NationStates Jolt Archive


If al-Qaeda plans to attack Canada...

The Chinese Republics
18-05-2006, 02:02
where will it be?

According to CSIS, attack on Canada is "now probable" (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/05/10/attack-probable.html).

*POLL WARNING*
Marrakech II
18-05-2006, 02:17
Now why would they attack a nation they can use as a base of operations? The lax Canadian immigration policies are great for getting in your jihad buddies. Why would they want to risk Canada from actually having a good immigration policy?
Ginnoria
18-05-2006, 02:18
Now why would they attack a nation they can use as a base of operations? The lax Canadian immigration policies are great for getting in your jihad buddies. Why would they want to risk Canada from actually having a good immigration policy?
This is precisely why we need four walls around the US, not just one. And a ceiling, in case they decide to start catapaulting people in.
The Chinese Republics
18-05-2006, 02:23
Now why would they attack a nation they can use as a base of operations? The lax Canadian immigration policies are great for getting in your jihad buddies. Why would they want to risk Canada from actually having a good immigration policy?
One word:

AFGHANISTAN


As for immigration policy, it's not lax, it's screwed. It's not Canada's job to protect your turf btw, instead, why don't you Saran (R) wrap your friggin country. Works great against the so-called "illegals" too.
Undelia
18-05-2006, 02:49
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.
Notaxia
18-05-2006, 03:12
Why would terrorists attack Canada?

Because of our bacon.
Dobbsworld
18-05-2006, 03:30
Now why would they attack a nation they can use as a base of operations? The lax Canadian immigration policies are great for getting in your jihad buddies. Why would they want to risk Canada from actually having a good immigration policy?
Seems to me that you'd like that idea. What a negative-vibe merchant.
New Stalinberg
18-05-2006, 03:39
I'm not going to fear because the mountees will protect them.
Marrakech II
18-05-2006, 04:23
Seems to me that you'd like that idea. What a negative-vibe merchant.

Seems I have learned from the best eh Dobbsworld?;)
The Atlantian islands
18-05-2006, 04:33
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.

You really think the only reason the arabs have issues with us is because of Israel?
Trytonia
18-05-2006, 04:37
Because of our bacon.


Its flat and not jihad friendly... no hills to hide in like real bacon
DesignatedMarksman
18-05-2006, 04:43
But they sure aren't going to use handguns or rifles, after all those require a PERMIT and we KNOW that TERRORISTS will OBEY THE LAW.

Maybe Canada will belly up to the bar and accept a larger part of the WOT. Heck, maybe they'll send a few warship around the globe with the USN? Tag team? (No, not across the great lakes, I mean across the OCEAN)
DesignatedMarksman
18-05-2006, 04:45
You really think the only reason the arabs have issues with us is because of Israel?

You're touching the US. That's enough of a reason for them.
Langwell
18-05-2006, 04:56
They're all too preoccupied with the US to divert their attention to us. I feel pretty safe up here.
The Atlantian islands
18-05-2006, 05:25
You're touching the US. That's enough of a reason for them.

I'm an American...lol...I was speaking for the West as a whole. :p
Sarkhaan
18-05-2006, 05:26
someone warn the moose!
DesignatedMarksman
18-05-2006, 05:26
They're all too preoccupied with the US to divert their attention to us. I feel pretty safe up here.


You mean mexico?
Dakini
18-05-2006, 05:37
Maybe Canada will belly up to the bar and accept a larger part of the WOT. Heck, maybe they'll send a few warship around the globe with the USN? Tag team? (No, not across the great lakes, I mean across the OCEAN)
lol

Yes, we're not doing anything in the war against terrorism, it's not like we've helped out in the war in Afghanistan or anything. Yep, we're a bunch of lazy asses who are supporting the terrorists.
The Chinese Republics
18-05-2006, 06:04
You're touching the US. That's enough of a reason for them.
*Runs to the Alaska ferry terminal*

*touch*

*touch*

Oops :D
Secret aj man
18-05-2006, 06:13
where will it be?

According to CSIS, attack on Canada is "now probable" (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/05/10/attack-probable.html).

*POLL WARNING*


well at least they would get the streets dirty...canada is to damn clean!

just kidding,i love and i am a bit envious of my northern neighbors,but it is to damn clean up there...weird to me..lol..i was in montreal and felt bad to even flick a ciggarette in the street...so i didnt...stuck the damn thing in my pocket...which made me smell like a cig butt.
Santa Barbara
18-05-2006, 06:13
This is precisely why we need four walls around the US, not just one. And a ceiling, in case they decide to start catapaulting people in.

A ceiling? Are you crazy? They'll just burrow in from above. Or use the chimney, like Santa does. Only instead of gifts for good children, it's low wage employment. Didn't you see Aliens? They came in from the space between the ceiling and the roof, climbing upside down in a swarm. That's exactly what foreigners will do. No, we need a series of large, manned ringed towers, with billions of upwards-pointing metal spikes on the reinforced rooftop, booby traps, armed laser towers.

Your heart is in the right spot, but you're not thinking thoroughly.
Sarkhaan
18-05-2006, 06:17
A ceiling? Are you crazy? They'll just burrow in from above. Or use the chimney, like Santa does. Only instead of gifts for good children, it's low wage employment. Didn't you see Aliens? They came in from the space between the ceiling and the roof, climbing upside down in a swarm. That's exactly what foreigners will do. No, we need a series of large, manned ringed towers, with billions of upwards-pointing metal spikes on the reinforced rooftop, booby traps, armed laser towers.

Your heart is in the right spot, but you're not thinking thoroughly.
are you standing on your head again?
Santa Barbara
18-05-2006, 06:19
are you standing on your head again?

Well, how else could I talk through my arse?
Sarkhaan
18-05-2006, 06:23
Well, how else could I talk through my arse?
touche.
Straughn
18-05-2006, 06:51
*Runs to the Alaska ferry terminal*

*touch*

*touch*

Oops :D
Hey! I felt that! I felt that a-hmmm, perhaps i'm being too hasty ...

Nope, nothing. Try again. A little harder.
Quagmus
18-05-2006, 11:16
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.
To boost canadian and international support for the war on Drugged Illegal Terrorist Immigrants.
Damor
18-05-2006, 11:24
This is precisely why we need four walls around the US, not just one. And a ceiling, in case they decide to start catapaulting people in.And a floor, because otherwise they might tunnel in.
Xandabia
18-05-2006, 12:10
why would they attack Canada when they could launch another attack on the US. Maybe the UN building?
Not bad
18-05-2006, 12:19
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.

Desert people completely misunderstand hockey as an insult to places without ice. And they think moose are an infidel's insult aimed at camels. Anyway why wouldnt international terrorists attack Canada? Canada is international, they are terrorists. It's their job. And their hobby.
Quagmus
18-05-2006, 12:20
Desert people completely misunderstand hockey as an insult to places without ice. And they think moose are an infidel's insult aimed at camels. Anyway why wouldnt international terrorists attack Canada? Canada is international, they are terrorists. It's their job. And their hobby.
It's mice. Why is this so difficult? :mad:
Not bad
18-05-2006, 12:21
It's mice. Why is this so difficult? :mad:

I blame public education
Deep Kimchi
18-05-2006, 12:22
where will it be?

According to CSIS, attack on Canada is "now probable" (http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/05/10/attack-probable.html).

*POLL WARNING*

IIRC, the Prime Minister doesn't even have bodyguards. Unlike some political leaders (US, Russia, UK, etc) the PM of Canada doesn't have any protection at all.

You could probably assume that a high profile unguarded target would be their first choice.
Not bad
18-05-2006, 12:22
why would they attack Canada when they could launch another attack on the US. Maybe the UN building?

Why not both?
Not bad
18-05-2006, 12:24
IIRC, the Prime Minister doesn't even have bodyguards. Unlike some political leaders (US, Russia, UK, etc) the PM of Canada doesn't have any protection at all.

You could probably assume that a high profile unguarded target would be their first choice.

You mean like Canada?
Deep Kimchi
18-05-2006, 12:25
You mean like Canada?
No, like the PM of Canada. No exotic planning, preparation, or weapons needed.

Three large men with their bare hands.
Not bad
18-05-2006, 12:33
No, like the PM of Canada. No exotic planning, preparation, or weapons needed.

Three large men with their bare hands.

If you were talking South American terrorists sure. Not really Al Qeadas S.O.P. though. They tend towards killing as many random Jane and John Q Public types as they can in a single incident rather than killing people they might dislike for some reason. It apparantly is more effective at producing terror and news coverage
Xandabia
18-05-2006, 14:25
They might be cunning and attack Mexico and make it look like it was the US National Guard
Kryozerkia
18-05-2006, 14:28
If they MUST, I insist that they have the decency to take out Harper and attack 24 Sussex Drive when he's asleep there.
Drunk commies deleted
18-05-2006, 15:17
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.
Al Qaeda doesn't give a crap about Israel/Palestine except as an issue to recruit and raise support among Muslims.
Dakini
18-05-2006, 15:21
IIRC, the Prime Minister doesn't even have bodyguards. Unlike some political leaders (US, Russia, UK, etc) the PM of Canada doesn't have any protection at all.

You could probably assume that a high profile unguarded target would be their first choice.
Oh no, don't take out Harper, we all love him so dearly.
The Coral Islands
18-05-2006, 16:15
Hello? What about the East Coast?

Canada does not stop at Montréal, you know.

Seriously, Halifax was on the top ten list of spots in North America for the Russians to nuke if the Cold War ever came to that. If Vancouver's port makes it onto you list, the Haligonian one ought to as well.

[Although on the upside, the East escaping a hitlist is not so bad]


Regardless, I picked Young Street.

And about the "lax immigration laws" I ask you this: How many of the Sept. 11 terrorists came through Canada?
-What is that you say?
NONE.
I mean come on, Canada has done a fine job keeping herself and the US safe so far. What's with all the unfounded criticism?
Squornshelous
18-05-2006, 16:17
A moose!

The symbol of Canada!

Or perhaps a maple tree!

They're going to blow up all the syrup!


Probably the CN Tower though. It has the same symbolic value as the WTC, and if they hit it just right, it might fall on the stadium.
Deep Kimchi
18-05-2006, 16:17
Figure that Spain was attacked for less.

Canada has been very prominent in Afghanistan with military forces.

Canada would be an easy target - far easier than the US.
The Coral Islands
18-05-2006, 16:25
well at least they would get the streets dirty...canada is to damn clean!

just kidding,i love and i am a bit envious of my northern neighbors,but it is to damn clean up there...weird to me..lol..i was in montreal and felt bad to even flick a ciggarette in the street...so i didnt...stuck the damn thing in my pocket...which made me smell like a cig butt.

How about this? It is in today's news (May 18):

Windsor, Ont., has a new weapon in the battle to keep its streets clean: portable ashtrays.

They're plastic, the size of a dental floss dispenser with a snap-shut lid, and they are free.

They're also flame retardant, meaning smokers can stub out their butt in the tiny boxes and throw them into the next garbage can they come across.

They're a small weapon in the war against garbage, but Janice Dama, Windsor's clean city co-ordinator, says they'll make a big difference.

"You can spend an hour just cleaning up cigarette butts and still it doesn't look like you've accomplished a lot because there are so many of them," she told CBC News. "They're lightweight, they get in the crevices, they'll blow around, you know, they travel. They're one of the hardest things to collect."

There are also lots and lots of them. Thousands of smokers toss their butts onto the street, where they blow around and accumulate in the gutters and grass.

Windsor is so tired of the cigarette litter that it has joined an international campaign to eliminate butts altogether, by handing out portable ashtrays at the major city intersections.

The ashtrays are used extensively in Australia, where they're manufactured. They're also being used in England, Israel, Malta, South Africa and the United States.

At least one Windsor smoker says he'll use the ashtray, at least when he's downtown.

"It does look bad a lot of the times, with all of the cigarette butts and stuff like that," Bob Cowan said. "I'll use it when I'm downtown, anyway."
Dakini
18-05-2006, 16:42
I mean come on, Canada has done a fine job keeping herself and the US safe so far. What's with all the unfounded criticism?
Don't worry, it's just the ignorant americans that are so stupid. Many of them are sensible people who don't buy into propaganda and finger pointing. Bush likes to blame Canada a lot for things that we didn't do and then not apologize for it when it turns out he was wrong.

At any rate, I think the BC ferry was mentioned because it's kinda a mass transit thing and there are more people moving on that then say, a ferry going to PEI. Al Quaeda seems to like picking popular mass transit systems and killing lots of people in one go, out East isn't too heavily populated, though an attack over there may be strategic, it won't produce the right sort of body count.
Dakini
18-05-2006, 16:43
Canada would be an easy target - far easier than the US.
Why on earth would you think that?
Notaxia
19-05-2006, 05:51
Canada has two things going for it; We recognise the differences between various types of foreigners, and we treat them as individuals.

No brown skinned portuguese is going to get arrested for suspicion of terrorism for speaking the wrong language.
Langwell
19-05-2006, 06:03
If they MUST, I insist that they have the decency to take out Harper and attack 24 Sussex Drive when he's asleep there.

Back off, you bloody liberal.
Goderich_N
19-05-2006, 06:11
Oh no, don't take out Harper, we all love him so dearly.

Well, according to the polls, a lot of Canadians do.
Zogia
19-05-2006, 06:40
Why would thay attack Canada?! Last I heared, Canada was the Western World's Preinvation Afganastan.

Note: Number of Al-Qaeda opertives, not goverment tipe.
Great Beer and Food
19-05-2006, 06:55
You really think the only reason the arabs have issues with us is because of Israel?

One word: YES!

Seriously though, fundamentalist islamics are nuts. They live by a doctrine of active conversion which means they're required to recruit and convert new followers just like christianity, and yes, they do hate the western way of life....but all of this on it's own is not enough for even nutty islamics to blow themselves and skyscrapers up. There is one crucial part of the puzzle that has never been mentioned, and thats because the zionists and neo cons within the US government would prefer that you don't know.......America's unbridled support of Israel, both in policy and militarily. THIS is why they really hate us. THIS is why they attacked us, and why they will continue to over and over again until the US treats Israel like any other nation and stops granting it favored status....But this will never happen, because the US is now a ZOG, a zionist occupied government. The attacks will keep on coming, and the US president will keep on lying, making up nonsense like "They hate us for our freedoms", and dimwitted Americans will keep believing that and granting the zionists freedom to wage unlimited war in the middle east, all for the continued protection of Israel.
Santa Barbara
19-05-2006, 07:00
....America's unbridled support of Israel, both in policy and militarily. THIS is why they really hate us. THIS is why they attacked us, and why they will continue to over and over again until the US treats Israel like any other nation and stops granting it favored status....

I agree.

But this will never happen, because the US is now a ZOG, a zionist occupied government.

This is the part where your paranoid nazi melodrama makes me disgusted to be communicating with you.
Soviet Haaregrad
19-05-2006, 07:03
why would they attack Canada when they could launch another attack on the US. Maybe the UN building?

That's American right-wing terrorists who want to blow that up, Timothy McVeigh sorts.
Soviet Haaregrad
19-05-2006, 07:10
Back off, you bloody liberal.

The Liberals are twats, but I'd shoot Steven Harper myself.

:mp5:
Goderich_N
19-05-2006, 07:14
The Liberals are twats, but I'd shoot Steven Harper myself.

:mp5:

No, you wouldn't.
Soviet Haaregrad
19-05-2006, 07:39
No, you wouldn't.

You're right. :(

I couldn't morally justify it to myself. Not until the state demonstrates it is a threat to my well-being. Then, I'd shoot him. :D
Ragbralbur
19-05-2006, 07:54
How do you guys think the political fallout of a terrorist attack would play? I'd imagine Harper would get an original bump as Canadians rallied, but he would have to play it really carefully. I think the Canadian exposure to American news would hurt any attempts he made to institute anything like wire-tapping or detaining suspected terrorists. Canadians have been watching from the outside as the American government has used the shadow of 9/11 to engage in all sorts of security precautions, and our outsider status on those affairs has made us particularly skeptical. I believe very few Canadians support the American government's curtailing of freedoms to provide greater security for its people, and in the event of an attack on Canada, the people would be wary about any changes Harper proposed for fear that he would just be following the Bush model, which we dislike. A terrorist attack gives the Harper government a lot of rope to work with, but also enough to hang itself if they aren't careful.
Ultraextreme Sanity
19-05-2006, 08:27
Canadians are a tough buch of polite people who generaly care about just peace and beer and live and let live..as long as you do not piss them off..then they get all American on your ass. What would those nitwits gain by attacking Canada ? canada is one of the best peace keeping nations in the WORLD and is commited almost like no other to its UN duties..

I think I'd be almost MORE pissed to see them get hit than if we here in the US got it again . And not only because I have family there .

Its a greaat country with some great people ...some real whack jobs ...but what country doesnt have its whako's ?

And they send me MOOSEHEAD...DONT BE MESSING WITH MY BEER .
Corruptropolis
19-05-2006, 13:46
As long as they bomb something... Except for us. We're buddies! :D
Intestinal fluids
19-05-2006, 14:01
Canada has two things going for it; We recognise the differences between various types of foreigners, and we treat them as individuals.

No brown skinned portuguese is going to get arrested for suspicion of terrorism for speaking the wrong language.

What if say hypothetically a couple dozen brown skinned Portuguese started running around and killed 3 thousand Canadian citizens? Hell 4 or 5 Canadian citizens got killed by a few biker gangs and the whole country went into a tizzy. Dont get on a high horse till terrorism kills thousands of your citizens THEN tell me about how holier than though Canada is.
Czardas
19-05-2006, 14:11
That's American right-wing terrorists who want to blow that up, Timothy McVeigh sorts.
What are you talking about, we all know terrorists are only Islamic fundamentalists from the Middle East. :rolleyes:
Notaxia
19-05-2006, 22:27
What if say hypothetically a couple dozen brown skinned Portuguese started running around and killed 3 thousand Canadian citizens? Hell 4 or 5 Canadian citizens got killed by a few biker gangs and the whole country went into a tizzy. Dont get on a high horse till terrorism kills thousands of your citizens THEN tell me about how holier than though Canada is.

Portuguese citizens dont tend to be militant islamics. As in, 99% of them are christian. The Language of Portugal sounds nothing like the Arab/islamic tongues. Portuguese people look nothing like Middle easterners. Portugese dont dress like middle easterners.

We dont lump brown skinned people all in one big pile. If Canada had a problem with a certain ethnic of social group, We would concentrate our efforts on that group, not on everyone who isnt Canadian.

I know a lot of americans like to say "Its better to be safe than sorry." but guess what? That isnt true. "Its better to be educated than sorry."
DrunkenDove
19-05-2006, 22:35
Oil fields. That'd fuck up both Canada and America at the same time. That's got to be tempting for your average terrorist type.
PsychoticDan
19-05-2006, 22:38
They're all too preoccupied with the US to divert their attention to us. I feel pretty safe up here.
You shouldn't. If a nuke were to blow up in New York or Detroit it'd tickle you, too.
Mikesburg
19-05-2006, 22:40
And they send me MOOSEHEAD...DONT BE MESSING WITH MY BEER .

What if the terrorists targeted Moosehead Breweries?

WHAT IF? WHY AREN'T WE PROTECTING THE BREWERIES!?

*makes plans to consume extra quantities soon*
Soviet Haaregrad
19-05-2006, 22:43
What if say hypothetically a couple dozen brown skinned Portuguese started running around and killed 3 thousand Canadian citizens? Hell 4 or 5 Canadian citizens got killed by a few biker gangs and the whole country went into a tizzy. Dont get on a high horse till terrorism kills thousands of your citizens THEN tell me about how holier than though Canada is.


Portuguese aren't Arabs. It wasn't Portuguese who killed 3 000 Americans...
Francis Street
19-05-2006, 22:50
Most likely, mass public transport systems. That seems to be their pattern.

Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.
Yes, they do.

IIRC, the Prime Minister doesn't even have bodyguards. Unlike some political leaders (US, Russia, UK, etc) the PM of Canada doesn't have any protection at all.

You could probably assume that a high profile unguarded target would be their first choice.
Al-Qaeda don't seem to go in for assassinations. They prefer to just kill as many regular civilians as possible rather than go for a single high-profile target.
Khadgar
19-05-2006, 22:51
An attack on Canada is exceedingly unlikely, however if they were going to I'd wager it'd be a finacial institution.
Willamena
19-05-2006, 22:52
They would strike at the heart, symbols of capitalism, like... West Edmonton Mall!

(Oh, noes! think of the dolphins...)
Deep Kimchi
19-05-2006, 22:54
They would strike at the heart, symbols of capitalism, like... West Edmonton Mall!

(Oh, noes! think of the dolphins...)

No, if they went to Edmonton, the police would spot them as non-whites and take them for a "midnight ride" about 50 km out of town and drop them off in sub-freezing darkness to attempt (and probably die trying) to walk back.
Willamena
19-05-2006, 22:56
No, if they went to Edmonton, the police would spot them as non-whites and take them for a "midnight ride" about 50 km out of town and drop them off in sub-freezing darkness to attempt (and probably die trying) to walk back.
Um, this is Edmonton we're talking about, not Winnipeg. :p
Llewdor
19-05-2006, 23:51
As for immigration policy, it's not lax, it's screwed. It's not Canada's job to protect your turf btw, instead, why don't you Saran (R) wrap your friggin country. Works great against the so-called "illegals" too.

Something like 84% of our economy is tied up in exports to the United States. If they decided to secure that border for us, we'd be screwed.

The terrorists so far have demonstrated a willingness to ignore actual strateic targets and instead go after symbolic targets. The WTC wasn't nearly as important to the US as the oil tanker docks in Louisiana, and probably harder to attack, but the terrorists went after the WTC because it made a bigger statement.

As such, the Alberta oil fields are probably pretty safe. Something more symbolic like the CN Tower or SkyDome while the NY Yankees are there would be more likely.
Terrorist Cakes
19-05-2006, 23:52
I hope it's the ferry system. It can't get any worse, so an attack might actually make it better.
Lasqara
20-05-2006, 00:05
Portuguese people look nothing like Middle easterners.

How do you define "Middle East"?

Portugese dont dress like middle easterners.

This is - to variable extent - fairly true in their respective homelands, but do not Middle Easterners in the West tend to don Western garb?
Posi
20-05-2006, 00:07
I hope it's the ferry system. It can't get any worse, so an attack might actually make it better.
Which ferry system?

OOO, hopefully they replace it with a bridge too!
Llewdor
20-05-2006, 00:10
I hope it's the ferry system. It can't get any worse, so an attack might actually make it better.

But then they'd have to build new ferries. Remember how that turned out last time...
Posi
20-05-2006, 00:11
But then they'd have to build new ferries. Remember how that turned out last time...
Turned out quite well for Germany.
Terrorist Cakes
20-05-2006, 00:14
But then they'd have to build new ferries. Remember how that turned out last time...

We already need new ferries. Why not give them a real reason?
Llewdor
20-05-2006, 00:14
Turned out quite well for Germany.

The BC Ferry system's last foray into shipbuilding was an absolute disaster.
Mikesburg
20-05-2006, 00:15
How do you define "Middle East"?

First of all, not part of Europe, as Portugal happens to be.

Essentially the stretch of land Southeast of Europe, Northwest of Africa, West of India, and South of Russia.
Posi
20-05-2006, 00:19
The BC Ferry system's last foray into shipbuilding was an absolute disaster.
I know it was. That is why I suggested a bridge, even though we spend way too much building them.
Llewdor
20-05-2006, 00:22
I know it was. That is why I suggested a bridge, even though we spend way too much building them.

Plus you'd need like 20 bridges to go all the places the BC Ferries do.
CthulhuFhtagn
20-05-2006, 00:41
But they sure aren't going to use handguns or rifles, after all those require a PERMIT and we KNOW that TERRORISTS will OBEY THE LAW.

Actually, yes, they will. If they're in prison they can't exactly carry out acts of terrorism. There's a reason why the 9/11 hijackers were in this country legally.
Phalanix
20-05-2006, 00:46
Um, this is Edmonton we're talking about, not Winnipeg. :p
Hey I take offence to that!
-clubs Willamena and bring em out for a "Midnight" ride 25km outta the city and dumps em naked in the bushes- :p
Cheecan
20-05-2006, 00:49
That's American right-wing terrorists who want to blow that up, Timothy McVeigh sorts.
What are you talking about?! I'm left-wing and want to blow it up! The UN makes Bush look good! And thats saying something.
Llewdor
20-05-2006, 00:50
Hey I take offence to that!
-clubs Willamena and bring em out for a "Midnight" ride 25km outta the city and dumps em naked in the bushes- :p

I actually thought that sort of thing happened more in Saskatoon, but then I don't get much news from out east (Manitoba).
Phalanix
20-05-2006, 00:53
I actually thought that sort of thing happened more in Saskatoon, but then I don't get much news from out east (Manitoba).
To be honest it's only happened once here, I think. But it was a long time ago, you're more likely to carried off by a massive mosquito swarm here.
Deep Kimchi
20-05-2006, 00:54
To be honest it's only happened once here, I think. But it was a long time ago, you're more likely to carried off by a massive mosquito swarm here.
Deerflies, if it's summer.
Phalanix
20-05-2006, 00:56
Deerflies, if it's summer.
No it's mosquitos in the summer, unless you worry about tent worms then you are SO screwed (this year at least).
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 00:58
Which ferry system?

OOO, hopefully they replace it with a bridge too!
Didn't they want to build a bridge between Vancouver Island and Vancouver, and realized it would bankrupt the province?
Deep Kimchi
20-05-2006, 00:59
No it's mosquitos in the summer, unless you worry about tent worms then you are SO screwed (this year at least).
I've been eated alive by deerflies so many times in Canada that I am not about to go back unless it's the dead of winter.
Posi
20-05-2006, 01:01
Didn't they want to build a bridge between Vancouver Island and Vancouver, and realized it would bankrupt the province?
The bridge they are building from Pitt Meadows to Langely came close to bankrupting the province.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 01:02
I've been eated alive by deerflies so many times in Canada that I am not about to go back unless it's the dead of winter.
In which case you'd be eaten alive by frostbites. Honestly, the only place in Canada you can possibly think of visiting in the winter is the west coast...and that should be the southern tip of it.
Deep Kimchi
20-05-2006, 01:05
In which case you'd be eaten alive by frostbites. Honestly, the only place in Canada you can possibly think of visiting in the winter is the west coast...and that should be the southern tip of it.
Been to Ottawa and Edmonton in mid-winter. Toronto, too.
Posi
20-05-2006, 01:06
Been to Ottawa and Edmonton in mid-winter. Toronto, too.
You poor soul. Next time, hit up Montreal, Vancouver or Victoria.
Deep Kimchi
20-05-2006, 01:07
You poor soul. Next time, hit up Montreal, Vancouver or Victoria.
Haven't been to Montreal, but I've been to Vancouver too many times as well.

My favorite place in Canada is Churchill.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 01:12
You poor soul. Next time, hit up Montreal, Vancouver or Victoria.
Nah, Victoria and Quebec City. Olde Englande and classic French. :D
INO Valley
20-05-2006, 02:58
Why would terrorists attack Canada? They don't support Zionist Israel.
Oh, yes we do. :)
Posi
20-05-2006, 03:03
Nah, Victoria and Quebec City. Olde Englande and classic French. :D
My destinations are much better: prostitutes, tobacco, alcohol, strip clubs, marijauna and Olde Englande.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 06:17
My destinations are much better: prostitutes, tobacco, alcohol, strip clubs, marijauna and Olde Englande.
ahhh, goo' ol' Victoria. :D and don't forget our ability to mock the rest of Canada for being buried under inches of snow.
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 06:22
ahhh, goo' ol' Victoria. :D and don't forget our ability to mock the rest of Canada for being buried under inches of snow.
all your base are belong to washington
Posi
20-05-2006, 06:38
all your base are belong to washington
DC or the state? I suppose it doesn't matter as both get more snow than Vancouver or Victoria.
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 06:53
Didn't they want to build a bridge between Vancouver Island and Vancouver, and realized it would bankrupt the province?I'm against the bridge. It's impractical, expensive, not good for the enviroment, and won't last forever. I rather relax in a ferry ride than driving non-stop in a horrible weather. A tunnel is not a good idea either.

BTW, we seriously need new ferries up here before another one sink.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 06:58
I'm against the bridge. It's impractical, expensive, not good for the enviroment, and won't last long. I rather relax in a ferry ride than driving non-stop in a horrible weather. A tunnel is not a good idea either.

BTW, we seriously need new ferries up here before another one sink.
Yeah, the bridges are horrible ideas, but the only reason we're thinking about them is because BC Ferry is so unsuccessful as an enterprise, even though everybody on the islands rely on it to get to the mainland. Sell the company to an American company and watch the profits soar. :rolleyes:

Do you have a temporary ferry up there right now?
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:07
Yeah, the bridges are horrible ideas, but the only reason we're thinking about them is because BC Ferry is so unsuccessful as an enterprise, even though everybody on the islands rely on it to get to the mainland. Sell the company to an American company and watch the profits soar. :rolleyes: BC Ferries is becoming like a typical cruise company, have you heard about the names for the new super-c class ferries? :rolleyes:

Do you have a temporary ferry up there right now?
No, we have to live with one operating ferry for now. Tourism industry here is going to be so screwed.
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:07
I'm against the bridge. It's impractical, expensive, not good for the enviroment, and won't last forever. I rather relax in a ferry ride than driving non-stop in a horrible weather. A tunnel is not a good idea either.

BTW, we seriously need new ferries up here before another one sink.
I live near a metric tonne of bridges and a few ferries. Ferries are a pain in the ass for commuters (it takes a couple minutes to merge and cross the bridge, while the ferry has a 15 minute wait before a 15 minute ride), are more expensive (fuel ain't cheap), and tend to break down less.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:10
BC Ferries is becoming like a typical cruise company, have you heard about the names for the new super-c class ferries? :rolleyes:
actually, no. What are they thinking of naming them?

No, we have to live with one operating ferry for now. Tourism industry here is going to be so screwed.
Pardon me for my ignorance, but there's tourism up there? :eek:
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:14
Ferries are a pain in the ass for commuters (it takes a couple minutes to merge and cross the bridge, while the ferry has a 15 minute wait before a 15 minute ride)15 minute ferry crossing? Sounds like a Mill Bay ferry route.
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:15
15 minute ferry crossing? Sounds like a Mill Bay ferry route.
Yay, I know it is pretty lame. But it is something most people avoid at all costs.
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:16
actually, no. What are they thinking of naming them?
http://www.bcferries.com/news/files/06-028bcferriesannouncesnamesforthreenewsupercvessels.pdf

Coastal Renaissance, Coastal Inspiration and Coastal Celebration.

Pardon me for my ignorance, but there's tourism up there? :eek:Yep! ;)
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:20
http://www.bcferries.com/news/files/06-028bcferriesannouncesnamesforthreenewsupercvessels.pdf
Coastal Renaissance, Coastal Inspiration and Coastal Celebration.
How horribly lame.
Yep! ;)
Drunken fishermen are not tourist.
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:26
Drunken fishermen are not tourist.There's also a cruise ship terminal too. Everytime there's a cruise ship visit, the downtown and CowBay area is flooded with American and Asian tourists.

I felt like my town has been transformed into some theme park.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:28
How horribly lame.
seconded. They might be the corniest things I've heard in a while.
Drunken fishermen are not tourist.
They are in the Maritimes. :p
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:30
There's also a cruise ship terminal too. Everytime there's a cruise ship visit, the downtown and CowBay area is flooded with American and Asian tourists.

I felt like my town has been transformed into some theme park.
You should club them with a stick. *nod*
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:32
seconded. They might be the corniest things I've heard in a while.
They could have gone with something cool, like Big Bud or Tron or Fuck Campbell.
They are in the Maritimes. :p
Just as well, the Meritimes don't count as destinations.:p
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:34
You should club them with a stick. *nod*I was thinking of running them over, they jay walk too much and that's very annoying.
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:35
I was thinking of running them over, they jay walk too much and that's very annoying.
I jay-walk all the time.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:36
They could have gone with something cool, like Big Bud or Tron or Fuck Campbell.
If there was a ferry named that, I'd hop on it and ride it for entire weekends JUST so it would be able to keep running.
Just as well, the Meritimes don't count as destinations.:p
:eek:

I think the Newfies are coming to kill you in 3...2....
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:37
If there was a ferry named that, I'd hop on it and ride it for entire weekends JUST so it would be able to keep running.

:eek:

I think the Newfies are coming to kill you in 3...2....
I managed to distract them buy jiggling some keys
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:38
I was thinking of running them over, they jay walk too much and that's very annoying.
:eek: Do you have something against the sacred art of jaywalking?
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:39
I jay-walk all the time.Me too.

Less jay-walk is ok, but jay-walks every 6 seconds without looking for cars gives me a heart attack.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:41
I managed to distract them buy jiggling some keys
ooooooo, shiny! *steals keys and starts playing with them*
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:42
:eek: Do you have something against the sacred art of jaywalking?No. :D
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:42
Me too.

Less jay-walk is ok, but jay-walks every 6 seconds without looking for cars gives me a heart-attack.
I look for cars, but I still give people heart-attacks. I basically stroll right up beside the car as it passes (assuming I am going to cross after it passes).
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:43
ooooooo, shiny! *steals keys and starts playing with them*
*tackled by heard of disgruntled Newfies*
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:45
*tackled by heard of disgruntled Newfies*
They smell like fish...now I smell like fish. :(
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 07:46
DC or the state? I suppose it doesn't matter as both get more snow than Vancouver or Victoria.
State.

I was trying to think of something.. funny.
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 07:49
They smell like fish...now I smell like fish. :(
*throws trout*
The Chinese Republics
20-05-2006, 07:50
They smell like fish...now I smell like fish. :(
I always smell like fish every summer. :D
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:51
*throws trout*
*flees into her forests and refuses to come out*
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:51
They smell like fish...now I smell like fish. :(
I'm talking down town!
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 07:53
*flees into her forests and refuses to come out*
*plays with matches*
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:56
I'm talking down town!
Wow, I JUST got that innuendo. Good job, Posi.
Posi
20-05-2006, 07:57
Wow, I JUST got that innuendo. Good job, Posi.
I was hoping you wouldn't miss it.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 07:59
I was hoping you wouldn't miss it.
Moi? Miss an innuendo? NEVER! :p
Posi
20-05-2006, 08:05
Moi? Miss an innuendo? NEVER! :p
Maybe by your standards, but I add innuendos that aren't even there.
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 08:11
Maybe by your standards, but I add innuendos that aren't even there.
'tis not possible. It defies space-time continuum! :eek:
Posi
20-05-2006, 08:12
'tis not possible. It defies space-time continuum! :eek:
Shit, your right, your always right.

errrr, *throws sparkles in Ladamesansmerci's face*

*runs like nerd*
Ladamesansmerci
20-05-2006, 08:13
Shit, your right, your always right.

errrr, *throws sparkles in Ladamesansmerci's face*

*runs like nerd*
oooooooooooo, purty shiny sparkles! *sits down and plays with them*
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 08:14
Moi? Miss an innuendo? NEVER! :p
true dat.
Posi
20-05-2006, 08:22
oooooooooooo, purty shiny sparkles! *sits down and plays with them*
*giggles*

Hey Ladamesansmerci, did you blow a clown or something?
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 08:27
*giggles*

Hey Ladamesansmerci, did you blow a clown or something?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posi
20-05-2006, 08:28
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I think we should take her silence as a yes.
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 08:36
I think we should take her silence as a yes.
She ran away because you reveiled her secret.

Cookie for you.
Posi
20-05-2006, 08:38
She ran away because you reveiled her secret.

Cookie for you.
*mange said cookie*
IL Ruffino
20-05-2006, 08:59
*mange said cookie*
vhbj,jh
Shit. Sorry, pink floyd.. bells.. freaked out..

*gives another cookie*
Intestinal fluids
20-05-2006, 13:25
Could you hijack the thread any further or do blueberry muffins need to be discussed first?