Babies having babies, or in this case abortions
Drunk commies deleted
29-03-2006, 16:53
What is this world coming to? As if teen pregnancy wasn't bad enough, now a 2 month old infant girl had to have two fetuses removed from her. Maybe sex ed needs to start in the womb.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/pakistan_fetus_in_baby
What is this world coming to? As if teen pregnancy wasn't bad enough, now a 2 month old infant girl had to have two fetuses aborted from her. Maybe sex ed needs to start in the womb.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/pakistan_fetus_in_baby:eek:
I know that Virgins are getting harder and harder to find (pun intended) but this is really just...
I mean it puts a whole new meaning to the term "Robbing the cradle"
"Basically, it's a case of triplets, but two of the siblings grew in the other."
These were not the baby's babies, they were the mother's. They were siblings of the baby.
Kryozerkia
29-03-2006, 17:02
What a misleading thread title...
Gargantua City State
29-03-2006, 17:02
Ummm... the title of the thread is a little misleading... it wasn't an abortion. The fetus' were already dead inside the baby for... what? 7 months?
What a misleading thread title...
what would you call removing a fetus from a womb?
and would that meet the requirements for an immaculate conception?
Mooseica
29-03-2006, 17:09
Ummm... the title of the thread is a little misleading... it wasn't an abortion. The fetus' were already dead inside the baby for... what? 7 months?
Oh noes!!11!!! Teh misleadorz!! Shoot them all!! :p
Seriously though, does it really matter if the title isn't Gospel truth?
Kryozerkia
29-03-2006, 17:10
what would you call removing a fetus from a womb?
and would that meet the requirements for an immaculate conception?
Technically, if it had been a male, it wouldn't have been removed from the womb, therefore, what would you have called it?
Technically, if it had been a male, it wouldn't have been removed from the womb, therefore, what would you have called it?
but it was removed from a womb.
as for if the child was male...
I would call it "A procedure that the Patient would be happier that it happened while the patient didn't know what it entailed."
assuming the unfortunate fetuses were still in the same location...
Drunk commies deleted
29-03-2006, 17:21
Technically, if it had been a male, it wouldn't have been removed from the womb, therefore, what would you have called it?
In that case the thread title would have been "Pregnant BOY has abortion!!!"
In that case the thread title would have been "Pregnant BOY has abortion!!!"
I just had the image of the movie poster Junior flash into my head.
:headbang: a pregnant Arnold.... aaaarrrrrggggghhh!
The Half-Hidden
29-03-2006, 22:05
What is this world coming to? As if teen pregnancy wasn't bad enough, now a 2 month old infant girl had to have two fetuses removed from her. Maybe sex ed needs to start in the womb.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/pakistan_fetus_in_baby
I've heard of such cases before. It's a rare condition but it happens.
Secluded Islands
29-03-2006, 22:07
I just had the image of the movie poster Junior flash into my head.
:headbang: a pregnant Arnold.... aaaarrrrrggggghhh!
you didnt have to bring that up... gahh....
Dempublicents1
29-03-2006, 22:14
My fiance's mother works in a neonatal ICU. They saw a case like this once, except they noticed at birth and the other fetus was actually still living -attached to the kidney of the newborn.
Keruvalia
29-03-2006, 22:38
Ain't choice grand?
Iztatepopotla
29-03-2006, 23:09
This is what happens when you have sex with a pregnant woman!! :eek: