NationStates Jolt Archive


Blair and America

Philosopy
14-09-2006, 22:45
Former US President Jimmy Carter has said he believes Britain wasted a strong voice in the forming of US/UK common foreign policy.
Mr Carter told Newsnight: "I have been really disappointed in the apparent subservience of the British government's policies related to many of the serious mistakes that have been originated in Washington."

Mr Carter, an opponent of the US-led war in Iraq, added: "No matter what kind of radical or ill-advised policy was proposed from the White House, it seems to me that almost automatically the government of Great Britain would adopt the same policy without exerting its influence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5346976.stm

Is the President right? Could/should Blair have done more, and if so, what? Would it be fair to lay the blame for Iraq on the doorstep of Number 10, not the White House?
Philosopy
14-09-2006, 23:39
Is this boring because:

a) it's an old argument
b) it's Jimmy Carter
c) it's just boring?
Hydesland
14-09-2006, 23:41
Is this boring because:

a) it's an old argument
b) it's Jimmy Carter
c) it's just boring?

A little from collumn A, a little from collumn b, and a little from that lovely old C.
Philosopy
14-09-2006, 23:44
A little from collumn A, a little from collumn b, and a little from that lovely old C.
Thought so. It's difficult to get excited about Jimmy Carter.
The Black Forrest
14-09-2006, 23:48
Now now.

Carter the elder statesman is far better then Carter the President.
Neo Undelia
14-09-2006, 23:51
Now now.

Carter the elder statesman is far better then Carter the President.
He’s still a condescending asshole.
Farnhamia
14-09-2006, 23:52
Now now.

Carter the elder statesman is far better then Carter the President.

I quite agree. And he's still eligible, you know, only served the one term. Maybe we could draft him in '08.
The Black Forrest
14-09-2006, 23:56
He’s still a condescending asshole.

How so?

I met him once and didn't get that impression at all....