NationStates Jolt Archive


Pedophile claiming "religious freedom"

The Panda Hat
03-08-2006, 23:50
A man, currently undergoing trial for child molestation, has chosen to use a "religious freedom defense", calling his actions a "sacred ritual".

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/03/sex.ritual.ap/index.html

There's been alot of discussion on pedophilia lately, with many different viewpoints. However, I hope that even the admitted pedophiles on this board will condemn this man. Not only was he engaged in sexual relationships with children, but these were all disabled children. He worked as a tutor in a special needs school. Two of the victims were simply identified as "disabled", and seven were identified as autistic. All but one of them was under 13.

While I still maintain that children that young are completely incapable of giving consent, I can imagine a reasonable argument that says these children were in any way capable of giving consent.

I hope they lock him up and feed the key to a shark. Child molestation gets me angry enough, but doing it in the name of religion makes me want to bury a fork in someone's eye.
DesignatedMarksman
03-08-2006, 23:57
And we'll exercise our religious requirements to cut his balls off and choke him to death with them.

Hey, freedom of religion....
EvilMoguis
04-08-2006, 00:08
two can play at that game. it's my religion to sentence him to capital punishment based on his crimes. just like how we kill murderers to keep them from killing, i vote we cut off his penis(so he can never molest/rape again), then get him raped by some 6'0" 250lb guy named Bubba.
Fartsniffage
04-08-2006, 00:11
two can play at that game. it's my religion to sentence him to capital punishment based on his crimes. just like how we kill murderers to keep them from killing, i vote we cut off his penis(so he can never molest/rape again), then get him raped by some 6'0" 250lb guy named Bubba.

Why is it that everyone on this site is obsessed with have a chap name 'bubba' ass-raping sexual criminals? Why not have them interfered with by a fellow named 'charles' or 'rupert'?
Llewdor
04-08-2006, 00:12
Traditionally, the only people on whom you're allowed to impose your own religion without their consent is your children. If they were his kids, he'd have a much stronger and more credible argument.

After all, people mutilate their children for relgious reasons. Is this so different?
Posi
04-08-2006, 00:18
Why is it that everyone on this site is obsessed with have a chap name 'bubba' ass-raping sexual criminals? Why not have them interfered with by a fellow named 'charles' or 'rupert'?
Its a US thing. If you want to ass-rape someone in jail, you have to legally change your first name to Bubba.
Fartsniffage
04-08-2006, 00:19
Its a US thing. If you want to ass-rape someone in jail, you have to legally change your first name to Bubba.

And there was me thinking it was a racial stereotype ;)
WDGann
04-08-2006, 00:21
Why is it that everyone on this site is obsessed with have a chap name 'bubba' ass-raping sexual criminals? Why not have them interfered with by a fellow named 'charles' or 'rupert'?

Or Tarquin.

It's never Tarquin.
Fartsniffage
04-08-2006, 00:24
Or Tarquin.

It's never Tarquin.

Tarquin is a right little sod when your back is turned though, you've really got to watch him.
Ultraextreme Sanity
04-08-2006, 00:32
pedophiles have the right to be burried face down in a dung pile at a pig farm . With only their ass stickicking out above...ground..I hear the pigs go for the soft stuff first ...