NationStates Jolt Archive


"I believe we made the right decision":Koizumi

Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 16:27
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/060620/w062012.html

Japanese prime minister announces plans to withdraw troops from Iraq

http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/060620/w062012.jpg

Takenori Kanzaki, head of the ruling party's coalition partner, the New Komei Party, answers reporters' questions after meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Juinchiro Koizumi at Koizumi's official residence in Tokyo on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara, Pool)


TOKYO (AP) - Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on Tuesday announced the withdrawal of Japanese ground troops from southern Iraq Tuesday, moving to end the country's largest overseas military operation since the Second World War.

In a nationally televised news conference, Koizumi said the troops had accomplished their non-combat mission, and he pledged to continue aiding Iraqi reconstruction. He offered no timetable for the withdrawal, but Defence Chief Fukushiro Nukaga told reporters earlier in the day that the pullout would take "several dozen days."

Koizumi, who steps down in September, has been a vocal supporter of U.S. policy in Iraq. He is to travel to Washington for a summit with U.S. President George W. Bush later this month.

Japan will now consider expanding air operations in Iraq to include transport of medical supplies and United Nations personnel, following a request from UN General-Secretary Kofi Annan, said Takenori Kanzaki, head of the ruling party's coalition partner, the New Komei Party.

"Even after the withdrawal from Iraq, we must continue the efforts to support Iraq," he told reporters.

Japan has about 600 troops in the city of Samawah in southern Iraq. Dispatched in early 2004, they helped with projects such as rebuilding the infrastructure of the area.

Although the mission was strictly humanitarian, polls show most Japanese were opposed to it, worried the troops would be drawn into the fighting or become targets of terrorists.

Critics also said the dispatch violated the U.S.-drafted 1947 constitution, which foreswears the use of force to settle international disputes. The Iraq mission followed a dispatch of Japanese ships to offer logistical support for military action in Afghanistan.

The pullout was prompted by the announcement on Monday that Britain and Australia would hand over to Iraqi forces the responsibility for security in southern Muthana province, where the Japanese troops are based.

Koizumi defended the deployment on Tuesday.

"I believe we made the right decision," he said.

While no Japanese soldiers suffered casualties, other citizens in Iraq were targeted by militants demanding a Japanese withdrawal. Seven Japanese have been kidnapped in Iraq since the dispatch, and two of them were killed.

In April 2004, three Japanese aid workers were kidnapped and threatened with death unless Tokyo withdrew. Koizumi refused, and all three were later released unharmed.

Will the Japanese be the next nationality to be pilloried by the fans of the Smirking ChimpĀ®?
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 16:32
*bumps for all those who don't scroll down*
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 16:43
No takers, eh?

Colour me unsurprised.

And the 'Coalition' is now comprised of who, exactly?
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 16:57
Okay, a contentious comic by Tom Tomorrow, to try to elicit any sort of response to this piece of actual world news:

http://www.workingforchange.com/webgraphics/WFC/TMW06-21-06.jpg
Murgerspher
20-06-2006, 17:04
Thats preety funny.
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 17:15
Gosh, ya think maybe the Coalition of the Opportunistic and Short-Sighted just died its own little death inside itself long ago, when nobody was paying any attention -- you know, the way meaningless and shallow fictions do -- and that's why there hasn't been any response so far?

Nations in the coalition -- it's not a matter of whether they'll quit or not. It's just a question of which flight out they're going to take.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 17:18
Gosh, ya think maybe the Coalition of the Opportunistic and Short-Sighted just died its own little death inside itself long ago, when nobody was paying any attention -- you know, the way meaningless and shallow fictions do -- and that's why there hasn't been any response so far?

I dunno. You tell me. But who all is actually still in the Coalition, anyway? Other than Poland and the U.K.?
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 17:19
I dunno. You tell me. But who all is actually still in the Coalition, anyway? Other than Poland and the U.K.?
I think there might still be a Dane left. I think he missed the plane. Poor bastard.
Gravlen
20-06-2006, 17:25
I dunno. You tell me. But who all is actually still in the Coalition, anyway? Other than Poland and the U.K.?

Romania
Georgia
Denmark
El Salvador
Australia
Latvia
Albania
Mongolia
Azerbaijan
Lithuania
Slovakia


I don't know for sure anymore, but I think these countries contributes between 100-1000 soldiers each.
Nadkor
20-06-2006, 17:27
Romania
Georgia
Denmark
El Salvador
Australia
Latvia
Albania
Mongolia
Azerbaijan
Lithuania
Slovakia


I don't know for sure anymore, but I think these countries contributes between 100-1000 soldiers each.

What glorious coalition of two countries supported by countries who clearly can't be arsed. 100 people? Pfft. I could shit a more effective fighting force.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 17:32
Romania
Georgia
Denmark
El Salvador
Australia
Latvia
Albania
Mongolia
Azerbaijan
Lithuania
Slovakia


I don't know for sure anymore, but I think these countries contributes between 100-1000 soldiers each.

Not to needlessly denigrate anybody, but - c'mon... Albania? Mongolia? Shit man, where's the tiny Republic of Togo when you need 'em?
New Burmesia
20-06-2006, 17:34
Romania
Georgia
Denmark
El Salvador
Australia
Latvia
Albania
Mongolia
Azerbaijan
Lithuania
Slovakia


I don't know for sure anymore, but I think these countries contributes between 100-1000 soldiers each.

You missed about 3,000 South Korean soldiers (Which is odd, considering if we weren't at war with Iraq we'd probably be at war with North Korea over their very real not made up WMD) and the Italians.

And of course we Brits still work as America's decaying sidekick :)
Similization
20-06-2006, 17:37
Not to needlessly denigrate anybody, but - c'mon... Albania? Mongolia? Shit man, where's the tiny Republic of Togo when you need 'em?Sorry ,ate. Their troops are off smoking Tabago.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 17:40
And of course we Brits still work as America's decaying sidekick :)
You're the Baldrichttp://www.whiskyfun.com/Materialforlog9/Baldrick.jpg to their Edmund?http://www3.telus.net/naran/blackadder/images/BA1adder.jpg
Gravlen
20-06-2006, 17:46
You missed about 3,000 South Korean soldiers (Which is odd, considering if we weren't at war with Iraq we'd probably be at war with North Korea over their very real not made up WMD) and the Italians.

And of course we Brits still work as America's decaying sidekick :)
I thought they were pulled out? Or maybe it was just one third, 1,000 of them?

And you're right about Italy, but since they are on thir way out (By september, I think?) I kinda forgot about them as well
Carnivorous Lickers
20-06-2006, 17:46
What glorious coalition of two countries supported by countries who clearly can't be arsed. 100 people? Pfft. I could shit a more effective fighting force.


that paints a lovely image
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 17:58
Nadkor's colon-ition of the willing lower intestinal tract

Versus

Shrub's coalition of willing Mongols and Albanians

Who will come out on top?
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 18:04
<snip list>


I don't know for sure anymore, but I think these countries contributes between 100-1000 soldiers each.
I believe most of them are contributing fewer than 100 people now. Most of the countries on the list do not supply combat soldiers at all. They supply engineers, medical staff, and rear echelon staff -- drivers, builders, etc. And most of them have been steadily reducing their presence since the first year. I do believe there is just one Dane left in either Basra or Baghdad, and maybe fewer than ten Danes in all of Iraq, and they are all engineers.

Plus, don't forget, all of the coalition members were essentially paid to join, with political, trade, or financial deals. But apparently, they weren't paid enough to keep them committed to this shit project.
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 18:06
What glorious coalition of two countries supported by countries who clearly can't be arsed. 100 people? Pfft. I could shit a more effective fighting force.
Well, I wish you would, because they could use one over there.
Tactical Grace
20-06-2006, 18:08
Another way of putting it is, American soldiers outnumber British soldiers 20:1, and the rest of the world put together has contributed barely more than the British. So the whole world's support for the Iraq war is worth a few percent.
Similization
20-06-2006, 18:25
I do believe there is just one Dane left in either Basra or Baghdad, and maybe fewer than ten Danes in all of Iraq, and they are all engineers.Still, if I recall correctly, the Danes did provide the the invaders with a 50 year old submarine & some arctic combat gear. That has to count for something, right?

How do politicians keep a straight face, I wonder?
Gymoor Prime
20-06-2006, 18:35
Dammit, whatever happened to the Moroccan mine-detonating monkeys?
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 18:41
Dammit, whatever happened to the Moroccan mine-detonating monkeys?
They got a recording contract, didn't they?
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 18:42
Still, if I recall correctly, the Danes did provide the the invaders with a 50 year old submarine & some arctic combat gear. That has to count for something, right?

How do politicians keep a straight face, I wonder?
See? Who says the war on terror doesn't help the world? The Danish military were able to clean out their garage because of it.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 18:43
Dammit, whatever happened to the Moroccan mine-detonating monkeys?
They got replaced with Japanese mine-detonating robot monkeys. But now there's no monkeys left, what with the departure of the Japanese troops.

And the leftover bananas are really getting whiffy.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 19:43
See? Who says the war on terror doesn't help the world? The Danish military were able to clean out their garage because of it.
Clever bloody Danes. We should have donated our fleet of Sea Kings while we had the chance.
Muravyets
20-06-2006, 19:46
Clever bloody Danes. We should have donated our fleet of Sea Kings while we had the chance.
Well, there's always Iran and North Korea...
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 19:53
Well, there's always Iran and North Korea...
Only trouble with that would be, they'd want us to pilot those flying death-traps. Bring on the robot monkeys, I say! They're up to the challenge.
Dobbsworld
20-06-2006, 20:37
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j315/crashcow/NSG/robot_monkeys.jpg

Robot monkeys to the rescue!