NationStates Jolt Archive


Alan Greenspan Fortells of Successful Third Party in U.S.

Myrmidonisia
13-03-2006, 20:41
It seems like I've heard that only 20 percent, or so, of likely voters are not firmly committed to a party. That doesn't seem like enough to make a third party anything more than a spoiler for one of the major parties, much like Perot and Nader were in past elections. Greenspan seems to think differently, however. The ideological divide must look bigger from inside the beltway.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/10/news/newsmakers/greenspan_book/index.htm

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Recently retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan believes that there will be a major independent candidate for president from the nation's political center, according to a published report.

In an interview with The New York Times about his post-Fed activities, Greenspan said he makes that prediction in a memoir, for which he recently got an estimated $8.5 million advance from Penguin Press, a unit of British publishing concern Pearson (Research).

Greenspan told the Times he plans to argue that the current "ideological divide" separating conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats leaves "a vast untended center from which a well-financed independent presidential candidate is likely to emerge in 2008 or, if not then, in 2012."
Myrmidonisia
13-03-2006, 23:09
No interest in third parties? Going, going, ...
Mariehamn
13-03-2006, 23:10
I'm a big fan of Greenspan, so I hope he goes for it. We really need a logical, boring presidential candidate these days. Wait, did I just assume something? Must have been another thread. *realizes NS is my only English newsource*
The Black Forrest
13-03-2006, 23:14
Ok Alex I will take that one

Who hopes the day of the Libertarians will arrive.....
Myrmidonisia
13-03-2006, 23:17
I'm a big fan of Greenspan, so I hope he goes for it. We really need a logical, boring presidential candidate these days. Wait, did I just assume something? Must have been another thread. *realizes NS is my only English newsource*
I don't think he's running. I don't even think he'll be alive to see the races in 2008 and 2012.

I'm surprised that he thinks there is this large, unrecognized centrist element in the country. Most opinion polls seem to be about 45/45/10 when comparing major parties.

But if it's there --- Go Libertarian Party!
Lunatic Goofballs
13-03-2006, 23:20
Would you vote for Alan Greenspan?

I don't know if I would. I don't think he'd be very strong on foreign policy. However, I DO think he's sensible enough to appoint and listen to true experts on such affairs.
Fleckenstein
13-03-2006, 23:22
And i foretell global warming will actually come. . . .

bullshit. both parties have taken sides on everything. maybe if we found a third side to every issue. . . . .
Mariehamn
13-03-2006, 23:24
I don't think he's running. I don't even think he'll be alive to see the races in 2008 and 2012.
Good ol' Greenspan aien't goin' nowhere; Cheny will run out of steam before he does.
Would you vote for Alan Greenspan?
Depends. But, being an economist kind of guy, I got trust in him. As some people can obviously see, I've had only good encounters with economists and economics. :p
The Half-Hidden
14-03-2006, 00:03
It seems like I've heard that only 20 percent, or so, of likely voters are not firmly committed to a party. That doesn't seem like enough to make a third party anything more than a spoiler for one of the major parties, much like Perot and Nader were in past elections. Greenspan seems to think differently, however. The ideological divide must look bigger from inside the beltway.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/10/news/newsmakers/greenspan_book/index.htm
What ideological divide?