NationStates Jolt Archive

Why are Jews so overrepresented? Why isn't there an affirmative action program for Nobel Prizes? Think of the poor Muslims, who must feel belittled by the fact that the Jews are winning so often!

Oh, the bigots! And the ACM needs to put affirmative action into their Turing Prize program - and chess programs around the world need more affirmative action! Obviously, bigots are everywhere, promoting Jews!
</sarcasm>
Ashkenazi Jews have a noted history of achievement. Though only 0.25% of the world population, Jewish scientists make up 28% of Nobel prize winners in physics, chemistry, medicine, and economics, and have accounted for more than half of world chess champions.[20] In the United States, Ashkenazi Jews represent 2% of the population, but have won 40% of the US Nobel Prizes in science, and 25% of the ACM Turing Awards (the Nobel-equivalent in computer science). A significant decline in the number of Nobel prizes awarded to Europeans and a corresponding increase in the number of prizes awarded to US citizens occurred at the same time as Nazi persecutions of Jews during the 1930s and the Holocaust during the 1940s.[21]

I honestly see no point to this thread at all.

They don't really win that many Nobel prizes, it's just that the media reports it that way because the media is controlled by the Jews.

I honestly see no point to this thread at all.
The point is, if something is so obviously biased in favor of Jews, and against Muslims, it must be bigoted at the core.
</sarcasm>

They don't really win that many Nobel prizes, it's just that the media reports it that way because the media is controlled by the Jews.
I see you still have yours.

I still have my what?

Not that the world needs another muslim bashing thread....just some in it do....

Not that the world needs another muslim bashing thread....just some in it do....
WTF?

http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/taunt001.gif

Not that the world needs another muslim bashing thread....just some in it do....
Or a jew bashing thread!

Not that the world needs another muslim bashing thread....just some in it do....
Hey, I'm not bashing Muslims!

Or a jew bashing thread!
I'm bashing the Nobel Committee!

I still have my what?

Put your finger between your eyes and move it up - you should hit it about forehead-center.

tasteless......................

Or a jew bashing thread!

No, no Jew Bashing either.

I honestly see no point to this thread at all.

It is because he has had his arse handed to him on a plater on another thread (Evidence thread), that he has decided to try and hide by creating another thread...which needless to say consists of talking points and nothing of his own input.

It is because he has had his arse handed to him on a plater on another thread (Evidence thread), that he has decided to try and hide by creating another thread...which needless to say consists of talking points and nothing of his own input.
Ok while I agree with your viewpoint, following a poster thread to thread harassing is not allowed on the forum … I don’t want to see you or any one else get in trouble when tempers are flaring up

It is because he has had his arse handed to him on a plater on another thread (Evidence thread), that he has decided to try and hide by creating another thread...which needless to say consists of talking points and nothing of his own input.
once again, "talking points".

Do you honestly believe in the uberconspiracy that Karl Rove has agents all over the Internet, posting his "talking points" in forums?

I honestly see no point to this thread at all.
Trolling to mask admittance of his own bigotry and prejudice.

once again, "talking points".

Do you honestly believe in the uberconspiracy that Karl Rove has agents all over the Internet, posting his "talking points" in forums?
You like your strawmen, don't you?

Hey DK... can you make a thread without hinting at Bigotry or Hatred of any kind?

Hey, I'm not bashing Muslims!
no your just bashing people who support religious and racial equality,unless your just a very silly person with no sense of humour or irony........

Hey DK... can you make a thread without hinting at Bigotry or Hatred of any kind?
I'm not the one who constantly calls others "bigot". It seems to be the popular word of the Left.

Nooobody expects the JEWISH INQUISITION!

no your just bashing people who support religious and racial equality,unless your just a very silly person with no sense of humour or irony........

I have a lot more humor than Pantless, that's for sure, who had his sense of humor excised in surgery.

I'm not the one who constantly calls others "bigot". It seems to be the popular word of the Left.

Well it is an appropriate label for many on the right.

i hate stating the obvious but:

http://img18.photobucket.com/albums/v55/krazykit/2004-03-22_104550_troll.gif

Well it is an appropriate label for many on the right.
I've noticed the words used as labels when people run out of ideas.

"Talking points" "bigot" "racist" etc.

From the same people with the condescending attitude that "we in the West must hold ourselves to a high standard, but not expect as much from the benighted brown people"

Incredibly arrogant stuff, and the very definition of bigot and racist - but they can't see that at all.

Why are Jews so overrepresented? Why isn't there an affirmative action program for Nobel Prizes? Think of the poor Muslims, who must feel belittled by the fact that the Jews are winning so often!

Oh, the bigots! And the ACM needs to put affirmative action into their Turing Prize program - and chess programs around the world need more affirmative action! Obviously, bigots are everywhere, promoting Jews!
</sarcasm>

...

So...trolling, huh?

I've noticed the words used as labels when people run out of ideas.

"Talking points" "bigot" "racist" etc.

From the same people with the condescending attitude that "we in the West must hold ourselves to a high standard, but not expect as much from the benighted brown people"

Incredibly arrogant stuff, and the very definition of bigot and racist - but they can't see that at all.
And you know sometimes “labels” are used to correctly classify something.

So...trolling, huh?
Nope.

Think about it.

What reason can you think as to why so many Jews win, and so few Muslims, if we are all created equal, and Muslims outnumber Jews by orders of magnitude.

Why? If you say Jews are intellectually advantaged in some way, people will say you're a bigot. If you can't say that, then it must be bias in the Nobel Committee.

And you know sometimes “labels” are used to correctly classify something.

like bagels....they may look like doughnuts, bu their hard n' chewy

Why are Jews so overrepresented? Why isn't there an affirmative action program for Nobel Prizes? Think of the poor Muslims, who must feel belittled by the fact that the Jews are winning so often!

Oh, the bigots! And the ACM needs to put affirmative action into their Turing Prize program - and chess programs around the world need more affirmative action! Obviously, bigots are everywhere, promoting Jews!
</sarcasm>
I happen to agree that there is clear bias and bigotry in the Nobel Committee. Hell, they gave a Peace Prize to the likes of Mother Teresa. That's some sick and twisted shit.

like bagels....they may look like doughnuts, bu their hard n' chewy
Exactly ... but clasifying them as such means you have run out of ideas!

I happen to agree that there is clear bias and bigotry in the Nobel Committee. Hell, they gave a Peace Prize to the likes of Mother Teresa. That's some sick and twisted shit.
Oooh - they favor Catholics! Is there a Judeo-Christian bias in the Nobel Committee? Is that why Muslims are so downtrodden in science? Bias! Bigotry!

Oooh - they favor Catholics! Is there a Judeo-Christian bias in the Nobel Committee? Is that why Muslims are so downtrodden in science? Bias! Bigotry!
That’s not what she said … but I happen to agree with her … they either did not do their homework or are biased when they handed that one out

That’s not what she said … but I happen to agree with her … they either did not do their homework or are biased when they handed that one out
I'm not saying that's what she said. I'm asking a question.

Oooh - they favor Catholics! Is there a Judeo-Christian bias in the Nobel Committee? Is that why Muslims are so downtrodden in science? Bias! Bigotry!

yeah that, oooorrrrr he was making a joke, man thats like a preemptive straw-man

Nope.

Think about it.

What reason can you think as to why so many Jews win, and so few Muslims, if we are all created equal, and Muslims outnumber Jews by orders of magnitude.

Why? If you say Jews are intellectually advantaged in some way, people will say you're a bigot. If you can't say that, then it must be bias in the Nobel Committee.

Yes, clearly Muslims are mentally deficient and a sub-race. Never mind that "Muslim" isn't actually a race, and includes Arabs, Persians, and a very large number of ethnicities from south and southeast Asia.

Kidding aside, I think the problem is that much of the Islamic world has not liberalized and therefore hasn't done so for its educational systems. Back in the Middle Ages, actually, Muslims were among the leaders in philosophy, literature, science and medicine (think Averroes, Avicenna etc.), and Islam was generally practiced in a more liberal way. But, you know, there can't be a correlation there, right?

Yes, clearly Muslims are mentally deficient and a sub-race. Never mind that "Muslim" isn't actually a race, and includes Arabs, Persians, and a very large number of ethnicities from south and southeast Asia.

Note carefully that I did not say this.

Kidding aside, I think the problem is that much of the Islamic world has not liberalized and therefore hasn't done so for its educational systems. Back in the Middle Ages, actually, Muslims were among the leaders in philosophy, literature, science and medicine (think Averroes, Avicenna etc.), and Islam was generally practiced in a more liberal way. But, you know, there can't be a correlation there, right?

So, your hypothesis on why they entered a long period of intellectual stagnation?

Yes, clearly Muslims are mentally deficient and a sub-race. Never mind that "Muslim" isn't actually a race, and includes Arabs, Persians, and a very large number of ethnicities from south and southeast Asia.

Kidding aside, I think the problem is that much of the Islamic world has not liberalized and therefore hasn't done so for its educational systems. Back in the Middle Ages, actually, Muslims were among the leaders in philosophy, literature, science and medicine (think Averroes, Avicenna etc.), and Islam was generally practiced in a more liberal way. But, you know, there can't be a correlation there, right?

Just to be a jerk, Averroes(muhammed ibn-rushd) was trying to mix Aristotalian reason with religion, most philosophers especially modern ones with the exception of Thomas Aquinas think that this is pretty much impossible with "revealed religions"

So, your hypothesis on why they entered a long period of intellectual stagnation?


The defeat of the Mutazilites' school of thought, the Mongol invasions that destroyed the libraries of Baghdad and other cities, later European colonization...

I don't know, man, take a history class.

I'm not the one who constantly calls others "bigot". It seems to be the popular word of the Left.no, but your threads tend to reflex that sentiment. your title, for example, could've been worded differently.. like
"ever noticed this about the Nobel Committee?"
or even
"unusual Fact about the Nobel Prize Committee."

The defeat of the Mutazilites' school of thought, the Mongol invasions that destroyed the libraries of Baghdad and other cities, later European colonization...

I don't know, man, take a history class.
I think the problem was the Ottoman Empire.

I think the problem was the Ottoman Empire.

I think that was one of several problems, yes.

I think that was one of several problems, yes.
A long period of decadence and rot. And, when the humiliations began to happen in the 19th century at the hands of the West, people turned inwards to fundamentalism (some, not all, but enough to crush any free thought).

I think the problem was the Ottoman Empire.

Uh, yeah it was their collapse and division after WWI that caused a lot of the problems in the M.E. right now...

Uh, yeah it was their collapse and division after WWI that caused a lot of the problems in the M.E. right now...
Ah, the magic line drawing by the British...

here's Kuwait, and here's Jordan, and here's Iraq, and here's Saudi Arabia, and..... here's Israel...

I'm not certain what the criteria is that the Nobel Committee uses when it hands out prizes, so I can't say whether or not they're bigoted and racist.

I'm not certain what the criteria is that the Nobel Committee uses when it hands out prizes, so I can't say whether or not they're bigoted and racist.
Well, supporters of affirmative action in the US say that all you have to do to determine if the policies are racist and bigoted is look at the proportions.

If one group is getting awards way out of proportion to their numbers, obviously bigotry is in action.

Because we're all equally intelligent...

Ah, the magic line drawing by the British...

here's Kuwait, and here's Jordan, and here's Iraq, and here's Saudi Arabia, and..... here's Israel...

yes, and the whole "we'll just give every Abrahamic religion its own country"
theory Lebanon for the christians, Israel for the jews, and syria for the muslims

in other words lets put a monkey, dynamite, and matches in one room....see what happens...

DK, you aren't funny. You are a racist. You are a bigot. You make all these idiotic posts and threads from the "liberal" perspective, trying to make it sound like you are a victim or something.

You support rounding up muslims and killing them, because they are muslims.

You are a racist, and a genocidal maniac. Please, do yourself and everyone else a favor, and disconnect your internet.

DK, you aren't funny. You are a racist. You are a bigot. You make all these idiotic posts and threads from the "liberal" perspective, trying to make it sound like you are a victim or something.

You support rounding up muslims and killing them, because they are muslims.

You are a racist, and a genocidal maniac. Please, do yourself and everyone else a favor, and disconnect your internet.

I say we start a poll called "is deep kimchi a threat to the west?"


whos with me?

yes, and the whole "we'll just give every Abrahamic religion its own country"
theory Lebanon for the christians, Israel for the jews, and syria for the muslims

in other words lets put a monkey, dynamite, and matches in one room....see what happens...

Well, it's a little late now. I think the fuse is already lit.

Note carefully that I did not say this.


Forgive me if I misunderstood you, but please explain this statement.


What reason can you think as to why so many Jews win, and so few Muslims, if we are all created equal, and Muslims outnumber Jews by orders of magnitude.

Why? If you say Jews are intellectually advantaged in some way, people will say you're a bigot. If you can't say that, then it must be bias in the Nobel Committee.

You might not have meant it, but you implied that Muslims are inherently less intelligent, and not just for cultural reasons.

I say we start a poll called "is deep kimchi a threat to the west?"

whos with me?
I vote yes.

Forgive me if I misunderstood you, but please explain this statement.

You might not have meant it, but you implied that Muslims are inherently less intelligent, and not just for cultural reasons.
Nope. I gave my two reasons.

You're filling in your own. Bigot.

http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/taunt001.gif
.

i think this thread has officially, caught fire.

I'm not aware of any supporter of affirmative action who looks solely at the proportions to determine if certain policies are racist. Affirmative action is needed for many reasons, only one of which is the proportions.
The 8-A program in the US, for one.

Well, supporters of affirmative action in the US say that all you have to do to determine if the policies are racist and bigoted is look at the proportions.

If one group is getting awards way out of proportion to their numbers, obviously bigotry is in action.I'm not aware of any supporter of affirmative action who looks solely at the proportions to determine if certain policies are racist. Affirmative action is needed for many reasons, only one of which is the proportions.

Nope. I gave my two reasons.

You're filling in your own. Bigot.

Pot, kettle, you know the metaphor.

The 8-A program in the US, for one.Do they have a website that I could look at to view their methodology? Or at the very least, can you explain what the program does, and how?

Do they have a website that I could look at to view their methodology? Or at the very least, can you explain what the program does, and how?
Here's how the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission does it:

The EEOC can launch an investigation when its analyses of EEO-1 reports show patterns of discrimination, or when it receives referrals from OFCCP or the Wage and Hour Division, which, like OFCCP, is part of the Labor Department’s Employment Standards Administration. (Employers with 100 or more employees must file EEO-1 reports annually with the Labor Department. These reports provide snapshots of a company’s workforce by race and gender over nine broad occupational categories.)

The snapshot is merely looking for mismatched proportions. That's it. That earns you a major investigation (which will look at everything else).

Jews are just better than us. At everything.

>.>

What? It's true.

Why are Jews so overrepresented? Why isn't there an affirmative action program for Nobel Prizes? Think of the poor Muslims, who must feel belittled by the fact that the Jews are winning so often!

Oh, the bigots! And the ACM needs to put affirmative action into their Turing Prize program - and chess programs around the world need more affirmative action! Obviously, bigots are everywhere, promoting Jews!
</sarcasm>

So are you saying that Islam is backwards and that everyone is better than them?

So are you saying that Islam is backwards and that everyone is better than them?
Nope. You said that.

I gave two of my ideas on why it's happened. None of which involve your bigoted idea.

Nope. You said that.

I gave two of my ideas on why it's happened. None of which involve your bigoted idea.
Not really his "Biggoted idea" more his attempt to interpret what you said

There are a lot of people in this world that deserve that classification but I don’t see how his attempt at interpretation qualifies as such

Nope. You said that.

I gave two of my ideas on why it's happened. None of which involve your bigoted idea.

this wasn't in the OP was it?

And so you don't think Islam is backwards all of a sudden? WHen did this happen?

A long period of decadence and rot. And, when the humiliations began to happen in the 19th century at the hands of the West, people turned inwards to fundamentalism (some, not all, but enough to crush any free thought).

I guess he's referring to this.

this wasn't in the OP was it?

And so you don't think Islam is backwards all of a sudden? WHen did this happen?
See my theories here:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11583254&postcount=32

I'm not addressing whether or not Islam is backwards, because if I do, I'm a bigot.

So... see my theories there, and if you persist in thinking Islam is backwards and saying it, you're a bigot. In fact, you're the second bona fide bigot who isn't Deep Kimchi (as accused as bigot in other threads).

See my theories here:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11583254&postcount=32

I'm not addressing whether or not Islam is backwards, because if I do, I'm a bigot.

So... see my theories there, and if you persist in thinking Islam is backwards and saying it, you're a bigot. In fact, you're the second bona fide bigot who isn't Deep Kimchi (as accused as bigot in other threads).

Am I the first? Please let me be the first!

I say we start a poll called "is deep kimchi a threat to the west?"


whos with me?
Sorry... I'm not.

Am I the first? Please let me be the first!
Yes, you were the first.

Yes, you were the first.

Being called a bigot by DK? I'd be rather proud of that...

Nope.

Think about it.

What reason can you think as to why so many Jews win, and so few Muslims, if we are all created equal, and Muslims outnumber Jews by orders of magnitude.

Why? If you say Jews are intellectually advantaged in some way, people will say you're a bigot. If you can't say that, then it must be bias in the Nobel Committee.

Probably because those in charge are holding people back.

It says nothing of either intellectual advantage (genetics wise - but access to knowledge) nor does it say anything of bias by the committee. Yet again I think we are seeing you look at the world as being either black or white because shades of grey don't seem to exist in your world.

I think a lot of people agree that Islamic societies are being run by oppressive regimes, but disagree that Islam itself being the problem (as you often point out).

Christianity was used in the same way. It's only a matter of time before internal strife brings about change.

But thats just my guess.

Yes, you were the first.

Let's review the situation:

Your argument (we'll call it A) - Yesmusic is bigoted against Muslims.

A fact (B) - Yesmusic is a Muslim. (here comes the good part)

A + B -> C - Yesmusic is bigoted against himself!
(yeah, I'm aware of people who are bigoted against their own groups, but I'm certainly not one.)

This is ignoring the fact that you calling someone else a bigot is hilarious.

Probably because those in charge are holding people back.

It says nothing of either intellectual advantage (genetics wise - but access to knowledge) nor does it say anything of bias by the committee. Yet again I think we are seeing you look at the world as being either black or white because shades of grey don't seem to exist in your world.

I think a lot of people agree that Islamic societies are being run by oppressive regimes, but disagree that Islam itself being the problem (as you often point out).

Christianity was used in the same way. It's only a matter of time before internal strife brings about change.

But thats just my guess.


I am positing two ideas, not black and white. I could posit more ideas, but I thought I would hear from others first. Any other ideas posited are your own. Such as the idea that Muslims are somehow inferior. That's your idea, bud.

See my theories here:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11583254&postcount=32

I'm not addressing whether or not Islam is backwards, because if I do, I'm a bigot.

So... see my theories there, and if you persist in thinking Islam is backwards and saying it, you're a bigot. In fact, you're the second bona fide bigot who isn't Deep Kimchi (as accused as bigot in other threads).

Are you drinking today?

Here's how the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission does it:

The snapshot is merely looking for mismatched proportions. That's it. That earns you a major investigation (which will look at everything else).That's a bit different than saying that proportions are the only thing that matters; their looking at everything else is evidence of this. The reason they look at proportions is because that's the easiest thing to prove; it's highly difficult to prove racism. Nonetheless, it's conceivable that the proportions are skewed for reasons other than racism, which is what the EEOC is looking at.
With that said, I have no problem with the Nobel Prize Committee's practices being investigated.

See my theories here:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11583254&postcount=32

I'm not addressing whether or not Islam is backwards, because if I do, I'm a bigot.

So... see my theories there, and if you persist in thinking Islam is backwards and saying it, you're a bigot. In fact, you're the second bona fide bigot who isn't Deep Kimchi (as accused as bigot in other threads).
I don’t think it means what you think it means

(Sorry I had to say it)

In the end you are just upset over being classified as such by someone and are trying to shoehorn the proposed opposition into that same classification (weather the classification for yourself or not I am not debating)

He is attempting in one way or another to analyze or remark on your motives not necessarily his own.

You appeared to get mad at an erroneous classification of yourself as a bigot why do you persist on trying to do the same to others?

This is ignoring the fact that you calling someone else a bigot is hilarious.
I am using Muravyet's criteria:

If you criticize or blame Muslims for something, you're a bigot.

so, even though you're a Muslim, you can still be a bigot to yourself

You appeared to get mad at an erroneous classification of yourself as a bigot why do you persist on trying to do the same to others?
Inconceivable!

I'm not mad - I'm trying to have a sense of humor, which many people here seem to lack.

Are you drinking today?
I don't drink. I'm trying to have a sense of humor.

I am using Muravyet's criteria:

If you criticize or blame Muslims for something, you're a bigot.

so, even though you're a Muslim, you can still be a bigot to yourself

If "you blame _____ for something" is being bigoted against that group, then I suppose that I'm bigoted against every person in the world, most of all against myself. I don't think that's what Muravyet was saying, though.

Being called a bigot by DK? I'd be rather proud of that...
Just say the magic words that violate Muravyet's criteria, and you too can be an NS Bigot, with an official t-shirt and plaque from Deep Kimchi.

I am positing two ideas, not black and white. I could posit more ideas, but I thought I would hear from others first. Any other ideas posited are your own. Such as the idea that Muslims are somehow inferior. That's your idea, bud.


No that was my guess on what you were tryign to say.



I am using Muravyet's criteria:

If you criticize or blame Muslims for something, you're a bigot.

so, even though you're a Muslim, you can still be a bigot to yourself

Oh I see, you are just going through a "call everyone a bigot" phase.

Just say the magic words that violate Muravyet's criteria, and you too can be an NS Bigot, with an official t-shirt and plaque from Deep Kimchi.

I'd rather not be associated with a troll, thanks. The stains are difficult to get out...

Oh I see, you are just going through a "call everyone a bigot" phase.
Would you like to trade what you have for what's behind Door Number Three?

With apologies to Ruffy :D

http://www.hlj.me.uk/ns/ruffy.jpg

With apologies to Ruffy:

http://www.hlj.me.uk/ns/ruffy.jpg
Hey, you're not supposed to have that on the plane. You might light a fart or something.

Would you like to trade what you have for what's behind Door Number Three?


*gives up his idea for the chance at a better idea*

*gives up his idea for the chance at a better idea*

The next questions for you are:

"Why do people think I'm playing the victim complex, or flamebaiting, when I'm trying to be funny? Does everyone think DK is actually serious all the time? Can you tell when he's serious?"

I don't drink. I'm trying to have a sense of humor.

Don't try so hard. You'll shoot your eye out.

The next questions for you are:

"Why do people think I'm playing the victim complex, or flamebaiting, when I'm trying to be funny? Does everyone think DK is actually serious all the time? Can you tell when he's serious?"


I suggest, when attempting the humor, to try something other than Muslim bashing because I don't think most people find it to be funny coming from someone known to bash Muslims daily.

Inconceivable!

I'm not mad - I'm trying to have a sense of humor, which many people here seem to lack.


http://www.queendom.com/tests/minitests/fx/humor.html

http://www.queendom.com/tests/minitests/fx/humor.html

45%. I'm not wacky enough. :(

Results:
Do you have a sense of humor?

Your score = 75






What does your score mean?
Your wacky sense of humor rocks! It appears that you can laugh at just about anything, including yourself -which is way cool! And hey, if you can't laugh at yourself, who can you laugh at right? Just kidding. Of course you know you have to make sure you're not offending anyone right?! In any case, most people probably get a kick out of your wit and most likely love hanging out with you. We think you're pretty funny too!
What do you mean funny? Funny how?

What do you mean funny? Funny how?

I got the impression they don't like dark humor. What's wrong with dark humor?

I got the impression they don't like dark humor. What's wrong with dark humor?

God God! I scored 80%

Not quite goofball territory though!

Whew!

http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/taunt001.gif
Dear lord what a useful smiley. Kudos, dear woman, kudos. That about accurately sums up this thread.

Dear lord what a useful smiley. Kudos, dear woman, kudos. That about accurately sums up this thread.

I cant make out if he's swinging his feet or shaving...As for this thread, I rephrazed my opinions about muslims billions of times, it doesnt change anything...

Dear lord what a useful smiley. Kudos, dear woman, kudos. That about accurately sums up this thread.
I live to please. ;)

I got the impression they don't like dark humor. What's wrong with dark humor?

It makes me want to go home, cut myself, then cry all night while eating a gallon of rocky road while I bleed all over it and it starts tastes gross because I forgot to put bandages on...

I happen to agree that there is clear bias and bigotry in the Nobel Committee. Hell, they gave a Peace Prize to the likes of Mother Teresa. That's some sick and twisted shit.
And please don't forget Literature Nobel Prize winner Günter Grass who has just recently admitted to have been a member of the Waffen-SS (shortly before he put his newest book on the market).

I live to please. ;)
Do tell...

Do tell...
Heh, you wish. :p