The Nazz
18-02-2006, 08:19
Because the federal government has all this extra money to throw at the struggling oil industry (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/14/business/14oil.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=7f705e667bdcf305&hp=&ex=1139893200&oref=slogin&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all):
New projections, buried in the Interior Department's just-published budget plan, anticipate that the government will let companies pump about $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal territory over the next five years without paying any royalties to the government.
Based on the administration figures, the government will give up more than $7 billion in payments between now and 2011. The companies are expected to get the largess, known as royalty relief, even though the administration assumes that oil prices will remain above $50 a barrel throughout that period.
Administration officials say that the benefits are dictated by laws and regulations that date back to 1996, when energy prices were relatively low and Congress wanted to encourage more exploration and drilling in the high-cost, high-risk deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
You have to travel nearly to the bottom of the article to get to the fact that those incentives have a trigger price on them--about $35 a barrel--above which price the oil companies are supposed to pay royalties. When was the last time you saw oil lower than $35 a barrel. Remember, this is oil and gas that will be pumped off of public land--taxpayer owned land--and the oil companies will get it for nothing. What do you suppose the chances are that the oil companies pumping this oil will give us those royalties in the form of lower energy prices?
New projections, buried in the Interior Department's just-published budget plan, anticipate that the government will let companies pump about $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal territory over the next five years without paying any royalties to the government.
Based on the administration figures, the government will give up more than $7 billion in payments between now and 2011. The companies are expected to get the largess, known as royalty relief, even though the administration assumes that oil prices will remain above $50 a barrel throughout that period.
Administration officials say that the benefits are dictated by laws and regulations that date back to 1996, when energy prices were relatively low and Congress wanted to encourage more exploration and drilling in the high-cost, high-risk deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
You have to travel nearly to the bottom of the article to get to the fact that those incentives have a trigger price on them--about $35 a barrel--above which price the oil companies are supposed to pay royalties. When was the last time you saw oil lower than $35 a barrel. Remember, this is oil and gas that will be pumped off of public land--taxpayer owned land--and the oil companies will get it for nothing. What do you suppose the chances are that the oil companies pumping this oil will give us those royalties in the form of lower energy prices?