NationStates Jolt Archive

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.

Damn straight. I could swing a federal job out of it that I'm unqualified for. :)

I would be too busy getting marshmallows.

Yes, but no so much or so fast as to put out the fire.

Yes, but only on the parts of him that were not on fire.

Nah. I'd hate to get hit over the head by a fire-extinguisher weilding Secret Service agent...

A better question would be would I set fire to George Bush, just so I could piss on him. The answer is yes. Yes I would.

Sure! I'd be glad to piss on him, with or without the fire. :)

Tempting, but I believe that I'd probally be more concerned with locating my hot dogs and marshmallows.

Yes, yes I would. But then, when he'd dried out, I'd set him alight again....

Yes. Just because I disagree with him doesn't mean I wouldn't save his life. I might also go number two on him, but that's irrelevant.

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.Only if I didn't have any more suitable methods for putting out the fire.

Don't try it. One lick of flame going the wrong way, and - :eek:

Not to mention if you're female.

I think I'd strike a thoughtful pose, and look at him long and hard, then ask, "Do you want me to piss on you?"
If he said yes, I wouldn't. If he said no, I would.
Let him see what it's like to not be listened to...

Yes. I'd also piss on him if he choked on a pretzel.

A better question would be would I set fire to George Bush, just so I could piss on him. The answer is yes. Yes I would.
You'd be arrested as a dangerous muslim subversive* if you set him on fire though: just piss on the wanker anyway. Piss in a water pistol and squirt him.

*(Even if you're Jewish.)

Yes, I would. Because no matter how little respect I have for him and his "accomplishements", I remember he is a human being, all all human beings deserves the right to be saved if their life is in peril.

Yes, I would. Because no matter how little respect I have for him and his "accomplishements", I remember he is a human being, all all human beings deserves the right to be saved if their life is in peril.
If he was in the habit of preserving human lives himself, that argument would be a lot more convincing.

Sure I'd piss on him. I'd rather use a fire extinguisher or even a bucket of water. However, if the President of the US was in front of me and on fire I would pee on him if I had absolutely nothing better to use.

I would form a committee to determine the viability of putting together a senate oversight committee in charge of appointing people to urinate on the President. I would also make sure that the proper authorities were in place to study the possible carcinogenic effects of inhaling Presidential smoke. After careful study, I would look into forming a new Cabinet position under the umbrella "Department of Non-Combustable Bodily Fluids" (DNCBF) and appoint only the finest mind dedicated to the mass consumption of water I could find. Once the Senate approves a nomination, that appointee would be in charge of appointing someone to piss on the Pres.

Afterwards, a lengthy investigation into what lead the President to be on fire in the first place would span 4 election cycles and would eventually place blame squarely on the shoulders of some White House staffer whom nobody has ever heard of because we secretly hired him 2 hours after the fire ensued.

There would be, of course, a nearly instant Presidential pardon.

I would form a committee to determine the viability of putting together a senate oversight committee in charge of appointing people to urinate on the President. I would also make sure that the proper authorities were in place to study the possible carcinogenic effects of inhaling Presidential smoke. After careful study, I would look into forming a new Cabinet position under the umbrella "Department of Non-Combustable Bodily Fluids" (DNCBF) and appoint only the finest mind dedicated to the mass consumption of water I could find. Once the Senate approves a nomination, that appointee would be in charge of appointing someone to piss on the Pres.

Afterwards, a lengthy investigation into what lead the President to be on fire in the first place would span 4 election cycles and would eventually place blame squarely on the shoulders of some White House staffer whom nobody has ever heard of because we secretly hired him 2 hours after the fire ensued.

There would be, of course, a nearly instant Presidential pardon.
Well, I was going to make a smart rectal comment, But I can't beat this.

No, because it would be difficult and sick. (I am a girl.)

Also, watching him burn to death would be much more entertaining than pissing on him so he'd live. It would be even more entertaining if someone was poking him with a stick at the same time. *pass the marshmallow please*

This may just be my favourite thread ever.

*applauds*

well no i wouldnt.

but in my defense im a woman and pissing on people just doesnt come naturally to me.

i might suggest that he "stop drop and roll" in a manure pile though

No, because it would be difficult and sick. (I am a girl.)

Also, watching him burn to death would be much more entertaining than pissing on him so he'd live. It would be even more entertaining if someone was poking him with a stick at the same time. *pass the marshmallow please*
*passes bag of marshamallows and hands stick*

If he was in the habit of preserving human lives himself, that argument would be a lot more convincing.
Just because he's causing mass destruction and mayhem across the world doesn't mean I have to stoop down to his level.

I value every human life equally.

No i wouldn't piss on him,i'd find some fire wood and build a huge bonfire on him and then invite every NS'er to come along for the party.

No i wouldn't piss on him,i'd find some fire wood and build a huge bonfire on him and then invite every NS'er to come along for the party.

should we bring some booze with us too?

I'd piss on Bush, then pour gasoline on him and watch the flames a second and final time.

Just because he's causing mass destruction and mayhem across the world doesn't mean I have to stoop down to his level.

I value every human life equally.
It does you great credit, but I'm afraid I can't claim as much.

It does you great credit, but I'm afraid I can't claim as much.

Me neither...burn him *asks for matches and more petrol*

If my urine was composed of flamable materials, sure.

Or I could tell Dick that shotgun over there is actually shoots water...*evil*

The alcohol content of my blood would make urination likely to have negative health effects for both me and Mr President in the event of fire.

Think he could sign a resignation letter first? I'd probably do it then...

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.

He doesn't have to be on fire. :)

Pissing on a burning bush sounds almost biblical, and I wouldn't even piss on YOU if you were on fire.

"Would you piss on Bush if he was on fire?"

No, but I would most likely piss on you even if you weren't on fire.

"Would you piss on Bush if he was on fire?"

No, but I would most likely piss on you even if you weren't on fire.

You'd let him burn? :eek:

You should at least beat the fire out with an old shoe or something. :)

If my urine was composed of flamable materials, sure.

Or I could tell Dick that shotgun over there is actually shoots water...*evil*

Actually, i think I would tell dear Dick that it was a nest of quails burning, and hand him a handgun. Now, THAT, my friends, is sweet revenge.

He doesn't have to be on fire. :)
A good point well made.

You'd let him burn? :eek:

You should at least beat the fire out with an old shoe or something. :)

Yeah, good idea. I'd simultaneously piss on his and stomp on him with an old shoe. Eutrusca -- what kind of a horrible man wouldn't piss on their president while stomping on him? Inaction would be despicable. :)

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.

I'd piss on him even if HE WASN'T ON FIRE. Ahem, but seriously, I would. I'd prefer him not to burn to death if I can help it. Milk of human kindness and all that.

I'd piss on him even if HE WASN'T ON FIRE. Ahem, but seriously, I would. I'd prefer him not to burn to death if I can help it. Milk of human kindness and all that.
He has a doctor's note excusing him from the milk of human kindness.

He has a doctor's note excusing him from the milk of human kindness.

What the hell are you on about?

I'd piss on the ground just in front of him, so that he has to drag himself forwards in mortal agony just to earn the privilege of getting my piss on him. Nah just kidding.

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.
As unlikely as it might be, I would nonetheless prefer to extinguish the burning Bush through the medium of a tanker-truckful of liquefied manure.

You know, just to make sure he's out. Or something.

As unlikely as it might be, I would nonetheless prefer to extinguish the burning Bush through the medium of a tanker-truckful of liquefied manure.

You know, just to make sure he's out. Or something.
You make sure to drive a tankerfull of liquid manure wherever you go? Is this some sort of subgenius thing?

You make sure to drive a tankerfull of liquid manure wherever you go? Is this some sort of subgenius thing?
I did say it was unlikely. It'd just be my preferred means of dousing the fire before it spread and actually hurt somebody, that's all.

I did say it was unlikely. It'd just be my preferred means of dousing the fire before it spread and actually hurt somebody, that's all.Ah, I see. It's a sane and reasonable move: your bladder might not hold enough, after all.

It's a sane and reasonable move: your bladder might not hold enough, after all.
Sanity and reason are just so... Pink. Serious bonus points for doing it in a Bob tee-shirt, though.

Depends if I'd been drinking.

Gah! I can't decide! I hate bush but... I don't know!

Certainly, and I would invite everyone I know to come HELP me piss on him. And spit*, too.



*Yes, with a p, not an h. He has done enough of spitting with an h on people to last us a lifetime.

It'sd unlikely you'd need to, but perhaps somebody might have disposed of his minders and keepers before setting him on fire. Stranger things have happened: Abe Lincoln's trip to the theatre springs to mind.
Why again isn't this a poll with about 5 options of deployment?

These threads are great for the sheer ingenuity of the posters. :D

To save time, i'll just say, i'd film it, and make sure it was just his mouth, nose and eyes that got it. He still needs to feel the rest as well. Oh yeah, his just a little of the hair on his head as well, so he can smell that heating up AS WELL as still feeling what's going on.
I haven't even read the rest yet, i might alter this, i might not.

It's not like it'd put the fire out if he was rolling on the ground screaming and the flames weren't defeated by that...

So mainly it's a question of whether you'd deliver a last insult before he died, really...

I would form a committee to determine the viability of putting together a senate oversight committee in charge of appointing people to urinate on the President. I would also make sure that the proper authorities were in place to study the possible carcinogenic effects of inhaling Presidential smoke. After careful study, I would look into forming a new Cabinet position under the umbrella "Department of Non-Combustable Bodily Fluids" (DNCBF) and appoint only the finest mind dedicated to the mass consumption of water I could find. Once the Senate approves a nomination, that appointee would be in charge of appointing someone to piss on the Pres.

Afterwards, a lengthy investigation into what lead the President to be on fire in the first place would span 4 election cycles and would eventually place blame squarely on the shoulders of some White House staffer whom nobody has ever heard of because we secretly hired him 2 hours after the fire ensued.
There would be, of course, a nearly instant Presidential pardon.
You win. !!!!!! For the bolded ... make sure it's someone with the same competency and resume' qualifications that Bush tends to staff the admin, ambassadorships, and science boards with.
*FLORT*

It does you great credit, but I'm afraid I can't claim as much.
Oh, I don't pretend to ask anyone else to hold my standards. If it's any consolation, I would not feel very glad to save him. But there are times you have to do something because you know it's the right thing to do, regardless of personnal feelings.

Oh, I don't pretend to ask anyone else to hold my standards. If it's any consolation, I would not feel very glad to save him. But there are times you have to do something because you know it's the right thing to do, regardless of personnal feelings.

You would probably be one of the people reincarnated into a saint then. I bow to you, Saint Skaladora.

Oh, I don't pretend to ask anyone else to hold my standards. If it's any consolation, I would not feel very glad to save him. But there are times you have to do something because you know it's the right thing to do, regardless of personnal feelings.


Sd said it best....

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10488552&postcount=11

You would probably be one of the people reincarnated into a saint then. I bow to you, Saint Skaladora.
You give me way too much credit.

Besides, Saints are part of the catholic dogma. Reincarnation is essentially a bhuddist concept. And I'm an agnostic.

You give me way too much credit.

Besides, Saints are part of the catholic dogma. Reincarnation is essentially a bhuddist concept. And I'm an agnostic.

What about X-ty gallons of Guiness on an installment plan?

No, but I'd arrange for there to be a nice semen stain on his clothes for the crime scene investigators to find.

What about X-ty gallons of Guiness on an installment plan?
Whaaaat? o_O

Another anti President Bush thread, sick, just sick, the Mods should really put a stop to these threads, I know they wont but they should.

Other than this post, I wont waste my time posting on this thread.

Another anti President Bush thread, sick, just sick, the Mods should really put a stop to these threads, I know they wont but they should.

Other than this post, I wont waste my time posting on this thread.

Yeah, and anti-Bush thread in a political forum is so inappropriate...

Seriously, how bad does he have to be before you're even slightly annoyed by him?

Other than this post, I wont waste my time posting on this thread.
My esteem and respect for you jaunted several points as a consequence of this sentence in your thread. I'd say you won it.
Keep up the good work!!!!!!!

*FLORT*

No, but I'd arrange for there to be a nice semen stain on his clothes for the crime scene investigators to find.
You know, if he really is like the fundies that support him so generously, you're liable to find one anyway, given his likely response to a hell-like environment and his record of attempting to bring it to us.

Seriously, how bad does he have to be before you're even slightly annoyed by him?
http://workingforchange.speedera.net/www.workingforchange.com/webgraphics/wfc/TMW09-21-05.jpg
...yeah, Satan is so misunderstood...

-snip-
Ah, brilliant. Suddenly it all makes sense...

Ah, brilliant. Suddenly it all makes sense...Yep..

and No, we didnt need Iowa (Iran) :D

and No, we didnt need Iowa (Iran) :D
I wouldn't know about that, having been to neither. I've been to Idaho, though, and that was surprisingly beautiful. That count for something? :D

I've been to Idaho, though, and that was surprisingly beautiful. That count for something? :D
It's a good song by the B-52's, I know that.

Don't they grow potatoes out there?

Don't they grow potatoes out there?
That and "liberty compounds".

That and "liberty compounds".
I was lucky enough not to stumble upon any of those. Didn't stumble upon any potatoes, either, just for the record. :p

I was lucky enough not to stumble upon any of those. Didn't stumble upon any potatoes, either, just for the record. :p
I passed two of them while riding around the state (so i was told) - road between Boise and Kooksia. *nods*

I might douse him in whiskey....

"I was trying to help! Honest! They never taught me that in school!"

I might douse him in whiskey....

"I was trying to help! Honest! They never taught me that in school!"
...or you can say you've watched a lot of westerns and that's what they always drank to get through the operation!

I was conflicted about this for a while, but I guess I'd piss on the President. Letting someone die by incineration seems sick and twisted, pissing out the flames seems sickly ironic. And I'm a sucker for irony (and public urination, any excuse I get).

Ultimately, I think any case where the President managed to screw up so monumentally that I would have to pee to rescue him would probably lame-duck him faster than he could say "there's a pretzel lodged in my trachea."

...or you can say you've watched a lot of westerns and that's what they always drank to get through the operation!

Hmm, good point. And that's an excuse to make of with Bush's cowboy hat without anyone noticing anything out of the ordinary.

Hmm, good point. And that's an excuse to make of with Bush's cowboy hat without anyone noticing anything out of the ordinary.
Ooooh .... clever. I might just have sh*t in the hat and then squared it back on his happy chimp cranium a second time (after too much Cracklin' Oat Bran and McDonald's salad, so it's souper-runny), but you're idea's okay too.

I passed two of them while riding around the state (so i was told) - road between Boise and Kooksia. *nods*
What, you don't recognize a potato when you see it?

What, you don't recognize a potato when you see it?
I can't recognize their stalks above ground while i'm zooming by at 70mph, no. :D

I can't recognize their stalks above ground while i'm zooming by at 70mph, no. :D
Stalks? What are you talking about, "stalks"?

http://www.socko.com/fun1st/SpudAlbum/images/On%20the%20Road%20Again.jpg

Don't know about you, but i don't see any stalks. Maybe you should get your eyes checked, or next thing you know, you're actually seeing "liberation compounds" or silly things like that.

If it was 9:00 AM, 3:00 PM, 10:00 PM, or I have just had a forty.

I am a regular pisser.

Stalks? What are you talking about, "stalks"?

http://www.socko.com/fun1st/SpudAlbum/images/On%20the%20Road%20Again.jpg

Don't know about you, but i don't see any stalks. Maybe you should get your eyes checked, or next thing you know, you're actually seeing "liberation compounds" or silly things like that.
That's seriously creepy. If i remember my long, windy roads through golden-grass covered small rolling hills correctly, THAT IS Idaho, isn't it?

That's seriously creepy. If i remember my long, windy roads through golden-grass covered small rolling hills correctly, THAT IS Idaho, isn't it?
Of course it is. I am inside your head! Muahahahaaaaaa.


Actually, I have no idea. :p
It doesn't look much like the Idaho I saw, way too hilly for that. But it does kind of look like Montana or Wyoming, so it could just as well be Idaho after all, I guess. But no matter where it is, the only thing of importance here is - let me yell it at you - there are NO STALKS! :p

Of course it is. I am inside your head! Muahahahaaaaaa.


Actually, I have no idea. :p
It doesn't look much like the Idaho I saw, way too hilly for that. But it does kind of look like Montana or Wyoming, so it could just as well be Idaho after all, I guess. But no matter where it is, the only thing of importance here is - let me yell it at you - there are NO STALKS! :p
What, then, do you call all the greenery ABOVE ground in the photos here:
http://www.photobar.com/galleries/potato/potato.htm
?

What, then, do you call all the greenery ABOVE ground in the photos here:
http://www.photobar.com/galleries/potato/potato.htm
?
That? Liberation Camp camouflage. They can get that green stalky stuff really cheap, and it seems their right-wing militia propaganda about "potatoes" (yeah, right :rolleyes:) has caught on already. :eek:


But do not despair - the truth is out there. Here, take this image and spread it to your friends, and soon they, too, shall know what the free world has known for centuries: that potatoes grow in baskets.


http://www.photobar.com/galleries/potato/images/49027.jpg

That? Liberation Camp camouflage. They can get that green stalky stuff really cheap, and it seems their right-wing militia propaganda about "potatoes" (yeah, right :rolleyes:) has caught on already. :eek:


But do not despair - the truth is out there. Here, take this image and spread it to your friends, and soon they, too, shall know what the free world has known for centuries: that potatoes grow in baskets.


http://www.photobar.com/galleries/potato/images/49027.jpg
It seems like agitprop. One second it's stalks, the next minute it seems largely innocuous.

Course, it could be them hiding their taters with dope.

It seems like agitprop. One second it's stalks, the next minute it seems largely innocuous.

Course, it could be them hiding their taters with dope.

Hmm, let's see.

http://www.photobar.com/galleries/potato/images/029U2654.jpg
Just stalks, right?



Now let's zoom in a little:

http://gottwaerts.de/jan/pranger/landkrass_leer/hanf.jpg



Aaaand a little more:

http://www.dhm.de/museen/hanf/blatt01.jpg


:eek:


And if you look reeeeeeaaaally closely, you come upon the most scary sight of all (not displayed to protect the innocent): Whatever the fuck that is - I'm scared now. (http://www.formteile.ch/tb-ice/Hanf-Feld.jpg)

:eek:
And if you look reeeeeeaaaally closely, you come upon the most scary sight of all (not displayed to protect the innocent): Whatever the fuck that is - I'm scared now. (http://www.formteile.ch/tb-ice/Hanf-Feld.jpg)
Unless i miss my guess .... that APPEARS to be ... my aunt and her puppy. I told her to take those photos offline, but did she listen to me? No, of course not!

I'd piss on Bush, kick him, then go find Rumsfeld and rip out his jugular vein and shove it in his mouth so while he dies of blood loss he drowns in his own blood. Then I'd find Cheney, and pop out and go "BOO!" thus giving him a heart attack. After that I'd hop in my '61 vette and drive away from the scene of the crime.

I wouldn't piss on him - I'd just add more napalm.

Unless i miss my guess .... that APPEARS to be ... my aunt and her puppy. I told her to take those photos offline, but did she listen to me? No, of course not!
o.O
Erm, she's looks like a real nice person and all, and that puppy is just adorable, but I really have to go now, what a pity... *runs away*



And to make up for hijacking the thread I'll actually finally answer the question. Would I piss on him?
For the purposes of this thread: Hell no!
In real life: Literally - probably not. I'm a girl, too, so that seems a bit, um, impractical and just a wee (ahahaha) bit dangerous. Figuratively - of course. Nobody should burn to death. My worst nightmare. *shudder*

I'd piss on his burnt-out corpse...

I would not piss on him. I would fetch water to douse the poor darling, and then I would give him a swat on the bum for playing with matches. Those are for GROWN UPS, Georgie! You don't play with those. Now run along and play, and I don't want to hear about you fooling about with that naughty Dickie Cheney any more. You boys get up to such tomfoolery.

No, I would have run off if I had thought I could get away with it. If not I would try to douse it some other way. Why? Because I am too chicken-shit to have actually whipped out my dick and pissed on him while he slowly and agonizingly died from the flames that would nontheless consume him, though I wish I had the balls to do such a thing.

I'd probably piss myself laughing, but not on him...

This should be a poll. :)