NationStates Jolt Archive

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is going to speak to the UN general assembly in new york this week. Im not sure sure i want him in my country. True the UN is international territory, so technically his speech wont be on US territory, but the trip he takes to get to the building will leave him no choice but to enter US territory. So why cant the US block him from entering the country? We have 2 choices here, either we can let the man into the country so that he can bash us on our own turf (that would be humiliating) or we can restrict him from ever entering US territory, and if he enters it...we'll just pretend like we thought it was a military maneuver and we take him out. I prefer option #2 but wuddya y'all think?

What, you think the President of Iran is going to blow up a night club or something? :p

What, you think the President of Iran is going to blow up a night club or something? :p

Actually... :eek: :eek: :eek: ;)

You could protest, you know.

Just let him speak. Though it would be cool to see him get in without passing through the US. Maybe he could go into space and pilot the rocket in a vertical line down towards UN HQ.

You could set up a boxing ring outside the UN building. Then, just him and Bush, 10 rounds. It would solve the world's problems without a nuclear war. :)

If I were Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, I'd wanna take a dump on Dick Cheney's penny loafers. On camera.

If I were Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, I'd wanna take a dump on Dick Cheney's penny loafers. On camera.

I'd wanna do that just as me.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is going to speak to the UN general assembly in new york this week. Im not sure sure i want him in my country. True the UN is international territory, so technically his speech wont be on US territory, but the trip he takes to get to the building will leave him no choice but to enter US territory. So why cant the US block him from entering the country? We have 2 choices here, either we can let the man into the country so that he can bash us on our own turf (that would be humiliating) or we can restrict him from ever entering US territory, and if he enters it...we'll just pretend like we thought it was a military maneuver and we take him out. I prefer option #2 but wuddya y'all think?

The question is: Are you sure G. W. Bush wants you in his country? You see, he has the power to do something about it :p

Seriously though: Let him in, let him talk. If you can't defeat this guy on his arguments, then what are you?

Seriously though: Let him in, let him talk. If you can't defeat this guy on his arguments, then what are you?
Republican? ;)

theres no harm in letting him talk. iran is not the worst, still i wont like to live thier.

Allowing an enemy of the state to enter the country is borderline treason. Unfortunately, the UN is not really US territory, so he can't be stopped. Hopefully there's going to be a big protest. Ahmadinejad -- you're next.

Allowing an enemy of the state to enter the country is borderline treason. Unfortunately, the UN is not really US territory, so he can't be stopped. Hopefully there's going to be a big protest. Ahmadinejad -- you're next.

And threatening the life of a democratically-elected head of Government of a sovereign nation is a borderline act of war. Just let him be, he is entitled to present his nation's case to the international community.

Allowing an enemy of the state to enter the country is borderline treason. Unfortunately, the UN is not really US territory, so he can't be stopped. Hopefully there's going to be a big protest. Ahmadinejad -- you're next.

another internet tough guy!!!

if you arent willing to allow freedom of democratically elected leaders to travel to the UN, give it to a country thats willing to allow these diplomatic freedoms

Just let him speak. Though it would be cool to see him get in without passing through the US. Maybe he could go into space and pilot the rocket in a vertical line down towards UN HQ.

Maybe they could stuff him in the nosecone of an ICBM and fire it at the UN to see if the rocket works. :D

You could set up a boxing ring outside the UN building. Then, just him and Bush, 10 rounds. It would solve the world's problems without a nuclear war. :)

But would you want Bush to win? That could mean he would become President of Iran if he won...hmm...hmm... So where do you want this ring set up?

So where do you want this ring set up?International waters, of course! :D

Allowing an enemy of the state to enter the country is borderline treason. Unfortunately, the UN is not really US territory, so he can't be stopped. Hopefully there's going to be a big protest. Ahmadinejad -- you're next.

What do you mean, he's next?

And threatening the life of a democratically-elected head of Government of a sovereign nation is a borderline act of war. Just let him be, he is entitled to present his nation's case to the international community.

Where did you ever come up with the notion he was democratically elected? As I recall, the clerics decided who could and could not run for president in that election.:rolleyes:

What do you mean, he's next?Maybe RA works at McDonalds? :confused:

Allowing an enemy of the state to enter the country is borderline treason.
Has he been declared as such?

International waters, of course! :D
Preferably, of the shark-infested kind. We could get rid of them both.

I suppose Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is thinking the same thing about having to go through America to get to the U.N after all with all the complaining he does about it imagine the horror of being forced to visit often! :D

if you arent willing to allow freedom of democratically elected leaders to travel to the UN, give it to a country thats willing to allow these diplomatic freedoms

I am allowing him to travel to the UN. But if he sets one foot on US territory, I would have no problem declaring an open hunting season on fundamentalist, insane, Iranian dictators.

I am allowing him to travel to the UN. But if he sets one foot on US territory, I would have no problem declaring an open hunting season on fundamentalist, insane, Iranian dictators.Isn't Chamenei staying in Iran?

Isn't Chamenei staying in Iran?

I used the plural form. That includes both Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. Hopefully this country has shooters better than Elmer Fudd.

I am allowing him to travel to the UN. But if he sets one foot on US territory, I would have no problem declaring an open hunting season on fundamentalist, insane, Iranian dictators.

with all them body guards? and what about if he goes to buy some munchies! if you shoot every political figure that’s in America where would are convenient stores makes money and how would world leaders be able to accurately make there decisions on the U.S if they never see it?

Plus everyone should be able to go to Disney land

Unfortunately, the US agreed long ago to consider anyone travelling to or from the UN diplomatically protected. So, we not only can't do anything to him, but are in fact partially responsible for his continued safety.

I used the plural form. That includes both Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. Hopefully this country has shooters better than Elmer Fudd.

Why the hell would you want whack Mohammad Khatami? The guy is a moderate. Sure he didn't push the clerics for reform as hard as his supporters wanted him to, but he is a hell of alot more reasonable than his replacement.