NationStates Jolt Archive

Yes well without actually saying it for fear of getting Pwned by mods.
When i was 15 i did some stuff that was fun and we were cautious and that.
I just want to know... is it SUCH a bad thing? i mean if your cautious and your both prepared and that.
Ps the girl was 16 so it could be considered slightly immoral in that respect i suppose.

Not a problem in the slightest in my opinion, in fact, it helps mature people for later life.

As long as you knew what you were doing and took precautions, then its fine. Assuming that you mean what I think you meant by fun. If you actually meant clubbing baby seals or driving a combine harvester through a kindergarten, then you are a sick, twisted person. ;)

Yes well without actually saying it for fear of getting Pwned by mods.
When i was 15 i did some stuff that was fun and we were cautious and that.
I just want to know... is it SUCH a bad thing? i mean if your cautious and your both prepared and that.
Ps the girl was 16 so it could be considered slightly immoral in that respect i suppose.
Although I don't usually recommend sex at that age, at least you sound like a relatively responsible young man ( I hope that by "cautious" you mean that you used something to prevent both pregnancy and STDs ). There's no need to fret over it. I just hope you learned something. And no, it's not a "bad thing" at all. It simply IS ... period.

As long as you knew what you were doing and took precautions, then its fine. Assuming that you mean what I think you meant by fun. If you actually meant clubbing baby seals or driving a combine harvester through a kindergarten, then you are a sick, twisted person. ;)

Er...yes....what were YOU talking about??! (Hides Club)

Although I don't usually recommend sex at that age, at least you sound like a relatively responsible young man ( I hope that by "cautious" you mean that you used something to prevent both pregnancy and STDs ). There's no need to fret over it. I just hope you learned something. And no, it's not a "bad thing" at all. It simply IS ... period.

A subsequent lack of periods would indicate badness.

And I don't see a problem in what you did.

A subsequent lack of periods would indicate badness.
No. That would indicate a lack of knowledge, sometimes known as ignorance. :p

A subsequent lack of periods would indicate badness.

And I don't see a problem in what you did.
>.>


Unless she's on birth control.

>.>

Unless she's on birth control.
At sixteen? OMG! Perhaps I am "getting old!" :eek:

Yes well without actually saying it for fear of getting Pwned by mods.
When i was 15 i did some stuff that was fun and we were cautious and that.
I just want to know... is it SUCH a bad thing? i mean if your cautious and your both prepared and that.
Ps the girl was 16 so it could be considered slightly immoral in that respect i suppose.
You were one year appart, teenagers and it was consentual. Plus you were cautious. It's not a bad thing.

I don't see any problem. Provided you took steps to make sure she didn't get pregnant, it doesn't particularly matter. Not in my view, at least.

At sixteen? OMG! Perhaps I am "getting old!" :eek:
Oh yes. Some girls I know have been on birth control for quite a few years now. Although, they started taking it for other reasons, I'd say the primary purpose has shifted...

Oh yes. Some girls I know have been on birth control for quite a few years now. Although, they started taking it for other reasons, I'd say the primary purpose has shifted...
Ah! Period stablization! Yes, I've heard of that. Whew! Thought I was losing my grip there for a moment! :)

Personally I think a great deal of society would be helped dramatically if we'd revert ourselves a few hundred years and just regard people as "adult" when they were 13ish. I think this "teenage" no-man's-land between childhood and adulthood seriously makes problems for practically everyone.

*coughs* yes well, i was expecting to attract some christians here but i seem to have scared most of them off so im left with the liberal people.
(Sighs)

Nothing wrong with it, since you were cautious, although perhaps you shouldn't run around and brag about it, some religious fanatics here and there might get upset and try to drive the devil out of you ;).

Nothing wrong with it, since you were cautious, although perhaps you shouldn't run around and brag about it, some religious fanatics here and there might get upset and try to drive the devil out of you ;).
That was the idea. But i seemed to have scared them all away :(
Oh noes!
(cries salt tears for there are no more worlds to conquer...or christians to upset anyway)

Blu-tac's here!

You should not do that before marriage. However God is forgiving, so you won't definitely burn, you might, but then I might, anyone might, it's all up to the Lord. However you might try to be a better person, thus limiting the risk that you will burn...

Ah! Period stablization! Yes, I've heard of that. Whew! Thought I was losing my grip there for a moment! :)

haha. grip. yeah, that was bad. . . .

anywho, quoting spongebob:

safety first!

and

Mermaid Man: Sure, why else would we run around in colored undies?
Squidward: I can think of three good reasons.

Blu-tac's here!

You should not do that before marriage. However God is forgiving, so you won't definitely burn, you might, but then I might, anyone might, it's all up to the Lord. However you might try to be a better person, thus limiting the risk that you will burn...

(Sneaks up on Blu-tac and hisses)
MWAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

God doesnt exist! ;p People were doing things like that this young since forever! Marriage is a Pagan Idea! (Cackles and Drags Blu-Tac away into his trap)

Personally I think a great deal of society would be helped dramatically if we'd revert ourselves a few hundred years and just regard people as "adult" when they were 13ish. I think this "teenage" no-man's-land between childhood and adulthood seriously makes problems for practically everyone.
You know, I've often thought that myself. Perhaps where the problem comes in is that education seems to be taking longer and longer for people to reach a level of competence in most fields. :confused:

I slept w/ several girls under the age of 18 while I was also under 18. I was also statutorily (sp?) raped (whoo hoo)by a friend of my sister when I was 17. Had one pregnancy scare.

And, except for regularly hanging out here, I turned out relatively normal.

Of course I will be the standard hypocrite and oppose my daughter doing the same thing while encouraging my son to be safe when the time comes.

Yes well without actually saying it for fear of getting Pwned by mods.
When i was 15 i did some stuff that was fun and we were cautious and that.
I just want to know... is it SUCH a bad thing? i mean if your cautious and your both prepared and that.
Ps the girl was 16 so it could be considered slightly immoral in that respect i suppose.
If both participants are consenting, then there's nothing immoral about it. It's not even illegal here in Canada: legal consenting age is set at 14.

Although it's kind of an archaic law, and it might be useful to lower the consentment age to 12. Kids are having "fun" increasingly younger since they started having puberty earlier in the last two or three decades. I think this should be taken into account.

I'm talking about consenting sex between two minors here, though. I wouldn't condone sex between a minor and a major as a rule of thumb, but with common sense factoring in. It's mighty st00pid to prosecute a 18 yo guy for having intercourse with his 17 yo gf, IMHU.

Blu-tac's here!

You should not do that before marriage. However God is forgiving, so you won't definitely burn, you might, but then I might, anyone might, it's all up to the Lord. However you might try to be a better person, thus limiting the risk that you will burn...
Allow me to roll on the floor laughing....

*rolls on the floor, laughing out loud*

You know, I've often thought that myself. Perhaps where the problem comes in is that education seems to be taking longer and longer for people to reach a level of competence in most fields. :confused:
All the education system does nowadays is teach kids how to take tests. It's the sad state of our society today that being able to pass a test on a certain subject is more valuable then actual knowledge or skill in that area.

That was the idea. But i seemed to have scared them all away
Oh noes!
(cries salt tears for there are no more worlds to conquer...or christians to upset anyway)

openly admitting for the second time that you created a thread in order to troll?

As long as you knew what you were doing and took precautions, then its fine. Assuming that you mean what I think you meant by fun. If you actually meant clubbing baby seals or driving a combine harvester through a kindergarten, then you are a sick, twisted person. ;)

Heh: http://store.asymmetric.net/images/club_seals.gif

(Can't seem to get images to show in my post...)

If both participants are consenting, then there's nothing immoral about it. It's not even illegal here in Canada: legal consenting age is set at 14.

Although it's kind of an archaic law, and it might be useful to lower the consentment age to 12. Kids are having "fun" increasingly younger since they started having puberty earlier in the last two or three decades. I think this should be taken into account.

I'm talking about consenting sex between two minors here, though. I wouldn't condone sex between a minor and a major as a rule of thumb, but with common sense factoring in. It's mighty st00pid to prosecute a 18 yo guy for having intercourse with his 17 yo gf, IMHU.

Seconded, every bit of it. Sorry, Europa alpha.

I'm too lazy to check what the age of consent is here (14? 16?), but the fact that I don't know says it all. I don't think anybody I knew back when I was around that age was concerned with the age of consent.
Hell, you have two kids who are nervous, excited, and insecure enough as it is, and the best you can hope for is that they approach having sex in a responsible manner.
Now whether "responsible" means using condoms, taking the pill, or choosing not to have sex at all for yet another while, depends on the person. Some people can be mature enough at 15, some aren't at 18.

The age of consent should really only come into play when one person is significantly older than the other.

If both participants are consenting, then there's nothing immoral about it. It's not even illegal here in Canada: legal consenting age is set at 14.

That's it. I'm moving to Canada... :rolleyes:

openly admitting for the second time that you created a thread in order to troll?

Some people have no humour and obviously are just BORN to be accountants.
(grins at a personal joke.)

That's it. I'm moving to Canada... :rolleyes:
Well, it's only sensible. A repressive law does nothing to deter underage sexual intercourse. I'd rather have well-educated kids appraching the subject in a responsible manner.

Better two kids who make love with a condom and the pill, than two kids secretly having sex without protection, unknowing of what possible consequences might follow their acts.

Some people have no humour and obviously are just BORN to be accountants.
(grins at a personal joke.)
And here goes me thinking that this career counselling lady's advice in 10th grade telling me to go into restaurating ships was the most inappropriate job advice I would ever get.

*sigh* I miss my girlfriend... :(

*sigh* I miss my girlfriend... :(
As in "my girlfriend is far away"/"we don't see each other often" or as in "I don't have a girlfriend anymore and my heart cries"?

There is no age of consent in China.






And any adult(or person tried as such) can commit statutory rape on me for 14 days.

As in "my girlfriend is far away"/"we don't see each other often" or as in "I don't have a girlfriend anymore and my heart cries"?

Option 1... :(

*sigh* I miss my girlfriend... :(

As do I my friend....but alas, she is off in a faraway and exotic land called Washington (the state, no one seems to get that If I don't say it, If I meant DC I'd say DC)

There is no age of consent in China.






And any adult(or person tried as such) can commit statutory rape on me for 14 days.
Any adult seems to include any gender. Are you sure of what you're saying?

Option 1... :(
Hey, at least you got one. I'd be willing to pretend to have a soul in order to sell it just for a chance to get a boyfriend.

You were one year appart, teenagers and it was consentual. Plus you were cautious. It's not a bad thing.

I agree

Hey, at least you got one. I'd be willing to pretend to have a soul in order to sell it just for a chance to get a boyfriend.

There aren't enough of you around... either that or im just blind, probably both. Which wouldn't really help with the playing, its kinda helpful to be able to pick up on such things. Which, on topic, is fine by me, indeed I believe it should be encouraged. For safety, education, and to ease awkward situations in the future.

As do I my friend....but alas, she is off in a faraway and exotic land called Washington (the state, no one seems to get that If I don't say it, If I meant DC I'd say DC)

Hey I know exactly what you mean (about Washington). I'm from there, and for some stupid reason, saying Washington anywhere outside the state means Washington, DC unless you specifically say not DC.... :rolleyes:

Personally I think a great deal of society would be helped dramatically if we'd revert ourselves a few hundred years and just regard people as "adult" when they were 13ish. I think this "teenage" no-man's-land between childhood and adulthood seriously makes problems for practically everyone.

...what problems. Chaffing on the penis from excessive masterbation? Last I checked most 13 year olds should not be having sex under any circumstances. Disagree? Go talk to one.

I don't see any problem with that, as long as you both wanted to do it (no one forcing the other), and if you took precautions against both MST and pregnancy.

Btw, 15 is the age of consent in many countries (it is in France, for example), so it's not really "underage" ;)

Hey I know exactly what you mean (about Washington). I'm from there, and for some stupid reason, saying Washington anywhere outside the state means Washington, DC unless you specifically say not DC.... :rolleyes:

Lets see on one hand you have the nations capitol that is in the news every second of everyday and the focal point of the United States. On the other hand you have...trees. Do the math :p