NationStates Jolt Archive


Former CIA operative states that Iran will have Nuclear weapons

Wilgrove
31-05-2006, 23:05
I was watching Hardball, and they had on a former CIA Operative, Bob Bear. He states that Iran is after Nuclear Weapons, and that the leader first target will be Israel. Paliestine may also help Iran. The only way to stop him, is to bomb Iran. However, here's the catch. 1.) Our troops are scretched out, so taking on a third country would be near to impossible. 2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. 3.) If we bomb them, the rest of the arab world will come after us, with more terrorist attacks etc. etc. So we're caught between the hard place and the rock. Iran litterly has us by the nutsack. This is the start of World War III.
Gravlen
31-05-2006, 23:22
This is the start of World War III.
Nah, I doubt it. I still can't believe that Iran would start a pointless nuclear war by attacking Israel if they get nukes. It is a lose-lose scenario.
I V Stalin
31-05-2006, 23:24
I was watching Hardball, and they had on a former CIA Operative, Bob Bear. He states that Iran is after Nuclear Weapons, and that the leader first target will be Israel. Paliestine may also help Iran. The only way to stop him, is to bomb Iran. However, here's the catch. 1.) Our troops are scretched out, so taking on a third country would be near to impossible. 2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. 3.) If we bomb them, the rest of the arab world will come after us, with more terrorist attacks etc. etc. So we're caught between the hard place and the rock. Iran litterly has us by the nutsack. This is the start of World War III.
Why do people assume the Iranians are stupid? They're not going to nuke shit - the sole reason they want to develop nukes is as a big 'Fuck You' to America.
Thegrandbus
31-05-2006, 23:25
This is the start of World War III.
Meh, not a world war in till someone invades France
Nadkor
31-05-2006, 23:25
They will?

Cool.

At least the US will forget about invading them.
The SR
31-05-2006, 23:29
my mate down the pub says... blah blah

why oh why would the iranians nuke israel? i they did the land would be uninhabitible and therefore the palestinians would be unable to move back in. kinda defeats the puropse really!! and they would get all the after effects too. utter propaganda bullshit
Gravlen
31-05-2006, 23:35
my mate down the pub says... blah blah

why oh why would the itanians nuke israel? i they did the land would be uninhabitible and therefore the palestinians would be unable to move back in. kinda defeats the puropse really!! and they would get all the after effects too. utter propaganda bullshit
I thought you said "Italians" :D
Drunk commies deleted
31-05-2006, 23:38
Why do people assume the Iranians are stupid? They're not going to nuke shit - the sole reason they want to develop nukes is as a big 'Fuck You' to America.
No, the reason they want nukes is so that they can continue to use terrorism and deter any military response that terrorism might bring.
Istenbul
31-05-2006, 23:40
I was watching Hardball, and they had on a former CIA Operative, Bob Bear. He states that Iran is after Nuclear Weapons, and that the leader first target will be Israel. Paliestine may also help Iran. The only way to stop him, is to bomb Iran. However, here's the catch. 1.) Our troops are scretched out, so taking on a third country would be near to impossible. 2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. 3.) If we bomb them, the rest of the arab world will come after us, with more terrorist attacks etc. etc. So we're caught between the hard place and the rock. Iran litterly has us by the nutsack. This is the start of World War III.

If our current CIA couldn't get the information correct on Iraq...what makes you think an EX-CIA man will get Iran correct?

Just rumors, gossip and speculations. If they can research a nuclear weapon on their own, they deserve it. Why should we be the hypocrites with the bombs and say others can not have them?
The SR
31-05-2006, 23:42
I thought you said "Italians" :D

thats a fair point. thats why the computers have edit buttons :p
Londim
31-05-2006, 23:52
http://www.kevincannon.org/portfolio/nyo-nuclear-bush.jpg

And you say we have to be worried about Iran
Cheese penguins
01-06-2006, 00:00
Why do people assume the Iranians are stupid? They're not going to nuke shit - the sole reason they want to develop nukes is as a big 'Fuck You' to America.
Why can't they all line up on a hill and scream "Fuck America" or like make a nice plane with the message written on it that drops leaflets that say "Fuck America", actually that is kinda catchy, FUCK AMERICA!!
Celtlund
01-06-2006, 00:10
I was watching Hardball, and they had on a former CIA Operative, Bob Bear. He states that Iran is after Nuclear Weapons, and that the leader first target will be Israel. Paliestine may also help Iran. The only way to stop him, is to bomb Iran. However, here's the catch. 1.) Our troops are scretched out, so taking on a third country would be near to impossible. 2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. 3.) If we bomb them, the rest of the arab world will come after us, with more terrorist attacks etc. etc. So we're caught between the hard place and the rock. Iran litterly has us by the nutsack. This is the start of World War III.

...and Bill Clinton had John Kennedy assinated so he could become President when he grew up...Oh wait...Hillary had it done so Bill would become President...no, no...Hillary had it done so she could become... :eek: :D
Gravlen
01-06-2006, 00:31
thats a fair point. thats why the computers have edit buttons :p
But it was a good question though: Why would the Italians nuke Israel?

My best bet would be that the Eurovision Song Contest was a factor somehow... :p
Tropical Sands
01-06-2006, 00:35
2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. *snip*

I'd just like to point out that its a common misconception that we get most of our oil from the Middle East. The majority of our oil doesn't come from Iran, or any Middle Eastern country, but actually from Canada.

The Middle East combined is just the largest supplier to the world in general.
JiangGuo
01-06-2006, 00:50
The United States in its history has never taken direct military action against a test-verified nuclear-armed country with ballistic missiles. The simple logic being that the US unwilling to see a mushroom cloud over a major American city. The Iranians are rationally banking on this continuous deterent against America military action - conventional or nuclear.

Just look at North Korea, they claim to have working weapons and the US sabre-rattling about regime change ceased almost immediately.

Strategically, for Iran, aquiring nuclear arms is a defensive/survivalist goal.

As for the old "they're a bunch of ragtag Islamic maniacs and Israel is going to a goner if they get their dirty hands on nukes!!!!111" - the mullahs may have considerable clout in Iran, but they run the whole show. All that talk about wiping Israel off the map is rheoteric, like the US talking about 'spreading freedom and democracy'. Its constantly said but no concrete action is taken.

Personally, I'd celebrate when Iran announces their nuclear test this year.
DrunkenDove
01-06-2006, 01:00
My best bet would be that the Eurovision Song Contest was a factor somehow... :p

Pssst....The Italians don't compete in the Eurovision anymore.
DrunkenDove
01-06-2006, 01:02
The Middle East combined is just the largest supplier to the world in general.

It also has the worlds largest untapped reserves.
Psychotic Mongooses
01-06-2006, 01:26
Personally, I'd celebrate when Iran announces their nuclear test this year.

Uhh, I wouldn't.
Wilgrove
01-06-2006, 03:08
Yall are assuming that the leader of Iran is a rational and sane fella. :rolleyes:
Gravlen
01-06-2006, 10:41
Pssst....The Italians don't compete in the Eurovision anymore.
Exactly!! But the Israelis are, and they brought Dana International to the world. That's got to be the cause of some very bad blood - perhaps even grounds for a vendetta!
Gravlen
01-06-2006, 10:50
Yall are assuming that the leader of Iran is a rational and sane fella. :rolleyes:
Not necessarily, but there is more then one person in the Iranian government - And Ahmadinejad is not the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei is.
Drunk commies deleted
01-06-2006, 14:58
The United States in its history has never taken direct military action against a test-verified nuclear-armed country with ballistic missiles. The simple logic being that the US unwilling to see a mushroom cloud over a major American city. The Iranians are rationally banking on this continuous deterent against America military action - conventional or nuclear.

Just look at North Korea, they claim to have working weapons and the US sabre-rattling about regime change ceased almost immediately.

Strategically, for Iran, aquiring nuclear arms is a defensive/survivalist goal.

As for the old "they're a bunch of ragtag Islamic maniacs and Israel is going to a goner if they get their dirty hands on nukes!!!!111" - the mullahs may have considerable clout in Iran, but they run the whole show. All that talk about wiping Israel off the map is rheoteric, like the US talking about 'spreading freedom and democracy'. Its constantly said but no concrete action is taken.

Personally, I'd celebrate when Iran announces their nuclear test this year.
I, for one, am hoping we'll have an administration that is willing to glass a nuclear armed Iran if they continue to use terrorism against us like they did in the Khobar towers bombing.
Psychotic Military
01-06-2006, 15:39
Yall are assuming that the leader of Iran is a rational and sane fella. :rolleyes:


andyou think we assume that your a rational person:gundge:
Gravlen
01-06-2006, 16:50
I, for one, am hoping we'll have an administration that is willing to glass a nuclear armed Iran if they continue to use terrorism against us like they did in the Khobar towers bombing.
There is no publicly available evidence to link Iran to that attack, is there?
OcceanDrive
01-06-2006, 17:17
Not necessarily, but there is more then one person in the Iranian government - And Ahmadinejad is not the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei is.Thanks god for the Ayatollas :D :cool: :D :D

BTW.. *honest question*
which one is the Army commander-in-cheif ?
Which one calls the military shots?? (military strikes, cease-fires, etc)?
Khadgar
01-06-2006, 17:19
I was watching Hardball, and they had on a former CIA Operative, Bob Bear. He states that Iran is after Nuclear Weapons, and that the leader first target will be Israel. Paliestine may also help Iran. The only way to stop him, is to bomb Iran. However, here's the catch. 1.) Our troops are scretched out, so taking on a third country would be near to impossible. 2.) We get our oil from Iran, so if we bomb them, there goes our Economy. 3.) If we bomb them, the rest of the arab world will come after us, with more terrorist attacks etc. etc. So we're caught between the hard place and the rock. Iran litterly has us by the nutsack. This is the start of World War III.

Israel could make Iran their bitch in about a week given provocation. Iran isn't that stupid.
Lionstone
01-06-2006, 17:25
I, for one, am hoping we'll have an administration that is willing to glass a nuclear armed Iran if they continue to use terrorism against us like they did in the Khobar towers bombing.


I for one am hoping that there will be a sane enough administration that WONT try and glass someone with the ability to hit back just as hard.
Corneliu
01-06-2006, 17:29
Personally, I'd celebrate when Iran announces their nuclear test this year.

I'd be buying as much lead as I can to block out the radiation.
Corneliu
01-06-2006, 17:30
Thanks god for the Ayatollas :D :cool: :D :D

BTW.. *honest question*
which one is the Army commander-in-cheif ?
Which one calls the military shots?? (military strikes, cease-fires, etc)?

You back again? I thought we got rid of you? Alwell. I guess its back to the status quo then eh? :D
Corneliu
01-06-2006, 17:32
I for one am hoping that there will be a sane enough administration that WONT try and glass someone with the ability to hit back just as hard.

Right now...Iran cannot hit the United States directly.
RLI Returned
01-06-2006, 17:33
I'd just like to point out that its a common misconception that we get most of our oil from the Middle East. The majority of our oil doesn't come from Iran, or any Middle Eastern country, but actually from Canada.

The Middle East combined is just the largest supplier to the world in general.

However the general principle still applies. If Iran stopped exporting oil then the prices would skyrocket, especially if other Middle Eastern nation decided to show solidarity.
Szanth
01-06-2006, 17:34
I'd be buying as much lead as I can to block out the radiation.

And then die from lead poisoning. :p
OcceanDrive
01-06-2006, 17:41
You back again? I thought we got rid of you? Alwell. I guess its back to the status quo then eh? :Dyes, YES I am back.. Leaner and Meaner than eva!! :D :D ;) :D

Actually I am on a NS diet

"20 minutes a day/ 3-4 times a week."

So.. do not get offended If I do not reply as fast as I used to.
Corneliu
01-06-2006, 17:41
And then die from lead poisoning. :p

Not necessarily if you do it right.