NationStates Jolt Archive


Think you're not prejudiced? Prove it here.

Rhaomi
31-05-2006, 01:51
I recently came across a very interesting website (http://implicit.harvard.edu/) hosted by a premier Harvard psychological program. It allows the user to take a wide variety of rapid-fire sorting-type trials of images and words associated with various ethnic and cultural groups. The program's creators have designed a powerful mathematical model which analyzes how a person sorts the various stimuli to uncover hidden biases, biases which the person may not admit to or even be aware of.

Keep in mind that these tests do not uncover just racial prejudices, but all kinds of unconscious judgements -- there are tests for young/old, fat/thin, gay/straight, and even Presidential biases. I encourage everyone to try out these tests; they're free, anonymous, objective, scientifically based, and may reveal unconscious prejudices you never knew you had.
Big Jim P
31-05-2006, 01:52
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally, without fear or favor.
Neu Leonstein
31-05-2006, 01:53
Last time I did it, it told me I was slightly racist against Black people. Meh.
Europa Maxima
31-05-2006, 01:54
Done it already. I know I am only attracted to whites sexually, so this is no news.
Not bad
31-05-2006, 01:55
Sorry cant trust it. Harvard let a Bush aide into it's business school and the kid didnt pass the Nation States forum test of merit. All things Harvard are now suspect. For all we know Republicans paid for that test to discredit Democrats as prejudiced.
Galemir
31-05-2006, 02:00
I don't believe I'm prejudice. I don't care about anything except a person's personality. If they're a jerk to me for no reason, then I have a reason to dislike them.
Freising
31-05-2006, 02:02
The (religion) test says I prefer Jews over other religions. In fact I moderately sway away from Jews. I don't see how this test is good for anything except testing reflexes and brain processing.
Dakini
31-05-2006, 02:04
I don't like that site, it said that I had a moderate preference for men with science and women with liberal arts.


I only got screwed up with the things because they switched the sides. If they'd introduced female on the same side as science instead of with liberal arts, I would have got the opposite result. I got used to placing male to the left and female to the right.
Not bad
31-05-2006, 02:09
Your data suggest a slight association of European American with Harmless Objects and African American with Weapons compared to African American with Harmless Objects and European American with Weapons.
Assis
31-05-2006, 02:16
Well... I think this is absobloodylutely BS. :D
Assis
31-05-2006, 02:17
The (religion) test says I prefer Jews over other religions. In fact I moderately sway away from Jews. I don't see how this test is good for anything except testing reflexes and brain processing.
Spot on... :sniper:
Dobbsworld
31-05-2006, 02:19
I click on the 'proceed' link and there's dozens of tests.



























Fuck that noise. I know who I can't stand - fucking Nazis, that's who. I don't need a test to tell me that...
Greater londres
31-05-2006, 02:28
apparantly I'm not a racist. that information changed my life
CthulhuFhtagn
31-05-2006, 02:31
This was hilarious. It said I have a preference towards light-skinned people, and I constantly ended up sending words like "nasty", "terrible", and "agony" to whichever side the white people were on.
Dinaverg
31-05-2006, 02:34
Moderately prefer Euros. *shrug* Sorry, my race sucks now-a-days.
An archy
31-05-2006, 02:41
These test seem to be based on a generally good concept. They take into account all sorts of other potential factors and effectively isolate them from the factor of prejudice. The problem that I see is that there is too much potential for variability. What if you happen to be processing things a little more slowly, by pure coincidence, on one particular go around. I say, if you want to measure any latent prejudices as accurately as possible, you should take one of these tests about 7 or 8 times. That should eliminate any variability.

Secondly, I'd like to say that latent prejudices are meaningless. What really matters is how you actively decide to treat people. If you treat everyone the same, I'd say you are a genuinly unprejudiced person, no matter what subconscious tendancies you might have.
Dodudodu
31-05-2006, 02:42
Your results could not be determined...

Does that mean I'm not racist at all?
The Parkus Empire
31-05-2006, 02:48
Already did this sorta thing. It said I trust Black (http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/verkleidung/costumed-smiley-047.gif) poeple less then White. No prejudice there, if it was a dark night, I'd feel safer around White people. Blacks (http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/verkleidung/costumed-smiley-090.gif) have a higher crime rate. Acually, according to the test, a lot of Blacks (http://smilies.vidahost.com/cwm/survivor/nick_brown.gif) are just as biased toward other Blacks (http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/verkleidung/costumed-smiley-012.gif). Big deal, I don't intentionally dislike Blacks (http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/verkleidung/costumed-smiley-026.gif). I'd feel safer around a Jew, then an European-America (I'm a EA, by the way), so it's nothing to be ashamed about.
An archy
31-05-2006, 02:50
Does that mean I'm not racist at all?
That means you're so unracist, words cannot discribe how open minded you are.

No. Actually, it means you went too slow or got too many answers incorrect.
Greater Alemannia
31-05-2006, 02:51
I'm not even going to do the test, because fuck straight I'm prejudiced. I prefer whites and asians.
Garindi
31-05-2006, 02:54
I don't need this test to know that I'm prejudiced. I'll admit that if two gangsta-looking black guys were walking towards me as I was walking on the sidewalk, I would cross the street. I may be called a racist, but there have been too many incidents for me to risk it.
Tomzilla
31-05-2006, 02:56
I'm slightly racist against Whites when it comes to weapons. And I'm 100% white...