NationStates Jolt Archive

If the New York Times is a credible source for you.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/world/europe/28plot.html?ex=1314417600&en=e1d83c082e48e461&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Just getting more impression that the case is not "about nothing" and that the government indeed does have a plethora of evidence.

Assuming that the NYT isn't pulling a Jayson Blair, or a Judith Miller, it all sounds good for the prosecution.

On advice of legal counsel, this article is unavailable to readers of nytimes.com in Britain. This arises from the requirement in British law that prohibits publication of prejudicial information about the defendants prior to trial.

On advice of legal counsel, this article is unavailable to readers of nytimes.com in Britain. This arises from the requirement in British law that prohibits publication of prejudicial information about the defendants prior to trial.

Same here. Anyone want to copy and paste this article?

Same here. Anyone want to copy and paste this article?

August 28, 2006
Details Emerge in British Terror Case
By DON VAN NATTA Jr., ELAINE SCIOLINO and STEPHEN GREY

LONDON, Aug. 27 — [CENSORED]