NationStates Jolt Archive


Insurrection in Paris

Anarchic Conceptions
31-03-2006, 17:17
Rather surprising turn of events in France, Clicky! (http://www.guardian.co.uk/fromthearchive/story/0,,983409,00.html)


A sanguinary and obstinate insurrection has outbroken in Paris in consequence of the determination of the government to clear the atollers nationaux of the immense numbers of workmen who have homes supported at the expense of the taxpayers...

...the combatants seem to have been animated with the most obstinate fury. Torrents of blood have flowed, but the accounts are so various that it is impossible to state the number of killed and wounded.

One report estimates the total number of slain at 11,000 but others speak of smaller numbers, although it is owned on all hands that it has been one of the most bloody struggles ever decided in the streets of Paris.

The national guard are said to have at first turned out reluctantly, and to have acted with hesitation; but at least they seem to have fought with the utmost determination and energy.

The statements respecting the garde mobile vary, as some reports affirm that a portion of it showed symptoms of disaffection, and even refused to act against the insurgents; but other accounts speak in the highest terms of its courage and energy. The troops of the line appear never to have wavered or hesitated for a moment.

The French have really grown soft over the last few years
Argesia
31-03-2006, 17:24
Wha...
Is this yet another alarmist thread? Hasn't NS General cried wolf over France like 1,000 times by now?
Anarchic Conceptions
31-03-2006, 17:29
Wha...
Is this yet another alarmist thread? Hasn't NS General cried wolf over France like 1,000 times by now?

I'm just using the same headline the Guardian did.
The Magyar Peoples
31-03-2006, 17:33
When are there never riots in Paris? Been a way of life for around 200years.
Anarchic Conceptions
31-03-2006, 17:34
When are there never riots in Paris? Been a way of life for around 200years.

You reckon?
The Magyar Peoples
31-03-2006, 17:39
You reckon?

See 1789, 1815, 1830, 1848, 1870, 1920s, 1930s, 1960s, 1990s. So, I'd say pretty much a way of life.
Corneliu
31-03-2006, 17:57
The Guardian? Oh brother. What is the London Times saying?

Nothing in the International Herald tribune, a french-English NewsPaper.

And here's another article on the Job's plan

http://www.ttc.org/200603311629.k2vgtg302399.htm
Corneliu
31-03-2006, 18:04
And upon further review, I hereby declare this a false story.
Haven Lands
31-03-2006, 18:05
Guys, go read the entire article. That was set in 1848.
Anarchic Conceptions
31-03-2006, 18:12
See 1789, 1815, 1830, 1848, 1870, 1920s, 1930s, 1960s, 1990s. So, I'd say pretty much a way of life.

You reckon?
Anarchic Conceptions
31-03-2006, 18:15
And upon further review, I hereby declare this a false story.

False, no.
Recent, no.
The Magyar Peoples
31-03-2006, 18:15
You reckon?

Cocky twat.
Corneliu
31-03-2006, 18:17
False, no.
Recent, no.

Since you left off the 1848 part, it was false.
Zilam
31-03-2006, 18:21
damnit..And here I was hoping that there was like a civil war in france...well not really hoping. But ya know...I was wanting to see something cool!
The Infinite Dunes
31-03-2006, 18:29
Since you left off the 1848 part, it was false.
Since when has anyone ever posted the date of the news item they were quoting?
Refused Party Program
31-03-2006, 18:31
The best coverage of the CPE fuck-up is on the LibCom blog (http://libcom.org/blog/).

EDIT: Ahahaha. Good show.
Corneliu
31-03-2006, 18:32
Since when has anyone ever posted the date of the news item they were quoting?

Because most of the links here are recent. This was very misleading. I to thought that a Civil War had broken out in France today.
Sdaeriji
31-03-2006, 18:33
Since you left off the 1848 part, it was false.

No, it just means you didn't read the whole article and you assumed it was recent.
The Infinite Dunes
31-03-2006, 18:35
Because most of the links here are recent. This was very misleading. I to thought that a Civil War had broken out in France today.Your obviously VERY guliable then, either that and/or you have VERY low expectations of France.
Corneliu
31-03-2006, 18:35
No, it just means you didn't read the whole article and you assumed it was recent.
Truth be told, i didn't click the links. I hardly click on the links on here :D
The Magyar Peoples
31-03-2006, 18:36
Truth be told, i didn't click the links. I hardly click on the links on here :D

Same.
I V Stalin
31-03-2006, 19:08
Since when has anyone ever posted the date of the news item they were quoting?
Well, not often. But most people put the proper name of their source. It should be the Manchester Guardian.
Gravlen
31-03-2006, 19:16
They stationed themselves near the Barriere du Trone, crying "Vive Napoleon!" "Vive l'emperuer!".

Gave me a hint that something wasn't right...

Vive la révolution! :D
The Infinite Dunes
31-03-2006, 19:24
Well, not often. But most people put the proper name of their source. It should be the Manchester Guardian.True, very true. Bad form Anarchic Conceptions, bad form. *shakes head*
I V Stalin
31-03-2006, 19:34
True, very true. Bad form Anarchic Conceptions, bad form. *shakes head*
I can't tell if that's sarcasm or not...
I'm going with yes it is. So...erm...:p to you. :)