NationStates Jolt Archive

http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm

Yes

The first sentence explains alot, which is honestly quite sad.

Why do you plagiarise? (http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm)

Why do you plagiarise? (http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm)
Why do you care?

Why do you plagiarise? (http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm)

Pwned.

Why do you care?

Because it is dishonest and down-right unchristian to steal what someone else wrote and pass it off as yours.

Why do you plagiarise? (http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm)
Yikes. Good call.

Why do you care?
No, seriously. That's kind of bad. If it weren't you, I'd tear into you for it...that's how bad it is. Why pass this off as your own work? AND WHY THE HELL TALK ABOUT YOURSELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

Going on strict scriptural interpretation you shouldn't even own a gun (except for pure sporting purposes).

The problem I see is that, if you're going to carry it, you need to be willing to pull the trigger when it comes down to it.

If you're not willing to do that then carrying the gun becomes fairly pointless, yes you can threaten but if they are willing to call your bluff? You're fucked.

Personally I plan on getting self-defence classes sometime (maybe that Israeli style, whatever it's called) but in most life I rely on the fact I carry no valuables and that I can look decently threatening at need to avoid trouble.

I live in the UK where owning a gun is illegal for most intents and purposes but I occasionally go airgun shooting and I would like to go hunting or at least use an actual rifle someday. I don't feel threatened enough in my daily life to even carry the knife I take on camp (in a scrap it'd be a chocolate teapot mind).

Because it is dishonest and down-right unchristian to steal what someone else wrote and pass it off as yours.
Ah, touche.

AND WHY THE HELL TALK ABOUT YOURSELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

For ease of replacing "Fr. Frog" with "Deep Kimchi"

AND WHY THE HELL TALK ABOUT YOURSELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

You'll notice that the text plagiarised does so also.

It seems like you are only allowed to carry two swords. Further it seems like you're not allowed to use them.

Why do you plagiarise? (http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm)
lol busted

For ease of replacing "Fr. Frog" with "Deep Kimchi"
No, I mean in either version...the person is talking about themselves in the third person. Sinuhue hates that!

No, I mean in either version...the person is talking about themselves in the third person. Sinuhue hates that!

It's good to know that some of the people here spend most of their time Googling every block of text that gets posted.

Personally I plan on getting self-defence classes sometime (maybe that Israeli style, whatever it's called)

Maga Krav. Get it. It's the best one I ever attended in terms of teaching you to kick ass in real life situations.

You'll notice that the text plagiarised does so also.
I know (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10007576&postcount=16). It's a failing of the English language that the word 'you' can be so ambiguous. I meant it in the impersonal, not direct sense.

You have interesting ideas, very interesting, and have given me much to think on.

It's good to know that some of the people here spend most of their time Googling every block of text that gets posted.

I'd actually read it before. I googled it because I recognised your stolen text. But, sure, if you want to cover up your plagiarism by lashing out at the person that caught you with it, then, well, knock yourself out.

Going on strict scriptural interpretation you shouldn't even own a gun (except for pure sporting purposes).
Care to explain?

It's good to know that some of the people here spend most of their time Googling every block of text that gets posted.
Hmmm...they wouldn't have to if people weren't being big fat stealers!

I know (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10007576&postcount=16). It's a failing of the English language that the word 'you' can be so ambiguous. I meant it in the impersonal, not direct sense.

One, while stilted, works well in such cases. :)

I'd actually read it before. I googled it because I recognised your stolen text. But, sure, if you want to cover up your plagiarism by lashing out at the person that caught you with it, then, well, knock yourself out.
I'm surprised that you, Fass, have read a pro-gun website. Didn't it make you break out in hives?

You have interesting ideas, very interesting, and have given me much to think on.
See, Deep Kimchi! See how you mislead others into believing that you have actually presented them with your own ideas? Doesn't that bother you? Sheesh! I'm just going to pretend I wrote a Shakespearian sonnet now...

Maga Krav. Get it. It's the best one I ever attended in terms of teaching you to kick ass in real life situations.

Ta, I'll look it up a bit better now.

Care to explain?

Thou shalt not kill. If you carry a gun then you either intend to kill if it comes down to it or you will not and the criminal is now the proud owner of a brand spankin' new gun.

Neither of which is a good outcome.

One, while stilted, works well in such cases. :)
I considered it, and decided not to sound like a pompous ass this once:)

WHY TALK ABOUT ONESELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

Okay, I guess it doesn't sound too bad...

I considered it, and decided not to sound like a pompous ass this once:)
WHY TALK ABOUT ONESELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?
Okay, I guess it doesn't sound too bad...

Oh, hush! I use it all the time. :p

I'm surprised that you, Fass, have read a pro-gun website. Didn't it make you break out in hives?

Why does that surprise you? Anyway, I don't think I searched it out on my own. Someone who credits their sources linked there on a blog, IIRC.

Ta, I'll look it up a bit better now.



Thou shalt not kill. If you carry a gun then you either intend to kill if it comes down to it or you will not and the criminal is now the proud owner of a brand spankin' new gun.

Neither of which is a good outcome.I don't buy that. There's nothing wrong with killing in defense of human life. "Thou shalt not kill" is a bad translation. It should be "thou shalt not murder".

I considered it, and decided not to sound like a pompous ass this once:)

WHY TALK ABOUT ONESELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

Okay, I guess it doesn't sound too bad...

You should do it more often.

See, Deep Kimchi! See how you mislead others into believing that you have actually presented them with your own ideas? Doesn't that bother you? Sheesh! I'm just going to pretend I wrote a Shakespearian sonnet now...

Ai'ight, the frog dude has interesting ideas.

Ta, I'll look it up a bit better now.



Thou shalt not kill. If you carry a gun then you either intend to kill if it comes down to it or you will not and the criminal is now the proud owner of a brand spankin' new gun.

Neither of which is a good outcome.

That depends on the translation. Many versions now claim that "murder" is closer than "kill". I'm not advocating either, just stating that there is some ambiguity involved in that particular statement.

I considered it, and decided not to sound like a pompous ass this once:)

WHY TALK ABOUT ONESELF IN THE THIRD PERSON?

Okay, I guess it doesn't sound too bad...

One does not always sound like a pompous ass when using "oneself". But perhaps one needs a new tailor, because ones clothes are absolutely dreadful? Away with you, beggah!

It's good to know that some of the people here spend most of their time Googling every block of text that gets posted.You don't seem to get the idea that it is very bad to plagarise someone else's work and pass it off as your own. If that were my work you stole, I'd seriously consider legal action. As a writer, it's absolutely the worst sin you can commit against someone.

As an annoyed poster and as a writer, I think you should quit digging a hole for yourself and retract your attempt to cheat someone else out of their due credit.

I don't buy that. There's nothing wrong with killing in defense of human life. "Thou shalt not kill" is a bad translation. It should be "thou shalt not murder".

So how come Jesus was all on the whole 'turn the other cheek' business.

Maybe the actual translation should be 'murder' but if Jesus doesn't want you hitting people, why would he let you shoot them?

... if Jesus doesn't want you hitting people, why would he let you shoot them?

owned.

So how come Jesus was all on the whole 'turn the other cheek' business.

Maybe the actual translation should be 'murder' but if Jesus doesn't want you hitting people, why would he let you shoot them?

And how would you shoot someone if you're only allowed to carry two swords? :confused:

Oh, hush! I use it all the time. :p
I know.:eek:

Out of interest, what do you guys think of this (http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0007182368/qid=1133287475/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_11_1/202-2410360-9594260) piece of fiction I wrote recently, be honest now.;)

I know.:eek:

Well, then, that was just an underhanded barb by you. Hmpf!

No

Out of interest, what do you guys think of this (http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0007182368/qid=1133287475/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_11_1/202-2410360-9594260) piece of fiction I wrote recently, be honest now.;)

Heh .. zing.

Out of interest, what do you guys think of this (http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0007182368/qid=1133287475/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_11_1/202-2410360-9594260) piece of fiction I wrote recently, be honest now.;)

Oh, stop you are making my sides hurt.:p

You don't seem to get the idea that it is very bad to plagarise someone else's work and pass it off as your own. If that were my work you stole, I'd seriously consider legal action. As a writer, it's absolutely the worst sin you can commit against someone.

As an annoyed poster and as a writer, I think you should quit digging a hole for yourself and retract your attempt to cheat someone else out of their due credit.

I'm sorry. I was terribly bored today.

Your in deep kimchi um....Deep Kimchi. The plebes...wait...WE the plebes, demand an apology of sorts...or at the very least, an edit to the OP listing the original source. Sheesh!

Edit: great, you have to say sorry just before I post my demands, thereby making them pointless. Bleh!

Out of interest, what do you guys think of this (http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0007182368/qid=1133287475/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_11_1/202-2410360-9594260) piece of fiction I wrote recently, be honest now.;)

OMFG, it's Zombie-Tolkien! Run for your lives!!!

Well, then, that was just an underhanded barb by you. Hmpf!
Oh come on now Fass...underhanded barbs are what I'm all about! It's why you teeter on the edge of love/hate with me...that and my constant use of ... and ??? and !!!

Oh come on now Fass...underhanded barbs are what I'm all about! It's why you teeter on the edge of love/hate with me...that and my constant use of ... and ??? and !!!

Honey, sweety, darling, I stopped teetering and went off the edge a long time ago.

And how would you shoot someone if you're only allowed to carry two swords? :confused:

You stab and hack, which is pretty much the same when you get down to it.

Or you get a javelin, or a bow, or a sling...

Honey, sweety, darling, I stopped teetering and went off the edge a long time ago.
Well, you don't take to joking very often.

Well, you don't take to joking very often.

I joke all the time.

http://www.frfrogspad.com/religion.htm


NO, I think it automatically makes you a republican christian. Which is worse.

I joke all the time.

Well, you rarely see the humor when I try to joke with you.

OMFG, it's Zombie-Tolkien! Run for your lives!!!

Nah, Tolkein was just my frontman, a bit like Shakespeare.

P.S. I take no responsibility for Jane Austen, any of the Brontes or Dan Brown.