NationStates Jolt Archive


WWIII causes

Minaris
29-07-2006, 03:08
Poll. Explain stance
Posi
29-07-2006, 03:08
I see no poll!
Keruvalia
29-07-2006, 03:09
Damn Dirty Apes.
Posi
29-07-2006, 03:10
Damn Dirty Apes.
How many dirty stinkin apes does it take to change a lightbulb?
Sel Appa
29-07-2006, 03:12
How many dirty stinkin apes does it take to change a lightbulb?
None, some human will do it for them.

The US unjustly invades Russia and the world supports Russia, except for Canada and Mexico.
Mikesburg
29-07-2006, 13:18
stance

n.

1 - The attitude or position of a standing person or animal, especially the position assumed by an athlete preparatory to action.

2 - Mental posture; point of view: “Peru... has also toughened its stance toward foreign investors” (Abraham F. Lowenthal).
German Nightmare
29-07-2006, 13:26
This thread.

Just thinking about it will make it come into existance! :eek:
Pure Metal
29-07-2006, 13:31
I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

we all know who said that
(i seem to be in a serious mood today :eek: )
Swilatia
29-07-2006, 13:33
i don't see a poll. and could you please go learn how to be specific.
BogMarsh
29-07-2006, 13:34
Poll. Explain stance

*polls Minaris with a point-head stick*

*stands on floor*

I find standing on floors convenient.
The Aeson
29-07-2006, 14:13
we all know who said that
(i seem to be in a serious mood today :eek: )

Elmo!

Er...

Albert Einstein!

Anyways, the Middle East seems to be a good bet, but don't take your eyes off of the midwest either. And Russia seems to think that the US is going to try and interfere with elections in Russia next year.
Ieuano
29-07-2006, 14:15
Poll. Explain stance

*searches for poll, falls off cliff*
Naliitr
29-07-2006, 15:30
WWIII- Caused when America sends troops over to Lebanon, allowing Israel to fully and completely destroy the Lebanese government, and take over the government themselves. The surrounding middle-east does not like this, and unites to take back Lebanon and Israel. Then Britian and other "free countries" send troops to back the Israelis and Americans in the middle-east. And viola, you have the two sides to the conflict. The Muslim Fundamentalists against the "free countries of the world". I have a feeling that the Rouge Nations might form a union to take a piece of the pie in the conflict. I.E. NK, China, Venezuela, Cuba.
Alleghany County
29-07-2006, 16:59
When three of the ten kingdoms rebell against the Anti-Christ, World War III will occur.
Vetalia
29-07-2006, 17:00
Why all the fighting?
Not_utopia
29-07-2006, 17:07
its bound to happen eventualy.

I predict either a slow escalation or a bright flash and an atomic fireball.
Wisjersey
29-07-2006, 17:08
its bound to happen eventualy.

I predict either a slow escalation or a bright flash and an atomic fireball.

That's easy, I predict that like with all world wars so far, Germany will start it!

(seriously, who else would have the legitimation to start WWIII? :D )
Toremal
29-07-2006, 17:15
How many dirty stinkin apes does it take to change a lightbulb?
Warning - un-funny old joke coming up

Nearly as many as it takes for blondes to do it.
Not_utopia
29-07-2006, 17:16
atomic fire ball:

iran/ north korea deploys an atomic weapon against Isreal/Japan(or soulth korea)

steady escaation:

could be anywhere.
Wisjersey
29-07-2006, 17:20
atomic fire ball:

iran/ north korea deploys an atomic weapon against Isreal/Japan(or soulth korea)

steady escaation:

could be anywhere.

I don't think China would move a bit if North Korea was to nuke South Korea or Japan. It would be the very own fault of the North Koreans. It would be just very stupid to sacrifice the lives of 1.3 billion Chinese for mere 20 million North Koreans.

In the case of Israel/Iran, that might get ugly locally... but I don't see global escalation possible here either. I don't think Russia or China would be so dumb and side with Iran.
Zolworld
29-07-2006, 17:20
Religious fundamentalism, oil, perhaps economics if china continues to grow. stupidity.
Not_utopia
29-07-2006, 17:23
I don't think China would move a bit if North Korea was to nuke South Korea or Japan. It would be the very own fault of the North Koreans. It would be just very stupid to sacrifice the lives of 1.3 billion Chinese for mere 20 million North Koreans.

I was thinking that the USA would be likely to repond to north Korea. If they ever get thier missiles working then the USA may be in the firing line.
Wisjersey
29-07-2006, 17:24
I was thinking that the USA would be likely to repond to north Korea. If they ever get thier missiles working then the USA may be in the firing line.

A conflict USA - China is way more likely over the issue of Taiwan, I'd think.
Not_utopia
29-07-2006, 17:27
China is a growing power so economics might cause friction with the USA too.