NationStates Jolt Archive

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

Ratings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

I was reading the transcript of that yesterday and that's perhaps the only time I've agreed with anything those two have said.

It's a terribly sad, nasty world she lives in, isn't it?

Ratings.

:eek:

Dammit! :mad:

Next time, wait a few pages before you actually answer me. ;)

So they'll have something to talk about other than kid touchers and their enablers in Congress.

Well, after I seen that, I figured she just really needed someone to lay some pipe... so i went down, gave her the baloney pony and now shes cool. Funny how a little R&R will change a persons outlook on life.

:)

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

I guess it makes good entertainment?

:eek:

Dammit! :mad:

Next time, wait a few pages before you actually answer me. ;)

It occurs to me that we're going to have to avoid even the most innocent use of the word "page" for a while. For instance, no one will be wanting to "take a page out" of anyone else's book, or at least not in public. :p

It's a terribly sad, nasty world she lives in, isn't it? It must be. I almost feel sorry for her...*almost*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

I don't know what's uglier--her mug or her beliefs.

At least she and her fellow idiots didn't show up to desecrate those poor girls' funerals. (Props to Mike Gallegher for arranging that.)

I don't know what's uglier--her mug or her beliefs.

At least she and her fellow idiots didn't show up to desecrate those poor girls' funerals. (Props to Mike Gallegher for arranging that.)

True. And the fact that she and the WBC traded air-time for the opportunity to do an on-site revelation of the Gospel message that Pennsylvania is being punished because the governor said mean things about the WBC, just shows what media-whores they really are.

I don't know what's uglier--her mug or her beliefs.

At least she and her fellow idiots didn't show up to desecrate those poor girls' funerals. (Props to Mike Gallegher for arranging that.)

Indeed. At least when seeing them on television or listening to them on the radio we can turn them off.

Indeed. At least when seeing them on television or listening to them on the radio we can turn them off.

Im always trying to turn them on... but its hard... or should i say, not so hard... with these religious fanatical types... sheesh...

yes mega props to Gallagher for working out a deal to stop those nuts from showing up at the Amish funerals. Then again, the Amish probably would have handled themselves pretty well even if the protesters did show up. Giving those media whores 1 hour of broadcast time almost seems like working a deal with the devil and encouraging them to get more fanatic.

and the ACLU ofcourse, supports them and is fighting for them.

with alot of their protests containing anti-gay rhetoric, I am surprised they have not shown up on Capitol Hill after the whole Foley scandal became public. That is odd don't you think?

One thing I found a tad ironic about the interview was Hannity's umbrage and his repeating of how the parents would feel seeing Ms BatshitInsane on TV telling them their children deserved to die.

Does Hannity not know that the Amish don't have TVs?


Of course, you realise that her coming onto the program is FOX's attempt at balance. Because Hannity is against her, it 'logically' follows that she's a liberal. Thus FOX has balance in it's opinion shows.

I was reading the transcript of that yesterday and that's perhaps the only time I've agreed with anything those two have said.

It's a terribly sad, nasty world she lives in, isn't it?

The problem is that they come off looking just as much like assholes as she does. This is at least the second time she's been on Fox and the commentator has gone off on her and started insulting her - with her just smiling about it the whole time as if they have proven her right.

What a nasty, nasty woman.

Of course, you realise that her coming onto the program is FOX's attempt at balance. Because Hannity is against her, it 'logically' follows that she's a liberal. Thus FOX has balance in it's opinion shows.

mmmm, you're really reaching there. don't strain yourself.

but yes, Hannity did make himself look silly with the TV comment, lol.

The problem is that they come off looking just as much like assholes as she does. This is at least the second time she's been on Fox and the commentator has gone off on her and started insulting her - with her just smiling about it the whole time as if they have proven her right.


This "religous" group has been attacked by many and trust me, those attacking them are simply echoing the sentiments of the majority of people watching no matter their political or religous leanings.

But I do agree that cooler heads do prevail. I say just sit back, control the emotions and let them do the talking, occasionally presenting a counter point. These people will make themselves look like monsters more effectively than anyone else can.

The problem is that they come off looking just as much like assholes as she does. This is at least the second time she's been on Fox and the commentator has gone off on her and started insulting her - with her just smiling about it the whole time as if they have proven her right.
In her mind, they have. Which is why it's pointless arguing with religious fanatics such as her. No matter what you say to them, it just proves their point.

TBH, I felt she came off the interview pretty well. It was Hannity who ended up looking like an idiot. He tried his best to get her angry (which is pathetic journalism anyway) and ended up getting angry himself when she didn't rise to his bait and so he resorted/descended to just insulting her by the end.
Pathetic interviewing by a talentless hack.

;) Of course, you realise that her coming onto the program is FOX's attempt at balance. Because Hannity is against her, it 'logically' follows that she's a liberal. Thus FOX has balance in it's opinion shows.

No, she's not a "liberal". I'd say she's someone who has taken basic ideas often found on the right and mutated them into something far beyond the boundaries of any respectable conservative philosophy. For example, one can oppose homosexuality on moral (or even biological) grounds without shouting "God hates fags" at a military funeral.

WBC is a disgrace to Christianity and Hannity, not to mention Colms, is right to denounce them. Sometimes conservatives and liberals actually agree on an issue. Shocking, I know, but there it is ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?Why invite her? Because she's controversial and that gets ratings.
Much as I hate her, Hannity isn't scoring any points by playing the moral emotional card either.
I seriously wonder what that family would say if one of their own were "killed by an angry God"...:rolleyes:

I need my own talk show.

"Today's guests include:

The Vienna Boys Choir
Former Representative Mark Foley
Shirley Phelps Roper
The tiger from Siegfried and Roy"

I think you can see where this is headed. :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

Because if they invited Bill Clinton, he would make them look like the jackholes they are.

I need my own talk show.

"Today's guests include:

The Vienna Boys Choir
Former Representative Mark Foley
Shirley Phelps Roper
The tiger from Siegfried and Roy"

I think you can see where this is headed. :D

LOL! and "Luncatic Goofballs" would be the perfect name! Make sure it is a radio show so you can use all those funny and stupid soundbytes.

Because if they invited Bill Clinton, he would make them look like the jackholes they are.


you sure he wouldn't just flip out and throw a tantrum like he did with Chris Wallace?

I need my own talk show.

"Today's guests include:

The Vienna Boys Choir
Former Representative Mark Foley
Shirley Phelps Roper
The tiger from Siegfried and Roy"

I think you can see where this is headed. :D
You mustn't forget spiders! :)

I was going to write something about staving in her head with a lead pipe, but I'm on Youtube now, so I guess I'll just watch an episode of Sealab 2021 instead.

LOL! and "Luncatic Goofballs" would be the perfect name! Make sure it is a radio show so you can use all those funny and stupid soundbytes.

Well, Shirley and the tiger have a lot in common: They both attack fags and we like to watch them disappear. :)

i hope someday that she realizes that she is doing truely evil work.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

what a bitch she is

;)

No, she's not a "liberal". I'd say she's someone who has taken basic ideas often found on the right and mutated them into something far beyond the boundaries of any respectable conservative philosophy. For example, one can oppose homosexuality on moral (or even biological) grounds without shouting "God hates fags" at a military funeral.

WBC is a disgrace to Christianity and Hannity, not to mention Colms, is right to denounce them. Sometimes conservatives and liberals actually agree on an issue. Shocking, I know, but there it is ;)
I know. I was just bored, so indulged in a bit of flamebaiting.
Damn you! You didn't fall for it!
*shakes fist angrily at NM*

I like the way, when the guy on the left calls her "a soulless, thoughtless, evil, mean, cruel woman", the only item she actually objects to is thoughtlessness. Genius.

I like the way, when the guy on the left calls her "a soulless, thoughtless, evil, mean, cruel woman", the only item she actually objects to is thoughtlessness. Genius.

I loved that part too. Especially because it's the part that's true.

Honestly, I thought they were a bit hard on her. She's an idiot, yes, but that's no reason to rail on her. Just point out the error of her ways and let the viewers see her insanity and stupidity for themselves. It's not like it ain't obvious.

It's funny, even though the link didn't work for me (damn school computers with their filtering!), I knew instantly that it had to be Ann Coulter or that Phelps hag.

i hope someday that she realizes that she is doing truely evil work.

She will. I think she has a seat reserved by the furnace. :)

She will. I think she has a seat reserved by the furnace. :)

I wouldn't hold my breath. Religious wackos belive they are doing God's work. In fact, the more fundamentalist conservatives support what these people stand for, not just how they go about getting their message across.

They should have kept their cool. Calmly asking her the questions would have shown her to be plenty nutty. Too bad the interveiwer was a nut too.

I wouldn't hold my breath. Religious wackos belive they are doing God's work. In fact, the more fundamentalist conservatives support what these people stand for, not just how they go about getting their message across.

...um...I was referring to the 'H' place. :)

...um...I was referring to the 'H' place. :)

I know what you were talking about, now reread what I wrote.

I know what you were talking about, now reread what I wrote.

You're saying that even a place in Hell would not convince her that she was in the wrong?

I know what you were talking about, now reread what I wrote.

You think that even as she roasts alive, she would think: 'God is just testing my faith'?

why does no one use the bible against her? She admits that she sins and that she deserves to die...why not throw "May he among us without sin cast the first stone" at her? She, as a sinner, is in no place to judge anyone else.

You think that even as she roasts alive, she would think: 'God is just testing my faith'?

I was responding to the "She will." more than anything else.

...um...I was referring to the 'H' place. :)Kim Jong Il's Hamam*?

*Turkish hotbath. Plenty of need for a furnace. =)

why does no one use the bible against her? She admits that she sins and that she deserves to die...why not throw "May he among us without sin cast the first stone" at her? She, as a sinner, is in no place to judge anyone else.I think they did once. It was an Asian-American woman on Fox that quoted scripture on her.

why does no one use the bible against her? She admits that she sins and that she deserves to die...why not throw "May he among us without sin cast the first stone" at her? She, as a sinner, is in no place to judge anyone else.

Do you honestly think it'd help?

I'm sure it's been tried. :p

I like the way, when the guy on the left calls her "a soulless, thoughtless, evil, mean, cruel woman", the only item she actually objects to is thoughtlessness. Genius.

You think she should have objected to "woman" instead?

=)

I think they did once. It was an Asian-American woman on Fox that quoted scripture on her.
hmm...I must have missed that one *scampers off to Youtube*

Do you honestly think it'd help?

I'm sure it's been tried. :p

It wouldn't shut her up, but for those out there who are easily swayed, maybe it would have some kind of effect. Her argument makes sense in a very twisted way, especially with her flawed logic. Pointing out those inconsistancies would make for a much better interview instead of calling her a soulless idiot

hmm...I must have missed that one *scampers off to Youtube*



It wouldn't shut her up, but for those out there who are easily swayed, maybe it would have some kind of effect. Her argument makes sense in a very twisted way, especially with her flawed logic. Pointing out those inconsistancies would make for a much better interview instead of calling her a soulless idiot

They tried to argue that the Tsunami in Indonesia was retribution by God on...wait for it... Sweden! Yes, that since the swedish apparently like to vacation there, God created the tsunami and killed tens of thousands of people to get a couple hundred swedish tourists. Because they have some gay legislators in their government.

I'm not making this up. Now what logical argument could one possibly need? :p

They tried to argue that the Tsunami in Indonesia was retribution by God on...wait for it... Sweden! Yes, that since the swedish apparently like to vacation there, God created the tsunami and killed tens of thousands of people to get a couple hundred swedish tourists. Because they have some gay legislators in their government.

I'm not making this up. Now what logical argument could one possibly need? :p

say what
thats bullshit
shot her now i say

why does no one use the bible against her? She admits that she sins and that she deserves to die...why not throw "May he among us without sin cast the first stone" at her? She, as a sinner, is in no place to judge anyone else.

How about whacking her on the head with a Bible? I hope that one day they piss off some Vet and he comes to their church for show and tell with a M-16.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRWwWCKXFFY

Jesus, why even invite that bitch onto their show anymore? Isn't it obvous from previous visits that it never works out?

It's like how having Cheney around makes Dubya look human, and having Rumsfeld around makes him look less dumb (nothing could make him look smart.)

Having this woman on makes Hannity look like he's got some morals and Colmes look like he's got some balls.