NationStates Jolt Archive

I couldn't think of a better way to start a WWE Raw thread. So shoot me...:sniper:

*bang*

There is none hotter than Stacey Kiebler. As far as Im concern she is one of hottest women on planet and I love her. I want her to have my babies:p alright, maybe not but you get the idea. And Stacey, if your reading this, marry me

Too bad she got 3rd on Dancing With the Stars...I thought it would have been a sure thing, with her background in dance.

Her only real asset are her legs.

It's enough. :p

Mickie James is just so perky, and she's got a hell of an ass. Plus I like a girl with some meat on her. Stacy Keibler is undeniably hot, but Mickie James is more my type.

i demand pictures!

actually (yes, google is my friend) i was gonna vote trish till i saw this :eek: *drools*

http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5559/stacykeibler98zm.jpg

If you go on the WWE site you can see a video of Mickey James giving Trish Stratus a nice big kiss under the mistletoe. Even though it's nowhere near christmas time, It sure gave me some christmas spirit.

Wrestling? The spectacle where they make believe they're fighting? Right...

Wrestling? The spectacle where they make believe they're fighting? Right...

They do that in movies too. In fact, lots of movies are made entirely out of make believe!

Mickie James is just so perky, and she's got a hell of an ass. Plus I like a girl with some meat on her. Stacy Keibler is undeniably hot, but Mickie James is more my type.

At least Mickie James is a bona fide excellent women's wrestler. Not only does she look more realistic, she also packs a punch. (Too bad for her creepy storyline.)

They do that in movies too. In fact, lots of movies are made entirely out of make believe!

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.

Wrestling? The spectacle where they make believe they're fighting? Right...

Now don't take this the wrong way, but somehow I thought you'd be one to appreciate entertainment consisting mainly of semi-naked, muscle-bound men wrestling with eachother.

I mean, that's why I watch it.

Wrestling? The spectacle where they make believe they're fighting? Right...
Think of it as a soap opera written by deranged lunatics. "Two guys have a dispute, so one of them attacks the other with a steel folding chair while a worm-eating guy with facepaint breaks an oversized alarm clock over his head." Now it makes sense.

Wrestling? The spectacle where they make believe they're fighting? Right...
considering the homoeroticism I'd would've have thought you'd be all for it.. Are meatheads not your type?

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.

Neither do Michael Bay's movies, and yet, for some reason, they still manage to entertain. And that's all I need them to do.

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.
Sure it does. These guys are actors. Each guy plays a part. For example, one guy has just discovered that his ancestors were pirates, so now he plays the part of a wrestling pirate and is about to wrestle his old ally who betrayed him.

considering the homoeroticism I'd would've have thought you'd be all for it.. Are meatheads not your type?

Some are, but I prefer my homoeroticism to be penetrative instead of just implied.

Stacy Kiebler all the way...those legs are amazing....

Now don't take this the wrong way, but somehow I thought you'd be one to appreciate entertainment consisting mainly of semi-naked, muscle-bound men wrestling with eachother.

I can get that at my local bar whenever I want.

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.

What is "artistic value" anyway? I watch movies for entertainment. I assume that by "theatre", you meant it in the American sense (but spelled it in British English)?

I liken WWE to the Globe Theatre...entertainment for the masses, and maybe in a hundred years it will be studied by bored 14 year olds in class and quoted by exceptionally literate Space Captains.

Think of it as a soap opera written by deranged lunatics. "Two guys have a dispute, so one of them attacks the other with a steel folding chair while a worm-eating guy with facepaint breaks an oversized alarm clock over his head." Now it makes sense.

Not to mention the heel-face turns. Most of the characters in WWE seem to suffer from multiple personalities, going routinely from sadistic, opportunistic sleazebags into honorable champions of the weak and the oppressed... And then back again.

How did this become about the merits of pro wrestling?

I know a few pro wrestlers and have met a considerable number more. Hell, I've been powerbombed by Kevin Nash. :p

These guys are part actor, part athlete and part stuntman. They're in a class by themselves.

But we're talking about the women, aren't we? And they are all of the above AND devastatingly attractive. :)

Not to mention the heel-face turns. Most of the characters in WWE seem to suffer from multiple personalities, going routinely from sadistic, opportunistic sleazebags into honorable champions of the weak and the oppressed... And then back again.
Yep. The great ones pull that off all the time.

But we're talking about the women, aren't we?

I just cannot allow that on my watch.

I just cannot allow that on my watch.

Well, I suppose I could forgive you that one quirk. ;)

Where are the frikkin pics?:mad:

Where are the frikkin pics?:mad:
http://www.wwe.com/superstars/divas/

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.

Whilst fully concurring, does the former qualify the latter, or are they concurrent assertions.....

Returning reasonably to topic, whilst finding the whole affair melodramatic, risable and as transparent as David Cameron's "softer" manifesto, having been compelled to watch it by means of babysitting, it is insidiously addictive.

I couldn't think of a better way to start a WWE Raw thread. So shoot me...:sniper:

Wrestling is stupid, it is fake as hell. The westlers are fakely arrogant, and would probably piss themselves if you put a gun to their head, dispite the fact that tey are such badasses :rolleyes:

Wrestling is stupid, it is fake as hell. The westlers are fakely arrogant, and would probably piss themselves if you put a gun to their head, dispite the fact that tey are such badasses :rolleyes:
See, you just don't get pro wrestling. It's kinda sad, it's not rocket science you know.

Pro wrestling is fake. Of course it is, nobody thinks it's real. Guess what? The people shot in movies, they're not really shot either.

Pro wrestlers are actors who play a character in storylines that are funny because they're cheezy and exaggerated. Then they put on an acrobatic performance. See, it's entertainment. It's not sports, although pro wrestlers are extremely talented atheletes, and it's not a real fight.

You want real fights? Go watch UFC or Pride.

It's really a shame that this had to be explained to you.

Where are the frikkin pics?:mad:

http://istanbul.metblogs.com/photos/wrestling.jpg

http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/7374/shoesmell7ij.jpg

Yummy.

http://istanbul.metblogs.com/photos/wrestling.jpg

http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/7374/shoesmell7ij.jpg

Yummy.

Where would we be without you, Fass? :p

i demand pictures!

actually (yes, google is my friend) i was gonna vote trish till i saw this :eek: *drools*

http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/5559/stacykeibler98zm.jpg
*drools aswell* I love Stacey Kiebler

Wrestling is stupid, it is fake as hell. The westlers are fakely arrogant, and would probably piss themselves if you put a gun to their head, dispite the fact that tey are such badasses :rolleyes:

You'd piss yourself if I put a gun to your head, too. No amount of steroids will stop a bullet in the brain from killing you. However, unlike you, they would not be afraid of a fist fight with one another.

http://istanbul.metblogs.com/photos/wrestling.jpg

http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/7374/shoesmell7ij.jpg

Yummy.
Not nearly blonde enough...and a tad too hairy. Not bad though.

Not nearly blonde enough...and a tad too hairy. Not bad though.

Hairy is hot, so shut your mouth.

Hairy is hot, so shut your mouth.
In the right places. :p

In the right places. :p

Which is the chest and stomach and groin and pits and legs and face.

Which is the chest and stomach and groin and pits and legs and face.
I'm not so keen on chest and stomach...even face can be too much sometimes.

I'm not so keen on chest and stomach...even face can be too much sometimes.

Why don't you just do girls, then?

Which is the chest and stomach and groin and pits and legs and face.

What a coincidence. I have hair in all those places. In fact, the only place I don't have hair is my back.

Why don't you just do girls, then?
But where would the fun in that be?

Either way, some women can be hairy...and their entire anatomy is just not my thing.

What a coincidence. I have hair in all those places. In fact, the only place I don't have hair is my back.

:fluffle:

But where would the fun in that be?

Don't ask me, I loves me the hairy cock.

Either way, some women can be hairy...and their entire anatomy is just not my thing.

Eeeuw...

:fluffle:

Though I do trim the crotch region.

Don't ask me, I loves me the hairy cock.
Now that is a body part I contend to being more on the hairy side.

Eeeuw...
That about sums it up. :)

Though I do trim the crotch region.

Trimming is acceptable, just not shaving. Except the balls, which is common sense.

To answer the original question - I voted Maria, but only because I momentarily managed to forget about Stacy Keibler.

I also agree with everything Drunk Commies Deleted said about WWE and pro-wrestling. Spot on :)

Does former WWE wrestler Gail Kim count?
If not then it's Stacey. Love them legs!

While full of theatrics, wrestling is not done in a theatre, and has no artistic value.

Pro-wrestling has it's roots in the theater - Commedia dell'arte specifically.

Your implied definition of theater would preclude street theater and other modern experemental forms from being theater because it's not performed in a theater, for example.

As for artistic value or merit, how do you want to measure that. By the measures of popularity and income produced, it has quite a bit of value.

And if you want critical acclaim or influance, Keith Johnstone, the improvisational theater guru, was inspired by pro-wrestling, because to a large degree "traditional theater" is a dead art. And several of today's top comedians have come up through impro.

Even as an expression of emotion and a carthitic release, it certainly has value.

Personally, I enjoy small and independent circut pro-wrestling more than WWE. It's more interactive and alive.

Oh, and Fass you inspired this: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=472157

:D

Stacy Keibler!

*drools*

Stacy Keibler.. Fantastic legs.

Looks like the consensus is Stacy...thanks for weighing in. The poll is open for another 6 months if anybody feels very strongly about somebody else. ;)

At least Mickie James is a bona fide excellent women's wrestler. Not only does she look more realistic, she also packs a punch. (Too bad for her creepy storyline.)How odd, I'd view Mickie's storyline as the best in the WWE right now.
Oh, and Stacy is on Smackdown!

http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/7374/shoesmell7ij.jpg

Yummy.Why is that guy sniffing his own shoe? Wouldn't sniffing someone else's make more sense?