NationStates Jolt Archive


Pwned! The State of the Union Speech the Blue Staters Wanted...

Cynigal
02-02-2006, 16:35
The only Speech that would have made Ted Kennedy happy...

--------------------

The (blue) State of the Union address

Feb 2, 2006

My fellow Americans, I am evil.

I only care about rich people, and rich people only care about other rich people -- unless, of course, your name is Kennedy. In fact, it is misleading to say that I only care about the rich. I truly only care about Republican, white, Christian males who are rich.

I would say that I am truly the president of Halliburton, except I'm having the darndest time spelling the word "Halliburton." I'm corrupt, incompetent and racist. Oh, sure, in order to help deal with the problem of illegal aliens, I have offered a guest worker program, but "guest worker program" spelled backwards means "shoot to kill." Or at least I think it does.

The black Democratic congressman from New York, Charlie Rangel, nailed it when he called me "our Bull Connor." Donna Brazile, the black lady who ran the presidential campaign for Al Gore, also got it right. I am the titular head of the Republican Party, the party of the "white boys."

I stole the election in 2000. I conspired with the governor of Florida to steal votes. The governor of Florida just happens to be my brother. I stole the election in Ohio in 2004 by conspiring with my buddies at Diebold, who make the voting machines, which they rigged in my favor. When you think about it, those white boys at Diebold, well, they're my brothers, too.

Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation is Islam is right. I ordered the Army Corps of Engineers to blow up the levee in New Orleans in order to flood and kill black people. Oh, sure, we snagged a lot of whites -- that's why they came up with the term "collateral damage."

I'm pretty stupid. Martin Sheen, the man who played a real president on "West Wing," got it right -- I am a "moron." Aaron McGruder, who illustrates the comic strip "The Boondocks," also got it right when he called me "functionally illiterate." Maybe someday I'll wake up from this dream in which I make an SAT verbal score higher than Rhodes Scholar Bill Bradley, get better college grades than Al Gore, graduate from Yale, and get an MBA from Harvard.

I've been a lousy economic steward. I came into office with an economy headed towards recession, and shortly thereafter we endured the 9/11 terrorist attacks. We then invaded two countries, Iraq and Afghanistan. And, most recently, our economy endured hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Since I've been in office, our productivity growth has averaged over 3.5 percent per year, with inflation remaining low. Unemployment stands at 4.9 percent, 400,000 new jobs were created in the last two months, and homeownership is at an all-time high. But, I agree with nearly half of Americans who believe we are already in a recession. And I expect to go down in history -- as I should -- as presiding over the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.

I agree with Harry Belafonte and Cindy Sheehan that I am the world's greatest terrorist. I'd have to go some to emulate my idols -- Joe, Mao and Adolf -- but a fella's gotta start somewhere.

Sen. Ted Kennedy is right. I lied us into the war. Repeatedly. I intentionally sent men and women in harm's way, so that I could be a wartime president, because -- unlike Michael Dukakis -- I sure look spiffy in a flight suit. As Sen. John Kerry puts it, our military terrorizes Iraqi civilians. Meanwhile, I should tell you the real reasons for going into the war: to steer defense contracts to my buddies; to get the SOBs who tried to kill my daddy; to engage in torture; to find a justification to spy on American citizens who have no connection to terrorism whatsoever; and to send soldiers into the field with no body armor and no exit strategy.

How our military managed to topple two governments and free 55 million people just beats the dickens out of me. How Iraq and Afghanistan managed to hold free elections -- well, that's a head-scratcher. And how about that Oxford Research International poll showing almost 71 percent of Iraqis say their own life is "good"? Boy, I could use numbers like that. And even though I'm a warmonger, polls show support for terrorism is falling in the Arab world.

Yep, I not only lied, I got the British to lie. I also got the worldwide intelligence community -- the United Nations, the French, the Germans, the Egyptians, the Jordanians, and the Russians -- all to deceive the world by agreeing that Saddam possessed WMD. And who says I can't bring the world together?

I would recommend impeachment, but then you'd just get Cheney. I would go to my White House bedroom and kill myself, but then you'd just get Cheney. Oh, if only I hadn't been born. But then, as my daddy used to say, if a dog's butt were square, he'd poop bricks.

Thank you, and God bless.
------------------
Larry Elder is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist and publishes a monthly newsletter entitled "The Elder Statement."
TrashCat
02-02-2006, 18:12
Fffft!!

Why is it some dumb dog gets to see the Human President and not a Cat?

I mean, all it did was get itself blown up.

Besides, if Bush were really as Evil as he claims he would be petting a Persian while giving his speech.

He's obviously a fraud. No Cat = !Evil
Syniks
03-02-2006, 05:18
Too close to home to comment ? :headbang:

No matter. :rolleyes:
Free Soviets
03-02-2006, 05:31
Too close to home to comment ? :headbang:

No matter. :rolleyes:

perhaps if it were funnier?
Myotisinia
03-02-2006, 05:53
The only Speech that would have made Ted Kennedy happy...

The only problem with that little gem is that it is almost exactly what the liberals here really think, and the heavy sense of irony and sarcasm it attempts to impart will be totally lost on most of them.

Best not to give them too many ideas, They have such a shortage of original ones as is.
Gymoor II The Return
03-02-2006, 05:54
perhaps if it were funnier?

Aw, come on. That's like yelling at a kid for drawing outside the lines.
Stone Bridges
03-02-2006, 06:01
Eh it's not that funny. Cute, but not funny.
Free Soviets
03-02-2006, 06:14
And how about that Oxford Research International poll showing almost 71 percent of Iraqis say their own life is "good"?

lowered expectations?
Undelia
03-02-2006, 06:31
lowered expectations?
I wouldn't be surprised.

Anyway, the article was fairly dead on about what radical liberals believe. When I say “radical liberal” what I mean, of course, are those who, for whatever reason, are piously devoted to the US Democratic Party. It’s pretty much the worst mainstream political philosophy in the Western World, besides maybe radical conservatism and devotion to the US Republican Party.
Evil Woody Thoughts
03-02-2006, 06:35
I wouldn't be surprised.

Anyway, the article was fairly dead on about what radical liberals believe. When I say “radical liberal” what I mean, of course, are those who, for whatever reason, are piously devoted to the US Democratic Party. It’s pretty much the worst mainstream political philosophy in the Western World, besides maybe radical conservatism and devotion to the US Republican Party.

I don't think I've ever seen a better description of the US two-party system. (help me, I'm trapped there!):D
The Black Forrest
03-02-2006, 06:48
The only problem with that little gem is that it is almost exactly what the liberals here really think, and the heavy sense of irony and sarcasm it attempts to impart will be totally lost on most of them.

Best not to give them too many ideas, They have such a shortage of original ones as is.

So who helped you write this?
Gymoor II The Return
03-02-2006, 06:58
So who helped you write this?

Yeah, it's the literary equivalent of leaving a bag of burning dog poo on someone's porch.
Gauthier
03-02-2006, 07:15
Fffft!!

Why is it some dumb dog gets to see the Human President and not a Cat?

I mean, all it did was get itself blown up.

Besides, if Bush were really as Evil as he claims he would be petting a Persian while giving his speech.

He's obviously a fraud. No Cat = !Evil

Ahem. Ernst Stavro Blofeld (and if you want to include him as well, Douglas "Dr. Evil" Powers) were both evil geniuses. Cats know evil geniuses, being such themselves and therefore will only stoop to accompanying humans that display such tendencies.

Which is why no cat goes near Shrub. And it does say something about Socks' sudden departure from the Clinton White House.
Peisandros
03-02-2006, 07:40
Aw, come on. That's like yelling at a kid for drawing outside the lines.
Lol, good point.

OP=Really not that funny though.
Revnia
03-02-2006, 11:31
Almost right Bush. If you keep going this way, by 2007 you state of the union will be top notch!
Syniks
03-02-2006, 16:11
So who helped you write this?
If you look at the whole post, you will see it was written by that Race Traitor Larry Elder. That damn Neocon Black Dude. :rolleyes:
AtheistsRsinners
03-02-2006, 17:00
I don't know what the fuck kind of straw man nonsense you think you are acheiving but this is raw, ignorant stupidity. STRAW MAN STRAW MAN god damned straw man. Let's just glaze over this though and write about how Ted Kennedys a communist HEY that's funny LOL!
Syniks
03-02-2006, 17:48
I don't know what the fuck kind of straw man nonsense you think you are acheiving but this is raw, ignorant stupidity. STRAW MAN STRAW MAN god damned straw man. Let's just glaze over this though and write about how Ted Kennedys a communist HEY that's funny LOL!
Awww. Did the evil Conservative Black Man hurt your widdle feewings?

http://datanation.com/fallacies/straw.htm

Definition:
The author attacks an argument which is different from, and
usually weaker than, the opposition's best argument.

Examples:
(i) People who opposed the Charlottown Accord probably just
wanted Quebec to separate. But we want Quebec to stay in
Canada.
(ii) We should have conscription. People don't want to enter
the military because they find it an inconvenience. But they
should realize that there are more important things than
convenience.

Proof:
Show that the opposition's argument has been
misrepresented by showing that the opposition has a stronger
argument. Describe the stronger argument.

References: Cedarblom and Paulsen: 138

How is the OP a strawman?
Anarchic Christians
03-02-2006, 18:18
It's almost like the 'apology' threads Eut and Sierra/Kimichi/whatever the fuck Armed Bookworms (I lose track, he may not have been AB originally) is calling himself now kept posting a few months back.

A really bad attempt at humour or just plain petulant sarcasm. Either way, I wasted 2 minutes on this post.