I didn't have to.

And you're somehow surprised by this? The left has always advocated freedom of speech ... as long as you agree with them. :(

And the right advocates locking dissidants up in Gitmo and spying on political rivals.


Ain't generalizations fun?

I live in Canada, where fox news is forbidden. Seriously, thought. The CRTC (Canada Radio and Television Critics) will not give FOX news a liscence to broadcast in Canada because they think fox news is biased to the right, even though the CBC is biased to the Left. But I guess since because the CRTC is run entirely by Liberals who where appointed into the CRTC during the jean chretien and paul martin regimes, its no wonder they would ban FOX news. Because in Canada one of the identifing traits of the Liberal left is hating America. The most Anti-America provinces in canada are quebic and Ontario, which are also the most Left-wing provinces in canada. The most pro-america province in canada is Alberta, which is also the most right wing. Makes me wonder why the left hates America.

...hence I say these kind "liberals" should not even call themselves as such. They are hypocrites of the highest magnitude. For a republican who advocates that, it'd depend on whether or not they stand by civil liberties in general.

I would say, in either case, we're talking about people with the Lawful Evil alignment.

I have seen a republican advocate that all non christians in america either be forcably converted or deported. Is this a typical republican viewpoint? There are assholes on either side.

Thank you. I'm as liberal as the next person and I am frankly embarrassed by what some other liberals get up to. Maybe the idiots on the extreme wings of both sides, right and left, should be sent on a nice long cruise together and let the rest of us work something out.

Yeah because any extreem political group is the beacon of freedom of speach:rolleyes:

There are plenty of "leftists" on this forum that prove your steriotyping incorrect

As with fundie Christians, it's the noisy, unwashed rabble of the left that people remember most.

I would say, in either case, we're talking about people with the Lawful Evil alignment.



I smell the taint of Chaos in this thread....

I would say, in either case, we're talking about people with the Lawful Evil alignment.


Careful, careful, Oi mate your nerdness is showin!

Thank you. I'm as liberal as the next person and I am frankly embarrassed by what some other liberals get up to. Maybe the idiots on the extreme wings of both sides, right and left, should be sent on a nice long cruise together and let the rest of us work something out.

I would prefer to drop them all on an island, give each one an M-16, and let them settle their differences. LMAO!

I would say, in either case, we're talking about people with the Lawful Evil alignment.
You're assuming they have tact and abide by order - maybe they just want to silence their foes by force. More like chaotic evil then. ;) Neutral evil if by stealth. :)

I smell the taint of Chaos in this thread....

I'm guessing the OP is Chaotic Neutral.

I'm guessing the OP is Chaotic Neutral.

Chaos Undivided ;)



...I CALL FOR AN EXTERMINATUS ON THIS THREAD!

You're assuming they have tact and abide by order - maybe they just want to silence their foes by force. More like chaotic evil then. ;) Neutral evil if by stealth. :)

No, they want laws and regulations from positions of authority to bolster their side -- hence, Lawful Evil. ;)

I am referring to self-proclaimed liberals who cannot stand opposing views - for instance, that fascists be silenced simply because their views conflict with said liberal's. And vice-versa, of course. In the second case though it isn't as odd. One self-proclaimed liberal NS poster I have in mind did actually say something to this effect.

i was arguing that fascists should have their freedom to march and agitiate limited because of the potential (intended) results of their actions, not because i disagree with them. not their right to 'speech' per say. its the physical manifestations of their actions i want to constrain. that was specifically in relation to some pimply american posters who were bleating about the british union of fascists 'right' to march into a jewish area of london in 1936. but not the 'right' of the locals to send em packing before they desecrated synagogues.

i disagree with everyone, but I would only advocate limiting the 'freedoms' given to groups who advocate turning jews to ash and that kind of thing. in the same way US tv wont show osama's videos with the sound on perhaps?

but im not liberal (at least i think not, what do you americans mean when you use that term?) so i presume its not me you refer to.

How cool would that be to be a Mod? If you don't like something, just go in, type "EXTERMINATUS!" and delete the thread or lock it. How sweet is that?

Chaos Undivided ;)



...I CALL FOR AN EXTERMINATUS ON THIS THREAD!

http://www.iptablog.org/images/dalek.jpg
"EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!"

but im not liberal (at least i think not, what do you americans mean when you use that term?) so i presume its not me you refer to.
And I am not an American! :) I'm a Euro-liberal. Americans usually mean leftists, and more commonly, Democrats when they refer to a liberal. We refer to classical liberals.

So we're all here waiting for Sigmar?

How cool would that be to be a Mod? If you don't like something, just go in, type "EXTERMINATUS!" and delete the thread or lock it. How sweet is that?
You lawful evil bastard! :eek:

As with fundie Christians, it's the noisy, unwashed rabble of the left that people remember most.

Yup and most around here try to rise above grouping all of them togeather with the right ...

I live in Canada, where fox news is forbidden. Seriously, thought. The CRTC (Canada Radio and Television Critics) will not give FOX news a liscence to broadcast in Canada because they think fox news is biased to the right, even though the CBC is biased to the Left. But I guess since because the CRTC is run entirely by Liberals who where appointed into the CRTC during the jean chretien and paul martin regimes, its no wonder they would ban FOX news. Because in Canada one of the identifing traits of the Liberal left is hating America. The most Anti-America provinces in canada are quebic and Ontario, which are also the most Left-wing provinces in canada. The most pro-america province in canada is Alberta, which is also the most right wing. Makes me wonder why the left hates America.

That's why I wouldn't move to Canada. Ya'll are entirely too fascist. The idea of Free Speech never took hold up there did it?

That's why I wouldn't move to Canada. Ya'll are entirely too fascist. The idea of Free Speech never took hold up there did it?

Perhaps they left it outside one day and it froze. If that's true, it's damn silly.

Careful, careful, Oi mate your nerdness is showin!


I'm not a nerd, dammit! I'm a geek and a dork! :p

http://www.iptablog.org/images/dalek.jpg
"EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!"

HAHAHAHA!

And I am not an American! :) I'm a Euro-liberal. Americans usually mean leftists, and more commonly, Democrats when they refer to a liberal. We refer to classical liberals.

well you should put that on your profile then shouldnt you....


oh, shit. :p

silly SR.

but my point stands. no free speech for fascists. no more appeasement.

well you should put that on your profile then shouldnt you....
My profile already (and perhaps overabundantly) describes my policital position(s).

but my point stands. no free speech for fascists. no more appeasement.
Unless they resort to violence, they are as entitled to it as much as anyone else is.

Anyways, I'm off for a nap. I'll catch up on NS later.

I'm not a nerd, dammit! I'm a geek and a dork! :p


Ahhh my freind differant words same meaning....:D

Ahhh my freind differant words same meaning....:D

No, they connote different things. ;)

No, they connote different things. ;)

Heheh yeah okay, and only a nerd would know that?

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene.

Well we HAVE been venting our anger at you, but you complain about it all the time . . .

Now that's just silly. Trolls aren't undead, so holy water has no effect on them. We need magical weapons to prevent the troll's regeneration.

Yeah, I'm taking a D&D bend in this thread. :D

Well then you should know that it's fire and acid that stops trolls not magic weapons! (Unless of course the magic weapon in question produces fire and acid.)

I couldn't get the thing to play, so I'm not 100% sure what it's about. Can you tell me specifically what this is about, and what group the "liberals" are advocating be stripped of their rights?

And I can't play it at all . . . library terminal here . . .

I smell the taint of Chaos in this thread....

<sniffs armpit> That's me I think . . .

Well then you should know that it's fire and acid that stops trolls not magic weapons! (Unless of course the magic weapon in question produces fire and acid.)

I know that they all do, but I was trying to set myself up for my "rod" joke early. Way to ruin teh funnay. :p

I know that they all do, but I was trying to set myself up for my "rod" joke early. Way to ruin teh funnay. :p

What do you mean? MY rod of lordly might produces fire and acid aplenty!

Maybe I should see a cleric about that...

What do you mean? MY rod of lordly might produces fire and acid aplenty!

Maybe I should see a cleric about that...

I'm not sure a healing spell's gonna help that. You should try penicillin.

A paladin can cure anything, lay hands! Though only if you're under 18.

A paladin can cure anything, lay hands! Though only if you're under 18.

Pedo much? :eek:

Pedo much? :eek:

Well you know those holy men!

Well you know those holy men!

Someone needs to tell Representative Foley that he really needs to stop trying to play Paladins.

Aaaaah. It all makes sense.

Now what's the difference between midgets and dwarves again?
Dwarves have developed this particular breed called the trollslayer.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/GermanNightmare/Trollslayer.gif
I have yet to see that development in midgets...
I smell the taint of Chaos in this thread....
Chaos Undivided ;)
...I CALL FOR AN EXTERMINATUS ON THIS THREAD!
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/GermanNightmare/Inquisition.jpg
Don't you just love Cyclonic Torpedoes? How many do you think we'd need for this thread? One? Maybe two?!? Exterminatus in Extermis for t3h win!
So we're all here waiting for Sigmar?
Nay, we're waiting for Gotrek and his buddy Felix to appear...
Well we HAVE been venting our anger at you, but you complain about it all the time . . .
You read my mind - first thing I thought upon reading the OP. :D

Midgets intimidate me.

I'm not sure why, does anybody know?

You are afraid of stepping on one by accident maybe?

America doesn't have an extreme left.

And you're somehow surprised by this? The left has always advocated freedom of speech ... as long as you agree with them. :(
The left invented free speech rights, while the right traditionally hated it.

Fortunately most right-wingers have drifted sufficiently left to support it.

I think this woman could be related to 'MeansToAnEnd'

*CENSORED*

I don't see why people who openly admire dictators who killed millions (Hitler) deserve free speech.

Nazism invalidates free speech rights.

I think this woman could be related to 'MeansToAnEnd'

http://von.kelly.googlepages.com/home

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

I don't see why people who openly admire dictators who killed millions (Hitler) deserve free speech.

Nazism invalidates free speech rights.
I'm going to go in two directions for this.
First off, free speech is free speech. If we start trying to make descisions on who does and doesn't get free speech, then soon enough we're looking at nearly every group and saying "No, they don't get free speech either." Then, soon enough, those eyes fall on something you say, and you get denied your own free speech. The idea that certain people don't deserve free speech is a fascist idea. Attacking Fascism with fascist ideas is rather stupid.

Second, bad ideas grow in seclusion. When they are properly aired out, and everyone can see them and has an opportunity to point out their flaws, people will understand them, and the arguments against them, and will not be vulnerable to a smooth-talking person with an agenda.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

There's more.

There's more.

Oh, nooooooooooo! *flees*

Dwarves have developed this particular breed called the trollslayer.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/GermanNightmare/Trollslayer.gif
I have yet to see that development in midgets...
Stop discriminating against trolls. They are a player race after all, they deserve equal treatment. :mad:

Stop discriminating against trolls. They are a player race after all, they deserve equal treatment. :mad:

Trolls a player race? Are we playing Shadowrun now?

LOL Holy shit! Soooo many gaming references:p

Apparently, the extreme left doesn't believe in free speech if someone holds conflicting views. Next time you want to accuse someone of being fascist, vent your anger out against those who stray so far from the mainstream that it becomes obscene. It's getting out of contol; we need to enforce free speech in this country. This is the root reason why "free speech zones" were constructed -- not to squash free speech but to improve it. Without them, these violent "protesters" would drown out all other voices in their quest to subject America to their views. Here's a 2-minute clip on the disgraceful behavior of these ultra-liberals -- I believe O'Reilly puts it best.

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?100506/100506_views_oreilly&OReilly_Factor_Talking_Points&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points%3A%2010/5&Talking%20Points&-1&Opinion&164&&&new
Bill O'Reilly wouldn't know "ultra-left" if it kicked him in the face. (Here's a hint, it would be the left foot and with red shoelaces.)

America doesn't have an extreme left.

Noam Chomsky? Howard Zinn? Ward Churchill? Ed Asner?

Stop discriminating against trolls. They are a player race after all, they deserve equal treatment. :mad:
Ah, but that's just me, having listened to the Kelly's Heroes movie theme song "Burning Bridges" one time too often.

Trolls a player race? Are we playing Shadowrun now?

You can play them in D&D, check out the monster manual. I don't remember exactly what the character level for them is, it is quite high though.

America doesn't have an extreme left.

And what planet do you live on? Hmmm?

And what planet do you live on? Hmmm?Name some.

Name some.

I did. Granted, there are no extreme leftists in government, but there are extreme leftists.

Stop discriminating against trolls. They are a player race after all, they deserve equal treatment. :mad:
Silly dwarves, discrimination is no fun - why spare certain races/species and kill others. Just kill them all. ^^ They'll receive equal amounts of balefire, that's for sure. My drow clerics are good at that.

I keep telling everyone to put morons like this on your Ignore list...

Neither the far left or the far right are proponents of freedom of speech. Although in addition to curtailing freedom of speech the specialty of the conservative far right is telling you how to act and the speciality of the 'liberal' far left is telling you how to think.