NationStates Jolt Archive


Hitler or Stalin?

Hobovillia
02-09-2006, 13:52
I'm more of a Hitler-enemy than a Stalin one.
Scarlet States
02-09-2006, 13:56
Are we voting for who we prefer or who we hate more?
Hobovillia
02-09-2006, 13:58
Are we voting for who we prefer or who we hate more?

Whatever you want, honey!
Scarlet States
02-09-2006, 13:59
I choose myrth.
New Lofeta
02-09-2006, 14:02
Hitler was a better enemy, Stalin kinda stayed out of the Limelight too much.

(Woo... people are copying my threads...)
Hobovillia
02-09-2006, 14:03
I choose myrth.

Copycat.

:mad:
New Lofeta
02-09-2006, 14:07
Copycat.

:mad:

Look who's talking.... :p
JiangGuo
02-09-2006, 14:08
Stalin - unlike Hitler he actually died of (probably) natural causes, while still in power. Poisoning theories by Beria aside.

Stalin made some really unwise choices in the early Soviet-German War, but with a few strokes of luck, his "all-means-necessary" leadership saw it through from the gates of Stalingrad to Berlin.
Phenixica
02-09-2006, 14:09
I hate them yet admire them.

Hitler for the way he legally turned Germany into a Ditatorship, But i kind of hate him for the WW2 and whole kill Jewish thing.

Stalin was just a Paranoid moron, But i thank him for his contribution to the War nomatter how late it came.
New Lofeta
02-09-2006, 14:13
Stalin was just a Paranoid moron, But i thank him for his contribution to the War nomatter how late it came.

Well, all my respect for Mr S. is destroyed because he turned the World's first Worker's Government into a corrupt police state.
Phenixica
02-09-2006, 14:17
Yeah but he made it that way because he was very,very paranoid.
Omnibragaria
02-09-2006, 14:25
Well, all my respect for Mr S. is destroyed because he turned the World's first Worker's Government into a corrupt police state.

There has never been a Worker's Government. One can romanticize the past and rewrite history all one wants, but from the very beginning of Marxism/Communism it was about a handful of elitists *using* populism and the working class in order to attain power.
Hobovillia
02-09-2006, 14:26
Hitler and Stalin are both sick bastards in my mind.

Stalin even more so.

Wait, I don't know.

Sorry I'm really indecisive. Myrth ate my children.
Phenixica
02-09-2006, 14:37
True, but then Communism was always more of a ideal.

Problem is people like the existance of a hiarchy because people like being better then others.
Jenrak
02-09-2006, 14:42
Myrth is the most evil of them all.
Cheese-wizia
02-09-2006, 14:52
Stalin....all the way lol
Super-power
02-09-2006, 14:55
To quote a friend:
"Piss or shit, take your pick."
They both equally suck.
Eralis
02-09-2006, 15:12
asid efrom the evils they did i would say stalin was good because of his police state and because im all for communism..but i have to go with hitler...hitler was a lover of history and art...that is why no major building that dealt with art or history was destroyed in ww2....also if it werent for him none of the people that came over here to get away from the nazi would have ever come and and in doing as such he is in part responsible for the progress of our country scientifically and militarily
Super-power
02-09-2006, 15:15
aside from the evils they did i would say stalin was good because of his police state and because im all for communism
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the communist ideology opposed to a police state?
New Stalinberg
02-09-2006, 15:20
What are you asking?

Anyway, Stalin is the worse of the two, and don't give me, "BUT HITLER KILL JEWS!!!!!!11" Because 33 million Russians died, and most of those deaths were caused by Stalin, not by the Germans.
Kanabia
02-09-2006, 15:22
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the communist ideology opposed to a police state?

Yes. What is it with all these fauxialists lately?
New Stalinberg
02-09-2006, 15:23
asid efrom the evils they did i would say stalin was good because of his police state and because im all for communism..but i have to go with hitler...hitler was a lover of history and art...that is why no major building that dealt with art or history was destroyed in ww2....also if it werent for him none of the people that came over here to get away from the nazi would have ever come and and in doing as such he is in part responsible for the progress of our country scientifically and militarily

Please, move to North Korea and tell us if you still love it.

And for the love of God, use proper puncuation.

There was actually a chapel from the 16th century that was destroyed.
Kamsaki
02-09-2006, 15:45
Rawr. Mussolini FTW!
Swilatia
02-09-2006, 16:07
stalin is worse. but the worst is mao.
Republica de Tropico
02-09-2006, 16:12
To quote a friend:
"Piss or shit, take your pick."
They both equally suck.

Piss is healthier. It's actually sterile. It can be easily rinsed off. On the other hand, shit is almost entirely dead or living bacteria. It's a breeding ground for disease, not to mention a carrier for parasites.

Are you really going to say that you have NO preference, you'd be just as happy chompin on shit as you would imbibing a little urine?
The blessed Chris
02-09-2006, 16:27
Stalin was a more proficient politician, had a normal sex life, and enjoyed himself. Hitler was an ascetic freak.
Allers
02-09-2006, 17:06
jesus,mahomet,
the one
the only one
The other one are shit
Soviestan
02-09-2006, 17:09
I would rather live in Germany under hitler than in the USSR under Stalin. Plus Stalin killed far more people than Hitler. I take Hitler.
Soviestan
02-09-2006, 17:09
stalin is worse. but the worst is mao.

err, no. Mao was a good man.
Liberated New Ireland
02-09-2006, 17:11
I prefer Stalin, 'cause he inspired One Day In The Life of Ivan Denisovich, one of my favorite books of all time. Hitler is just filler on the History channel...
Allers
02-09-2006, 17:12
err, no. Mao was a good man.
looks like corporation got it right
:fluffle:
Pacitalia
02-09-2006, 17:14
Stalin is a piss stain on the history of the Russian nation.

Hitler, however... goldmine... of... love. Yes... love.
Utracia
02-09-2006, 17:15
They were both psychos. How can I choose who I hate more? Hitler killed people because he was a racist prick and Stalin just killed anyone who he thought was an enemy... I guess that makes Stalin better, he didn't care who he killed.
Liberated New Ireland
02-09-2006, 17:16
Stalin is a piss stain on the history of the Russian nation.

Hitler, however... goldmine... of... love. Yes... love.

As in... the Ministry of Love?:confused::eek::(
Eon8
02-09-2006, 17:16
HALT
HAMMERZEIT

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/lunarsandwich/hammerzeit.jpg
Allers
02-09-2006, 17:22
democracy?
Liberated New Ireland
02-09-2006, 17:24
HALT
HAMMERZEIT

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b88/lunarsandwich/hammerzeit.jpg

:D :D :D
Anti-Social Darwinism
02-09-2006, 17:40
This is like choosing death by slow torture or death by slow, incredibly painful poison. They were both evil, they were both responsible for the deaths of millions of innocents. How can I choose which one to despise more?
Allers
02-09-2006, 17:42
This is like choosing death by slow torture or death by slow, incredibly painful poison. They were both evil, they were both responsible for the deaths of millions of innocents. How can I choose which one to despise more?
choice is the way