NationStates Jolt Archive

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?
Depends on what they are doing and if the other person is a woman too :)

With my current wife, if it was one of our regular friends, I would join in.

Join.

Long-term psyschological torture, followed by suicide (their's or mine; it doesn't matter).

I'd ask the lover if he knew beforehand that she was married. If he said no (and I was able to confirm he was telling the truth with a lie detector), I would spare him, allow him to leave in peace, and then butcher my wife. If he knew she was married (or said he didn't, but was lying) I'd kill them both.

I'd be surprised, firstly.

probably just leave without a word and go get shitfaced (for a week)


edit: then come back and try and sort things out/see if we have a future

Kill all the humans [/bender]

hehe :D

Divorce the stupid bitch and leave her with nothing, according to the infidelity clause in our prenup.

I'd probably just end the relationship.

Either that or the silent treatment. Not sure which is worse for them.

I wonder if I'd be aroused by it actually..... *ponders*

I'd ask the lover if he knew beforehand that she was married. If he said no (and I was able to confirm he was telling the truth with a lie detector), I would spare him, allow him to leave in peace, and then butcher my wife. If he knew she was married (or said he didn't, but was lying) I'd kill them both.


A lot of hostility there.

I found it makes my sex life better, and my wife's sex life better, and our sex life together better, now that we swing and have house parties regularly.

It also obviates cheating - if either of us wants someone from outside, we only have to invite them to our house.

The level of trust we have is very, very high.

For some guys who come over the first time, it's very intimidating, as they are expecting a husband to be as jealous as you are.

But your love and relationship are far more than sex. Far more. If your relationship is only bound by the sex you two have, then there's not much of a relationship there.

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?
The liklihood of this happening to me approaches zero as a limit. :D

But your love and relationship are far more than sex. Far more. If your relationship is only bound by the sex you two have, then there's not much of a relationship there.

That's a point of view :) I have to say it's not one I share: within the context of a 'real' relationship, I reckon the carnal, physical closeness (is it too much to say temporary oneness? :p) of sex represents a tangible, physical reflection of the love within the relationship as a whole. I'd be immensely hurt if I was the one seeing this happen, and would think that the relationship no longer had the underlying love and affection it ought to to _be_ a relationship.

Probably time to go our seperate ways, in other words.

However, kudos to you and yours if that's not the way you conceptualise things! Long may you couple and be a couple :)

When I was married, and she told me she'd been cheating, I heaved a sigh of relief (inwardly) and told her I wanted a divorce. I think she did the same thing.

Strike the lover upon the backside and testicles with the mysterious rod-thing I seem to have in my room and chase him out of the house in a humourous way. There doesn't seem to be an option on the poll for attacking the lover but sparing the wife.

I'd set my flock of vicious mutant ducks on them both.

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?
In my case it wouldn't be cheating. So I'd either join, watch, or if I wasn't in the mood, go eat dinner.

A lot of hostility there.

I found it makes my sex life better, and my wife's sex life better, and our sex life together better, now that we swing and have house parties regularly.

It also obviates cheating - if either of us wants someone from outside, we only have to invite them to our house.

The level of trust we have is very, very high.

For some guys who come over the first time, it's very intimidating, as they are expecting a husband to be as jealous as you are.

But your love and relationship are far more than sex. Far more. If your relationship is only bound by the sex you two have, then there's not much of a relationship there.

That is the best kind of relationship to have. My former G/F and I had that kind of trust between us and still do. For the record, we broke due to other reasons.

I'd set my flock of vicious mutant ducks on them both.

Good answer!

*Throws Cluichstan a cookie*

Shrug and leave. Probably yell as I walked away that I'd be making dinner or something.

If she wants to have sex with somebody else, that's fine by me, though admittedly I'd prefer if she told me beforehand.

Shrug and leave. Probably yell as I walked away that I'd be making dinner or something.

If she wants to have sex with somebody else, that's fine by me, though admittedly I'd prefer if she told me beforehand.
I would do the same thing, and while it's not fine with me in the sense that I don't approve, it's her life.

Good answer!

*Throws Cluichstan a cookie*

*bows* Thank you. Thank you. I'll be here all week, and I'll be in Vegas from the 16th through the 18th. :D

I would do the same thing, and while it's not fine with me in the sense that I don't approve, it's her life.

It's her life, and she should life it. And you should live yours.

But is it a good thing for you to live it together?

When I was married, and she told me she'd been cheating, I heaved a sigh of relief (inwardly) and told her I wanted a divorce. I think she did the same thing.

I am a big proponent of equality in marriage: both spouses should be allowed to sleep with other women.

If he was with another guy, I'd probably make a comment on the newcomer's ass, then go grab a coffee and watch some TV. Or, if I was horny at the time, probably join in.

If he was with a woman, I'd probably tell them to get the hell off the bed and do it on the floor or in the kitchen or something, because the smell of sweaty woman takes weeks to get out of the mattress and bedding. Ugh.

I don't think I could be in a serious relationship with someone that was completely monogamous and exclusive arrangement where "cheating" would even be an issue. That's just asking for trouble. Sex is just sex. Nothing to get all mad and murderous about, IMO.

I would do the same thing, and while it's not fine with me in the sense that I don't approve, it's her life.
Wow. What a tool you are.

It's happened to me. I didn't literally walk in on her, but her lover's fetishes were getting... Disturbing, and she came to me for help.I calmly told her that as she was apologetic and because she told me, she got a second chance. I told the male in question that things were over. It wasn't until he REFUSED to back off that I got threatening. As a result of this, she is INCREDIBLY loyal to me.

Perhaps this route is somewhat manipulative, but we're happier now then we ever were before, so.

I'd cry. And then I'd cut his balls off with a rusty scissors

I am a big proponent of equality in marriage: both spouses should be allowed to sleep with other women.

Genius! :D

I'd be surprised that I had a spouse.

Then I'd shoot them both dead on the spot. Not for any real reason, other than guns kill people and so I have no responsibility or choice on the matter! The issue is hopefully used to ban all guns, while liberals protest my timely execution and eventually a lawyer sets me free. Justice is served!

Then I go find me another spouse.

Wow. What a tool you are.
I'm not so sure. My interest in a relationship is if I get more enjoyment out of it than I would elsewhere. The fact that I might not enjoy the relationship after that happened may cause me to go elsewhere, but I'm not going to make a snap judgement on that. As long as I'm happy, what do I care what she does to make her happy?

Elgesh']But is it a good thing for you to live it together?
It's a good question, but a different one than was originally asked. There's a good chance that I would find myself stifled and need to leave, but I'm not going to cross that bridge till I come to it, which is hopefully never. I'm just not discounting the fact that I might still be quite content in my relationship with her. After he left I'd probably ask her not to do it anymore, but I'd play it by ear after that.

I'm not so sure. My interest in a relationship is if I get more enjoyment out of it than I would elsewhere. The fact that I might not enjoy the relationship after that happened may cause me to go elsewhere, but I'm not going to make a snap judgement on that. As long as I'm happy, what do I care what she does to make her happy?
Because you're in a relationship and certain behavioral codes are expected?

Now, if you'd arranged these permissions prior, this issue is moot. But if you just take that sort of deception like nothing's wrong, then you're a tool.

I would cry. But in the end, if my wife leaves me for that guy/girld, I would end up in self-multilation. There must have been something I did wrong that made her start cheating on me.

I would cry. But in the end, if my wife leaves me for that guy/girld, I would end up in self-multilation. There must have been something I did wrong that made her start cheating on me.

Maybe the only thing you did wrong was get yourself into a relationship with a skanky bitch. The rappers are always whining on and on about them, so there must be a bunch of them out there. :p

Because you're in a relationship and certain behavioral codes are expected?
I expect certain behavioural codes from myself, no one else. The only thing I expect in a relationship is that we try to make each other happy.

That brings up an important point, however. If it makes me unhappy I would talk to her about it. I'm betting that she would come to talk to me about it though, as she would undoubtedly feel the need to address it in some sort of way, at which point I'd deal with it.

All of the above

All of the above
Kill them both and then join in...uh...

Kill them both and then join in...uh...
0.o

0.o
Well he said "All of the above" and those were two of the options...

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?

Well, since I know that I please my husband and he pleases me, I'd first off be very shocked that he would look outside of our marriage, lets face it, people who want/need multiple partners usually means that the one they have do not satisfy them. People who engage in orgies or threesome's, foursome's etc, can say what they like, if they were happy with their partner they wouldn't do it. It's not like studies haven't been done on this or anything.

Personally, I would seriously consider divorce, if I did by some miracle stay in the marriage I don't believe I would or could ever forgive my husband. It would always be there.

I suppose it's hard to say until it happens, but I seriously doubt that my husband would ever cheat on me. He has better values than that, as do I.

But more to the point, it's a matter of not just trust being broken, but respect. If you truly love someone you would never be "OK" with sharing them sexually, anyone who says different is either lying to themselves or just doesn't get it. You don't have respect for the person you claim to love if you're ok with them sleeping with other people. It really is that simple.

If you truly love someone you would never be "OK" with sharing them sexually, anyone who says different is either lying to themselves or just doesn't get it.

Or they don't think like you do. Which is more likely.

Or they don't think like you do. Which is more likely.

Studies would tend to agree with me though. Many people who engage in multiple partner sex in studies have said "it saved our marriage" in fact a majority said that. So, that would say, that had they not engaged in what is known as a "open relationship" their marriage would be over, now why would that be? The answer seems fairly obvious to me. And it did to the Universities that have done studies on it too.

Oh and btw Whispering Legs, I believe my view of it is in the majority, not yours.

Oh and btw Whispering Legs, I believe my view of it is in the majority, not yours.

Appeal to majority is fallacious.

Studies would tend to agree with me though. Many people who engage in multiple partner sex in studies have said "it saved our marriage" in fact a majority said that. So, that would say, that had they not engaged in what is known as a "open relationship" their marriage would be over, now why would that be?

Hmm, because variety is the spice of life and no one likes to eat the same thing each and every day? No matter how much they love eating it.

I think your attitude on this matter - and yes, the majority's as well - stems from the concept of possessing, not merely loving, your partner.

Oh and btw Whispering Legs, I believe my view of it is in the majority, not yours.

Fifty years ago, learned doctors wrote books on the evils of masturbation and the physical and psychological damage that it causes. The majority of people believed these things.

Not very "Liberal" are you?

Studies would tend to agree with me though. Many people who engage in multiple partner sex in studies have said "it saved our marriage" in fact a majority said that. So, that would say, that had they not engaged in what is known as a "open relationship" their marriage would be over, now why would that be? The answer seems fairly obvious to me. And it did to the Universities that have done studies on it too.

What is the answer? I don't think it is obvious at all. There are numerous reasons why it could save the marriage I imagine. At least be clear about what you are saying


Oh and btw Whispering Legs, I believe my view of it is in the majority, not yours.

Yes, what the majority does -or claims to do- is an excellent way to judge the fitness of someone else's intimate realtionships.

Studies would tend to agree with me though. Many people who engage in multiple partner sex in studies have said "it saved our marriage" in fact a majority said that. So, that would say, that had they not engaged in what is known as a "open relationship" their marriage would be over, now why would that be? The answer seems fairly obvious to me. And it did to the Universities that have done studies on it too.

Oh and btw Whispering Legs, I believe my view of it is in the majority, not yours.
Monogamy is an exceedingly new concept, however. Only 500 or so years old, I think it was.

My beliefs are an amalgam of both. My spouse is allowed to indulge in whatever fetish she wants, so long as I'm involved.

Yes, what the majority does -or claims to do- is an excellent way to judge the fitness of someone else's intimate realtionships.

Yes, Lacadaemon. In a minute, Steph will regale us with why homosexuality is wrong... much to our confusion and consternation, for we thought she was a Liberal.

Fifty years ago, learned doctors wrote books on the evils of masturbation and the physical and psychological damage that it causes. The majority of people believed these things.

Not very "Liberal" are you?

I personally could care a less how you and your wife get your jollies, none of my business quite frankly.

However, when I got married and my husband and I made a promise to each other to be faithful to each other, well I took that promise seriously.. maybe you didn't. I don't care. It doesn't effect my life.

All I'm saying is I'm happy with my husband and my eyes never stray, why? Because I love him, he pleases me, and I hold him in very high respect and simply would not break my promise to the man I love.

I waited until I was in my 30's to get married for a reason, I was not willing to "settle" I waited till I found Mr. Perfect, at least Mr. Perfect for ME. I found him. I don't need any other man, he's more of a man then any man I've ever known. Why on earth would I want chopped liver when I already have steak!

Speaking of which, Paul Martin needs to start doing something with his campaign because the more Stephen Harper talks, the less sure I am of why I want don't want him running the country...

Reminds me of an emo quote :)
I discovered my wife in bed with another man, and I was crushed. So I said, "Get off me, you two!"

Well, since I know that I please my husband and he pleases me, I'd first off be very shocked that he would look outside of our marriage, lets face it, people who want/need multiple partners usually means that the one they have do not satisfy them. People who engage in orgies or threesome's, foursome's etc, can say what they like, if they were happy with their partner they wouldn't do it. It's not like studies haven't been done on this or anything. Way to make value judgements...studies say that homosexuality is unnatural and bad for you too...and other studies show that it's perfectly natural. Which 'studies' are right? And yes, I WILL say what I like...which includes sharing my husband with others. If I weren't 'pleased' with him, I'd leave him. The fact that we are so comfortable with one another, than having sex with other people in no way weakens our relationship, means our relationship is damn strong. And honest. You got a problem with that?

But more to the point, it's a matter of not just trust being broken, but respect. If you truly love someone you would never be "OK" with sharing them sexually, anyone who says different is either lying to themselves or just doesn't get it. You don't have respect for the person you claim to love if you're ok with them sleeping with other people. It really is that simple.
Cut the sanctimonious bullshit, and admit that your OPINION on the matter is just that. Opinion. Not fact. I'm 'lying or just don't get it'? Please. You don't know me, or my husband, nor do you have any 'authority' to tell me what is right or wrong for our relationship.

Yes, Lacadaemon. In a minute, Steph will regale us with why homosexuality is wrong... much to our confusion and consternation, for we thought she was a Liberal.


Wait a minute. Homosexuality is wrong again now?

This is even more confusing than the Canadian definition of "legal war".

Studies would tend to agree with me though. Many people who engage in multiple partner sex in studies have said "it saved our marriage" in fact a majority said that. So, that would say, that had they not engaged in what is known as a "open relationship" their marriage would be over, now why would that be? The answer seems fairly obvious to me. And it did to the Universities that have done studies on it too.

You know what I love the most about this? The idea that somehow, relationships are more likely to succeed if they remain monogomous. The fact is, the majority of ALL relationships fail. How many people are still with the first person they ever dated? Yeah...not that many. Most relationships dissolve...and plenty of 'monogomous' relationships do as well. There is no absolute here...what works for you might not work for me. But that you pretend your version of a relationship is the 'best' and that open-relationships are doomed to failure...is nothing short of laughable.

Yes, Lacadaemon. In a minute, Steph will regale us with why homosexuality is wrong... much to our confusion and consternation, for we thought she was a Liberal.


There is nothing wrong with homosexuality , nothing! In fact many homosexual couples have a far better track record of staying together in monogamy then a lot of Heterosexuals.

You're talking apples and oranges.. homosexuality has nothing to do with infidelity.

I personally could care a less how you and your wife get your jollies, none of my business quite frankly.

However, when I got married and my husband and I made a promise to each other to be faithful to each other, well I took that promise seriously.. maybe you didn't. I don't care. It doesn't effect my life.

All I'm saying is I'm happy with my husband and my eyes never stray, why? Because I love him, he pleases me, and I hold him in very high respect and simply would not break my promise to the man I love.

I waited until I was in my 30's to get married for a reason, I was not willing to "settle" I waited till I found Mr. Perfect, at least Mr. Perfect for ME. I found him. I don't need any other man, he's more of a man then any man I've ever known. Why on earth would I want chopped liver when I already have steak!
If you think his eyes never stray, you are deeply, deeply delusional. I have no doubt he doesn't act on his impulses, but it's somewhat hard to counter 300 million years of animalistic drive being honed to perfection inside our own minds.

I personally could care a less how you and your wife get your jollies, none of my business quite frankly. Apparently you do, because you like to tell everyone how wrong it is, and that he must be lying or just not get it.

However, when I got married and my husband and I made a promise to each other to be faithful to each other, well I took that promise seriously.. maybe you didn't. Good for you. Since you weren't there during Kimchi's vows, you have no idea whether "I will sleep with you, and only you" was a part of it.

<snip>

In other words, you have steak, but you wouldn't mind a big juicy hamburger every now and then?

In other words, you have steak, but you wouldn't mind a big juicy hamburger every now and then?
I like my meat...what can I say?

I like my meat...what can I say?

Yes, but what about *other* people's meat?

You know what I love the most about this? The idea that somehow, relationships are more likely to succeed if they remain monogomous. The fact is, the majority of ALL relationships fail.

Actually I was talking about marriage, not "relationships" and I believe the last study done found that 50% of marriages fail. That means that just as many in fact DO succeed.

Hey, like I said, I don't care how other people wish to get their jollies, it's none of my business, I was simply saying it wasn't for me. Nor will it ever be. You however may do as you please. I don't really care. If you think sharing your partner sexually is showing the love and respect for them that you have, carry on.. I'm not one to tell people what to do.

Hey, like I said, I don't care how other people wish to get their jollies, it's none of my business, I was simply saying it wasn't for me. Nor will it ever be. You however may do as you please. I don't really care. If you think sharing your partner sexually is showing the love and respect for them that you have, carry on.. I'm not one to tell people what to do.
Good. Then I'll consider this:
People who engage in orgies or threesome's, foursome's etc, can say what they like, if they were happy with their partner they wouldn't do it. It's not like studies haven't been done on this or anything.
and this:
If you truly love someone you would never be "OK" with sharing them sexually, anyone who says different is either lying to themselves or just doesn't get it. You don't have respect for the person you claim to love if you're ok with them sleeping with other people. It really is that simple.
to be fully recanted.

I'm not one to tell people what to do.
And I appreciate the sentiment, but at the same time:
If you truly love someone you would never be "OK" with sharing them sexually, anyone who says different is either lying to themselves or just doesn't get it. You don't have respect for the person you claim to love if you're ok with them sleeping with other people.

EDIT: Someone beat me to the punch...

So, what are we saying? Your reaction to finding out your partner sleeps with someone else depends on your own individual psychology matriceed through your reaction to your society's collective morality? (i.e. go with them, or go with something counter to it, or go with a minority sub-culture's norms, or [most likely!] pick 'n' mix depending on context?)

Seems fair to me :)

to be fully recanted.

I know how you love to debate everything to death..lol But you're looking for a debate here where there isn't one. Yes, that is MY personal opinion. However I don't believe that my personal opinion has to be yours.

I can't stress it enough, I don't care what you or anyone else wishes to do in their bedroom. I would never tell anyone what to do.

I gave my opinion, sure, and I stand by it.

However, that doesn't mean I expect nor do I care if everyone shares it or not.

I was simply giving my opinion and saying it was not for me.

You want to make more of it then there was, again, none of my business. As your opinion of me or on any other subject is also none of my business, as it doesn't effect my life.

I know how you love to debate everything to death..lol But you're looking for a debate here where there isn't one. Yes, that is MY personal opinion. However I don't believe that my personal opinion has to be yours.

I can't stress it enough, I don't care what you or anyone else wishes to do in their bedroom. I would never tell anyone what to do.

I gave my opinion, sure, and I stand by it.

However, that doesn't mean I expect nor do I care if everyone shares it or not.

I was simply giving my opinion and saying it was not for me.

You want to make more of it then there was, again, none of my business. As your opinion of me or on any other subject is also none of my business, as it doesn't effect my life.
Well that's no fun. Anyway, thanks for clarifying.

I know how you love to debate everything to death..lol But you're looking for a debate here where there isn't one. Yes, that is MY personal opinion. However I don't believe that my personal opinion has to be yours.
Like I said, I'm glad you have cleared that up. Because it certainly wasn't phrased as your personal opinion. I'm neurotic like that...I like things to be tidy...and clear.

Reminds me of an emo quote :)
Everything reminds you of an emo quote. :D

I like my meat...what can I say?

And by "meat," she means beef. And by "beef," she means...beef. :p

And by "meat," she means beef. And by "beef," she means...beef. :p
"parking the beef bus in tuna town" - A lapdance is so much better when the stripper is crying- Bloodhound gang

Anyone surprised that "join in" is winning?

Anyone surprised that "join in" is winning?

Nothing on NS suprises me anymore. I think we all expect polls not to be taken seriously

Anyone surprised that "join in" is winning?
In NSGeneral? I'm suprised it's not further ahead. Closely followed by 'Kill them both', of course.

Bind => Torture => Kill => Defile => Cook => Eat!

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?

Turn around and go...

Fuck them both soundly.
Then kill them both.


Nah- I take that back. I wouldnt kill my children's mother under any circumstances.
We would however, take in a very talented and attractive "domestic assistant" at that point.

If I walked in on them, my reaction would depend on whether I knew that this affair was going on. If I already knew about it, I'd probably just raise my eyebrows, ask whether the third party was staying for dinner/breakfast, request that they not make too much noise, and then go about my business. The same way I'd act if I found my wife playing Scrabble with a stranger, really.
On the other hand, if I didn't know about this particular partner, or if I had reason to believe that they weren't using protection, that bitch is getting the Hell out. I'm not about to be played as an idiot and risk STDs/raising other people's brats so she can save herself the embarrasment of admitting that she'd like to bed other people.

Oh, and everyone who would spare their life but kill the third party has some seriously fucked up priorities. Unless the third party is a friend/relation of yours/diseased in some way, there is no betrayal or actionable aggression against you in their actions. They're just getting some ass from a providing source. Your spouse, on the other hand, should be honest with you and follow her vows, and "I will only sex you" is an implied part of marriage. Sort of like how "I will bathe somewhat regularly" isn't explicitly stated either.

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?

I would be all kinds of pissed off. I would probably beat the shit out of both of them, then lock them up in my basement until they starve to death.

Fuck them both soundly.
Then kill them both.


Nah- I take that back. I wouldnt kill my children's mother under any circumstances.
We would however, take in a very talented and attractive "domestic assistant" at that point.I hereby volunteer for that position! It'd have to be a temporary contract, but I promise it would be worth it!

Nothing on NS suprises me anymore. I think we all expect polls not to be taken seriously
Because the various 'killing' options aren't as popular as 'join in', people aren't taking the poll seriously?

I hereby volunteer for that position! It'd have to be a temporary contract, but I promise it would be worth it!

Thanks. There would be many,many positions,actually. But I'm confident you'd be great. You're a good learner.

Either way,I think it would be a much better alternative to a grisly double homocide.

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?
throw her clothes at her and tell her to get the hell out of my house and threaten that if I ever see her around again that serious harm would be done.

I would then kick my husband out on the street (unless he decided he would go to counseling)


I don't see it ever happening though, as my husband is fully commited to me, and we have the type of relationship that if one of us was considering cheating we could talk about it and get counseling before anything bad happened.;)

Because the various 'killing' options aren't as popular as 'join in', people aren't taking the poll seriously?
I'd say that since the "Other" and/or "Leave the room" options aren't more popular then either double homicide or a threesome people aren't taking the poll seriously. Most people would either have a marital spat or a divorce, as is evidenced by most people's tendancy toward monogamy and nonkilling random people.

Thanks. There would be many,many positions,actually. But I'm confident you'd be great. You're a good learner.

Either way,I think it would be a much better alternative to a grisly double homocide.
No shit. Kind of a no brainer there...but I'm sure there are plenty who would disagree with you.

No shit. Kind of a no brainer there...but I'm sure there are plenty who would disagree with you.

Sometimes its hard for me to differentiate between right and wrong. SO-the possibilty of a double skull fucking THEN the grisly murder is a possibilty.

Even so, Sin- you're still wlecome to be my live-in domestic hump slave and household manager

Walk away. Completely. It's all over save the screaming, and nothing can come of the screaming, so just walk away.

The likelihood of my having a spouse is infinitesmally small, so I'd just try to figure out who the heck this person is and why they are having sex in my bed. Eventually, I'd probably take them and torture them both to death using one of the milder forms of Puritania (there's a description in the 'History of AMF' thread).

The likelihood of my having a spouse is infinitesmally small, so I'd just try to figure out who the heck this person is and why they are having sex in my bed. Eventually, I'd probably take them and torture them both to death using one of the milder forms of Puritania (there's a description in the 'History of AMF' thread).
Oh, we all know that eventually, you'll meet the young Hungarian pool boy of your dreams and go live happily ever after with him and his lap dog.

before I start i'm not saying that the way me and my wife believe is what's right, or the only thing that works in a relationship, it's just the way we do things. I'm not criticising anyone else.

I have absolute trust and faith in my wife and I know she would never cheat, but hypothetically if she did I would very likely force her to choose between me and her lover. If she chose her lover I would ask her to go with her lover and be happy, my main focus then would be on caring for our children. I will always belong to my wife, and hypothetically if she cheated the same would be true, however I would not be content to share her heart when she has all of mine. I would just take care of our children and hope that she realises that I will always love her with all of my heart and be content with only her. I've always believed that sex is a sacred thing to be shared between two people when they are ready to spend their whole lives together. At the end of the day what I want more than life itself is to give her the life of happiness that she truley deserves and if I didn't satisfy her than it would be clear to me that I couldn't give her what she deserves. My wife pleases me in every way and I please her, we believe our relationship is a deep and sacred thing. We both decided to devote ourselves fully to the other.

I'm not criticising any other way, but that's just the way me and my wife have always been.

Divorce the stupid bitch and leave her with nothing, according to the infidelity clause in our prenup.


wanna get married...damn your right:sniper:

I'd ask the lover if he knew beforehand that she was married. If he said no (and I was able to confirm he was telling the truth with a lie detector), I would spare him, allow him to leave in peace, and then butcher my wife. If he knew she was married (or said he didn't, but was lying) I'd kill them both.

Violent lil' sucker ain't ya.

Have fun on death row.

I would throw them both out into the streets, naked.

Especially if it's in the winter.

And yeah, all his crap that I can grab and throw out the window goes.

I would pop a cap in the guy who was cheating on my wife. Then I would start twidling with my gun as my wife starts crying with excuses on why she was doing it, listening to her say, "I'm sorry! I'll never do it again! We can get through this!" And then blast her half-way through her talking. Then I would fly away to a tropical paradise. Like Haiti!

Join in :p Maybe I would have even planned the whole thing from the get-go. ;)

I would pop a cap in the guy who was cheating on my wife. Then I would start twidling with my gun as my wife starts crying with excuses on why she was doing it, listening to her say, "I'm sorry! I'll never do it again! We can get through this!" And then blast her half-way through her talking. Then I would fly away to a tropical paradise. Like Haiti!

Another wannabe gangster.

Another wannabe gangster.
The world never runs out of those :rolleyes:

Hypothetically, if you were (or are) married, and you came home, entered your bedroom, and saw your spouse and some other man/woman/person...you know, what would you do?

I'd probably be a bit miffed that they started without me. But I'd get over it quickly. :)

I have a pocket knife and a short temper - any questions?

No, seriously, if I caught my fiancee cheating...and I seriously think I have a better chance of striking oil in my kitchen sink...I would throw her out once and for all with most of her stuff, except for one thing - and this one thing would be something she wishes she could have but would lose because she righteously deserves to lose it. Well, not so much an "it" as a "her." I would take her beloved Yorkshire terrier and keep her for myself. After all, I love the dog too. If we broke up almost any other way, I would let her take the dog, but if I caught her cheating, I would take the dog. And considering how attached she is to that dog, that would kill her. Plus I would pawn her engagement ring and make at least a grand or two.

Seriously, though, I trust her 99.9%. It's the other bastards I don't trust.

This is even more confusing than the Canadian definition of "legal war".do not...I repeat do not ask the Canadian Gov for a clear referendum number...

"Democracy in Quebec?...It is not 51% ...its a bit more...not sure how much...metric or Imperial??..."

:D :D :rolleyes: :D