NationStates Jolt Archive


hwo would i go about solving this integral v. calc 2

Shqipes
27-01-2006, 10:31
integral of e^s(sin(t-s))ds from t to 0

i kno whow to use the integration by parts rule but something needs to be done to make the t into an s
Newtsburg
27-01-2006, 10:35
Integration is against my religion, so I can't help you. If it was differentiation, I'd totally help you though...
Heron-Marked Warriors
27-01-2006, 10:37
**goes out on a limb**

Isn't the t a constant? and therefore doesn't need to be changed into an s

|Edit: That was my three thousandth post!?! FFS:(
Shqipes
27-01-2006, 10:46
**goes out on a limb**

Isn't the t a constant? and therefore doesn't need to be changed into an s

|Edit: That was my three thousandth post!?! FFS:(

spanks

:fluffle:

i feel special
The Squeaky Rat
27-01-2006, 10:51
Isn't the t a constant? and therefore doesn't need to be changed into an s

HMW is correct. For the purposes of the integration, t is a constant.
Heron-Marked Warriors
27-01-2006, 10:51
HMW is correct. For the purposes of the integration, t is a constant.

Booyah!
Shqipes
27-01-2006, 10:52
so then u=e^s
du=(e^s)ds
dv= sin(t-s)ds
v=cos(t-s)

are those right for integration by parts method?
Shqipes
27-01-2006, 10:55
end result:

(e^s)(cos(t-s))-(e^S)(sin(t-s))

i think i did something wrong

:headbang:
Heron-Marked Warriors
27-01-2006, 10:57
so then u=e^s
du=(e^s)ds
dv= sin(t-s)ds
v=cos(t-s)

are those right for integration by parts method?

I'm confused by the original question. Is it

(e^s)(sin{t-s})ds

or

e^(s(sin{t-s}))

?

If it's the first one, then yes, I believe you are correct.

If it's the second (which I doubt, but then I have no idea how old you are or even how the American education system paces this stuff) then you would be wrong.
Shqipes
27-01-2006, 10:58
I'm confused by the original question. Is it

(e^s)(sin{t-s})ds

or

e^(s(sin{t-s}))

?

If it's the first one, then yes, I believe you are correct.

If it's the second (which I doubt, but then I have no idea how old you are or even how the American education system paces this stuff) then you would be wrong.


its the first one, and im not sure if the end result is right

thanks for your help by the way
Heron-Marked Warriors
27-01-2006, 11:01
thanks for your help by the way

No problem.:)
The Riemann Hypothesis
27-01-2006, 11:02
To find out if your end result is right, differentiate it. If you get e^s sin(t-s) after differentiating, you did it right (or differentiated incorrectly).
Heron-Marked Warriors
27-01-2006, 11:05
end result:

(e^s)(cos(t-s))-(e^S)(sin(t-s))

i think i did something wrong

:headbang:

If you let y=e^s(sin(t-s))ds

then you have y=(e^s)(cos(t-s))-y

2y=(e^s)(cos(t-s))

y=((e^s)(cos(t-s))/2)

then slap the limits in and it should work
The Riemann Hypothesis
27-01-2006, 11:14
e^s sin(t-s) ds
u = e^s
du = e^s ds
dv = sin(t-s) ds
v = cos(t-s)

∫e^s sin(t-s) ds = e^s cos(t-s) - ∫e^s cos(t-s) ds

u = e^s
du = e^s ds
dv = cos(t-s) ds
v = - sin(t-s)

∫e^s sin(t-s) ds = e^s cos(t-s) + e^s sin(t-s) - ∫e^s sin(t-s) ds
2∫e^s sin(t-s) ds = e^s cos(t-s) + e^s sin(t-s)

∫e^s sin(t-s) ds = e^s (cos(t-s) + sin(t-s))/2

Then plug in 0 and t.