NationStates Jolt Archive

I'm sure there lots of places that the people would like us to attack.
Them russians dont like Putin and the french must take that woossie Chirac.
And now that we did so fine... ( we did so fine! )
And there's other nasty leaders in line.
Let's go and, help Ruanda,
That would be a good place to start!
BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB

(c) Capital Steps www.capsteps.com


Okay.. which place to attack next?

I voted for Sudan. Genocidal, slave-owning, terrorist cocksuckers have a violent invasion coming to them.

in terms of oppression, it'd have to be Sudan

North Koreans are starving en masse, but apparently they love their KJI... so while they might be oppressed by the bonds of communism, they might not know it

North Korea. Sure Iran is big in the news now but you just wait and see, Kim Jong-Il will want to get back in the news again.

Hopefully a full scale withdrawal and concentration upon natinal defence, however, given that Bush conducts military strategy in the manner of an over zealous game of "pin the tail on the donkey", the US ought to invade Iran, and N.Korea.

I voted for Canada since I live here. Therefore, Canada would win.

Hopefully a full scale withdrawal and concentration upon natinal defence, however, given that Bush conducts military strategy in the manner of an over zealous game of "pin the tail on the donkey", the US ought to invade Iran, and N.Korea.

OUCH! Too close to the truth for comfort.
Unless the Dems develop a proper Tough Guy strategy, they ain't going to return as a viable political force.
The tail gets pinned on the Donkey, alright...

PS: voted for Sudan.
Same reason as Drunken Commies Deleted.

*laughs*
Who voted for Texas?

Given DCD's post I voted for Sudan.[Slaves & terrorists.. :mad: ]

*laughs*
Who voted for Texas?

Given DCD's post I voted for Sudan.[Slaves & terrorists.. :mad: ]

Levity break.
I felt that 2004 voters ought to have a chance at thumbnosing the other side.
Hence the inclusion of Texas and Massachusetts.

I voted for Sudan. Genocidal, slave-owning, terrorist cocksuckers have a violent invasion coming to them.
White Folk generally aren't welcome in Africa.

Sudan. I'm an islolationist but genocide is just plain wrong.

Let's get that Manifest Destiny back into play!

Onwards, onto Ontario! March madly to Mexico! The whole hemisphere will be ours!

"The Yanks are comming, the Yanks are comming,
the rum-tum-tumming everywhere!
Over there, say a prayer, bring the fight, bring the fight, over there!
et cetera"

North Korea.

I give this thread "Most Uplifting title of the Year Award"

White Folk generally aren't welcome in Africa.
Like we care. You'll find a few B1 bombers and a bunch of Abrams tanks constitute an open invitation to just about any nation on any continent.

Like we care. You'll find a few B1 bombers and a bunch of Abrams tanks constitute an open invitation to just about any nation on any continent.

On that point, the only US attack I would sanction would be to remove Mugabe and return Zimbabwe to UN, or British control as a mandate, for a little.

Nice philosophical point incidentally, military strategy for the modern age....:p

Like we care. You'll find a few B1 bombers and a bunch of Abrams tanks constitute an open invitation to just about any nation on any continent.

+ after 20 years of various Arab Jihad legions, even Atilla would be considered an improvement. Especially in places like Darfur...

Now, some folks in the White House favour going North...

http://www.wimp.com/canadians/

Zimbabwe.

Luxembourg.

Zimbabwe.
Agreed. Since not on poll though, I voted for Sudan.

The US should attack Mexico. Then they won't have a problem with the border.

Iran. Might as well get the job done now and save us the trouble of doing it later. You know "We don't want to fight/But by Jingo if we do/We've got the ships/We've got the men/And got the money too." and all that.

Luxembourg.
That should be fun... the war would be over before it even started... :p
...though...you might also want to go for Liechtenstein... if you find enough space to place your troops there ;)

That should be fun... the war would be over before it even started... :p
...though...you might also want to go for Liechtenstein... if you find enough space to place your troops there ;)
*chomps cigar*
*looks at map*
*scratches chin*
where'n hale's that?
Damnation.. place is too small to put a USO in.

*chomps cigar*
*looks at map*
*scratches chin*
where'n hale's that?
Damnation.. place is too small to put a USO in.
:D
Well... its people keep it quite hidden from the rest of the world... only few of us know that in fact, it's an underground paradise, almost all of it's splendour hidden under ground with just a tiny little peak of mountainous land visible on a conventional geographical map.
:...doesn't make it any easier to invade though... maybe Luxembourg really is the better option ;)

That should be fun... the war would be over before it even started... :p
...though...you might also want to go for Liechtenstein... if you find enough space to place your troops there ;)

Well, I was thinking that the US should invade Tahiti, just because it looks nice.

It wouldn't be much fun, though. Any French troops would surrender as soon as the US Marines appeared on the horizon in their amphibious assault ship.

:D
Well... its people keep it quite hidden from the rest of the world... only few of us know that in fact, it's an underground paradise, almost all of it's splendour hidden under ground with just a tiny little peak of mountainous land visible on a conventional geographical map.
:...doesn't make it any easier to invade though... maybe Luxembourg really is the better option ;)

Well now, I just picked a place I forgot to include in the Poll.

New Mexico.
One of those disgusting blue states where people hate freedom!
And they HAVE hidden weapons of mass destruction.
They're hiding them in a place called.... Los Alamos.

*enters Rumsfeld*
Rummy: All the more reason to go get them, Mr President.

Dubya + Rummy: Butt first.... Help Rwanda YEAH - we got bombs that are smart!

We'll attack whatever country is convient for us, that's how it always is with war sadly enough.

"Oh Germans invading? Nah we'll hang back on this one, here's some shit to tide you over. Damn they're attacking us, ATTACK!"

-20 odd years later-

"Oh Germans invading? Nah we'll hang back on this one, here's some more shit to tide you over. Damn they're attacking us, might as well attack both of them while we're at it."

Any nation has its own agenda when entering a war, the U.S. is just the easy one to make fun of because we're heros for it ;)

The war strategy to date is very simple, segregate and weaken via blockade.

Iraq was under 10+ years of sanctions etc.. before it was finally attacked and the result ends up looking like they may turn it into a fundamentalist islamist state in ongoing civil war; and as a result it seems ties between the Islamic states may increase.

North Korea doesn't appear to have the technological edge. It is hard to tell what you would do in North Korea? It just doesn't seem to make sense. Maybe it is just my lack of knowledge on North Korea. Starving people triplets being rounded up, extravagant living communist leader with a harem? Maybe I just don't get it.

I think the lack of a state department is a good sign that you may be invaded. Or when they tell everyone to leave, etc..

Canada and Mexico and the US are becoming more and more integrated, in reality there is a North American Union of sorts.

Invading Iran cause they are getting 1950's technology all on their own seems sorta a lost cause. It creates a new identity of paranoia to create 'terror' in the minds of the weak.

Iran of course is the talk of the town of course being a peace loving person I could only hope that reason will win out and mutally benificial arangments can be created.

As for Sudan, sure it does have allot of oil but it is not like they are withholding it.

Personally I favour good relations over occupation but maybe that is just my human side speaking.

The US military has enough things to worry about when they don't have 'command' of the situation if for instance they still have been unable to find Osama... or calm public opinion in Iraq about their 'good intentions' at the monting iraqi insurgency (ps 99% of insurgents (resistance)in iraq are iraqi, it is just pop opinion to make people think it is foreign agents)

The only reason Invasion plays out is when you are stopped from having movement inside an area or agression against you is being put forth, in reality, not just opinion.

The US is turning into a 'movement' fighter, more so shifting from 'communism' to 'fundamentalism' they arn't concerned with 'states' anymore now it is a story of 'capacities' controling who is allowed to be followed, it is political b.s.

If they were concered about corruptiont they'd send the ford foundation or peace corps or something and make arangments to improve the world instead they are taking the hardline and making conditions even worse and forcing miitary spending to be even higher to enable even more extreme states to form.

If they really had an issue with any particular visible leader they coudl easly do an assasination and cover it up saying it was an independant act etc..

So it is ideology but as a lover of choice and freedom it seems wrong to tell other people how they should be, but that is government ain't it.

Honestly the US should be working towards having greenland included in a north american union. and purchasing it from the EU etc... as well as the french territories of the pacific and atlantic, if they could get away with it. This may expand their territorial waters and improve thier reputation as a fair dealer rather than a war monger. while consolidating the territorial imperialism in a lasting form rather than short term, that is if those areas were interested . Atleast get greenland so you can sink them if they arn't (bad joke) US should buy up the islands. and stick to well crafted assasinations and strategic terrorist attacks, rather then war crimes. IF they can't be linked to an attack then they can't be whined about for it. But I really don't beleive in the militant part.. we should all live in peace.

The us could have saved billions on a truce with al qaeda and allowed a democratic process to occur in afghanstan rather then stregnthening the mujahdeen

I believe 2006 will be the year the USA announces a change in foreign policy to isolationism. All troops will withdraw and no military aid will be given anywhere.

Additionally, pigs will fly.

I believe 2006 will be the year the USA announces a change in foreign policy to isolationism. All troops will withdraw and no military aid will be given anywhere.

Additionally, pigs will fly.


True genetics is getting quite advanced. It is only a matter of time before someone grafts some wings onto the suckers...

if.. it hasn't happened already..

*laughs*
Who voted for Texas?

Given DCD's post I voted for Sudan.[Slaves & terrorists.. :mad: ]

Hey, I voted for Texas. Having troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, and South Korea we're too overstretched to take on Iran or Sudan without a major hike in enlistment, but hey, Texas we should be able to take on. And hell, they voted for Bush/Cheney so they deserve it.

I say that we invade Antarctica. Fucking penguins got it coming, and they might be after us if we don't get them first.
Think about it, all that space, miles and miles of frozen waste that no one is watching, and they control it on their own. There aren't even any Polar Bears around to keep them under control, so the penguins just sit up their and plot their penguin plans.
We must act now, lest they makes us all slaves as part of their wicked penguiney plans.

The ideal scenario would be a Canadian attack from the North while the US is caught off guard dealing with the middle east. :D We could use Norad against them and they wouldn't even know what hit them until Paul Martin plants a Red Maple Leaf on the tippity top of the whitehouse and capitol hill.

For now I'll settle for a settlement for the Iran Nuke situation.

South Korea does not belong on the poll, Cuba should have taken its place on the poll.

Dictator for life Fidel Castro of Cuba who is now allied with Dictator for life Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, on the cuba, Fidel Castro issue, no Fidel no problem, no Castro no problem.

Iran and Cuba
Iranian Leader to Travel to Cuba and Venezuela Before UN General Assembly Meeting
Western Hemisphere Policy Watch
(30 Aug 05) - New York will not be the first stop which Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will travel in his first foreign visit as Iran's newly elected president. Scheduled to attend the summit of the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September, Ahmadinejad will instead be making a stop in Cuba and Venezuela before heading to the United States for the UN summit, according to the Iranian news agency, Farda News.

(Photo) Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro meets with Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Tehran May 9, 2001. Castro urged Iran during the trip to help it defeat the U.S. "as you toppled the Shah" in 1979. Castro also said, together, Cuba and Iran would bring America "to its knees."
Ahmadinejad would have been to the United States, to participate at the meeting of the UN general assembly. However, advisors to the conservative Iranian president have apparently advised him against his debut on the international scene in the country that Iran often refers to as the "Great Satan."
"Ahmadinejad on his trip to New York will be making a stop in Caracas to meeting with Hugo Chavez [the Venezuelan president] and after that to Havana to meet with [the Cuban leader] Fidel Castro," said a report on Farda News. The 60th meeting of the UN general assembly is set to begin on 14 September.

Yesterday, lauding the resistance of the Cuban nation to the hegemonic policies of the US, Chairman of the Expediency Council Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani said President Fidel Castro is regarded as an impressive character in contemporary history and his presence on the political scene has left a double impacts on the anti-imperialism spirit of the Cuban nation.

Iran and Cuba are on the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Iran and Cuba are on the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism.axis of Evil.. vol.2 :D :D :p :D

I say that we invade Antarctica. Fucking penguins got it coming, and they might be after us if we don't get them first.
Think about it, all that space, miles and miles of frozen waste that no one is watching, and they control it on their own. There aren't even any Polar Bears around to keep them under control, so the penguins just sit up their and plot their penguin plans.
We must act now, lest they makes us all slaves as part of their wicked penguiney plans.lol reminds me of a Batman movie :D

lol reminds me of a Batman movie :D
I just wanted to say "Fucking penguins got it coming." <- 14th Greatest Phrase in the English Language
And any time I can include polar bears in a rant is a good time.

I just wanted to say "Fucking penguins got it coming." <- 14th Greatest Phrase in the English Language
And any time I can include polar bears in a rant is a good time.

The true test of ranting is when you can put a reference to Russel Crowe into a rant about Hobbes. *nods*

If you do invade somewhere, it should be a place where human rights are abused and the government is nearly totalitarian....That's why I voted Texas.

totalitarian: Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed.

Texas is totalitarian? Babies come from the magical stork.

totalitarian: Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed.

Texas is totalitarian? Babies come from the magical stork.

It was a joke. I don't wish the US to invade anywhere, including Texas.
But giving the Governor/President a veto is very undemocratic.

Like we care. You'll find a few B1 bombers and a bunch of Abrams tanks constitute an open invitation to just about any nation on any continent.
Tell that to the black people bitching about colonialism.

Dictator for life Hugo Chavez of Venezuela

Ah yes... doesn't democracy just suck.

In the words of a comedian whose name I can't remember:

"Bush's plan is clearly to invade Iraq, knock through to Iran next door, and then build a conservatory on Syria".

Hmm, was Luxembourg the place where pre-WWI, they had about 150 soldiers, who in times of peace doubled up as postmen?:)

Tell that to the black people bitching about colonialism.

I fail to see why, Imperialism civilised them, altered them from savages to humans, and proffered to them all the advantages of modern culture.

I fail to see why, Imperialism civilised them, altered them from savages to humans, and proffered to them all the advantages of modern culture.
Riiight. Ever read 'Heart of Darkenss'? Try it sometime.

Riiight. Ever read 'Heart of Darkenss'? Try it sometime.


By Taki?

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_10_11/taki.html


Here’s a tip to those young whippersnappers Sam Francis calls post-Buckley geniuses. (You know the kind. They call for non-stop war in order to gain non-stop peace.) There’s a very nice place by the name of Equatorial Guinea, somewhere below the Sahara, where most of the dirty work has already been done. Couple of thousand Marines can do the trick, and we’ll get more oil out of the place than we ever hope to get from Iraq. No, I have not been drinking.

It’s the fiefdom run by that nice guy Teodoro Obiang Nguema, who came to power by overthrowing his uncle back in 1979. In order to ensure that the wicked uncle did not in turn pull a number on him, Teodoro had him killed and then devoured his testicles. I kid you not. Teodoro is reputed to eat a lot of testicles (he believes that he absorbs their power) because he’s killed a hell of a lot of people. In fact, Teodoro is the African equivalent of Pol Pot, the Cambodian folk hero who murdered more than a third of his countrymen but had the decency not to eat their balls.


[/teaser]

By Taki?

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_10_11/taki.html
No, by Joseph Conrad.
Heart of Darkness (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_of_darkness)

Tell that to the black people bitching about colonialism.
We'll send in black troops. Problem solved.

I voted Iran largely because of their developing nuclear capabilities, but it was a close race with Massachusetts! Gotta love the idea of finally deposing and incarcerating that woman-chasing, girl-drowning, reality-challenged, alcoholic porker, Teddy-baby Kennedy! :D

Riiight. Ever read 'Heart of Darkenss'? Try it sometime.

Incidentally, yes, I rather believe I have, or at the least had a synopsis of it in reference to the Tempest. Whilst the protaginist(forgotten the name) may well have been corrupted and perverted by the power proffered to him by his position, it is, utlimately narrative.

And ultimately, coloialism was a beneficient force.

Why no mexico? I was talking to a mexican friend and proposed that we conquer it, he had no problems with the idea.

Why no mexico? I was talking to a mexican friend and proposed that we conquer it, he had no problems with the idea.

... I forgot...

We'll get Iowa next. We'll just work our way through everyone whose name starts with "I". Yeah, I'm looking at you, Idaho. You're on the list!

We'll get Iowa next. We'll just work our way through everyone whose name starts with "I". Yeah, I'm looking at you, Idaho. You're on the list!


And back in the U S A..
to the blue states that got in our way
We're gonna
come and bomb ya,
give 2008 a good start...

California, we might not warn ya
Hey Hawaiia, we're gonna fry ya

Incidentally, yes, I rather believe I have, or at the least had a synopsis of it in reference to the Tempest. Whilst the protaginist(forgotten the name) may well have been corrupted and perverted by the power proffered to him by his position, it is, utlimately narrative.

And ultimately, coloialism was a beneficient force.

It certainly wasn't beneficent for these people:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Leopold%27s_Ghost
King Léopold takes his place with the great tyrants, having reduced the population of the Congo Free State -- literally his private fiefdom -- from twenty million people to ten million in forty years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/congo.shtml

It certainly wasn't beneficent for these people:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Leopold%27s_Ghost
King Léopold takes his place with the great tyrants, having reduced the population of the Congo Free State -- literally his private fiefdom -- from twenty million people to ten million in forty years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/congo.shtml
Thanks, I hadn't got around to posting stuff like that.

totalitarian: Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed.

Texas is totalitarian? Babies come from the magical stork.

Thats Cuba.