NationStates Jolt Archive


Next time,don't try to liberate countrieswithout thinking Americans....

Orion Ascendant
29-06-2006, 02:30
Like the above says,please,try not to 'liberate'(invade) countries without hard evidence to back up your claim.Refer to Iraq and *lack of WMD*.They did have it at one time,but they lacked the capability at the time of invasion.Similarly,try to get your information correct.

As well,when your government decides to do a job,do it thoroughly and correctly,instead of letting your damn politics get in the way.You could have finished off the job in the First Gulf War,but,of course.....politics.Look at Afghanistan.You guys got into the mess,you're stuck.

As well,considering your history,the US saying that a country doesn't have a right to chemical weapons is a bit rich.Anyone heard of Agent Orange being used in Vietnam?

Similarly,please,choose someone who is not so...difficult.Now,Bill Clinton was an easy person to tolerate.A statesman.

Being in the military of my home country,I can empathise with the soldiers in Iraq.They are doing a job involving completing tasks ordered by people higher up the command chain who have no experience of the execution or management of the consequences,working in stressful conditions.

I quite like your country,and the majority of its people,but most sincerely,your government is incompetent.Thankfully,in the next few decades,China and India are going to provide a good counterbalance to American influence,and moderate them.

Next election,please,choose someone who is actually good!
Myrmidonisia
29-06-2006, 02:32
Blow it out your ... Sorry, I'm usually more polite than than. So just bugger off.
IL Ruffino
29-06-2006, 02:32
Many many spacebar taps are missing here :(
WangWee
29-06-2006, 02:32
Like the above says,please,try not to 'liberate'(invade) countries without hard evidence to back up your claim.Refer to Iraq and *lack of WMD*.They did have it at one time,but they lacked the capability at the time of invasion.Similarly,try to get your information correct.

As well,when your government decides to do a job,do it thoroughly and correctly,instead of letting your damn politics get in the way.You could have finished off the job in the First Gulf War,but,of course.....politics.Look at Afghanistan.You guys got into the mess,you're stuck.

As well,considering your history,the US saying that a country doesn't have a right to chemical weapons is a bit rich.Anyone heard of Agent Orange being used in Vietnam?

Similarly,please,choose someone who is not so...difficult.Now,Bill Clinton was an easy person to tolerate.A statesman.

Being in the military of my home country,I can empathise with the soldiers in Iraq.They are doing a job involving completing tasks ordered by people higher up the command chain who have no experience of the execution or management of the consequences,working in stressful conditions.

I quite like your country,and the majority of its people,but most sincerely,your government is incompetent.Thankfully,in the next few decades,China and India are going to provide a good counterbalance to American influence,and moderate them.

Next election,please,choose someone who is actually good!

Your post has changed the American public! They are becoming thinner and smarter as we speak!

Thanks dude!
Ginnoria
29-06-2006, 02:32
Like the above says,please,try not to 'liberate'(invade) countries without hard evidence to back up your claim.Refer to Iraq and *lack of WMD*.They did have it at one time,but they lacked the capability at the time of invasion.Similarly,try to get your information correct.

As well,when your government decides to do a job,do it thoroughly and correctly,instead of letting your damn politics get in the way.You could have finished off the job in the First Gulf War,but,of course.....politics.Look at Afghanistan.You guys got into the mess,you're stuck.

As well,considering your history,the US saying that a country doesn't have a right to chemical weapons is a bit rich.Anyone heard of Agent Orange being used in Vietnam?

Similarly,please,choose someone who is not so...difficult.Now,Bill Clinton was an easy person to tolerate.A statesman.

Being in the military of my home country,I can empathise with the soldiers in Iraq.They are doing a job involving completing tasks ordered by people higher up the command chain who have no experience of the execution or management of the consequences,working in stressful conditions.

I quite like your country,and the majority of its people,but most sincerely,your government is incompetent.Thankfully,in the next few decades,China and India are going to provide a good counterbalance to American influence,and moderate them.

Next election,please,choose someone who is actually good!
What's that? You hate freedom?

Looks like we have our next target. What country are you posting from?
Neo Undelia
29-06-2006, 02:33
I’ll keep all you’re advice in mind next time the powers that be come to me for council on foreign police.:rolleyes:
WangWee
29-06-2006, 02:35
I’ll keep all you’re advice in mind next time the powers that be come to me for council on foreign police.:rolleyes:

I hear those gendarmes can be quite difficult.
Desperate Measures
29-06-2006, 02:37
I want to agree but it's so hard to read...
Baked squirrels
29-06-2006, 02:41
China has many problems right now...they're economy has flourished, but with dreadful effects. One of my Chinese friends told me when he came home to Beijing that he didn't even want to say what color the air is. Also many rural communities suffering from it. The male surplus is also becoming a problem.
Markreich
29-06-2006, 02:42
Like the above says,please,try not to 'liberate'(invade) countries without hard evidence to back up your claim.Refer to Iraq and *lack of WMD*.They did have it at one time,but they lacked the capability at the time of invasion.Similarly,try to get your information correct.

As well,when your government decides to do a job,do it thoroughly and correctly,instead of letting your damn politics get in the way.You could have finished off the job in the First Gulf War,but,of course.....politics.Look at Afghanistan.You guys got into the mess,you're stuck.

As well,considering your history,the US saying that a country doesn't have a right to chemical weapons is a bit rich.Anyone heard of Agent Orange being used in Vietnam?

Similarly,please,choose someone who is not so...difficult.Now,Bill Clinton was an easy person to tolerate.A statesman.

Being in the military of my home country,I can empathise with the soldiers in Iraq.They are doing a job involving completing tasks ordered by people higher up the command chain who have no experience of the execution or management of the consequences,working in stressful conditions.

I quite like your country,and the majority of its people,but most sincerely,your government is incompetent.Thankfully,in the next few decades,China and India are going to provide a good counterbalance to American influence,and moderate them.

Next election,please,choose someone who is actually good!

I'm as impressed with your ignorance as your lack of grammer.
Agent Orange was a DEFOLIANT AND NOT A CHEMICAL WEAPON.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_orange
Free shepmagans
29-06-2006, 02:45
Like the above says,please,try not to 'liberate'(invade) countries without hard evidence to back up your claim.Refer to Iraq and *lack of WMD*.They did have it at one time,but they lacked the capability at the time of invasion.
So we have to strike while they are weak, it's called strategy. ;)

As well,when your government decides to do a job,do it thoroughly and correctly,instead of letting your damn politics get in the way.You could have finished off the job in the First Gulf War,but,of course.....politics. I actually agree with this.

As well,considering your history,the US saying that a country doesn't have a right to chemical weapons is a bit rich.Anyone heard of Agent Orange being used in Vietnam?
Yupp. Was it directly targeted to civilian ceters like Saddam's attacks were?

Similarly,please,choose someone who is not so...difficult.Now,Bill Clinton was an easy person to tolerate.A statesman.
A liar and a criminal. At least Bush chooses one. ;)

Being in the military of my home country,I can empathise with the soldiers in Iraq.They are doing a job involving completing tasks ordered by people higher up the command chain who have no experience of the execution or management of the consequences,working in stressful conditions.
Good for you, have a cookie.

I quite like your country,and the majority of its people,but most sincerely,your government is incompetent.Thankfully,in the next few decades,China and India are going to provide a good counterbalance to American influence,and moderate them.
Unless the US collapses and China decides to "liberate" [Insert country of choice here].
Next election,please,choose someone who is actually good!
Don't tell us, tell the electoral college, the popular vote is there to make us feel special.
Desperate Measures
29-06-2006, 02:46
I'm as impressed with your ignorance as your lack of grammer.
Agent Orange was a DEFOLIANT AND NOT A CHEMICAL WEAPON.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_orange
But a nasty defoliant:
The US Veterans Administration has listed prostate cancer, respiratory cancers, multiple myeloma, type II diabetes, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, soft tissue sarcoma, chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, peripheral neuropathy, and spina bifida in children of veterans exposed to Agent Orange as side effects of the herbicide.
Free shepmagans
29-06-2006, 02:47
I'm as impressed with your ignorance as your lack of grammer.
Agent Orange was a DEFOLIANT AND NOT A CHEMICAL WEAPON.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_orange
I think he's refering to it's harmful effects. Someone tell him neglegence and malice are not the same thing.;)
Katganistan
29-06-2006, 02:48
"Next time,don't try to liberate countrieswithout thinking Americans...."

Next time when you post a thread, could you try NOT to flamebait?