Straughn
16-02-2006, 04:01
Well i didn't see this anywhere so i posted. Caught my attention a day or so ago.
I guess the question would be whether it would be worth it to work for a company that does it ... can you just remove the chip when you punch out for the day?
http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/139/3812/2006-02-15.asp?wid=139&nid=3812
CHIPPING WORKERS POSES HUGE SECURITY RISK
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Since we first publicized last week that Cincinnati video surveillance company CityWatcher.com had implanted the first VeriChip RFID tags into U.S. employees, the story has exploded. Financial Times reporter Richard Waters got the story from us, then his story landed in Slashdot and the Drudge Report, and that resulted in over 200 Google news stories around the world and several prominent TV news features.
As talk shows and media pundits cover the issue, however, there is one crucial fact they are missing: THE VERICHIP IS NOT SECURE -- IT CAN BE HACKED. What's more, the vast majority of Americans oppose it.
Of course, CASPIAN newsletter subscribers already know the VeriChip was cloned just last month by security researcher Jonathan Westhues, putting a huge dent in VeriChip's message that its implant provides a high level of security. The truth is the chip implant does nothing of the kind.
(See: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/verichip-hacked.html)
Below is an excerpt from the press release we sent last Thursday that initially sparked the media frenzy on the "implanted workers" story. Note that the focus of our reporting was the fact that neither CityWatcher nor Six Sigma Security had any idea that the VeriChip implant was insecure and had been hacked:
Ironically, implantable tags may not provide CityWatcher with that additional safety, after all. Last month security researcher Jonathan Westhues demonstrated how the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned by a hacker, who could theoretically duplicate an individual's VeriChip implant to access a secure area. Westhues, author of a chapter titled "Hacking the Prox Card" for Simson Garfinkel's recent "RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy," said the VeriChip "is not good for anything" and has absolutely no security. "No one I spoke with at Six Sigma Security or at CityWatcher knew that the VeriChip had been hacked," [Spychips co-author Liz] McIntyre observed. "They were also surprised to hear of VeriChip's downsides as a medical device. It was clear they weren't aware of some of the controversy surrounding the implant."
(Source: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/us-employees-verichipped.html)
In the meantime, we've been busy talking with reporters and radio hosts everywhere about the serious downsides to chip implants. Here are just a few of the scores of media stories that have featured our opposition to the chips:
Ohio Company Implants Security Chips Into Employees (New York Sun) http://www.nysun.com/article/27551
Video surveillance outfit chips workers (The Register) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/10/employees_chipped/
Company requires RFID injection (Security Focus) http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/134
Employees get microchip implants (WorldNetDaily) http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48760
Spy chips in employees' arms (p2pnet) http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7884
RFID Injection Required for Datacenter Access (Slashdot) http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/02/12/0031213.shtml
Firm implants ID chips (Cincinatti Enquirer) http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060214/BIZ02/602140331/1076
Our original press release (also reproduced below) can be found at: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/us-employees-verichipped.html
----
(I should mention the post goes on, but it's a call to action, and that's not what i'm going for here)
I guess the question would be whether it would be worth it to work for a company that does it ... can you just remove the chip when you punch out for the day?
http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/139/3812/2006-02-15.asp?wid=139&nid=3812
CHIPPING WORKERS POSES HUGE SECURITY RISK
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Since we first publicized last week that Cincinnati video surveillance company CityWatcher.com had implanted the first VeriChip RFID tags into U.S. employees, the story has exploded. Financial Times reporter Richard Waters got the story from us, then his story landed in Slashdot and the Drudge Report, and that resulted in over 200 Google news stories around the world and several prominent TV news features.
As talk shows and media pundits cover the issue, however, there is one crucial fact they are missing: THE VERICHIP IS NOT SECURE -- IT CAN BE HACKED. What's more, the vast majority of Americans oppose it.
Of course, CASPIAN newsletter subscribers already know the VeriChip was cloned just last month by security researcher Jonathan Westhues, putting a huge dent in VeriChip's message that its implant provides a high level of security. The truth is the chip implant does nothing of the kind.
(See: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/verichip-hacked.html)
Below is an excerpt from the press release we sent last Thursday that initially sparked the media frenzy on the "implanted workers" story. Note that the focus of our reporting was the fact that neither CityWatcher nor Six Sigma Security had any idea that the VeriChip implant was insecure and had been hacked:
Ironically, implantable tags may not provide CityWatcher with that additional safety, after all. Last month security researcher Jonathan Westhues demonstrated how the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned by a hacker, who could theoretically duplicate an individual's VeriChip implant to access a secure area. Westhues, author of a chapter titled "Hacking the Prox Card" for Simson Garfinkel's recent "RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy," said the VeriChip "is not good for anything" and has absolutely no security. "No one I spoke with at Six Sigma Security or at CityWatcher knew that the VeriChip had been hacked," [Spychips co-author Liz] McIntyre observed. "They were also surprised to hear of VeriChip's downsides as a medical device. It was clear they weren't aware of some of the controversy surrounding the implant."
(Source: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/us-employees-verichipped.html)
In the meantime, we've been busy talking with reporters and radio hosts everywhere about the serious downsides to chip implants. Here are just a few of the scores of media stories that have featured our opposition to the chips:
Ohio Company Implants Security Chips Into Employees (New York Sun) http://www.nysun.com/article/27551
Video surveillance outfit chips workers (The Register) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/10/employees_chipped/
Company requires RFID injection (Security Focus) http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/134
Employees get microchip implants (WorldNetDaily) http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48760
Spy chips in employees' arms (p2pnet) http://www.p2pnet.net/story/7884
RFID Injection Required for Datacenter Access (Slashdot) http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/02/12/0031213.shtml
Firm implants ID chips (Cincinatti Enquirer) http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060214/BIZ02/602140331/1076
Our original press release (also reproduced below) can be found at: http://www.spychips.com/press-releases/us-employees-verichipped.html
----
(I should mention the post goes on, but it's a call to action, and that's not what i'm going for here)