NationStates Jolt Archive

You know you're curious . . .

http://www.billoreilly.com/quiz?action=viewQuiz&quizID=134&destinationpage=/pg/jsp/community/cwtest.jsp

Of course, my results were:

"Based on the answers you gave...
You are a traditional warrior."

But you knew that already :D

im secular and progressive...how embarassing.

Based on the answers you gave...
You lean heavily towards being a traditional warrior.

I'm moderate

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

Bah, five question quiz? Borr-ring. :|

Based on the answers you gave...
You lean heavily towards being an S-P.

Really I can't stand this whole culture war bullshit.

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

Bah, five question quiz? Borr-ring. :|

you were looking for a comprehensive psychological assesment?

its bill o'reilly! your lucky it didn't consist of one question:

1.Do you hate america?
A.yes B.no

I'm in the "secular-progressive" camp. Excellent.

Based on the answers you gave...
You are an S-P.




That was a very short quiz. I clicked yes for all the questions. :)

I'm in the "secular-progressive" camp. Excellent.

*shakes hand*

long live the american constitution

Based on the answers you gave...
You lean heavily towards being an S-P.

Where was the "I don't know" option? :mad:

Do you believe the definition of marriage should include homosexuals?


What if I answer no, but because I reject the notion of marriage as a statist institution in the first place, with no regard to the particular combination of genitalia involved?


Are you against states legally mandating that parents be informed when their underage daughters have abortions?


What if I answer no, but qualify that answer by saying that I voted against said proposal in my own state because it was presented as a constitutional amendment, and the issue in question has nothing to do with defining and instituting the structures of a state government?

I need not even take the test at all, and I already know that i do not fit within O'Reilly's extremely tiny box, one way or the other. Which is just fine.

(edti: Ah, what the heck... "You have some traditional beliefs, but have not committed to either side." My Political Compass and Moral Politics results suggest otherwise Bill. But then those aren't made to depict anyone who even slightly wanders out of your own tiny box as the antichrist incarnate.)

It has 5 questions because that's how many the average Bill O'Reilly audience can answer in 3 hours. :p

2. Do you believe the definition of marriage should include homosexuals?
King's Row
Knute Rockne All American
Home Are The Brave




3. Do you believe the definition of marriage should include homosexuals?
King's Row
Knute Rockne All American
Home Are The Brave

Is this quiz illucid?
A. Pineapples
B. 2 + 2 = 4
C. Why is it repeating itself?
D. Why is it repeating itself?

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some traditional beliefs, but have not committed to either side.

Secular progressive here. Big surprise :D

I hate all cultures.

Based on the answers you gave...
You lean heavily towards being a traditional warrior.

You lean heavily towards being an S-P.

I wonder if Bill has settled his sexual harassment suit.....

You lean heavily towards being an S-P.

I wonder if Bill has settled his sexual harassment suit.....

Have you heard the recording? He even sucks at harassment.

BAM, bitches: "You are a traditional warrior."

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

Dear lord..

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

Dear lord..

*Pushes Ruffy into a side*

*Doesnt look to see which side he lands on*

*Pushes Ruffy into a side*

*Doesnt look to see which side he lands on*

*crashes into Pat Robertson*

You bastard!

*crashes into Pat Robertson*

You bastard!

MWAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAH :D

*Watches as Pat summons hell-fire to strike Ruffy*

You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.
Oh, yeah, that's right. Because not thinking that the US is bad by definition, and that rich people shouldn't be punished for being rich makes me a "culture warrior". :rolleyes:

im secular and progressive...how embarassing.
Me too, and I wear it as a badge of honor.

Oh, yeah, that's right. Because not thinking that the US is bad by definition, and that rich people shouldn't be punished for being rich makes me a "culture warrior". :rolleyes:
Goddamn right.

MWAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAH :D

*Watches as Pat summons hell-fire to strike Ruffy*

*furiously scratches at the door*
*finger nails fall off*
*bursts into flames*

Oh, yeah, that's right. Because not thinking that the US is bad by definition, and that rich people shouldn't be punished for being rich makes me a "culture warrior". :rolleyes:

Well..according to the test, that, along with the other things that you voted S-P on (had you voted "conservative") would have made you a culture warrior, yes.

I think I had 100% towards S&P.
*scratches head*
What the hell is a "Culture Warrior", anyhow?

I'm moderate

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some S-P beliefs, but have not yet committed to either side.

same.


but not surprising. either "fighting the good fight" or "secular-progressive (fucking buzzwords) pinko-commie"

Based on the answers you gave...
You have some traditional beliefs, but have not committed to either side

Sounds a bit like me...

"You have some traditional beliefs, but have not committed to either side."

I think I had 100% towards S&P.
*scratches head*
What the hell is a "Culture Warrior", anyhow?A Bill O'Reilly clone, I'd imagine.

Apparently I've got some traditional beliefs, but I'm not loyal to either side.

My answers:

Question 1: No, Christ no, for the love of all that doesn't suck, no.
Question 2: I don't see why not, it's got nothing to do with me, yes.
Question 3: Fuck yes.
Question 4: Absolutely not! Bush may be incompetent, but the US is still a powerful force for good.
Question 5: No. The 'rents generally have to OK anything else kids do, why should abortion be any different. Fuck, when I was 17 I needed my parents siggy to go with the band to Bowling Green for a concert.

Question 5: No. The 'rents generally have to OK anything else kids do, why should abortion be any different.

Because parents have no right to compel their children to go through pregnancy.

Because parents have no right to compel their children to go through pregnancy.

Parents force kids to do a whole lot of things that the kid isn't necessarily happy with. Are we going to do away with those things as well?

Parents force kids to do a whole lot of things that the kid isn't necessarily happy with. Are we going to do away with those things as well?

When they concern a decision like pregnancy, absolutely. And what if the girl in question has been raped by a family member?

When they concern a decision like pregnancy, absolutely. And what if the girl in question has been raped by a family member?

If the kid's been raped by a family member, then Child Protective Services has a role to play.

But there are many, many big decisions that parents force kids to deal with. Once again, how is pregnancy any different?

while im ther, i think i will buy a bill orielly t shirt

But there are many, many big decisions that parents force kids to deal with. Once again, how is pregnancy any different?

Because it's a question of basic bodily autonomy and the choice will have significance throughout the rest of the child's life.

The only circumstances in which parents are entitled to exercise their authority are when a child in engaging in activities that harm others or that harm herself; the risks associated with abortion are not severe enough to mitigate the loss of freedom any child compelled to go through pregnancy would suffer.

Because it's a question of basic bodily autonomy and the choice will have significance throughout the rest of the child's life.

The only circumstances in which parents are entitled to exercise their authority are when a child in engaging in activities that harm others or that harm herself; the risks associated with abortion are not severe enough to mitigate the loss of freedom any child compelled to go through pregnancy would suffer.

You've still not addressed my concerns about other issues of potentially vital importance. Things like marriage, schooling, that sort of stuff.

Hell, I'm not even arguing for parental consent. I'm arguing for parental notification.

You've still not addressed my concerns about other issues of potentially vital importance. Things like marriage, schooling, that sort of stuff.

I don't think parents should be entitled to prevent marriage (once the kid is above, say, thirteen) and the argument could be reasonably made that compulsory education is immoral, especially as the students grow older.

Edit: Also, both of those fall under the category of "harming herself."

Hell, I'm not even arguing for parental consent. I'm arguing for parental notification.

All too often, it amounts to the same thing.