NationStates Jolt Archive

I guess somebody forgot to do the family values background check?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/28/consultant.conviction.ap/index.html

Statistics show that 72% of Clinton critics are child molesters.

Clinton is awesome.

'Tis better to fuck an intern than a child (does this belong in the pedophilia thread?)

It's pretty sad when a 'respected and fair' news organization makes such a blatant attempt at poisoning the well. Whether or not asshole B was a pedophile does not make his claims about asshole A and giving away nuclear secrets at all less valid. It's doubtful that anybody even remembered this guy and apart from those involved, nobody really gives a shit about him. The entire article is basically written as a giant excuse for clinton apologists to have a masturbatory catharsis as they nod their sage heads about the depravity of a Clinton accuser. Even the headline shows this. The words 'Man behind anti-Clinton ad convicted' would to most people mean that he was involved in a crime by running the ad itself, which was patently not the case.

It's pretty sad when a 'respected and fair' news organization makes such a blatant attempt at poisoning the well. Whether or not asshole B was a pedophile does not make his claims about asshole A and giving away nuclear secrets at all less valid. It's doubtful that anybody even remembered this guy and apart from those involved, nobody really gives a shit about him. The entire article is basically written as a giant excuse for clinton apologists to have a masturbatory catharsis as they nod their sage heads about the depravity of a Clinton accuser. Even the headline shows this. The words 'Man behind anti-Clinton ad convicted' would to most people mean that he was involved in a crime by running the ad itself, which was patently not the case.

Well, without the whole anti-Clinton ad, this guy would have gone down as just another pedophile. Seems more like they needed a headline and someone behind something that was once controversial (although I can't remember the ad) makes for a quickie news story.

Statistics show that 72% of Clinton critics are child molesters.

Id REALLY like to see a source for that.

It's pretty sad when a 'respected and fair' news organization makes such a blatant attempt at poisoning the well. Whether or not asshole B was a pedophile does not make his claims about asshole A and giving away nuclear secrets at all less valid. It's doubtful that anybody even remembered this guy and apart from those involved, nobody really gives a shit about him. The entire article is basically written as a giant excuse for clinton apologists to have a masturbatory catharsis as they nod their sage heads about the depravity of a Clinton accuser. Even the headline shows this. The words 'Man behind anti-Clinton ad convicted' would to most people mean that he was involved in a crime by running the ad itself, which was patently not the case.

Oh gee, when did you ever respect a Commie-Pinko-Leftist-Liberal-Al-Jazeeera-Wannabe news organization like CNN?

:rolleyes:

*snip*

I bet you like making children cry.

Oh gee, when did you ever respect a Commie-Pinko-Leftist-Liberal-Al-Jazeeera-Wannabe news organization like CNN?

:rolleyes:
quotes are a generally cynical bastard's best friend.

I bet you like making children cry.
Hmm, is the child in question anything like the bully in Big Bully? Cause if so, of course I do.

It would have been 1,000 times funnier if the guy was arrested for the murder of Vince Foster...

Id REALLY like to see a source for that.

I never said they were true statistics.




The entire article is basically written as a giant excuse for clinton apologists to have a masturbatory catharsis as they nod their sage heads about the depravity of a Clinton accuser.

It is and I did.

Clinton is awesome.

Clinton sucks, despite the fact he lied under oath, I don't think he did enough to prevent terrorism. That's why the US was attacked numerous times under his leadership.

Clinton sucks, despite the fact he lied under oath, I don't think he did enough to prevent terrorism. That's why the US was attacked numerous times under his leadership.

And of course it was Clinton's fault that Dear Leader ignored the briefings on Bin Ladin that were passed on by the Clinton Administration all the way to 9-11.

"Cramer faces up to 149 years in prison"

Impressive legal system..

Clinton sucks, despite the fact he lied under oath, I don't think he did enough to prevent terrorism. That's why the US was attacked numerous times under his leadership.

Oh please. Honestly, tell me you cared about terrorism before 9/11, which DIDNT happen on Clintons watch.

And of course it was Clinton's fault that Dear Leader ignored the briefings on Bin Ladin that were passed on by the Clinton Administration all the way to 9-11.

Yeah, it is. If Clinton had done more to get Al Gore elected then we could have avoided this whole mess.

Democrats suck. They can't even protect us from Republicans, how can they protect us from terrorists.

In fact, if you really want to follow the conservative logic thread, let's elect the Taliban to Senate, and get them to declare that "naturally born citizen" means "people who are citizens now and were not born by C-section" and then make Bin Laden president.

Clinton sucks, despite the fact he lied under oath, I don't think he did enough to prevent terrorism. That's why the US was attacked numerous times under his leadership.
I don't think Bush did anything at all about terrorism in his first 8 months in office.

It's pretty sad when a 'respected and fair' news organization makes such a blatant attempt at poisoning the well. Whether or not asshole B was a pedophile does not make his claims about asshole A and giving away nuclear secrets at all less valid. It's doubtful that anybody even remembered this guy and apart from those involved, nobody really gives a shit about him. The entire article is basically written as a giant excuse for clinton apologists to have a masturbatory catharsis as they nod their sage heads about the depravity of a Clinton accuser. Even the headline shows this. The words 'Man behind anti-Clinton ad convicted' would to most people mean that he was involved in a crime by running the ad itself, which was patently not the case.

It's VERY valid when the party he supported yabbers on about morality and family values.

Id REALLY like to see a source for that.

Your sarcasm detector is off. Please turn it on.

Statistics show that 72% of Clinton critics are child molesters.
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

I don't think Bush did anything at all about terrorism in his first 8 months in office.

Terrorism had been the #1 issue. It was Clinton's administration that found out who Osama Bin Laden was.

When Bush came into office the justice dept. ignored terrorism and Ashcroft focused on prostitution in New Orleans. When 9/11 happened Bush only wanted to hear about Hussein, even when the Clinton left-overs told him "we already know that it was bin Laden."

Bush has only made this country less safe.

Sorry, he's also made it less American, less free, less powerful, less afordable, and less economically stable. What I should have said is "with regard to safety, he has only made this country worse."