NationStates Jolt Archive

Original Article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41771)
"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states. This will include all of the capitals and at least the 10 largest cities of all Islamic-dominated states and the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina. In addition, North Korean cities and military installations will be destroyed."

Hey, after all, Mutually Assured Destruction saved us all from nuclear annihilation in the Cold War...why not use the same doctrine to save Europe and the US from a WMD attack. If Terror-sponsoring states in the Middle East knew what was at stake, they would hunt down the terrorists for us.

Great idea. I'm sure it won't occur to the terrorists who do the bombing to not be in a large muslim city after the fact.

That wouldn't be free, you tit.

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state...

So, what the odds that New York counts as one of 100 largest 'Islamic' cities?

So, what the odds that New York counts as one of 100 largest 'Islamic' cities?

Dearborn, too. :eek:

So, what the odds that New York counts as one of 100 largest 'Islamic' cities?

Good point, there are an awful lot of muslims living in London.

I'm sure the fallout from the nukes wouldn't harm us good Christian folk right?

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states.

I like the way this has carefully been written so that a terrorist attack using WMD's carried out by anyone, regardless of their religious or political doctrine will trigger the holocaust. Now there's something for the Neo-Nazis to do.

Oh no!

If you nuke them, the suicide bombers will die!

Oh wait...

:rolleyes:

you can't threaten to kill someone who is more than willing to die anyway.

it's like making the penalty for attempted suicide the electric chair


And (as posted above), most of the heavily populated muslim cities are not even going to be in the middle east.


Oh yea, and what was that about how terrible the terrorists are for killing innocent civilians?


If you don't want your cities on the target list, you have to earn your way off the list. Give us the head of bin Laden on a stick, and you may get a pass. Shut down your nuclear programs in an open and verifiable way, and you can earn your way off the target list

"bully in the playground" come to mind?

"gimme your lunch money, or the janitor scrapes you off the locker with a spatula"

That doctrine assumes that terrorist organisations would care about large amounts of people dying all over the planet within a short amount of time. Even if anybody were stupid enough to do that, the ensuing power vaccum would be a great way of getting even more radical religious groups into power. Something tells me Russia and China wouldn´t enjoy the sight of mushroom clouds billowing so close to their borders either.

What if the terrorists don't live in any of those cities?
Or maybe the pope thinks "hey, that'd be a good way to get rid of those pesky infidels!" and then sends a team of Swiss guards to blow up the corn museum in Iowa or something.

Just make it Mecca. Since according to their beliefs they have to visit the city once before they die, if it's a destroyed radioactive pile of sand, they're all going to hell automaticly. (Logical Sacarsm)

I think my plan for free Internet porn all over the world would be more effective.

I think my plan for free Internet porn all over the world would be more effective.

*gives Markreich a bigger cookie than before; a whole batch, in fact*

[QUOTE=Roof;11686857]Original Article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41771)
"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:...

It would have been better if you had looked around in this forum for a few days before making your first post. You shall be eaten alive for this.

Oh, welcome to NS General. :rolleyes:

It would have been better if you had looked around in this forum for a few days before making your first post. You shall be eaten alive for this.

Oh, welcome to NS General. :rolleyes:

I think you are wasting your time... one post, and that is an article swiped from elsewhere by the look of it. I'd say we have just discovered a new breed of troll.

Pretty bum idea, I'd have to say. If we did that, we'd be blasting the cities of several of our allies, such as Turkey.

Pretty bum idea, I'd have to say. If we did that, we'd be blasting the cities of several of our allies, such as Turkey.

And, of course... the whole dumb idea revolves around the belief that militants of OTHER inclinations, wouldn't just blow shit up to cause mass destruction.... kind of a worldwide scale 'suicide by cop'... except, dropping nukes at random, effectively.

So - some dude from the IRA sticks a bomb in Central Park, and then sits back to watch the US murder billions of innocents.

As awesome as this idea is, I have a better idea:



Tacos. Wait, hear me out!

Suicide bombers don't eat tacos. I checked. Also, militant radical fundamentalist religious nuts don't eat tacos either. I have conducted an extensive study and I have found a correlation. The more tacos someone eats, the less likely they are to bomb people. So I propose that we introduce the taco to the Middle East. :)

I like the way this has carefully been written so that a terrorist attack using WMD's carried out by anyone, regardless of their religious or political doctrine will trigger the holocaust. Now there's something for the Neo-Nazis to do.

and, conveniently, the only terrorist groups that actually have been caught with wmd inside the u.s. are the neo-nazis. funny that.

Someone's been into the Strangelove again. What did I tell you about Strangelove before bed?!

Original Article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41771)
"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states. This will include all of the capitals and at least the 10 largest cities of all Islamic-dominated states and the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina. In addition, North Korean cities and military installations will be destroyed."

Hey, after all, Mutually Assured Destruction saved us all from nuclear annihilation in the Cold War...why not use the same doctrine to save Europe and the US from a WMD attack. If Terror-sponsoring states in the Middle East knew what was at stake, they would hunt down the terrorists for us.
Great FIRST post!! :rolleyes:

Let's look at the most populous Muslim Countries:

The Largest Muslim Communities (http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam.html)

Top 10 Largest National Muslim Populations
Country Number of Muslims
Indonesia 170,310,000
Pakistan 136,000,000
Bangladesh 106,050,000
India 103,000,000
Turkey 62,410,000
Iran 60,790,000
Egypt 53,730,000
Nigeria 47,720,000
China 37,108,000

Methinks that your strategy is somewhat flawed, especially since 3 of those countries also have nuclear weapons. :eek:

And, of course... the whole dumb idea revolves around the belief that militants of OTHER inclinations, wouldn't just blow shit up to cause mass destruction.... kind of a worldwide scale 'suicide by cop'... except, dropping nukes at random, effectively.

So - some dude from the IRA sticks a bomb in Central Park, and then sits back to watch the US murder billions of innocents.

Yeah, I know that, but the idiocy of the idea is so great that I didn't bother dealing with the more obvious factors.

Great FIRST post!! :rolleyes:

Let's look at the most populous Muslim Countries:

The Largest Muslim Communities (http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam.html)

Top 10 Largest National Muslim Populations
Country Number of Muslims
Indonesia 170,310,000
Pakistan 136,000,000
Bangladesh 106,050,000
India 103,000,000
Turkey 62,410,000
Iran 60,790,000
Egypt 53,730,000
Nigeria 47,720,000
China 37,108,000

Methinks that your strategy is somewhat flawed, especially since 3 of those countries also have nuclear weapons. :eek:


But NONE of them have a good old fashioned taco stand. *nod*

But NONE of them have a good old fashioned taco stand. *nod*

You're right.

Screw Radio Free Iran, we need to get Awesome Taco Stand Iran!

You're right.

Screw Radio Free Iran, we need to get Awesome Taco Stand Iran!

They also need beer, but that is going to take some time. Still, the tacos will get our foot in the door. *nod* :)

BTW folks, this idea was proposed by:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/images/worldnetdaily.jpg

A right wing nutbar for sure!!

As awesome as this idea is, I have a better idea:

Tacos. Wait, hear me out!

Suicide bombers don't eat tacos. I checked. Also, militant radical fundamentalist religious nuts don't eat tacos either. I have conducted an extensive study and I have found a correlation. The more tacos someone eats, the less likely they are to bomb people. So I propose that we introduce the taco to the Middle East. :)
Would you like fries with that? :p

*squints at screen* If you force yourself to stop thinking, and adopt a fearful and paranoid attitude... I guess it's an okay plan. But it's amazingly silly once you... uhm... think. :rolleyes:

Would you like fries with that? :p

Guacamole. :)

Great idea. I'm sure it won't occur to the terrorists who do the bombing to not be in a large muslim city after the fact.

shit the fallout will kill them,no matter what cave they hide in...then we can take the oil and quit pissing around.

BTW folks, this idea was proposed by:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/images/worldnetdaily.jpg

A right wing nutbar for sure!!

WorldNUTdaily. :p

shit the fallout will kill them,no matter what cave they hide in...then we can take the oil and quit pissing around.

And to make things easier during the long nights ahead, the oil will most likely glow in the dark. Kewl.

Original Article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41771)
"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states. This will include all of the capitals and at least the 10 largest cities of all Islamic-dominated states and the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina. In addition, North Korean cities and military installations will be destroyed."

Hey, after all, Mutually Assured Destruction saved us all from nuclear annihilation in the Cold War...why not use the same doctrine to save Europe and the US from a WMD attack. If Terror-sponsoring states in the Middle East knew what was at stake, they would hunt down the terrorists for us.

really easy to be honest.

the liberals would be offended(and i am one)

tell them that in 1 week you will be nuked into glass shit we will put in museams(sp)
and if you dont want that..hand over the murderous scum you all seem to support..or we take the gloves off...and everyone suffers...not really complicated.

if not...nuke em..and i hardly support that option...but i also dont support some little brit kid getting blasted on a train cause they want me to bow to mecca every morning.

fuck them...police their own loonies or we will have to...and it will be ...god forbid..ugly...like them blowing up kids.

do they really think they can beat us in playing dirty...this is pissing me off.

i could be so much more evil then these fucktards...but alas..i have a modicum of morals...blow up more kids and watch that evaporate.

WorldNUTdaily. :p
Would you like your country nuked because some militant Muslim blew up some American property? Didn't think so.

That guy should never be allowed to write another column for cash rewards. Truly a nutbar!!

really easy to be honest.

the liberals would be offended(and i am one)

tell them that in 1 week you will be nuked into glass shit we will put in museams(sp)
and if you dont want that..hand over the murderous scum you all seem to support..or we take the gloves off...and everyone suffers...not really complicated.

if not...nuke em..and i hardly support that option...but i also dont support some little brit kid getting blasted on a train cause they want me to bow to mecca every morning.

fuck them...police their own loonies or we will have to...and it will be ...god forbid..ugly...like them blowing up kids.

do they really think they can beat us in playing dirty...this is pissing me off.

i could be so much more evil then these fucktards...but alas..i have a modicum of morals...blow up more kids and watch that evaporate.
Advocating nuclear destruction =/= "a modicum of morals"

Would you like your country nuked because some militant Muslim blew up some American property? Didn't think so.

That guy should never be allowed to write another column for cash rewards. Truly a nutbar!!

nuking a country is a last resort....how often has the us nuked people...shit...911 was almost..no....worse then pearl harbor...so we should take it on the chin?

i say ...give them the option...hand over the scumbag kid killerrs...or...your blasted....not to complicated.

either they support them for their own twisted or mis informed ideals....or they dont..but i am sick and tired of seeing kid getting blown up on buses going to school...fuck them...time for the "few" to suffer for the many.

dont like that..then go over their and negotiate....hope you come home with your head attacthed to your torso...but they are freedom fighters...lol...be my guest...cast your lot with the evil fucks(and your probably a good person)they count on that..be my guest.

it is far past the time where we give as shit about being pc..they gave up tghat right years ago...munich comes to mind.


bast em all to hell or let them change their tune,what do you think they will do?
i think they will want to fight..cause their brains are baked..and i say...take the fucking gloves off!

zombie by the cranberries come to mind...sad

nuking a country is a last resort....how often has the us nuked people...shit...911 was almost..no....worse then pearl harbor...so we should take it on the chin?

i say ...give them the option...hand over the scumbag kid killerrs...or...your blasted....not to complicated.

either they support them for their own twisted or mis informed ideals....or they dont..but i am sick and tired of seeing kid getting blown up on buses going to school...fuck them...time for the "few" to suffer for the many.

dont like that..then go over their and negotiate....hope you come home with your head attacthed to your torso...but they are freedom fighters...lol...be my guest...cast your lot with the evil fucks(and your probably a good person)they count on that..be my guest.

it is far past the time where we give as shit about being pc..they gave up tghat right years ago...munich comes to mind.


bast em all to hell or let them change their tune,what do you think they will do?
i think they will want to fight..cause their brains are baked..and i say...take the fucking gloves off!

zombie by the cranberries come to mind...sad
I think that your judgment is based on fear and hatred. Your solution will not work and will only cause greater nuclear poliferation and greater destructive forces to be unleashed.

Using nuclear weapons is NOT a viable option.

BTW, in regards to 9/11, how is America taking it on the chin? Afghanistan has been invaded and Iraq has been invaded illegally. IF anyone is taking it on the chin, it is the tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis who have died for Bush's unjust war. Your bleating about innocent kids on buses pales in comparison to the devestation inflicted upon Iraq.

really easy to be honest.

the liberals would be offended(and i am one)

tell them that in 1 week you will be nuked into glass shit we will put in museams(sp)
and if you dont want that..hand over the murderous scum you all seem to support..or we take the gloves off...and everyone suffers...not really complicated.

if not...nuke em..and i hardly support that option...but i also dont support some little brit kid getting blasted on a train cause they want me to bow to mecca every morning.

fuck them...police their own loonies or we will have to...and it will be ...god forbid..ugly...like them blowing up kids.

do they really think they can beat us in playing dirty...this is pissing me off.

i could be so much more evil then these fucktards...but alas..i have a modicum of morals...blow up more kids and watch that evaporate.

If the whole world operated like this, I would move to russia, make some pipebombs, buy an ak-47, and assault some moscow mall or something, taking out as many people as possible.

Just so Russia would have legitimate reason, in your logic, to nuke the fuck out of america.

Original Article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41771)
"I propose that the U.S. immediately adopt and publish the following nuclear doctrine:

In the event of a WMD attack by terrorists on the U.S. homeland or U.S. military facilities overseas, the U.S will immediately and without discussion use its immense nuclear weapons capabilities to destroy the 100 largest Islamic cities on earth, regardless of state, and destroy all of the military facilities of Islamic-dominated states. This will include all of the capitals and at least the 10 largest cities of all Islamic-dominated states and the "holy" cities of Mecca and Medina. In addition, North Korean cities and military installations will be destroyed."

Hey, after all, Mutually Assured Destruction saved us all from nuclear annihilation in the Cold War...why not use the same doctrine to save Europe and the US from a WMD attack. If Terror-sponsoring states in the Middle East knew what was at stake, they would hunt down the terrorists for us.
If you use that solution, then the entire Islamic world will simply kill us off with conventional weapons. They certainly have the manpower (1,000,000,000+ people), and are the fastest growing religion out there. They won't be using WMDs.

And besides that, we'd have the rest of the world on our asses. And I wouldn't go around nuking Islamabad if I were you.

Hah..hahah, it pains me to thinksome politicians are serious about these kinds of strategies. Ok, nuclear holocaust and radioactivity and bombing NYC by accident cuz lots of Muslims live there... heh, think of the global backlash. If, say the US actually nuked Mecca, the center city of the Islamic faith, the United States, and I am serious about this, would be destroyed. For one there are millions (dont ask how many, idk, some1 else probly does) of muslims, 99.999% perfectly normal, the rest kinda crazy I guess, who live in the good US of A. Think of how bad terrorism is now. Not..too bad in repect to what it could be. Dude. Think. Iran may or may not be only interested in have nuclear tech for power and not weapons, Im not going to argue that, but the moment we do this, they will develope the tech. All of Europe would be on our ass, all of Arabia, all our moderate muslim allies, (Turkey, n others) would be on our ass. Oil's bad now? where the hell are we going to get the blood of America once we pull off probably the worst attrocity in human history.

Basically in reality it's a deathwish. Posed by crazy people who've come to see the world as good guys-Christians vs. bad guys-Muslims. I think it's sad due to the ignorance of the radicals, hell on both sides. Honestly I've never realized what was so bad about Islam. Everything I've heard about Islam being bad and harsh and evil, has come from Christian radicals. Funny thing is that medeival europe people were executed for practically looking at the Church the wrong way.

I know its a long post, but what Im sayin is, the only bad thing I've heard about one side is from the other. In my view, all radicals are people to be looked at closely for they are dangerous...especially when given political power....one of my favorite sayings goes...All the extremists are involved in politics because the moderates have got shit to do.

Geeze...that was long. :rolleyes:

Is there a limit for stupidity? :headbang: if there is Im sure this idea is a LIMITBREAK!

Let's try this...

http://adminfoo.net/files/images/demons.of.stupidity.gif

oh yeah, nuking muslims fun stuff:rolleyes: this thread is an asshole.

I support tacos.

Seriously, its nearly impossible to find them on this side of the Atlantic, but they are genuinely one of the nicest foodstuffs around. If they were more readily available I'm sure we in the Olde Worlde would be much happier.

I support tacos.

Seriously, its nearly impossible to find them on this side of the Atlantic, but they are genuinely one of the nicest foodstuffs around. If they were more readily available I'm sure we in the Olde Worlde would be much happier.

I gather tacos for everyone?

Is there a limit for stupidity? :headbang: if there is Im sure this idea is a LIMITBREAK!

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Einstein.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Einstein.

Einstein liked tacos too.

I gather tacos for everyone?

Tacos For World Peace. :)

I'm going to have one attempt at logical argument, then I'll go with the taco idea.


and if you dont want that..hand over the murderous scum you all seem to support..or we take the gloves off...and everyone suffers...not really complicated.
How's this for an option, they don't necessarily know where they are, and saying "hand over the murderous scum or we'll become murderous scum", doesn't that seem the slightest bit hypocritical to you?


if not...nuke em..and i hardly support that option...but i also dont support some little brit kid getting blasted on a train cause they want me to bow to mecca every morning.

fuck them...police their own loonies or we will have to...and it will be ...god forbid..ugly...like them blowing up kids.

do they really think they can beat us in playing dirty...this is pissing me off.

See above


i could be so much more evil then these fucktards...but alas..i have a modicum of morals...blow up more kids and watch that evaporate.
Please tell me you're taking the piss. "if you blow up kids, I'll blow up more kids" :rolleyes:


I give up, tacos all the way.

Tacos For World Peace. :)

yes!:)

Einstein liked tacos too.

He was a smart guy. :)

He was a smart guy. :)

He was a jew

He was a smart guy. :)

Well, he was no Einst....err...yah, I guess he was.

He was a jew

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty." -Albert Einstein

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty." -Albert Einstein

"God does not play dice with the universe."
-Albert Einstein.

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty." -Albert Einstein

Im not saying thats bad, I'm just saying

Im not saying thats bad, I'm just saying
I'm not saying either. I'm just pointing out that while Einstein believed in God, he certainly didn't believe any of the generic religous dogmas. *nod*

"God does not play dice with the universe."
-Albert Einstein.

I would. Papa needs a new pair of... galaxies. :)

I would. Papa needs a new pair of... galaxies. :)

"Thank God Clowns dont run the universe."

-Me.

Im not saying thats bad, I'm just saying

Oy vey?

"Thank God Clowns dont run the universe."

-Me.

Because it's soooo well run now! :rolleyes:

I suspect that God is a mime. :p

Because it's soooo well run now! :rolleyes:

Point.



I suspect that God is a mime. :p


*head explodes*

As awesome as this idea is, I have a better idea:



Tacos. Wait, hear me out!

Suicide bombers don't eat tacos. I checked. Also, militant radical fundamentalist religious nuts don't eat tacos either. I have conducted an extensive study and I have found a correlation. The more tacos someone eats, the less likely they are to bomb people. So I propose that we introduce the taco to the Middle East. :)

Dude. Have you ever TRIED to find halal tacos?
Heck, just keeping the sour creme cold and getting the lettuce is tough... now consider the corn shell goodness.
No wonder they're all angry at the US -- there is a taco gap!

Yeah, I know that, but the idiocy of the idea is so great that I didn't bother dealing with the more obvious factors.

Sometimes you have to spell it out for the proles, though. :)

Dude. Have you ever TRIED to find halal tacos?
Heck, just keeping the sour creme cold and getting the lettuce is tough... now consider the corn shell goodness.
No wonder they're all angry at the US -- there is a taco gap!

One that must be closed. *nod*

As awesome as this idea is, I have a better idea:



Tacos. Wait, hear me out!

Suicide bombers don't eat tacos. I checked. Also, militant radical fundamentalist religious nuts don't eat tacos either. I have conducted an extensive study and I have found a correlation. The more tacos someone eats, the less likely they are to bomb people. So I propose that we introduce the taco to the Middle East. :)
I have an even better vision:
Doritos

Why Doritos over Tacos?
Because they're already proven to be effective at subduing ME inhabitants.

Case in point: Saddam Hussein. Apparently he craves Doritos and has been eating them for the past couple of years.
And in that time, how many people has he killed?
NONE!

Thus, my point is proven:
Doritos*psycho Middle Eastener = peaceful puppy.

Someone's been into the Strangelove again. What did I tell you about Strangelove before bed?!
But we cannot allow a mineshaft gap!

Dearborn, too. :eek:

*big white blinding flash*

oh, crap

BTW folks, this idea was proposed by:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/images/worldnetdaily.jpg

A right wing nutbar for sure!!
Too true:
Here's a quote from another article on their site. This one is about how some people were lobbying California legislature to ban "all sexual orientation and gender identity in textbooks, classroom materials and school-sponsored activities"
The asshat's comment on this?

This is not as education. This is homosexual reproduction.
Since homosexuals don't reproduce naturally, they need to recruit – not to be their children, mind you, but to be their prey. That's why they care so much about what happens in schools – where they obviously have few of their own children.
...
Let's be honest; there's only one reason to teach kindergarteners about sexual perversion – and that is to raise a new generation of pliable sexual victims of that perversion.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51994
I mean, c'mon. I thought this bigoted asshat thinking disappeared around the same time as the last woolly mammoth.
Obviously not.
Methinks this author's ancestors were in the evolutionary control group.

I have an even better vision:
Doritos

Why Doritos over Tacos?
Because they're already proven to be effective at subduing ME inhabitants.

Case in point: Saddam Hussein. Apparently he craves Doritos and has been eating them for the past couple of years.
And in that time, how many people has he killed?
NONE!

Thus, my point is proven:
Doritos*psycho Middle Eastener = peaceful puppy.


Interesting theory. :p

Tea! Everyone MUST have TEAHHHAAAA!!!

http://www.utsa.edu/today/images/events/wow/2002/tea.jpg

In the Name of Her Imperial Majesty taco's are banned and TEAHHHHAAAA is the order of the DAY!!!

HUZZAH!!!

no need to thistroy all of mecca. we can just fly a missile into the kabba, preferably during that stupid hajj so there are millions of muslims witnessing the destruction of their religion, and declare mecca a basic average city.

I'm sure the fallout from the nukes wouldn't harm us good Christian folk right?

pray to jesus and it will all be grand.

no need to thistroy all of mecca. we can just fly a missile into the kabba, and declare mecca a basic average city.

Cup of tea love?

So - some dude from the IRA sticks a bomb in Central Park, and then sits back to watch the US murder billions of innocents.

why would the ira bomb a country that funded it?

pray to jesus and it will all be grand.

whats the point in praying to a corpse?

[QUOTE=Demented Hamsters;11688212]I have an even better vision:
Doritos

QUOTE]

sorry i'm votiung for phillios fog tortillas.

sorry i'm votiung for phillios fog tortillas.
nope. Doritos all the way. Look at Saddam: That man hasn't killed anyone in the last couple of years. He's not even poked a Kurd with a pointy stick. It's plainly obvious that Doritos have changed him entirely.

We start parachuting Doritos down all over Iraq, Gaza, Afghanistan, Iran, Lebannon and all our problems will be solved.

well this thread has been officially highjacked

whats the point in praying to a corpse?

About the same as praying to money or science, which most people do anyway.

I think roof should put a hat on so this weird thaoughts don't leak out.

Tacos are a danger to National Security. Just ask lawmakers in Gwinnett County GA www.csmonitor.com/2006/0719/p03s03-ussc.html

Tacos are a danger to National Security. Just ask lawmakers in Gwinnett County GA www.csmonitor.com/2006/0719/p03s03-ussc.html

Bastards! I want my taco stand! :mad:

Hah..hahah, it pains me to thinksome politicians are serious about these kinds of strategies. Ok, nuclear holocaust and radioactivity and bombing NYC by accident cuz lots of Muslims live there... heh, think of the global backlash. If, say the US actually nuked Mecca, the center city of the Islamic faith, the United States, and I am serious about this, would be destroyed.


Hell, I'd help and i'm not Muslim.

http://www.p0stwh0res.com/images/offtopic.gif

That wouldn't be free, you tit.

Technically, we've already paid for the weapons. What good is an ICBM with several thermonuclear warheads if you never use it?

And think of the astonishingly bad PR it generates. I mean, if you think people were upset at the US now, you haven't seen anything yet.

Now technically, there have been discussions since the early 1990s about the proper response to a single terrorist detonation of a real nuclear weapon within the US - and the response requires the US to identify the state that sponsored the terrorist act. So, if it's done by al-Qaeda, there's not really anyone to nuke, unless we want to blame Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Yemen. And if the sponsor is Iran, well, that's pretty simple.

The response involves a tit for tat exchange - with the same demand that the US gave Japan in early August of 1945. Surrender, or we do one city every few days until your country surrenders unconditionally.

The thought exercise, and the subsequent policy is described in the book, "Tomorrow's War".

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51994
I mean, c'mon. I thought this bigoted asshat thinking disappeared around the same time as the last woolly mammoth.
Obviously not.

This 'bigotted asshat thinking', as you call it, is a living link to our past and should be preserved behind glass in a museum somewhere.

Tea! Everyone MUST have TEAHHHAAAA!!!

http://www.utsa.edu/today/images/events/wow/2002/tea.jpg

In the Name of Her Imperial Majesty taco's are banned and TEAHHHHAAAA is the order of the DAY!!!

HUZZAH!!!
Say old chap, do you mean a "cuppa char"?