NationStates Jolt Archive


Bush 'planted fake news stories on American TV'

Demented Hamsters
04-06-2006, 13:47
Yeah, yeah. I know. The thread title is a bit extreme, but it's taken from the original article about how prevalent Video News Releases (VNRs) are passed off as factual, unbiased news reports in the US media.
Getting the thread title right is a difficult, yet important artform.

They're not all US state dept VNRs - the article does state that the big US companies (eg GM, Mars, Pfizer) are also in on it. But you write it the way it'll sell, I guess.

Doesn't take away from the fact that the US govt has been (and still is) involved in passing off fake stories as truth. Good to see propoganda is alive and well in the US. And that the US media is still a beacon of honesty, truth and impartialness.

Whole article copied, cause the Independent insists on you paying for the privilege of reading it.

Bush "Planted Fake News Stories on American TV"
By Andrew Buncombe
The Independent UK

Monday 29 May 2006

Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.

Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.

The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.

"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."

Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.

The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.

The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.

Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.

Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."

The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."

The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).
Link (http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/14398/Bush_Planted_Fake_News_Stories_On_American_TV)
Now to wait for the usual Bush apologists to first dismiss it because of it's source, say there's nothing wrong with reporting the 'facts' in Iraq, then argue that it's nothing new and Clinton did the same, and of course argue that the media is a bunch of leftists and the Bush admin needs to do this in order to maintain a sense of balance.
Refused Party Program
04-06-2006, 13:53
I wouldn't call your thread title extreme. It's an accurate representation of the allegations.
Demented Hamsters
04-06-2006, 13:56
I wouldn't call your thread title extreme. It's an accurate representation of the allegations.
Well, not entirely accurate. Very selective, as it doesn't inform you that it's not just the Bush Admin that's doing it.
Hobovillia
04-06-2006, 14:03
Weird shit man, weird shit.


That just goes to show GET OUT OF AMERICA NOW ERIKA! WHILE YOU CAN!

Yeah, my friend that moved back to America last year because her parents jobs weren't pying enough.
[NS]Liasia
04-06-2006, 14:09
I was under the impression it was fox's job to plant fake news.. ah well. Maybe Bush and Fox are in cahoots.
Jeruselem
04-06-2006, 14:19
Slack news networks getting given pre-packaged "news" and using it to make money. Suits the supplier and broadcaster to both win.
The Taker
04-06-2006, 14:50
So THAT is where Michael Moore learned how to do that.
Skinny87
04-06-2006, 14:52
So THAT is where Michael Moore learned how to do that.

Moore has never pretended to be a genuine news network. He has always said his documentaries are for entertainment purposes.
Non Aligned States
04-06-2006, 15:41
He has always said his documentaries are for entertainment purposes.

I'd like to see the news networks linked in showing these VNRs to also claim their broadcasts are for entertainment purposes. If they pass it off as news, that's at the very least, false advertising. I'm not too sure, but I think that one is a sue-able offence.
Jeruselem
04-06-2006, 15:51
I'd like to see the news networks linked in showing these VNRs to also claim their broadcasts are for entertainment purposes. If they pass it off as news, that's at the very least, false advertising. I'm not too sure, but I think that one is a sue-able offence.

People don't watch documentaries every day but they do end up watching the news everyday in some form. If you are feed corporate or government VNRs as news, you'd might as well set-up a news network just for this reason called the Propaganda Network!
Free Soviets
04-06-2006, 16:07
Well, not entirely accurate. Very selective, as it doesn't inform you that it's not just the Bush Admin that's doing it.

though that's probably the thing that's actually illegal (i'm not sure about the law for all the corporate propaganda videos, but the gao declared the state's ones were clearly illegal covert propaganda back in jan. of 2005)
Non Aligned States
04-06-2006, 16:07
I know. An interesting thought would be how the Busheviks respond to this one? I'd say we would see a mix of Moore blaming, liberal media claims and a few "it's always been there, get used to it" points.

Although the last point might hold a grain of truth. I seem to recall on this board that some mention was made regarding the CIA planting news in foreign networks so as to improve the credibility of their propaganda during the cold war.
Demented Hamsters
05-06-2006, 05:26
I know. An interesting thought would be how the Busheviks respond to this one? I'd say we would see a mix of Moore blaming, liberal media claims and a few "it's always been there, get used to it" points.
I was wondering the same thing myself. Seems the answer is 'none of the above' and their response is, "I'll ignore this and it'll go away and I can continue pretending that they do nothing wrong"