NationStates Jolt Archive


Hillary Introduces Video Game Legislation

Lazy Otakus
16-12-2005, 20:16
Just read it on GamePolitics (http://www.livejournal.com/users/gamepolitics/160116.html#cutid1).

In a noon press conference Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and Evan Bayh (D-IN) introduced federal legislation designed to protect children from inappropriate video games. Today's move represents the formal filing of the Family Entertainment Protection Act (FEPA) announced by Clinton and Lieberman on November 29th.

GamePolitics has just received a press release from Sen. Clinton's office. It reads, in part:

With just over a week left in the holiday gift shopping season, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joe Lieberman and Evan Bayh, joined by parents, advocates and experts, introduced legislation designed to prohibit the sale of inappropriate video games to children. In unveiling the bill, the Senators underscored that video game content is getting increasingly violent and sexually explicit, yet young people are able to purchase these games with relative ease and parents are struggling to keep up with being informed about the content.

The Senators emphasized that their legislation will put teeth in the enforcement of video game ratings, helping parents protect their children from inappropriate content. They were joined in making the announcement by April DeLaney, Director of the Washington Office for Common Sense Media; Norman Rosenberg, President and CEO of Parents Action for Children and Dr. Michael Rich, Director of the Center on Media and Child Health at Children's Hospital in Boston and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, in a show of support for the legislation.

"The holiday season is a particularly important time to raise awareness of this issue. Video games are hot holiday items, and there are certainly wonderful games that help our children learn and increase hand and eye coordination. However, there are also games that are just not appropriate for our nation's youth," said Senator Clinton. "This bill will help empower parents by making sure their kids can't walk into a store and buy a video game that has graphic, violent and pornographic content."

"The content of many cutting edge games is becoming more and more vivid, violent, and offensive to our most basic values," Lieberman said. "We are not interested in censoring videos meant for adult entertainment but we do want to ensure that these videos are not purchased by minors. Our bill will help accomplish this by imposing fines on those retailers that sell M-rated games to minors, putting purchasing power back in the hands of watchful parents."

"Many parents are being stretched thin trying to provide a good life for their children while protecting them from a coarsening culture,' Senator Bayh said. 'Our legislation will give parents a hand by requiring retailers to abide by the ratings that are meant to keep children from purchasing violent video games."

Interesting that all similar attempts to legislate video game (like the recent Illinois video game law (http://www.livejournal.com/users/gamepolitics/149325.html)) have been declared unconstitutional. I wonder why Mrs. Clinton believes that this one might have a different fate. Why don't politicians understand that all that they are archieving is wasting money and showing their ignorance to an already depoliticized youth? They may score a few points in the family value crowd, but since the average gamer is 29 years old, they may turn off a lot of other voters.
Megaloria
16-12-2005, 20:18
Those parents really ought to try parenting sometime.
DrunkenDove
16-12-2005, 20:20
Those parents really ought to try parenting sometime.

It's not really all that hard. If the game has an 18+ sticker, then it's unsuitable for your kid. That easy.
Lazy Otakus
16-12-2005, 20:25
It's not really all that hard. If the game has an 18+ sticker, than it's unsuitable for your kid. That easy.

Not necessarily. The ESRB ratings are a guideline for parents and are based on subjective criteria. It's the parents' decision if the game is suitable or not.
Sdaeriji
16-12-2005, 20:25
Not like Clinton needs that 18-25 male demographic anyway. They never vote Democrat.
[NS]Cybach
16-12-2005, 20:32
I am never voting Democrat again :gundge:
Blauschild
16-12-2005, 20:34
Not necessarily. The ESRB ratings are a guideline for parents and are based on subjective criteria. It's the parents' decision if the game is suitable or not.

Which is the same reason why a parent can take their 10 year old kid to see any R rated movie.




The Gaming industry already regulates itself. Already has self-imposed ratings on their games. Already suggests to retailers to not sell games to kids who don't meet the sticker requirement. However how do you think a 12 year old gets his hands on a $50 game? The parent buys it. Introducing official regulations isn't going to change that fact.
Bolol
16-12-2005, 20:43
Why...?

Stop screwing around with my video games.
Hall of Heroes
16-12-2005, 21:27
Not like this matters. They get to score some easy political points, and then get it struck down by the courts so it never affects gamers. Everyone wins.
Neo Kervoskia
16-12-2005, 21:31
Get the fuck away from my violent content! :mad:
Lunatic Goofballs
16-12-2005, 21:40
Yes. That's the problem. Video games. That's why terrorists blow themselves up. One too many sessions playing Lemmings. :p
Sumamba Buwhan
16-12-2005, 21:41
this is the stupidest fucking cause ever to take up. who would want to be known for making video games boring? do violent movies go next? and then what? comic books?
Phalanix
16-12-2005, 21:45
Violent video games are on the lose! BANMAN (http://img.engadget.com/common/images/3060000000049551.JPG?0.2083855487827707) is on the case!
Medeo-Persia
16-12-2005, 22:35
Just another reason not to support the Hildabeast for President.
Heron-Marked Warriors
16-12-2005, 22:45
Cybach']I am never voting Democrat again :gundge:

Overreacting much?
Desperate Measures
16-12-2005, 22:49
It's not really all that hard. If the game has an 18+ sticker, then it's unsuitable for your kid. That easy.
I just can't believe that parents buy "Grand Theft Auto" for their children and then complain about the sex involved. What about all the grand theft auto, involved? Or the fact that you can target civilians with a rocket launcher? I mean, that was OK before you knew there was a hidden sex scene?
If my kid bought that game and was only interested in the sex, I'd think I did a fairly good job at parenting.
Lacadaemon
16-12-2005, 23:13
The Tappan Zee bridge is falling to bits. Yet we can't get any federal money to fix this part of the federal highway system (or upgrade it to carry commuter rail from rockland/orange thus cutting down on polution and car use), and NY's most high profile politian chooses to waste her time on this shit.

This is why I say she is a waste of space and a terrible senator. I can only hope the dimwits in this state do the right thing and vote her out next year.