NationStates Jolt Archive

Evidently, they think that homosexuality is a disease, and is "curable".

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.narth.com/

We can wait for NS General's faux doctor to respond... :rolleyes:

We can wait for NS General's faux doctor to respond... :rolleyes:

The one who claimed he was a cardiologist?

Evidently, they think that homosexuality is a disease, and is "curable".

http://www.narth.com/

Right-wing nutjobs.

It seems stupidity and a Ph. D. are not mutually exclusive.

We can wait for NS General's faux doctor to respond... :rolleyes:

Who dat? An NS Generalite doctor,expert on the homosexuals?

We can wait for NS General's faux doctor to respond... :rolleyes:
Clearly these people have homophobiaitis, caused by exceptional insecurity over one's own sexuality.

Possibly they need some treatments like being given a massage by both a man and a woman, and they can rate them out of ten to get a genuine idea of their true leaning.

That or we could go for the 1850s way - brick them up in the cellar and advise their kin to forget about them.

Who dat? An NS Generalite doctor,expert on the homosexuals?

No, the faux doctor who just shows up here for the leghumping.

Clearly these people have homophobiaitis, caused by exceptional insecurity over one's own sexuality.

Possibly they need some treatments like being given a massage by both a man and a woman, and they can rate them out of ten to get a genuine idea of their true leaning.

That or we could go for the 1850s way - brick them up in the cellar and advise their kin to forget about them.
Use two layers of bricks or you'll be able to hear them scream.

Narth?

Sounds like a name an Orc would choose for his pet.

No, the faux doctor who just shows up here for the leghumping.


Enodscopia?

The one who claimed he was a cardiologist?

Who was this? I missed it.

Enodscopia?

No...

Umm is this any differant though than the idea I have heard from many an Atheist that religious thought is disease of the mind?

Who was this? I missed it.

There was a troll that hated gay people, and claimed he was this ultra-fundamentalist Christian, and also a Cardiologist. Who didn't know the difference between anorexia and Anorexia Nervosa.

No, the faux doctor who just shows up here for the leghumping.


Get the squeegee ready then

There was a troll that hated gay people, and claimed he was this ultra-fundamentalist Christian, and also a Cardiologist. Who didn't know the difference between anorexia and Anorexia Nervosa.

Now that is sad. If you're gonna pretend on teh interwebs, at least do some research.

Umm is this any differant though than the idea I have heard from many an Atheist that religious thought is disease of the mind?
No, whoever you heard that from is an idiot too.

Get the squeegee ready then

Oh, she'll pop in, without a doubt. Squeegee at the ready! ;)

If she can find the time to post -- what with throwing her ankles in the air for a guy who's engaged to some other poor woman...

Umm is this any differant though than the idea I have heard from many an Atheist that religious thought is disease of the mind?

Yes.

Sort of like 'curing' the 'black disease' with bleach skin cream.

There was a troll that hated gay people, and claimed he was this ultra-fundamentalist Christian, and also a Cardiologist. Who didn't know the difference between anorexia and Anorexia Nervosa.

Ah, I remember that one...

Now that is sad. If you're gonna pretend on teh interwebs, at least do some research.

It's teh intarwebs - who on it cares enough to do research?

There was a troll that hated gay people, and claimed he was this ultra-fundamentalist Christian, and also a Cardiologist. Who didn't know the difference between anorexia and Anorexia Nervosa.

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably

Telling lies on the internet is a great and noble tradition. 18/f/cal ne1 want 2 cyber?!

No, whoever you heard that from is an idiot too.
He I tolsd them that, but they disagreed with me?

It's teh intarwebs - who on it cares enough to do research?

What is this...how you say...research? ;)

Sort of like 'curing' the 'black disease' with bleach skin cream.

Or vitiligo?

He I tolsd them that, but they disagreed with me?

...Huh?

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably

HAHAHAHA

Telling lies on the internet is a great and noble tradition. 18/f/cal ne1 want 2 cyber?!

*drools*

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably
I do too. I can't tell all those cooking utensils from each other.

Sort of like 'curing' the 'black disease' with bleach skin cream.


thats only part of the treatment though- for it to be successful, you need to wear highwater pants and one glittering glove

Side effects can be moderate to severe however and may include headache, insomnia,gender reassignment and diarrhea

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably

Well, you can see how he made the mistake - one being a major origin of the muscles of the shoulder girdle/rotator cuff and part of the glenohumeral joint, and the other an instrument used to widen the vaginal introitus and canal.

...Huh?


heheh let me try that again huh!

Heh I told them that, but they disagreed with me?

Use two layers of bricks or you'll be able to hear them scream.
The screaming may be a sobering influence on other homophobes. I say - just plasterboard over the cellar - everyone else can still hear them, but they've nary a chance of getting out ;)

Well, you can see how he made the mistake - one being a major origine of the muscles of the shoulder girdle/rotator cuff and part of the glenohumeral joint, and the other an instrument used to widen the vaginal introitus and canal.

Speculum... *shudder*

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably
Could have been worse, imagine mixing up scalpel and speculum. That could hurt.

Yes.


Why so?

Could have been worse, imagine mixing up scalpel and speculum. That could hurt.

Yikes! :eek:

Well, you can see how he made the mistake - one being a major origin of the muscles of the shoulder girdle/rotator cuff and part of the glenohumeral joint, and the other an instrument used to widen the vaginal introitus and canal.


Huh?

Why so?

Because it seems more like fundies saying atheism is a disease of the mind.

Speculum... *shudder*

Speculum play. *quiver*

Speculum play. *quiver*

I think I'm gonna be ill...

and he often used scapula and speculum interchangeably
ouch.

I bet the malpractice insurance for such a doctor would be very high.........:D

heheh let me try that again huh!

Heh I told them that, but they disagreed with me?
They're still idiots, don't worry about it.

Could have been worse, imagine mixing up scalpel and speculum. That could hurt.
Ouch, come on now lads...I'll refrain from joking about cutting off penises, if you'll agree to stop joking about sharp things being shoved up vaginas. Let's all spare each other the cringe-inducing images, shall we?

and the other an instrument used to widen the vaginal introitus and canal.
I usually use something else.

I've heard at least two true stories of doctors that told mothers to take their homossexual sons to a brothel and get them "cured"... :rolleyes:

Ouch, come on now lads...I'll refrain from joking about cutting off penises, if you'll agree to stop joking about sharp things being shoved up vaginas. Let's all spare each other the cringe-inducing images, shall we?
*cringe-gasm*
Sowwy.

I usually use something else.

That something else being quite underwhelming by comparison.

Sick bastards. They are idiots.

Because it seems more like fundies saying atheism is a disease of the mind.


What no I don't understand? Now I'm confuesd. I was talking about the line I hear form a lot of Athesits equating relgious thought with a mind that does not work correctly, I have never heard a relgious person say the same of an Athest mind.

That though was not the question I asked. I asked is there any differance in this being gay = being unwell, to the situatiopn that I describe above. You answered yes there is a differance, and when I asked what that differance is , your answer made no sense to me.

Please clarify.

I think I'm gonna be ill...

It only feels like that in the beginning of the first time. It passes.

That something else being quite underwhelming by comparison.
I'm sure, but causes less cringing.

I usually use something else.
Indeed. The meatus is sufficient.

That something else being quite underwhelming by comparison.

Quoted for troof. Ew.

I've heard at least two true stories of doctors that told mothers to take their homossexual sons to a brothel and get them "cured"... :rolleyes:
"Mom, I'm gay."
"OMG! Come with me son, I'm taking you to a brothel"
"Em, ok, if you think it's best.He he he he, free hookers"

"Mom, I'm gay."
"OMG! Come with me son, I'm taking you to a brothel"
"Em, ok, if you think it's best.He he he he, free hookers"

You mean I could've tried that? :(

I'm sure, but causes less cringing.

Cue: penis size boasting.

I'm sure, but causes less cringing.

You say cringing like it's a bad thing.

What no I don't understand? Now I'm confuesd. I was talking about the line I hear form a lot of Athesits equating relgious thought with a mind that does not work correctly, I have never heard a relgious person say the same of an Athest mind.

That though was not the question I asked. I asked is there any differance in this being gay = being unwell, to the situatiopn that I describe above. You answered yes there is a differance, and when I asked what that differance is , your answer made no sense to me.

Please clarify.

*shrug* I dunno, I'm probably biased, but Atheists are distinctly in the minority...

Cue: penis size boasting.

I'm huge!!!

Sorry, had to be done. ;)

Cue: penis size boasting.
Erm... not all of us are that insecure that we have to go "oh, but that's because you haven't seen mine, ho ho ho."

What no I don't understand? Now I'm confuesd. I was talking about the line I hear form a lot of Athesits equating relgious thought with a mind that does not work correctly, I have never heard a relgious person say the same of an Athest mind.

First off, I've heard that plenty of times. But secondly, you've got to realize that most people who would try to argue that atheists are inferior are also the sort of people who wouldn't be caught dead learning about human neurobiology.

"Mom, I'm gay."
"OMG! Come with me son, I'm taking you to a brothel"
"Em, ok, if you think it's best.He he he he, free hookers"

Now why didn't I think of that...

Erm... not all of us are that insecure that we have to go "oh, but that's because you haven't seen mine, ho ho ho."

I should have made it clear that the boasting would be ironic, such as in the manner observed above.

I'm huge!!!

Sorry, had to be done. ;)

Postpixkthnx.

You say cringing like it's a bad thing.
Well, if it's cold...

"Dammit! At least sit on it for a minute first!"
"I did, it came out like this!"

I should have made it clear that the boasting would be ironic, such as in the manner observed above.
Oh, ok. Sorry 'bout that.

First off, I've heard that plenty of times. But secondly, you've got to realize that most people who would try to argue that atheists are inferior are also the sort of people who wouldn't be caught dead learning about human neurobiology.
Schwann cells=best evar.(I just like the name)

Postpixkthnx.

Are you trying to get me banned? :p

Well, if it's cold...

"Dammit! At least sit on it for a minute first!"
"I did, it came out like this!"

Hotness.

Are you trying to get me banned? :p

No, I'm trying to get you bare.

*shrug* I dunno, I'm probably biased, but Atheists are distinctly in the minority...


Hehe ohh okay I see, you was just reacting to the words. I can dig that. Man did I really use the word in that way, damn I'm getting old!:p

Speculum play. *quiver*


yes-almost barbaric when not warmed properly

No, I'm trying to get you bare.

You've been trying since I first posted here. Think it's going to work now? ;)

First off, I've heard that plenty of times. But secondly, you've got to realize that most people who would try to argue that atheists are inferior are also the sort of people who wouldn't be caught dead learning about human neurobiology.


I would go further and say that these sorts of people are umm how do you say ...prats!

You've been trying since I first posted here. Think it's going to work now? ;)

I am quite relentless when it comes to drilling those I covet.

yes-almost barbaric when not warmed properly

Speak for yourself. Some of us like it barbaric.

Schwann cells=best evar.(I just like the name)
Indeed, I like the name too. Though I also appreciate the increased action potential conduction velocity provided by the myelination of neuronal axons by schwann cells.

Three cheers for showing off!

I am quite relentless when it comes to drilling those I covet.

You said "drilling"... *snicker*

Indeed, I like the name too. Though I also appreciate the increased action potential conduction velocity provided by the myelination of neuronal axons by schwann cells.

Three cheers for showing off!

Pfft! While the nodes de Ranvier are indeed cool, astrocytes rule supreme.

Indeed, I like the name too. Though I also appreciate the increased action potential conduction velocity provided by the myelination of neuronal axons by schwann cells.

Three cheers for showing off!
My ego, she hungers. And any excuse to post the word Schwann.

You said "drilling"... *snicker*

Oh, your snicker would diminish momentarily.

Pfft! While the nodes de Ranvier are indeed cool, astrocytes rule supreme.
I don't see how you can possibly assert that basic structural support and some trivial phagocitic action can compete with the rapid and exciting progress of saltatory conduction. I mean, astrocytes just lay about all day providing scaffolding for the real action.

(To astrocytes): GET A JOB, SLACKERS!

Pfft! While the nodes de Ranvier are indeed cool, astrocytes rule supreme.
Now now, we all know neurotransmitters are the best. Well apart from the pain related ones, though that depends on your kinks.

My ego, she hungers. And any excuse to post the word Schwann.

You wouldn't be so fond of schwannomas.

I don't see how you can possibly assert that basic structural support and some trivial phagocitic action can compete with the rapid and exciting progress of saltatory conduction. I mean, astrocytes just lay about all day providing scaffolding for the real action.

(To astrocytes): GET A JOB, SLACKERS!

You dare knock the synaptic transmission modulators and their electrically-coupled syncytium? Philistine! Saltatory conduction is so base - neurotransmission is where it's at.

I usually use something else.


Me too, but I still need the shoe horn. :D

What the hell are you people talking about?

You dare knock the synaptic transmission modulators and their electrically-coupled syncytium? Philistine! Saltatory conduction is so base - neurotransmission is where it's at.
You synapse-lovers, so fixated on flinging chemicals at each other from across the cleft. It's barbaric.

You dare knock the synaptic transmission modulators and their electrically-coupled syncytium? Philistine! Saltatory conduction is so base - neurotransmission is where it's at.

I'm going to agree with Bottle on this one. Sometimes the simple approach is the best one.

What the hell are you people talking about?
Shhh. For once I started a thread, and people are having fun...

You synapse-lovers, so fixated on flinging chemicals at each other from across the cleft. It's barbaric.

Some of us are just about interaction, while you are nothing but a fan of self-release.

No, whoever you heard that from is an idiot too.

Why ? When one states he worships a leprechaun that sometimes speaks to him and tells him what he should do, that the leprechaun is always right even if the facts seem to contradict it and that the most heinous crimes are in fact noble acts if the leprechaun says he approves - many people will call the man in question a dangerous nutcase.

But replace the leprechaun with God and suddenly he is to be considered devout and rational ?

You dare knock the synaptic transmission modulators and their electrically-coupled syncytium? Philistine! Saltatory conduction is so base - neurotransmission is where it's at.
Testify my brother! Seratonin FTW!

What the hell are you people talking about?
We're waving around bit words in the hope nobody will realise how little we know about neurobiology. Well I am at least.

Why ? When one states he worships a leprechaun that sometimes speaks to him and tells him what he should do, that the leprechaun is always right even if the facts seem to contradict it and that the most heinous crimes are in fact noble acts if the leprechaun says he approves - many people will call the man in question a dangerous nutcase.

But replace the leprechaun with God and suddenly he is to be considered devout and rational ?

It's called tradition. Also, the leprechaun can't do anything except sentence you to the wearing of the green shoes if you are a bad person who doesn't believe. God, on the other hand, will have you smoking a turd in Hell.

Some of us are just about interaction, while you are nothing but a fan of self-release.
It's always a popularity contest with you people.

"I get excitatory input from THREE different afferent pathways!" "My inhibitory impulses regulate the function of two feedback loops!"

Peer pressure, that's all it is. You depolarize your postsynaptic membranes every time some yahoo spits some glutamate in your direction. Well, OUR sodium channel acitivity is regulated by summation at our own axon hillock, not by whatever the cool kids are releasing at the moment.

It's called tradition. Also, the leprechaun can't do anything except sentence you to the wearing of the green shoes if you are a bad person who doesn't believe. God, on the other hand, will have you smoking a turd in Hell.

Butbut.. I want that pot of Gold !

Butbut.. I want that pot of Gold !
Oh, that's if you catch the leprechaun and force him to tell you where it is. Of course, that means torture...

Well, OUR sodium channel acitivity is regulated by summation at our own axon hillock, not by whatever the cool kids are releasing at the moment.


Best post ever.

Oh, that's if you catch the leprechaun and force him to tell you where it is. Of course, that means torture...

*hands the leprechaun over to Bush*

Testify my brother! Seratonin FTW!

That's 5-hydroxytryptamine to you!

Best post ever.
By far.

Gah, my brain hurts. I did my biology test a few days ago, I shouldn't have to think about it this much anymore.

It's always a popularity contest with you people.

"I get excitatory input from THREE different afferent pathways!" "My inhibitory impulses regulate the function of two feedback loops!"

Peer pressure, that's all it is. You depolarize your postsynaptic membranes every time some yahoo spits some glutamate in your direction. Well, OUR sodium channel acitivity is regulated by summation at our own axon hillock, not by whatever the cool kids are releasing at the moment.

And yet you remain in a refractory frigid state not due to someone else's premature gamma-aminobutyric acid burst, but by your own impotence.

And yet you remain in a refractory frigid state not due to someone else's premature gamma-aminobutyric acid burst, but by your own impotence.
Look, just because the voltage dependence of activation for my channels is slightly shifted doesn't mean you get to pick on me. Not all of us can become maximally permiable to current flow every 2 miliseconds. So I inactivate from time to time. I'm not a machine, dammit!

I always knew that's what this was really about for you. You're looking for some younger, more conductive membrane so you can run off and make a bunch of cute little low-resistance vesicles together. Why don't you just admit that it's because I'm fat?!

And yet you remain in a refractory frigid state not due to someone else's premature gamma-aminobutyric acid burst, but by your own impotence.
Nothing a little nitric oxide (not nitrous oxide) might help.

Oh, your snicker would diminish momentarily.

To a squeal? :eek:

To a squeal? :eek:

yeah-as soon as he said "Call me daddy"....

Look, just because the voltage dependence of activation for my channels is slightly shifted doesn't mean you get to pick on me. Not all of us can become maximally permiable to current flow every 2 miliseconds. So I inactivate from time to time. I'm not a machine, dammit!

I always knew that's what this was really about for you. You're looking for some younger, more conductive membrane so you can run off and make a bunch of cute little low-resistance vesicles together. Why don't you just admit that it's because I'm fat?!

It's not so much that you're fat, it's that you have layer upon layer of concentric lipid-bilayer deposits wound around your projections the removal of which you see as a fate worse than apoptosis.

Nothing a little nitric oxide (not nitrous oxide) might help.

I much prefer the indirectness of a potent and selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate specific type 5 phosphodiesterase.

It's not so much that you're fat, it's that you have layer upon layer of concentric lipid-bilayer deposits wound around your projections the removal of which you see as a fate worse than apoptosis.
I'll have you know that there are plenty of folks out there who like a little insulation on an axon. Not everybody is attracted to little anorexic processes with all their membrane hanging out for the world to see. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, considering the unmyelinated hussies you hung around with before we met.

It's not so much that you're fat, it's that you have layer upon layer of concentric lipid-bilayer deposits wound around your projections the removal of which you see as a fate worse than apoptosis.

And what, my good friend Fass, is that?

We are taking this thread to Cuba! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q5b6jrk4JQ&search=cuba%2C%20hijacking)

I'll have you know that there are plenty of folks out there who like a little insulation on an axon. Not everybody is attracted to little anorexic processes with all their membrane hanging out for the world to see. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, considering the unmyelinated hussies you hung around with before we met.

Unmyelinated is just an ugly word bitter glial-dependants such as yourself use for those whose potentials last longer and are slower to climax.

And what, my good friend Fass, is that?

http://www.google.se/search?hl=en&hs=5Gd&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=apoptosis&spell=1

It's not so much that you're fat, it's that you have layer upon layer of concentric lipid-bilayer deposits wound around your projections the removal of which you see as a fate worse than apoptosis.

It's posts like this that make me love Fass -- in a purely platonic way, of course. :p

Unmyelinated is just an ugly word bitter glial-dependants such as yourself use for those whose potentials last longer and are slower to climax.
As if I would ever be jealous of some puny little fibers that can hardly maintain an impulse for a dozen microns! Maybe some easily-impressed immarture membranes can be driven to threshold by your weak EPSPs, but it takes a lot more to induce conformational changes in my voltage-gated channel proteins.

Oh, and you know that time I claimed to be repetatively firing? I was faking it.

http://www.google.se/search?hl=en&hs=5Gd&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=apoptosis&spell=1

Ugh, in other words, good things.:rolleyes:

It's posts like this that make me love Fass -- in a pureply platonic way, of course. :p
(I have to admit, I'm getting pretty turned on at this point...)

As if I would ever be jealous of some puny little fibers that can hardly maintain an impulse for a dozen microns! Maybe some easily-impressed immarture membranes can be driven to threshold by your weak EPSPs, but it takes a lot more to induce conformational changes in my voltage-gated channel proteins.

Oh, and you know that time I claimed to be repetatively firing? I was faking it.

Of course you were faking it, as you fake your entire existence as an independent ectodermal descendant. Not even barely had we started burrowing our way to create the neural fold and crest, when you went off cavorting with the paraxial mesoderm, you perverted somite lover!

(I have to admit, I'm getting pretty turned on at this point...)
It seems the way to a girls heart is through her interneurones.

Of course you were faking it, as you fake your entire existence as an independent ectodermal descendant.

*GASP* Don't you dare bring my progenitor cell into this.


Not even barely had we started burrowing our way to create the neural fold and crest, when you went off cavorting with the paraxial mesoderm, you perverted somite lover!
Oh, and what was I supposed to do? Wait around until you finished differentiating, completed the pruning of your dendritic arborization, and formed your mature synaptic connection pattern? I had impulses of my own to transmit, and I wasn't about to waste my life waiting for you to get your big lazy soma off the extracellular matrix.

*GASP* Don't you dare bring my progenitor cell into this.

Peace be upon them, they were at least saved the shame of your lineage-treachery.

Oh, and what was I supposed to do? Wait around until you finished differentiating, completed the pruning of your dendritic arborization, and formed your mature synaptic connection pattern? I had impulses of my own to transmit, and I wasn't about to waste my life waiting for you to get your big lazy soma off the extracellular matrix.

You admit your wretched addiction to foreign and unworthy growth factors, allowing them to soil your superior plasma membrane with their sarcolemmic detritus. Duped so far were you that you sunk yourself to being only a step above the common myotome, leaving behind our beloved pia and arachoidea maters and instead mimicking their fascia through your own endo-, peri- and epineurium hoi polloi connective tissue! Why don't you just go get yourself a sarcomere while you're at it?

Peace be upon them, they were at least saved the shame of your lineage-treachery.

You admit your wretched addiction to foreign and unworthy growth factors, allowing them to soil your superior plasma membrane with their sarcolemmic detritus. Duped so far were you that you sunk yourself to being only a step above the common myotome, leaving behind our beloved pia and arachoidea maters and instead mimicking their fascia through your own endo-, peri- and epineurium hoi polloi connective tissue! Why don't you just go get yourself a sarcomere while you're at it?
Forgive me for wanting a little tensile strength for my output process.

And who are you to talk about dependence, anyhow? You need astrocytic regulation of pH and ion concentration as much as I do, so don't go walking around like your vesicle fusion never leads to excessive transmitter in the cleft.

"sexual adaptation" ? :D

Forgive me for wanting a little tensile strength for my output process.

And who are you to talk about dependence, anyhow? You need astrocytic regulation of pH and ion concentration as much as I do, so don't go walking around like your vesicle fusion never leads to excessive transmitter in the cleft.

It is clear that your peripheral exile leaves your information retention capacity naught (those cerebellar purkinje fibres taking pity on you through their correction of you notwithstanding) seeing as I was originally extolling the virtues of the noble astrocyte, which has in its morality forsaken you.

It is clear that your peripheral exile leaves your information retention capacity naught (those cerebellar purkinje fibres taking pity on you through their correction of you notwithstanding) seeing as I was originally extolling the virtues of the noble astrocyte, which has in its morality forsaken you.
I'm as able to have my firing pattern regulated by long term potentiation as you are, thank you very much, so there's no need to talk down to me. My point is, if you are going to go around knocking my affiliation with Schwann cells, or my fondness for the nodal regions of exposed membrane with high densities of ion channels that allow for greatly increased action potential velocity, then you'd better be willing to take a good hard look at your own addiction to glial modulation.

I'm as able to have my firing pattern regulated by long term potentiation as you are, thank you very much, so there's no need to talk down to me. My point is that you're hardly one to be impugning glial cells on the basis of their supportive role. If you are going to go around knocking my affiliation with Schwann cells, or my fondness for the internodal regions of exposed membrane with high densities of ion channels that allow for greatly increased action potential velocity, then you'd better be willing to take a good hard look at your own addiction to glial modulation.

Your "oomph" doesn't have enough "aah"

I think I'm learning again...Bah! I already took the biology final, I don't need yer fancy learnings n'more!