Montacanos
03-10-2006, 03:10
This is not simply a toned down version of the “Revolution” thread, though it has its inspiration in that as well as the short-lived “Why do we protest” thread which was going quite well originally. Anyway, I created this thread for the purpose of discussing what are the practical and necessary limits of an American public who finds itself frightened by recent developments in our political climate.
First, let me say that I see little point in measures such as “protest”. There are no battles won when we are segregated off too a little corner where are voices are heard by none other than ourselves. We fear that this state is becoming totalitarian, so how do we respond? Are we obedient even in our civil disobedience!? Such makes no sense to me. Why are we responding to a government that seizes our freedoms by learning to live with reduced ones?
The only course is to defy the state, we cannot play by their rules in the hope that they will begin to play by ours. We owe nothing to the collective when the collective is too foolish to see what is in front of its own eyes, and will keep paying up to the state in the hope that the state will respond with equal generosity. However, do we need to dismantle the entire state to do it? And if we don't where do we stop?
The only question is then, what is necessary, what is prudent? Do we dare disturb the universe? And if we do, how far can/will we take it? Is the trend such that we can destroy it without playing with the most desperate measures?
Also; Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience” http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/transcendentalism/authors/thoreau/civil/
First, let me say that I see little point in measures such as “protest”. There are no battles won when we are segregated off too a little corner where are voices are heard by none other than ourselves. We fear that this state is becoming totalitarian, so how do we respond? Are we obedient even in our civil disobedience!? Such makes no sense to me. Why are we responding to a government that seizes our freedoms by learning to live with reduced ones?
The only course is to defy the state, we cannot play by their rules in the hope that they will begin to play by ours. We owe nothing to the collective when the collective is too foolish to see what is in front of its own eyes, and will keep paying up to the state in the hope that the state will respond with equal generosity. However, do we need to dismantle the entire state to do it? And if we don't where do we stop?
The only question is then, what is necessary, what is prudent? Do we dare disturb the universe? And if we do, how far can/will we take it? Is the trend such that we can destroy it without playing with the most desperate measures?
Also; Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience” http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/transcendentalism/authors/thoreau/civil/