NationStates Jolt Archive


Gospel of Judas: Historically Accurate or False Document?

United O-Zone
20-04-2006, 20:26
I believe that the Gospel of Judas is more accurate than the Gospels in the New Testament because those Gospels have been corrupted by the Church in order to give the Church more power while the Gospel of Judas has remained untouched.
Ashmoria
20-04-2006, 20:31
the gospel of judas is an important historical find. it gives us a view into the beliefs of a branch of christianity that lost out in the theology debates

i dont see, however, why a book that dates to 300ad should be considered more religiously correct than the current bible.
Safalra
20-04-2006, 20:34
i dont see, however, why a book that dates to 300ad should be considered more religiously correct than the current bible.
Don't all the gospels date to about that time?
The Psyker
20-04-2006, 20:35
the gospel of judas is an important historical find. it gives us a view into the beliefs of a branch of christianity that lost out in the theology debates

i dont see, however, why a book that dates to 300ad should be considered more religiously correct than the current bible.
I'll agree with this point here.
Bolol
20-04-2006, 20:35
To be honest I cannot say one way or the other at this point. I need more data!
Call to power
20-04-2006, 20:37
does it really matter?
Mariehamn
20-04-2006, 20:37
Don't all the gospels date to about that time?
OmniWiki! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel#Origin_of_the_canonical_Gospels)
If by "about that time" you mean "give or take a couple centuries", then yes.
Personally, I don't.
The Small Pug
20-04-2006, 20:41
Don't all the gospels date to about that time?


Not quite... Mark (the earliest) was written at around 70/80 AD and the other three were written in the couple of decades that followed
AB Again
20-04-2006, 20:41
The document itself exists and is not a forgery, it is not false in that sense, so I have to assume that you are questioning the veracity of the content, and that is an unanswerable question.
Free Soviets
20-04-2006, 20:55
religiously correct

?
Ashmoria
20-04-2006, 21:07
?
well i suppose the OP is suggesting that it is more accurate to what happened in the life of jesus than what is in the new testament. i dont find that likely.
Jerusalas
20-04-2006, 21:08
Where's The Third Way? Or 'Mu'?
Evil little boys
20-04-2006, 21:12
I don't think the others were corrupted, they were just chosen because they fitted the image well.
In that way, the gospel by Judas is worth reading for christians, it'll show them there's more then one way to look at things ;)
Unionist
20-04-2006, 21:15
there are many books not used in the bible like the apogriphiya a seiries of books
that have nothing to do with christianity.. do you realize that Judas killed him self so by going against the christain beleif he should not have any credit
Jerusalas
20-04-2006, 21:16
there are many books not used in the bible like the apogriphiya a seiries of books
that have nothing to do with christianity.. do you realize that Judas killed him self so by going against the christain beleif he should not have any credit

I don't recall reading anywhere in the New Testament that suicide is a sin....
United O-Zone
20-04-2006, 21:54
Like I said, the New Testament Gospels were manipulated by the Church to portray the Church in a positive light and to give them more power. Read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" and you'll have some idea of what I'm talking about.