NationStates Jolt Archive


Some Injured GIs decide to stay in iraq

DesignatedMarksman
11-06-2006, 02:32
Talk about hardcore...there is a picture I always post for guys like this. DAAYUM! I thought this was gonna be about those two guys who married Iraqis and live there now. Guess not.




Some injured GIs decide to stay in Iraq By RYAN LENZ, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 49 minutes ago



MAHMOUDIYA, Iraq - Parallel scars running down 1st Sgt. Rick Skidis' calf tell the story of how he nearly lost his leg when a roadside bomb blew through the door of his armored Humvee.

ADVERTISEMENT




The blast shredded muscle, ligament and tendon, leaving Skidis in a daze as medics and fellow soldiers rushed to help him. Skidis remembers little of that day last November except someone warning him that when he woke, his foot might be gone.

After five months and six surgeries, the foot remains intact but causes Skidis haunting numbness and searing pain caused by nerve damage.

Skidis, 36, of Sullivan, Ill., fought through the surgeries and therapy to return in April to Iraq, conducting the same type of patrols that nearly killed him.

He is not an exception.

Nearly 18,000 military personnel have been wounded in combat since the war began in Iraq more than three years ago, according to Defense Department statistics. Some have lost legs and arms, suffered horrific burns to their bodies and gone home permanently.

But the vast majority have remained in Iraq or returned later — their bodies marked by small scars and their lives plagued by aches and pains.

"I wear my scars proudly," said Skidis as he gingerly lifted his pant leg to show the railroad-like tracks where doctors made incisions to save his foot. Why didn't he stay home? "I felt guilty because I wasn't sharing the same hardships that they were," Skidis said shyly, while another soldier nodded at his side.

For some soldiers in Iraq, it was a roadside blast that muffled their hearing or peppered their body in shrapnel. Others have been ripped by gunfire, sometimes leaving them with jabbing pains in their limbs and compromised movement.

Their wounds are often similar but there are many reasons for remaining at war when their wounds are a ticket home.

Some can't imagine any other job than being a soldier. Some know no other life. Others, like Skidis, feel the guilt, an obligation to their fellow soldiers.

Staff Sgt. Katherine Yocom-Delgado, 28, of Brooklyn, N.Y., lost 70 percent of the hearing in her left ear weeks ago when an artillery shell landed just a few feet away from her. Her teeth still hurt and she has frequent headaches, especially in the morning.

Yocom-Delgado tilts her head when she listens to people talk.

But she hasn't considered leaving — the wounds are not as important as the mission.

"I'm alive and I'm happy to be alive," she said with a smile. "I don't hurt every day."

As a woman, Yocom-Delgado represents just two percent of those injured in Iraq, a figure she quotes and has read in new articles. It's an odd distinction, she said, just her luck.

Spc. Steven Clark's luck is worse. The 25-year-old has been shot three times and wounded by shrapnel from a grenade that tore into his legs and back. He has been awarded three purple hearts — a fourth is on the way — and a bronze star with valor.

His friends have nicknamed him "Bullet Magnet" — but he won't consider leaving.

Clark, of Fitzgerald, Ga., says getting wounded was a mistake and his pain is punishment for letting people down. He won't show the scars on his calf or shoulder or back. He calls the attacks "incidents."

"I have pains. I have numbness from nerve damage. But it's just something I'm going to have to live with," Clark said. "I'm not going to change what I am just because it's dangerous."

Soldiers in the battalion, the 502nd Infantry Regiment of the Army's 101st Airborne Division, have been struck by more than 230 roadside bombs since they arrived in Iraq last October, leaving 15 dead. They've discovered about 350 more on the roads that crisscross their swath of desert.

More than 100 of the soldiers have been wounded, mostly on patrols in their sector south of Baghdad where Shiite and Sunni Arab tribes often clash with coalition forces. Twenty-seven of those wounded were evacuated from Iraq and remain at hospitals in the United States.

Pfc. Salvadore Bertolone, 21, of Ortonville, Mich., was injured when a roadside bomb blew glass shards into his face and arm. A scar curls down his cheek, but he dismisses his injury.

There are perks to staying in the fight after an injury, he said.

"I get free license plates for the rest of my life," Bertolone said. "And I've got people who are definitely going to be buying me drinks when I get home."

Though proud of their fellow soldiers, medics fear long-term health problems lie ahead.

"The soldiers here are so focused on staying in the fight that they suck up the pain and push through," said Capt. Dennison Segui, 33, a medic and physician's assistant from Browns Mills, N.J. "I know I'm busy here, but I'm nowhere near as busy as I will be when we get back."

Many of the injured soldiers have begged their commanders to let them come back. One soldier was sent home after a bomb exploded in his face and damaged his eyes. He likely will never return to Iraq, but still asks. Another was sent home because of a heart condition, but returned to Iraq three times, according to Lt. Col. Thomas Kunk, a commander in the 502nd Infantry Regiment.

Kunk, who is not a doctor, decides every week which wounded soldiers can return to duty. Often the soldiers research regulations and argue endlessly, he said.

It's heartbreaking when he has to say no, but he does.

"Sometimes there's too much 'Hooah!' in us guys," Kunk said. While he doesn't want to dampen that enthusiasm, he said, "I don't want to hurt the guy the rest of his life."

Kunk has injuries of his own, so he understands a soldier's conviction to fight. His leg swells and throbs by the end of the day, the lingering effect of a roadside bomb that damaged nerves and muscle. But he, too, won't think of leaving.

"I'm a father. Heck, I'm a grandpa to be honest with you. So I just kind of look at it from that perspective," said Kunk, 48. "I want to do right by them."
TeHe
11-06-2006, 02:51
God bless everyone one of them. Those are some real tough sons of bitches.
Teh_pantless_hero
11-06-2006, 03:02
"I wear my scars proudly," said Skidis as he gingerly lifted his pant leg to show the railroad-like tracks where doctors made incisions to save his foot. Why didn't he stay home? "I felt guilty because I wasn't sharing the same hardships that they were," Skidis said shyly, while another soldier nodded at his side.
Classic psychological phenomena.
Neo Kervoskia
11-06-2006, 03:03
Why?
DesignatedMarksman
11-06-2006, 03:35
Shows committment. I posted this in light of SR's accusation that somehow US troops are cowards. Bah.
Nagapura
11-06-2006, 04:37
Semper Fi.
Kazus
11-06-2006, 04:54
Thats just dumb. Why endanger yourself or your unit even more?
The Nazz
11-06-2006, 05:01
The article doesn't actually say how many of those who have injuries and who have the option of going home, choose not to. The anecdotes make it seem like it's a large number, but it's unclear. Plus, how many of those wounded soldiers actually have the option of going home as a result of their injuries? A wound is not a guaranteed ticket home, after all. Sloppy reporting--or reporting with an agenda. No way of telling which at this point, but there's some big questions left unanswered by this piece.
Teh_pantless_hero
11-06-2006, 05:36
Thats just dumb. Why endanger yourself or your unit even more?
What they said - they feel guilty. It's a classic psychological phenomena. Overwhelming guilt, even when you are the victim, evolves into stupidity.
The SR
11-06-2006, 21:42
Shows committment. I posted this in light of SR's accusation that somehow US troops are cowards. Bah.

i knoe i shouldnt bother, but i said this when?

i think it was their discipline i questioned
Zarathoft
11-06-2006, 22:05
Good job to them for have the guts to go back even after they've been wounded.
Quaon
11-06-2006, 22:16
Give me a link. Otherwise this is falsified right-wing propaganda. Even if it is true, it is phycological phenomana. Big deal.
Maverick Battalion
11-06-2006, 22:30
The article doesn't actually say how many of those who have injuries and who have the option of going home, choose not to. The anecdotes make it seem like it's a large number, but it's unclear. Plus, how many of those wounded soldiers actually have the option of going home as a result of their injuries? A wound is not a guaranteed ticket home, after all. Sloppy reporting--or reporting with an agenda. No way of telling which at this point, but there's some big questions left unanswered by this piece.

Heh, interesting that you pick this single article to call "reporting with an agenda." Then again, I'm sure you don't recognize the agenda of 60 Minutes, the Associated Press, et alibi because it lines up with your belief. You should realize that all people, no matter what they claim, are biased.

I agree that it is sloppy reporting; mostly just a feel-good piece giving examples of American military courage. But there are many sloppy pieces out there.

:eek: :mp5: :sniper:
The Nazz
11-06-2006, 22:48
Heh, interesting that you pick this single article to call "reporting with an agenda." Then again, I'm sure you don't recognize the agenda of 60 Minutes, the Associated Press, et alibi because it lines up with your belief. You should realize that all people, no matter what they claim, are biased.

I agree that it is sloppy reporting; mostly just a feel-good piece giving examples of American military courage. But there are many sloppy pieces out there.

:eek: :mp5: :sniper:
This was the article that was quoted--what am I supposed to do, go out and examine every fucking article published every day and examine it for signs of bias? Please.

All I was trying to do here was point out what wasn't being mentioned in the article, not make some larger statement about the state of the corporate media. I have other threads for that.
B0zzy
11-06-2006, 23:12
This was the article that was quoted--what am I supposed to do, go out and examine every fucking article published every day and examine it for signs of bias? Please.

You have a problem with that? :)
The Nazz
11-06-2006, 23:18
You have a problem with that? :)
Yeah--it cuts into my porn viewing time! :D
B0zzy
12-06-2006, 12:18
porn is so biased!