NationStates Jolt Archive

This has been done a few times before, but I'm making it again. Use this site (www.flamewarriors.com) and tell us which Flame Warrior you think a certain person is. Without a doubt, Eutrusca is The Centurion (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/centurion.htm).

I'm the "unimpressed and bored with spammish repeat threads"-archetype, however they've chosen to brand it.

Lurker, easily.

UN Abassadorship is the Tireless Rebutter (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/tirelessrebutter.htm).

What? It's fun to see how people's views of others change. Many will see me as a Necromancer (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/necromancer.htm).

I'm the "unimpressed and bored with spammish repeat threads"-archetype, however they've chosen to brand it.

Damn. That's what I was going to say... :(

Well...as far as I can tell I'm the Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm), which is odd because I really don't like cats...

But I don't know, anyone have any ideas?

Oh, and I feel like showing off. Would any of you like a demonstration of my Necromantic powers? A truely terrifying thread is the one which I will revive. One that will make us all scatter before it's might!

What? It's fun to see how people's views of others change. Many will see me as a Necromancer (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/necromancer.htm).

Eh, you would either be a Pinko (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/pinko.htm) or a Acne (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/acne.htm)...actually the second one is you perfectly.

I wonder what I am?

Can anyone do me? Only if you know me, obviously

There was a type in the forums, the Gladiator... It's the guy that visits the forum for the sake of the arguing, and basically makes the discussions into a show for his own ego, to show off his skill (and the opponents' weakness).

That would be me. :p

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/forum/viewtopic.php?t=85

Can anyone do me? Only if you know me, obviously

That could be taken soooo many ways. sorry. didn't mean to hijack

and now back to your normally scheduled thread.

Eh, you would either be a Pinko (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/pinko.htm) or a Acne (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/acne.htm)...actually the second one is you perfectly.

I wonder what I am?

Can anyone do me? Only if you know me, obviously
Do I need to show you the fact that I am in fact a necromancer? I CAN show you! And it will be truely terrifying.

or a Acne (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/acne.htm)...actually the second one is you perfectly.

I concur.

I wonder what I am?

Can anyone do me? Only if you know me, obviously

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm

Can anyone do me? Only if you know me, obviously

I'll do you, strumpet (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/strumpet.htm).

Do I need to show you the fact that I am in fact a necromancer? I CAN show you! And it will be truely terrifying.

Just furthering yourself as an "Acne". *Sigh*

That could be taken soooo many ways. sorry. didn't mean to hijack

and now back to your normally scheduled thread.

HAHAHAHHAHA...omg, how did I miss that!

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm

To a tee, Fass, to a tee. ;)

I'd actually like to know what others would say I am. Just for reference of course.

*sits back with smug look on face*

No one knows me enough to label me.

Just furthering yourself as an "Acne". *Sigh*
Look at the front page.

I'll do you, strumpet (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/strumpet.htm).

LOL...where did you pull that out of?

HAHAHAHHAHA...omg, how did I miss that!

eh- I'm just always in the gutter (mindwise, I mean)

eh- I'm just always in the gutter (mindwise, I mean)

But it's FUN in the gutter! :D

Could someone place me in a category? I'td be biased if I did it to myself.

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm

I'm going to do you, Fass.

Obviously (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/atheist.htm)
an angry, almost genetic loathing for privilege, greed, social exploitation, racism, sexism, homophobia, pro-lifers, the religious right, environmental degradation, the NRA, US imperialism, multinational corporations, big business, Republicans in general and George Bush in particular-totally (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/pinko.htm)

Could be (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/strumpet.htm).

So who am I?

I'll help you out, but I'd like you to do mine. (I may be biased).
Here's a list of the other possible types. :D

http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/forum/viewtopic.php?t=362

So who am I?
Steve?

So who am I?

Your too new.

You have to wait until people recognize you and know your posting style before you can get classified...give it time.

I'm going to do you, Fass.

Obviously (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/atheist.htm)
an angry, almost genetic loathing for privilege, greed, social exploitation, racism, sexism, homophobia, pro-lifers, the religious right, environmental degradation, the NRA, US imperialism, multinational corporations, big business, Republicans in general and George Bush in particular-totally (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/pinko.htm)

Could be (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/strumpet.htm).

And you missed out on this (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/perv.htm). Tsk, tsk.

Could someone place me in a category? I'td be biased if I did it to myself.

Castrated genitalia (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/weenie.htm).

And you missed out on this (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/perv.htm). Tsk, tsk.

I was most totally checking it out, but then my eye caught Strumpet so I had to put it instead.

I was most totally checking it out, but then my eye caught Strumpet so I had to put it instead.

So.... what are you wearing?

...:eek:

This has been done a few times before, but I'm making it again. Use this site (www.flamewarriors.com) and tell us which Flame Warrior you think a certain person is. Without a doubt, Eutrusca is The Centurion (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/centurion.htm).

A few times, eh? Sure.

Castrated genitalia (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/weenie.htm).

...

O_o

So.... what are you wearing?

My school uniform, let me describe it to you....it will stiffen your cock.

Black quasi-nice shirt.

Blue uniform shorts.

Black belt.

My I.D.

Blue SHORT boxers.

Underneath that just an illegal-for-you-to-think-about pair of hot cock n' balls.

You assgasming yet? :fluffle:

Or should I break out the Hypnotiq...what are yooOoUu wearing, and it better be erotic.

I'm the "unimpressed and bored with spammish repeat threads"-archetype, however they've chosen to brand it.

Ennui (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/ennui.htm)

My school uniform, let me describe it to you....it will stiffen your cock.

Black quasi-nice shirt.

Blue uniform shorts.

Black belt.

My I.D.

Blue SHORT boxers.

Underneath that just an illegal-for-you-to-think-about pair of hot cock n' balls.

You assgasming yet? :fluffle:

Or should I break out the Hypnotiq...what are yooOoUu wearing, and it better be erotic.

Great. The only time I have tried to mentally dress someone....

Most of the internet is
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/innocenceabused.htm
Although I have spotted one or two godfathers on here.

Great. The only time I have tried to mentally dress someone....

Ya dont make it down to South Beach much then, do ya? :D

None of you can put me into a catagorie! I, Posi, am too much of an individual to be placed in some "box".

My school uniform, let me describe it to you....it will stiffen your cock. Black quasi-nice shirt. Blue uniform shorts. Black belt.
My I.D. Blue SHORT boxers.

Whoever designed that should be shot. I am forever thankful not to have such hideousness projected onto my retinae.

Or should I break out the Hypnotiq...what are yooOoUu wearing, and it better be erotic.

I looked into it. Only available in Canada, US, UK and Japan. Thus, it must clearly suck, seeing as its markets are known for liking piss-water.

Oh, and I'm not wearing anything, apart from underwear, as I am lying in bed, tossing and turning, pondering why my chest hair is slightly lighter than my head hair. Turns out, it's the laptop LCD.

I'm big cat.

Word.

Whoever designed that should be shot. I am forever thankful not to have such hideousness projected onto my retinae.

*Sigh* Unfortunatly, that would be my school...as I go to private school and we have to wear uniforms. If only the girls were allowed to wear non-uniform tops...they I could really see what their packing.


I looked into it. Only available in Canada, US, UK and Japan. Thus, it must clearly suck, seeing as its markets are known for liking piss-water.

Thats a real shame, bro. Its amazing, I'll have to bring you some when I'm in Stockholm this summer. ;)

Oh, and I'm not wearing anything, apart from underwear, as I am lying in bed, tossing and turning, pondering why my chest hair is slightly lighter than my head hair. Turns out, it's the laptop LCD.

Thats hot....do you have a 6 pack...or do you have a hairy tub of lard hanging out around your midsection?

Also, I havnt grown any chest hair yet, am I missing out?

And finally, sent you a TG...since I'd assume you wouldnt want me asking this in public.

None of you can put me into a catagorie! I, Posi, am too much of an individual to be placed in some "box".

Too bad theres no "Canadian" catagory.

Too bad theres no "Canadian" catagory.
Ha! HA! My plan worked flawless.

Hmmm....seems like there a glitch on this thread.

Everyone says Eutrusca is a Centurion, but I personally think he could also be a Toxic Granny :D
I'm definitely a Lurker, with perhaps a combination of Fanboy, Ideologue, Grammarian and Nitpick.

something like Coffee Klatch (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/coffeeklatch.htm), Ideologue (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/ideologue.htm), and Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm), me :)

though i once got called Royalty (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/royals.htm)on one of these threads, which was flattering, but probably very wrong :p



edit: also, been called Bong before... but i no longer toke :D
still act high at least :P

'tween Bulldog and Centurion.

*smug and extremely happy about that*

But I have to say I have a very soft spot for Fragile Femmes.

Or hard spot?

Er, summat like that anyway, wot. Come on and admit it - feminine helplessness is almost as adorable as blind puppies!

I'm Loopy (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/loopy.htm) with Picadorish (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/picador.htm) tendencies during the more composed moments. w00t.

I think last time around somebody said Lurker, and somebody else said Pinko. Or something.

What? It's fun to see how people's views of others change. Many will see me as a Necromancer (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/necromancer.htm).
Some may see you as this. (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigdogmetoo.htm) Do you?

When someone refers to his random capitalization Garble might say something like, "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK".

I don't know why, but for some reason I find oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK incredibly hilarious.

Some may see you as this. (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigdogmetoo.htm) Do you?
Which one? Big-dog or Me-too?

Everyone says Eutrusca is a Centurion, but I personally think he could also be a Toxic Granny :D

Nah. Toxic Grannies are seen by the forum with pity (which they use). Eutrusca tries to GET pity for "being spat on (sic) after the Hanoi Rapefest '65" and uses the age card lots of times, but he still uses more his "service" than anything else. Plus he doesn't succeed at getting pity through his rethoric on either case, something which an actual toxic granny does. Eutrusca is aware that the position of Toxic Granny is more desirable than the one of centurion though, which is the reason for his attempt at getting pitied like Toxic Grannies are.

Which one? Big-dog or Me-too?
Definitely Big-dog.

I want someone to do me!

Probably PM. :p

PM, did you get my stalkergram last week? It should have been a guy loitering suspiciously in front of your house for 3 hours followed by a mysterious message written in cutouts from photos of you placed silently under your pillow while you slept.

I also wanted someone to do mine... :p

I think last time around somebody said Lurker, and somebody else said Pinko. Or something.

Nah. You were a Picador mixed with a Lurker. ;)

Your too new.

You have to wait until people recognize you and know your posting style before you can get classified...give it time.

what about me? :P

Nah. You were a Picador mixed with a Lurker. ;)
Well, that's alright I suppose.

Hmm I suppose I'm a pinko atheist with a hint of Rebel Leader, but I might be giving myself too much credit there.

Could somebody please analyse me? (in terms of flaming, obviously)

I hope I'm a http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/blissninny.htm

OK, time for some of the standard replies:

Eutrusca: Centurion (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/centurion.htm) and/or Toxic Granny (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/toxicgranny.htm)
Smunkeeville: Bliss Ninny (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/blissninny.htm)
Lunatic Goodballs: Loopy (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/loopy.htm)
UN Ambassadorship: Troglodyte (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm)
Fass: http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/picador.htm]Picador[/url]
Bolol: Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm), definitely
Terrorist Cakes: either Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm) or Lurker (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/lurker.htm), not entirely sure which.

what about me? :P

I would guess that your also too young.

But hey, I don't know, can you think of any posters that would know your posting style?

OK, time for some of the standard replies:

Eutrusca: Centurion (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/centurion.htm) and/or Toxic Granny (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/toxicgranny.htm)
Smunkeeville: Bliss Ninny (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/blissninny.htm)
Lunatic Goodballs: Loopy (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/loopy.htm)
UN Ambassadorship: Troglodyte (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/troglodyte.htm)
Fass: http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/picador.htm]Picador[/url]
Bolol: Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm), definitely
Terrorist Cakes: either Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm) or Lurker (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/lurker.htm), not entirely sure which.

Actually, I find that this fits his perfectly. This (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/target.htm).

Actually, I find that this fits his perfectly. This (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/target.htm).

Nah. There are people that support him (Quibs, Whittier...).

Nah. There are people that support him (Quibs, Whittier...).

No way, I've never seen anyone support UN.

You'd have to be insane...he claims to be a pro Bush America loving right winger...yet he supports the arabs.

Its impossible.

I'm still sticking with "target".

Actually, I find that this fits his perfectly. This (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/target.htm).

You know, you might have a point there...

You know, you might have a point there...

Yup.

I might as well pigeonhole myself.

Archivist (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm) - When in a heated debate, oftentimes I will scour my opponent's posting history for possible contradictions, hypocritical bullshit, etc.
Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm) - I don't normally engage someone directly unless I find something that needs attention brought to it. More often than not, I lazily browse the forum and reply casually, but when a remark of mine is met with aggressive opposition, I never hesitate to crush their argument; this, of course, after I've had my fun and drawn circles around it.
Picador (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/picador.htm) - If especially bored, I'll sometimes resort to provoking a response by acting in an idiosyncratic manner. This sort of taunting is rarely, if ever, done for any reason other than as a means of escaping the monotony that NS General periodically suffers from.
Philosopher (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/philosopher.htm) - Occasionally the above boredom will instead result in idle contemplation, where all I'm looking for is a fellow NSer to share their position on a controversial or highly theoretical subject and express the ideas and views that they have about it.

Now I feel similar to Jekyl and Hyde.

Ennui or Lurker.

Seems I'm not the only one bored half to death here tonight.

I would guess that your also too young.

But hey, I don't know, can you think of any posters that would know your posting style?

too young? what's your definition of young?

ah, i've spoken w/ the likes of Sin, Eut, drunk commies... i guess my posting style is that i don't leave a mark on peoples memories.

I'm afraid to ask. I can think of several that could reference me. I do the Archivist (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm) thing. Sometimes the tireless rebutter. I'm even been known to Nitpick. There are lots of them.

Ennui or Lurker.

Seems I'm not the only one bored half to death here tonight.

I think you're kind of an Ent. But I don't think you can self-declare that.

I think you're kind of an Ent. But I don't think you can self-declare that.

Why thank you. I stand (well sit), flattered.

Or did you just mean that I'm an old fogey?:p

Why thank you. I stand (well sit), flattered.

Or did you just mean that I'm an old fogey?:p

Oh, come on, you're practically a fixture here.

I'm afraid to ask. I can think of several that could reference me. I do the Archivist (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm) thing. Sometimes the tireless rebutter. I'm even been known to Nitpick. There are lots of them.

So, basically, an egotistical (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/ego.htm) Weenie (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/weenie.htm)?

Oh, come on, you're practically a fixture here.

Thanx I think. I'll try not to let it go to my head. I'll just remember some of the other things that are called fixtures.:D

So, basically, an egotistical (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/ego.htm) Weenie (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/weenie.htm)?

I think you'd have a hard time supporting those.

I think you'd have a hard time supporting those.

"I'm afraid to ask. I can think of several that could reference me. I do the Archivist thing. Sometimes the tireless rebutter. I'm even been known to Nitpick. There are lots of them."

By being afraid to ask, one may assume that being overly sensitive to criticism is the reason for not asking.

The Tireless Rebutter believes their argument is without defect, and the nitpick points out any defect in their opponent's argument. This can be thought of as egotistical.

"I'm afraid to ask. I can think of several that could reference me. I do the Archivist thing. Sometimes the tireless rebutter. I'm even been known to Nitpick. There are lots of them."

By being afraid to ask, one may assume that being overly sensitive to criticism is the reason for not asking.

Or someone kidding around.

The Tireless Rebutter believes their argument is without defect, and the nitpick points out any defect in their opponent's argument. This can be thought of as egotistical.
Or someone who has formed a good, solid argument and is willing to put in the effort to show the flaws in the argument of the other side. That's called debate. According to your point, it would be egotistical to use any debate tactics at all, other than simply agreeing with the other person.

Meanwhile, the EGO is not just a person who is egotistical.

Or someone kidding around.


Or someone who has formed a good, solid argument and is willing to put in the effort to show the flaws in the argument of the other side. That's called debate. According to your point, it would be egotistical to use any debate tactics at all, other than simply agreeing with the other person.

Meanwhile, the EGO is not just a person who is egotistical.

Ah, but the Tireless Rebutter does not alter his argument in a debate, he merely repeats it again and again with little tactical shift; rigidly uncompromising. As for the Nitpick, I would not consider drawing attention to minor, inconsequential errors a tactic. It does little to assist in a debate besides making the Nitpick seem obsessed with absolute correctness. The Ego, as one is described by Mike Reed, is solely egotistical. He does not mention anything about the definition of ego.

Ah, but the Tireless Rebutter does not alter his argument in a debate, he merely repeats it again and again with little tactical shift; rigidly uncompromising. As for the Nitpick, I would not consider drawing attention to minor, inconsequential errors a tactic. It does little to assist in a debate besides making the Nitpick seem obsessed with absolute correctness. The Ego, as one is described by Mike Reed, is solely egotistical. He does not mention anything about the definition of ego.

It does not say that on the site that was linked. The tireless rebutter says nothing about there being no tactical shift and that is the only site I saw these titles on. If you are reading more into it than is on that site then don't. I only used that site to point to names I could see fitting me to some degree or another.

It does not say that on the site that was linked. The tireless rebutter says nothing about there being no tactical shift and that is the only site I saw these titles on. If you are reading more into it than is on that site then don't. I only used that site to point to names I could see fitting me to some degree or another.

"For Tireless Rebutter there is no such thing as a trivial dispute. He regards all challenges as barbarians at the gates. His unflagging tenacity in making his points numbs and eventually wears down the opposition. Confident that his arguments are sound, Tireless Rebutter can't understand why he is universally loathed."

Interpret that how you will. It's all about interpretation, and I consider the warriors you chose, and the contents of your original post, inextricably linked to both Ego and Weenie. Your replies further solidify my opinion.

too young? what's your definition of young?

ah, i've spoken w/ the likes of Sin, Eut, drunk commies... i guess my posting style is that i don't leave a mark on peoples memories.

I just mean young as in you dont have enough posts to leave an impression on people. But thats just my opinion......

I would ask those people if they could classify you then.

This has been done a few times before, but I'm making it again. Use this site (www.flamewarriors.com) and tell us which Flame Warrior you think a certain person is. Without a doubt, Eutrusca is The Centurion (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/centurion.htm).

I dunno, I think its better if other people tell me what I am, since everyone usually chooses what is most flattering to themselves.

I dunno, I think its better if other people tell me what I am, since everyone usually chooses what is most flattering to themselves.

Agreed, so if anyone wans to come on down here and do Santa Barbara and I,...well that'd be great. :p

I'd like to think I'm a Big Cat or a Philosopher. But, I suspect I'm not considered that way, if I'm considered at all.

I dunno, I think its better if other people tell me what I am, since everyone usually chooses what is most flattering to themselves.

Kung Fu Master (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm) mixed with a little Howler (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/howlers.htm).

Evil Clown.

Kung Fu Master (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm) mixed with a little Howler (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/howlers.htm).
You nailed yourself there.

You nailed yourself there.

I like to think of myself as a sort of Godfather/Xenophobe/Picador combination.

I have to say that a forum this large, highly populated, and active is difficult for an Ego type flamewarrior.

On the topic, I have been known to take the role of the Tireless Rebutter.

Kung Fu Master (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm) mixed with a little Howler (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/howlers.htm).

*screeches and throws feces*

Still a lurker...I think. I'm starting to post a little when I can't sleep. Like right now. And a also a fanboy, to some extent, because whenever I see a thread on sports, I'll post something about the Mets, or just baseball.

"For Tireless Rebutter there is no such thing as a trivial dispute. He regards all challenges as barbarians at the gates. His unflagging tenacity in making his points numbs and eventually wears down the opposition. Confident that his arguments are sound, Tireless Rebutter can't understand why he is universally loathed."

Interpret that how you will. It's all about interpretation, and I consider the warriors you chose, and the contents of your original post, inextricably linked to both Ego and Weenie. Your replies further solidify my opinion.

So because I actually read the statements on that site. Statements that say nothing about never changing one's opinion, then I'm Ego and Weenie. Excellent argument. Perhaps next you'll tell me how something else you were wrong about proves your point.

Your interpretation would make it equal to ferrous cranus and the author of the site a person with a tendency towards calling the same thing by multiple names.

I've been told that I'm a http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/ferouscranus.htm
However, I find this to be an absurd accusation! I stand firmly behind the fact that this is completely untrue and I will not yield an inch in my position! :D

Kung Fu Master (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm) mixed with a little Howler (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/howlers.htm).

We do have quite a few howlers here, but I'm not sure you're one of them (read: you aren't).

We do have quite a few howlers here, but I'm not sure you're one of them (read: you aren't).

I was giving my interpretation of Santa Barbara, not myself.

Were's the option for poor but consistant debater?

No way, I've never seen anyone support UN.

You'd have to be insane...he claims to be a pro Bush America loving right winger...yet he supports the arabs.

Its impossible.

I'm still sticking with "target".

What's wrong with that? I support UN and I am a Pro-Arab Right-winger.

Being Conservative does not mean you hate Arabs.

What's wrong with that? I support UN and I am a Pro-Arab Right-winger.

My first guess would be, alot.

I meant UN the poster not the United Nations.


Being Conservative does not mean you hate Arabs.

Who said anything about hating the arabs?

I said supporting.

I was giving my interpretation of Santa Barbara, not myself.

In that case, good call.

Were's the option for poor but consistant debater?

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/palooka.htm

Maybe. But if you view yourself as a poor debater, that might change things...