NationStates Jolt Archive

Girls X-pelled for strip

By JOHN TROUP

TWO girls of TWELVE were expelled from a boarding school — after making a raunchy video to show to boy pupils.

The X-rated film had them cavorting in undies and flashing their breasts.

They showed it to boy boarders at their £16,000-a-year Royal Hospital School at Holbrook, Suffolk — and word soon spread.

But staff only stumbled over the film by accident when they quizzed the girls over alleged smoking.

They were asked what they had been up to and assumed teachers knew all about their video antics.

So they confessed to making the one-minute clip on a camcorder. A source said: “The film didn’t leave much to the imagination and the girls showed off everything they had.

”They made it for some boys in their year for a laugh and they in turn showed it to other boys at the school.

“The school only got to find out about what had happened by chance when somebody told a teacher the girls had been seen smoking.

“When the teacher asked them what they had been up to they assumed he was talking about the film and spilled the beans straight away.”The teacher was horrified and the matter was immediately referred to the headmaster, who expelled them both.”

The Royal Hospital School, which has 631 pupils aged from 11 to 18, has a good academic reputation.

It has been visited by Prince Andrew on several occasions.

Ninety-five per cent of pupils achieved grades A* to C in the last GCSEs and there has been a 100 per cent pass rate at A-level for the past four years.

Headmaster Howard Blackett said: “It was brought to my attention that two girls in year eight had made a homemade film of themselves. They used a small hand-held video camera.

“The matter was fully investigated. Four pupils were suspended for one week and the girls concerned were expelled.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006100318,00.html


I'm only kidding about the pics, you sick bastards! :p But i bet it got you to come in here.

This is pretty fucked up right here. But what can you do?

This sounds like a prestigous school too, so i bet these girls are in some serious deep shit.

Disturbing.

I'm only kidding about the pics, you sick bastards! :p But i bet it got you to come in here.

This is pretty fucked up right here. But what can you do?

This sounds like a prestigous school too, so i bet these girls are in some serious deep shit.

Apparently this is becoming common.

The article said they were expelled. I'm betting the parents don't get a refund either.

heh reminds me of something similar at my school.

year 11s went round handing out papers that the teachers were confiscating. So naturally we got one.

And so decivilisation and degeneration continues leading us further into cultural rot and decay. Er, so what's new then? :)

i'm not quite sure i see what they did that was worth expelling them over. and unless the article left something out, the whole thing sounds pretty much r rated, if not pg-13.

"The X-rated film had them cavorting in undies..."

Cavorting? Is the word cavorting still used in a serious sense?

Well this is silly. If they made the tape on their own time and with their own equiptment, what they do is their business and no one else's, except perhaps a parent's.

Cavorting? Is the word cavorting still used in a serious sense?

of course it is. why, i cavorted just yesterday.

"The X-rated film had them cavorting in undies..."

Cavorting? Is the word cavorting still used in a serious sense?
I don't know but if you're going to give it an X-rating there has to be penetration surely?

*hangs head in shame*
Sorry..

But staff only stumbled over the film by accident when they quizzed the girls over alleged smoking.

Moral of the story: Don't smoke.

*strokes beard*

*taps pipe*


that ain't right...

Moral of the story: Don't smoke.

nah. moral of the story: when dealing with school officials, deny, deny, deny.

why did they expect the teachers to know about their 'antics' though.

strange...

I agree with Free Soviets. This should teach this girls the ABDs of life: Always Be Denying.

Also, in view of the extra perks the pupils get I would increase the tuition to 40,000 pounds.

why did they expect the teachers to know about their 'antics' though.

strange...

cause kids are dumb and they fell for one of the standard interrogation tricks.

"we already know what you did, so you should just admit it"

kids, if that were true they wouldn't be asking you questions. come on.

nah. moral of the story: when dealing with school officials, deny, deny, deny.
Well the official rule whilst dealing with school officials is "Admit to the small stuf, and lie your ass off about the big stuff".

I think the issue is not what they did, per say, but rather, their age! these girls are 12, and they made kiddie porn. which is highly illegal. If they were 18, I'd say let them do what they want. To knowingly allow that to go on would make the school responsible for the film. They had to expell the girls.

On one hand, I really think this sort of thing is a sign of our corrupt, parent-less society and our loose, flippant morals regarding children.

On the other hand, it kinda turns me on.

I think the issue is not what they did, per say, but rather, their age! these girls are 12, and they made kiddie porn. which is highly illegal. If they were 18, I'd say let them do what they want. To knowingly allow that to go on would make the school responsible for the film. They had to expell the girls.

<Note: This post may possibly get me accused of some things that I find incredibly offensive. Just take it for the legal aspects, please>

That's an interesting thought. I don't follow the world of vice too closely, so forgive me if this seems like a naive question. But does a video that two pre-teen girls made of their "ni-nis" and "woo-woos" rank the same as a video of two girls of the same age made by adults, on the reprehensibility scale? When adults are involved, it's a case of exploitation, and they need to be taken out and fed to wolves, metaphorically speaking (or not). But can you really accuse the girls of self-exploitation? Bad judgement? Yes. Smack their parents about with a rubber boot? Certainly. But a charge of kiddie porn is going to put them on sex offender lists for the rest of their lives, if such things are published in the UK.

<Note: This post may possibly get me accused of some things that I find incredibly offensive. Just take it for the legal aspects, please>

That's an interesting thought. I don't follow the world of vice too closely, so forgive me if this seems like a naive question. But does a video that two pre-teen girls made of their "ni-nis" and "woo-woos" rank the same as a video of two girls of the same age made by adults, on the reprehensibility scale? When adults are involved, it's a case of exploitation, and they need to be taken out and fed to wolves, metaphorically speaking (or not). But can you really accuse the girls of self-exploitation? Bad judgement? Yes. Smack their parents about with a rubber boot? Certainly. But a charge of kiddie porn is going to put them on sex offender lists for the rest of their lives, if such things are published in the UK.

I agree with you. Kiddie pr0n, made by kids themselves and expressly made for other kids of the same age is not the reprehensible crime that the same pornography made by adults for pedophiles is. In fact I'm not even sure it should be a crime(the by kids for kids thing).

After all, the laws exist to protect children, right? Well what exactly is harmful about kiddie porn? It's not the fact that pictures were taken - that alone isn't a harmful act - it's the fact that it's usually non-consentual exploitation by the adult maker, in much the same way as rape is exploitation by the rapist. Without the exploitation component it shouldn't be a crime.

And so decivilisation and degeneration continues leading us further into cultural rot and decay. Er, so what's new then? :)
Decay of civilization assumes that we achived a "higher" point on which to decay from

cause kids are dumb and they fell for one of the standard interrogation tricks.

"we already know what you did, so you should just admit it"

kids, if that were true they wouldn't be asking you questions. come on.
Haha, I once knew a kid at camp who fell for that. The counselors were just messing around with him, saying "We know what you did" and such and then he cracked and admitted to having participated in some homosexual acts with another boy in our group.:eek: The counselors, needless to say, were stunned.

I agree with you. Kiddie pr0n, made by kids themselves and expressly made for other kids of the same age is not the reprehensible crime that the same pornography made by adults for pedophiles is. In fact I'm not even sure it should be a crime(the by kids for kids thing).

Yeah, I've often wondered that, if porn made by and for children counts as kiddy porn.

Yeah, I've often wondered that, if porn made by and for children counts as kiddy porn.
I will try to dig up the story but I believe it was around here about a year ago

A 16 year old female took nude pics of herself and ended up sending them to a police officer who was "under cover"

She got charged for the making and distrobution of picures of a minor

people send their 12 year olds to boarding school then wonder that they end up doing inappropriate things in their spare time?

Moral of the story: Don't smoke.

Or volunteer information.

On one hand, I really think this sort of thing is a sign of our corrupt, parent-less society and our loose, flippant morals regarding children.

On the other hand, it kinda turns me on.

But the bording-school parentless society was seen as being the backbone of British moral fibre for generations. If you want to create a society of emotionally barren empathicly vacant world conquerors, the best thing you can do is take away a parent's love.

I heard somewhere that the word faggot went from meaning "bundle of sticks" to "homosexual" because of boys bording schools and that story about the dying old man asking his three sons to break a bundle of sticks (you know, the first two can't break it, the youngest unties the bundle and breaks the sticks one by one, so the father tells them, "if you stick together you're stronger than anything).

The theory was that the boys would form strong cohesive bonds if they were taken away from families and grew up with eachother. The problem was, when you leave a bunch of boys in a confined space and leave it to themselves to figure out who's in charge, they all start raping eachother.

The obvious question is "Is this going to be in any way attributed to the school?". If, for instance, the girls were wearing uniforms, then fair enough. Similarly, if there's a chance of publicity that people will know what school these girls go to, then that's also fine. Expulsion on those grounds is understandable. However, if this was initially done entirely in privacy, I don't see the problem.

Apparently this is becoming common.

The article said they were expelled. I'm betting the parents don't get a refund either.


Most likely they won't get a refund, I know a lot of colleges don't for incidents like that so I am assuming this place won't refund either.


...and that's really disturbing that its becoming common. At this rate in 10 yeas it will be 9 year olds getting busted for this.

I agree with Free Soviets. This should teach this girls the ABDs of life: Always Be Denying.

Also, in view of the extra perks the pupils get I would increase the tuition to 40,000 pounds.


40,000 pounds?!?!?!? thats like 70,000+ US!

thats some expensive schoolin'

In case anyone wants to know the relevant law in Britain:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Children_Act_1978

Also from wikipedia. I just found it to be interesting:
"Available studies show that the majority of viewers appear to be male adolescents, and many of them are minor adolescents themselves."

Finally, that article UpwardThrust mentioned:
http://www.post-gazette.com/breaking/20040329pornp6.asp

40,000 pounds?!?!?!? thats like 70,000+ US!

thats some expensive schoolin'
Think of it as an investment, not an expense. They're getting a career... as porn stars. They can make good money.

I don't think this is too disturbing, provided they are all roughly the same age. Although I suppose you can't guarantee these things when you tape it all.

Wasn't Juliet like 12 and Romeo 15 in the original play?

Not trying to defend this but just want to bring up the history of young women and marriage/sex.

I don't think this is too disturbing, provided they are all roughly the same age.

exactly. this just strikes me as a "eh, so what?" sort of occassion.

Wasn't Juliet like 12 and Romeo 15 in the original play?
No, Juliet was 16. She was a statutory rapist. HAAAANG HER!!!!

I can understand them banning the girls.
They are a prestigious private school, and I'm sure they must mantain a certain reputation.
Personally, I don't care what happens to the little sluts, one way or the other.

I can understand them banning the girls.
They are a prestigious private school, and I'm sure they must mantain a certain reputation.
Personally, I don't care what happens to the little sluts, one way or the other.

I can think of a few things those little sluts can have happen to them... *grins maliciously*

The girls needs decades and decades of therapy. They sexually abused themselves.

You mean they're not going to finish the "Dirty Movies 101" class? :p

12 year old girls taping themselves in their undies and flashing their breasts.. 12? 16 I can understand.. But wow, 12. That isn't too nice.

Jailbait I tell ya... Jailbait. LMAO

Think of it as an investment, not an expense. They're getting a career... as porn stars. They can make good money.


The Porn Industry is becoming like the Tobacco Company:"Get em while theyre young"

This is disgusting news.

Even more so that this perversion has yet again occured in England, I really do despair for my Nation.

Those two little whores need not only expulsion from the school, but face imprisonment for their disgusting sex crimes.

The law of the land hardly is never applied to those degenrates and perverts who engage in underage sex.

Futrhtermore, those male pupils who watched this video clip and did not report it, should face expulsion as well.

This is disgusting news.

Even more so that this perversion has yet again occured in England, I really do despair for my Nation.

Those two little whores need not only expulsion from the school, but face imprisonment for their disgusting sex crimes.

The law of the land hardly is never applied to those degenrates and perverts who engage in underage sex.

Futrhtermore, those male pupils who watched this video clip and did not report it, should face expulsion as well.

is it sad that i can't tell whether this is parody or not?

is it sad that i can't tell whether this is parody or not?

Well, unless everything else he says is....

This is disgusting news.

Even more so that this perversion has yet again occured in England, I really do despair for my Nation.

Those two little whores need not only expulsion from the school, but face imprisonment for their disgusting sex crimes.

The law of the land hardly is never applied to those degenrates and perverts who engage in underage sex.

Futrhtermore, those male pupils who watched this video clip and did not report it, should face expulsion as well.

Kravania you seem to fail to realise that the two girls are the victoms here they have been sexually abused by themselves they need decades of treatment not years of punishment.

I wish I had gone to that school, and I bet I'm not the only one.

In all honesty though, expelling them is pushing it a bit.

Actually it just occured to me that the school could punish them for distributing porn round the school. Other than that they've got nothin really.

Dosn't any one here realise that the girls could never have consented to what they did to themselves?

Dosn't any one here realise that the girls could never have consented to what they did to themselves?

You mean they can't consent to take off their clothes?

Then how do they have showers?

You mean they can't consent to take off their clothes?

Then how do they have showers?

no one may shower until they reach the age of consent!

no one may shower until they reach the age of consent!

I second the motion.

That's why women should get breasts at 18...*Happy Birthday* POP! There they are. It would solve problems.

That's why women should get breasts at 18...*Happy Birthday* POP! There they are. It would solve problems.

Why should they ever get breasts? We could bread breasts out and use fake breast milk.

Lower the age of consent to 12. Problem solved. :fluffle: :D

That's why women should get breasts at 18...*Happy Birthday* POP! There they are. It would solve problems.

It could also possibly tear the shirt they're wearing.

:upyours: fuck this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!::upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours: :upyours:

:upyours: :upyours: fuck this site!:upyours: :upyours:

:upyours: :upyours: fuck this site!:upyours: :upyours:

Are you upset? Would you like to talk about it I'm here to listen.

:upyours: :upyours: fuck this site!:upyours: :upyours:

Uhhuh... and fuck you. If you don't like the site, then don't come here. Anyways, I don't think that lowering the age of consent to 12 would do ANYTHING good, It would just encourage these things to younger age groups.

Uhhuh... and fuck you. If you don't like the site, then don't come here. Anyways, I don't think that lowering the age of consent to 12 would do ANYTHING good, It would just encourage these things to younger age groups.

One might question whether that is such a bad thing. Admittedly it is an intimidating thought, perhaps lowering it to 12 wouldn't be the best move, then we'd get kids at 8 doing this. Maybe 16, or 15 would be better.

Do 12 year olds have breasts? Where were those busty 12 year olds when I was 12?

no one may shower until they reach the age of consent!


"I'm sorry honey but your smelly untill your 18. deal with it."

Do 12 year olds have breasts? Where were those busty 12 year olds when I was 12?

Well, they do now, some of them.

Do 12 year olds have breasts? Where were those busty 12 year olds when I was 12?


same here i dont remember seeing breasts on most women till high school.

12 year old girls taping themselves in their undies and flashing their breasts.. 12? 16 I can understand.. But wow, 12. That isn't too nice.

Seriously, what breasts... most girls don't have breasts till like 13 or 14... then again i grew up in the ultra polluted air of New Jersey so it might just be a mutation here

It could also possibly tear the shirt they're wearing.

hehe i wish i were at that birthday party ... i'm sure i'm not the only one:D

same here i dont remember seeing breasts on most women till high school.

even now at my school (9-12) we don't have girls with breasts... then again we don't have any girls ... 'tis why i hate my school for being all boys...

At no point in the report did it state that the girls were showing off their Double D breasts. But there was obviously *something* to show off. But anyway, that's not the point.

They got in trouble because they were clearly breaking the law. Yes, far enough, they were only messing around - but could you imagine the newspaper reports if the school didn't punish them severely, and then the video made it's way into public view via the internet. The school's reputation would be destroyed.

I feel sorry for the girls, mainly because they're being used as scapegoats - perhaps to send a message out to the parents of the other kids that this sort of thing is never tolerated.

But I bet applications for the school go up ten fold next year.

Do 12 year olds have breasts? Where were those busty 12 year olds when I was 12?

Probably the amount of food kids eat nowadays - makes puberty start earlier.