Spam: the ONLY solution
There are a lot of well meaning filters out there, but still spam is increasing, and its content is getting worse.
Clearly there is only one solution!
We need to initiate violent and militant action against spammers, destroying their facilities, covering them in boiling tar and feathers before finally putting them all to death in a series of show trials!
There are only really a few basic spam sources in the world, if we can track these down they can easily be destroyed.
Who is with me?
:sniper:
Lunatic Goofballs
22-07-2006, 15:26
*Destroys you*
Kahanistan
22-07-2006, 15:32
John Shelley would agree with you.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=lang_en%7Clang_ru&safe=off&q=subhuman+spammers+site%3Agdnctr.com&btnG=Search&lr=lang_en%7Clang_ru
Only, he'd skip the trials. He's even more right-wing than Ann Coulter or George Warlord Bush.
Tactical Grace
22-07-2006, 15:33
The way I see it, we have intelligence agencies for a reason. Half the spammers live in the US, and I bet the NSA could get their locations with ease. Some European countries aren't too bad at electronic recon either. One night, a couple of hundred people get grabbed. Then silence.
Behold, the war on spam is won.
It would take a lot of balls to fill that gap in the market.
Super-power
22-07-2006, 15:33
http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/page/i-1286.jpg
The way I see it, we have intelligence agencies for a reason. Half the spammers live in the US, and I bet the NSA could get their locations with ease. Some European countries aren't too bad at electronic recon either. One night, a couple of hundred people get grabbed. Then silence.
Behold, the war on spam is won.
It would take a lot of balls to fill that gap in the market.
Here here!
It wouldnt be a huge expenditure of time, money or effort for our governments to destroy all their equipment in one evening. Especially when you consider how much spam costs businesses
The Aeson
22-07-2006, 15:46
John Shelley would agree with you.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=lang_en%7Clang_ru&safe=off&q=subhuman+spammers+site%3Agdnctr.com&btnG=Search&lr=lang_en%7Clang_ru
Only, he'd skip the trials. He's even more right-wing than Ann Coulter or George Warlord Bush.
This guy has got to be kidding...
Right? I mean he can't possibly be serious?
Teh_pantless_hero
22-07-2006, 16:18
*Destroys you*
With irony?
Lunatic Goofballs
22-07-2006, 16:21
With irony?
Yes. :)
There are a lot of well meaning filters out there, but still spam is increasing, and its content is getting worse.
Clearly there is only one solution!
We need to initiate violent and militant action against spammers, destroying their facilities, covering them in boiling tar and feathers before finally putting them all to death in a series of show trials!
There are only really a few basic spam sources in the world, if we can track these down they can easily be destroyed.
Who is with me?
:sniper:Spammers or adware/popups?
after all, here on this forum, LG would be a spammer, so would Eut, Britster, Tinks, ME :eek:
but if it's against Adware/Popup companies...
NO MERCY :mad:
*Destroys you*
Im on your side. Spammers UNITE!!!!