NationStates Jolt Archive

the difference is...
If you have to ask ....

My apologies. I should have added 'In Nationstates'
No problem. Some people here have a life that encompasses *MANY* forums. Believe it or not, i'm not one of them.

Looking at the page's source, there is nothing that prevents us from looking at any links.

You have failed, no offense intended.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

Looking at the page's source, there is nothing that prevents us from looking at any links.

You have failed, no offense intended.

One generally does not block access to websites through the html or php code. One does that on a server level.

Fact is that the heads of Iraq's WMD program were caught, interrogated and kept in jail for months, and then let go. No evidence, no admissions, no reason to believe that the cashstrapped Iraq of the inter-war years could afford a WMD program.

And as I am sure it was said before: Saddam and Syria didn't like each other! Syria fought against Iraq in Desert Storm! And why the hell would Saddam send his weapons away the day he needs them the most?!

And as I am sure it was said before: Saddam and Syria didn't like each other! Syria fought against Iraq in Desert Storm! And why the hell would Saddam send his weapons away the day he needs them the most?!

They were both part of the Secret Arabislamofascist Conspiracy to Destroy Freedom and Our Moral Values. Logic does not apply to such savages, merely the decrees from the propagandists on high.

That is also why Ahmadinejad is sheltering Bin Laden.

I had a look at the amazon site where this book comes from...and I really do enjoy

a) The package deal with "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam" - basically a propaganda book akin to some of the threads we've seen here a few weeks ago.

b) The lists that say "People who bought this book also bought", which includes such awesome works as "Strategery: How George W. Bush Is Defeating Terrorists, Outwitting Democrats, and Confounding the Mainstream Media", "Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy" and "The Truth About Hillary : What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President".

And why the hell would Saddam send his weapons away the day he needs them the most?!

cause he's tricksy like that. he knew that the best way to win was to lose. bwhahahaha! saddam wins again!

I had a look at the amazon site where this book comes from...and I really do enjoy

a) The package deal with "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam" - basically a propaganda book akin to some of the threads we've seen here a few weeks ago.

b) The lists that say "People who bought this book also bought", which includes such awesome works as "Strategery: How George W. Bush Is Defeating Terrorists, Outwitting Democrats, and Confounding the Mainstream Media", "Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy" and "The Truth About Hillary : What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President".
This was mention a think around page too. I still dont think this proves anything about the book in question.

This was mention a think around page too. I still dont think this proves anything about the book in question.
You wouldn't, because you're a troll.
How about all the other points raised about the book?

cause he's tricksy like that. he knew that the best way to win was to lose. bwhahahaha! saddam wins again!
:eek:
Whoda thunkit?
...always the last place you look...

Another subscriber to NEWSPEAK, perhaps ... ohno i see the connection now ... Saddam's in on the NWO! D'oh!!! :eek:

well, Once we got off his back he would have those weapons brought back into the country, so it was totally justified.

Got proof?

He definitely had Antrax at one time, because the same yahoos calling the shots in the US today gave it to him. Not even all the Neocons were really cooled out by the US government handing over bio and chem weapons to Saddam, but they didn’t have much choice if they didn’t want to take early retirement. Whether or not after having facilities bombed and being told to get rid of them he still had them is doubtful. Saddam was a wily one. He would have known it was worth more to him to embarrass inspectors than to give the US administration what it was looking for.

He definately had chemical weapons, including artillery and rocket delivery systems for them in the First Gulf War. Being a sportsman though, the British General (nicknamed Piano Wire Pete for his background in the SAS, maybe in jest) took Iraqi commanders on a tour of his lines to show them what was going to be smoking on them. The British General was careful to show them atomic shells on hand and told the Iraqis that if they used chemical weapons on the coalition they'd be nuked. The British have always been a bit aggressive that way. Sort of like when they had a sub with nukes parked off the shores of the Argentine capital in case things went bad (the US were a bit pissed about not being told about that until the Falklands War was over).

The Bruce

well, Once we got off his back he would have those weapons brought back into the country, so it was totally justified.
Yes, I can picture that now:

- Saddam: Excuse me Syria, but the US have just left after invading my country and not finding the WMD. Yep, they restored everythin, left me in power, apologized and left quietly. Now, may I have them back please?
- Syria: Have what back?
- Saddam: The WMD that I sent to you just before the invasion. I'd like them back.
- Syria: What are you talking about? WMD? I haven't seen any. Hey Bashar, have you seen any weapons around here? This guy claims we have them. No? Not seen any weapons?
- Saddam: But I gave them to you! I want them back!
- Syria: You did? I can't remember meeting you before. And I don't remember any crates of weapons either. Now if you will excuse me...
- I'm serious! I'll invade you! Well, I would if it weren't for the fact that you had all of my WMD...
- Syria: Hehe, you're a funny guy. Made me smile. Well, have a nice day, and don't let the door hit you on the way out now.

:D

According to the 2nd in command of what was Saddam's airforce, he says in his book "Saddam's secrets" that Saddam sent his WMDs to Syria just before the war. This means the intel and my man W got it right the whole time. This is what I have been saying forever and someone is backing me up. Do you liberals admit you got this one wrong or what?

Firstly, a name and link would be much appreciated.

However, is there not even the slightest possibility that said "2nd in command" has simply been compelled, or payed, to write the above, since it provides an explanation both as to their absence, and their absence from Iraq in 2003. Politically conveniant no? Oh, moreover, the US hardly enjoys clement relations with Syria, could this be a prelude/ pretext to an invasion?

Yes, I can picture that now:

- Saddam: Excuse me Syria, but the US have just left after invading my country and not finding the WMD. Yep, they restored everythin, left me in power, apologized and left quietly. Now, may I have them back please?
- Syria: Have what back?
- Saddam: The WMD that I sent to you just before the invasion. I'd like them back.
- Syria: What are you talking about? WMD? I haven't seen any. Hey Bashar, have you seen any weapons around here? This guy claims we have them. No? Not seen any weapons?
- Saddam: But I gave them to you! I want them back!
- Syria: You did? I can't remember meeting you before. And I don't remember any crates of weapons either. Now if you will excuse me...
- I'm serious! I'll invade you! Well, I would if it weren't for the fact that you had all of my WMD...
- Syria: Hehe, you're a funny guy. Made me smile. Well, have a nice day, and don't let the door hit you on the way out now.

:D

Class. So far thatsmade my day, I can just picture the scene....:p

Firstly, a name and link would be much appreciated.

However, is there not even the slightest possibility that said "2nd in command" has simply been compelled, or payed, to write the above, since it provides an explanation both as to their absence, and their absence from Iraq in 2003. Politically conveniant no? Oh, moreover, the US hardly enjoys clement relations with Syria, could this be a prelude/ pretext to an invasion?

Even if he wasn't paid or compelled, the fact is he gets to make good cash off this book for himself.