And the winners are... Razzie Awards 2006
While waiting for news of the Oscars®, here are this years winners of the Golden Raspberry Awards:
Worst Picture:
Dirty Love
Worst Actor:
Rob Schneider
Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo (Sony/Columbia)
Worst Actress:
Jenny McCarthy
Dirty Love
Worst Supporting Actor:
Hayden Christensen
Star Wars III: No Sith, He's Supposed to be Darth Vader Fox)
Worst Supporting Actress:
Paris Hilton
House Of Whacks (Warner Bros.)
Worst Screen Couple:
Will Ferrell & Nicole Kidman
Bewitched (Sony/Columbia)
Worst Remake Or Sequel:
Son Of The Mask
Worst Screenplay:
Dirty Love, Written by Jenny McCarthy
Worst Director:
John Asher / Dirty Love
Most Tiresome Tabloid Targets:
(New Category, Saluting the Celebs We're ALL Sick & Tired Of!)
Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, Oprah Winfrey's Couch,
The Eiffel Tower & "Tom's Baby"
Congratulations to the winners. Well played. Poor 'Dukes Of Hazzard' didn't win this year... Oh well :fluffle:
Le link (http://www.razzies.com/history/05winners.asp)
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
06-03-2006, 01:44
I agree, the winners definately worked hard to get their awards. It takes a lot of effort to suck that bad. It can't happen just by accident.
Hayden Christensen got his for the uberlame "NOOOOoooooo!" at the end. Otherwise, his performance was merely sucky, not the completely dysmal required for a Razzie nod.
Yes, yes, yes, indeed, verily, da, muh-huh, rather, fuckin' a', and aye...
I agree with all of the above awards.
Hayden Christensen was fine; he was in the best film of 2005. The others deserved what they got though.
"[Dirty Love] is an affront to cheese. Also to breasts." --Roger Ebert, referring to another critic's comment that "Dirty Love" was "cheesy"
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
06-03-2006, 03:13
Hayden Christensen wasn't that bad. Sure, he sucked, but everyone was unusually hard on him because they were hopless nerds with inflated expectations that no one could match. The Star Wars prequels were doomed from the start, and nothing short of being able to cure cancer could have allowed them to live up to the expectations set before them.
Hayden Christensen wasn't that bad. Sure, he sucked, but everyone was unusually hard on him because they were hopless nerds with inflated expectations that no one could match. The Star Wars prequels were doomed from the start, and nothing short of being able to cure cancer could have allowed them to live up to the expectations set before them.
A script with proper dialogue would have been a nice start.
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII
06-03-2006, 03:39
A script with proper dialogue would have been a nice start.
Yeah, but he didn't write the dialogue, he just had to play with what he had.
And in a year that bore House of Wax, Monster in Law, Cheaper by the Dozen 2, Dukes of Hazzard, etc, Star Wars 3 wasn't anywhere near the bottom. Unless you went in expecting to see the Ultimate Movie ExperienceTM because your a stupid twat who didn't learn anything from the first two prequels.
Yeah, but he didn't write the dialogue, he just had to play with what he had.
And in a year that bore House of Wax, Monster in Law, Cheaper by the Dozen 2, Dukes of Hazzard, etc, Star Wars 3 wasn't anywhere near the bottom. Unless you went in expecting to see the Ultimate Movie ExperienceTM because your a stupid twat who didn't learn anything from the first two prequels.
Oh, I didn't go see it. I saw it pirated at a friend's house. And it really did suck on its own merit, forget that it was Star Wars. While marginally better than JarJar in the annoyance department, Hayden still had less on-screen presence.
Megaloria
06-03-2006, 03:43
Hayden actually got better in episode three. Portman, however, must have given up already because she got a bit worse. Ah well, Obi-Wan kicked enough ass to make up for it.
Minoriteeburg
06-03-2006, 03:47
Hayden actually got better in episode three. Portman, however, must have given up already because she got a bit worse. Ah well, Obi-Wan kicked enough ass to make up for it.
why didn't portman/chirstensen win worst on screen duo. seriously watching those two act together was more unpleasant than a colonoscopy.
and also who the hell let jenny mccarthy write and direct a movie?
Is there one for worst performance by a President??? Sorry didn't mean to hijack the thread but it does seem somehow appropriate.:D
AllCoolNamesAreTaken
06-03-2006, 05:46
why didn't portman/chirstensen win worst on screen duo. seriously watching those two act together was more unpleasant than a colonoscopy.
Actually, speaking as someone who has Crohn's Disease and therefore has to have several colonoscopys a year, the prep for a colonoscopy is much worse than the procedure itself. As long as you get enough Demmoral and Versed. That golytley (pronounced go- lightly) is so wrong! It is absolute hell!
But aside from the erroneous euphanism, yeah, that duo sucked.
Is there one for worst performance by a President??? Sorry didn't mean to hijack the thread but it does seem somehow appropriate.:D
If you're thinking about Bush, he won a Razzie for worst actor in 2004, for his performance in Farenheit 9-11 - and one for worst on-screen couple toghether with either Condoleeza Rice OR His Pet Goat. :D
I haven't seen Dirty Love, but I'm wondering how bad it can be? And why Uwe Boll and BloodRayne has gone unnoticed...
If you're thinking about Bush, he won a Razzie for worst actor in 2004, for his performance in Farenheit 9-11 - and one for worst on-screen couple toghether with either Condoleeza Rice OR His Pet Goat. :D ...
WOW thanks for sharing that.. his achievements are endless!