NationStates Jolt Archive

Who do you think it is. I have a suspicion that i may be seen as something of an extremeist. But what about lewrockwellia? neo K? Parratoga?

Well who?

Who do you think it is. I have a suspicion that i may be seen as something of an extremeist. But what about lewrockwellia? neo K? Parratoga?

Well who?

I think I might be in the top 10% of "most pissed off posters."

I think I might be in the top 10% of "most pissed off posters."
Lyric would rate #1 on that list... ;)

re: DHomme/OP:

Most Radical... Tough call since "Radical" to one is "moderate" to another.

Also, what Issue? I'm pretty radical on some issues, reactionary on others, and entirely unconcerned with still more.

What's your baseline?

I don't think LewRockwellia or Neo K are that radical. Especially not Neo K.

Honestly, there's too many nutty wingers on the board for me to pick just a few.

I'm pretty radical myself.

Which type of radical I am I don't know.

Avalon II hands down.

Presuming that by "radical", you mean "unwilling/unable to listen to sense".

I probably have the most extreme views on abortion.

I probably have the most extreme views on abortion.

Do you think that EVERY child should be aborted?

It'd be interesting to talk to someone with that sort of mentality.

What about me? I'm an anarchist, that's pretty radical:p

Do you think that EVERY child should be aborted?

It'd be interesting to talk to someone with that sort of mentality.

Almost. I think that it is far to difficult to get an abortion. I also think that everyone should get abortion counselling, pointing out the advantages of not having kids &c.

I also think either parent should have the option to abort the fetus over the objections of the other.

If the fetus can survive all that, then I suppose I'll allow it.

Ooooh Yah, I don't give a fuck about global warming either. Not because I don't believe in it, but because I just don't give a fuck.

What about me? I'm an anarchist, that's pretty radical:p

So twencen.

Calling yourself a radical is like calling yourself a geek: If you say "I'm a geek," you probably aren't one.

Labels blow.

Calling yourself a radical is like calling yourself a geek: If you say "I'm a geek," you probably aren't one.

Labels blow.
Hmmm... in that case... I'm definately NOT a radical. I am also NOT and extremist. Heheheh... :D

Probably Letila and the myriad Communistic posters.

I say Serapindal, his neo-con threads are sickening. Ick!

edit: BTW, am I radical?

Me.

Me.

Nay! Those with the libertarian views are the least radical! We just have common sense!

Who do you think it is. I have a suspicion that i may be seen as something of an extremeist. But what about lewrockwellia? neo K? Parratoga?

Well who?

Its me, whore.

Do you think that EVERY child should be aborted?

It'd be interesting to talk to someone with that sort of mentality.

We should have late term abortions for white trash and chavs - lord knows, Christians claim we homo's are the biggest threat to society; sorry, allowing chavs, white trash and red necks to breed and teach their culture to their off spring is pretty damaging to society :p

Chavs.... *Shudders*

KILL THE CHAVS!!!

We should have late term abortions for white trash and chavs - lord knows, Christians claim we homo's are the biggest threat to society; sorry, allowing chavs, white trash and red necks to breed and teach their culture to their off spring is pretty damaging to society :p

Very sorry, but no Christian I know would agree with that quote, nor say it in a believable manner.

Radical is a relative term. No one here is radical. The ones who say they think that they are really need to get some friends.

They'll pay to know what they really think.:cool:

Trausti Hraunfjord is the most radical I have seen
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=454489&page=2
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=454489&page=3

I'm not radical, but I am totally tubular.

I don't even know if anyone knows what mine are...:(

I probably have the most extreme views on abortion.I'd say we're rivals for that position ;) My views on abortion pretty much mirror yours. I would love to see a society where the vast majority of pregnancies are terminated (not all, but purely for the sake of the preservation of humanity - but frankly, maybe that wouldn't be such a good thing...). I don't like children at all, but that's the irrational part of my mind talking. Rationally, I think we should attend to those people that are already in existence before we create more. So many people in this world live in poverty, whether it be relative or absolute, and I think that should be addressed by governments rather than adding more people to the equation.

In terms of the most radical / extreme posters, I agree that the terms are relative. However, I'd say that Serapindal is one of the most extreme people on this forum.

Compared to the average Joe, I am extreme. However, I think I am more moderate than a lot of the people on this board.

I probably have the most extreme views on abortion.
Maybe on this forum, but in the real world Bill Bennet gets that dubious honor.

Media Matters exposes Bennett: "[Y]ou could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006

Me.

*cowers in fear*

I think I might be in the top 10% of "most pissed off posters."
I'm probably pretty high on "most pissing off poster"...

Trausti Hraunfjord is the most radical I have seen
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=454489&page=2
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=454489&page=3
Not really. Inflamatory maybe, but not radical. TH's opinions on the US are shared by millions, probably billions. Myself included.

I think that most people are more radical on NS then in real life. You can really offend people without fear of them hitting you or having to talk to them ever again.

Not really. Inflamatory maybe, but not radical. TH's opinions on the US are shared by millions, probably billions. Myself included. Wait... so you think terrorist attacks which kill innocent people are a good thing? :confused:

Wait... so you think terrorist attacks which kill innocent people are a good thing? :confused:

If there's a punchline at the end, yes.

If there's a punchline at the end, yes. You make me sad in the pants Keruvalia. :(

You make me sad in the pants Keruvalia. :(

You should learn to not take things so seriously. We get, what, 80 years to hang around here? Spending even 1 second on worry can take years off of that.

You should learn to not take things so seriously. We get, what, 80 years to hang around here? Spending even 1 second on worry can take years off of that. Did you even read what I said? "Sad in the pants" is not a expression to be taken seriously my friend. ;)

.....
....


....

Unless you're willing to make me "happy in the pants"....

Did you even read what I said? "Sad in the pants" is not a expression to be taken seriously my friend. ;)

The statement was not lost on me. I was ...


Unless you're willing to make me "happy in the pants"....

Oh, never mind ... you figured it out. :D

Wait... so you think terrorist attacks which kill innocent people are a good thing? :confused:
I've not read every single post by TH, but I haven't seen him/her promote terrorism. All I've seen is TH bitch & moan about the US terrorist regime. And I wholeheartedly agree.

There's a reason half the globe threw a party when 9/11 happened. It's got nothing to do with wanting to see people dead. It's got everything to do with seeing a murderous regime get a taste of it's own medicine.

Also, a wee bit of a disclaimer. I just noticed TH seems to believe the US government carried out the 9/11 disaster. I don't share that rediculous notion at all.

i gotta be in the top 20 or so... me and the rest of the UDCP... i mean just look at our website (http://www.udcp.org):P


communitarian anarcho-communists aren't two-a-penny you know ;)

Refused Party Program is a complete nutter. He even talks about himself in the third person.

i gotta be in the top 20 or so... me and the rest of the UDCP... i mean just look at our website (http://www.udcp.org):P

communitarian anarcho-communists aren't two-a-penny you know ;)

I'm having fun deconstructing your manifesto in a humorous way

I've done a lot more, but this one cracks me up...

"Groups of people who are in demand shall be exempt."

So, if I'm a prostitute, and I'm extremely popular, would I be exempt? And I noticed that you said that everyone has to be taking turns doing the "undesirable" jobs. Well, to some people, prostitution might be one of those "undesirable" jobs, but the people may have voted (by direct democracy) that male and female prostitution are genuinely "in demand". So, if there weren't enough prostitutes, and we voted for more, would men and women be forced to take turns...

I'm having fun deconstructing your manifesto in a humorous way

I've done a lot more, but this one cracks me up...

"Groups of people who are in demand shall be exempt."

So, if I'm a prostitute, and I'm extremely popular, would I be exempt? And I noticed that you said that everyone has to be taking turns doing the "undesirable" jobs. Well, to some people, prostitution might be one of those "undesirable" jobs, but the people may have voted (by direct democracy) that male and female prostitution are genuinely "in demand". So, if there weren't enough prostitutes, and we voted for more, would men and women be forced to take turns...
Unless the entire population wanted to take turns having sex with strangers against their own wishes, I doubt such a thing would happen...

If that's you deconstructing his manifesto, I suspect you'll be doing him a massive favour :p

I'm having fun deconstructing your manifesto in a humorous way

I've done a lot more, but this one cracks me up...

"Groups of people who are in demand shall be exempt."

So, if I'm a prostitute, and I'm extremely popular, would I be exempt? And I noticed that you said that everyone has to be taking turns doing the "undesirable" jobs. Well, to some people, prostitution might be one of those "undesirable" jobs, but the people may have voted (by direct democracy) that male and female prostitution are genuinely "in demand". So, if there weren't enough prostitutes, and we voted for more, would men and women be forced to take turns...
i suppose some jobs would be exempt too. either that or if thats what the local population decides through direct democracy, thats the law. it only seems crazy because of the hangups of our society - the society (local) that votes in such a way is highly likely to not have those same hangups or problems with prostitution...

anyway, it may have holes and not be complete, but that manifesto is a damn sight more than any other NS Party has, and besides this isn't the time (or place) for debate of this nature (plus i really can't be bothered right now) - if you want to argue points against it either wait for the next NS Election or use our forum

edit: and its not just my manifesto, for the record. there are about 20 members to our party

If that's you deconstructing his manifesto, I suspect you'll be doing him a massive favour :p

I'm not trying to do a good job deconstructing it, I'm trying to be funny. :rolleyes:

I'm not trying to do a good job deconstructing it, I'm trying to be funny. :rolleyes:
personally i lost my sense of humour today standing around doing market research in below-zero conditions for 8 hours solid... excuse me if i took your point too seriously

personally i lost my sense of humour today standing around doing market research in below-zero conditions for 8 hours solid... excuse me if i took your point too seriously

that's even more hilarious - an anarcho-communist doing market research...

that's even more hilarious - an anarcho-communist doing market research...
know thine enemy ;) :D

(ps: i gotta eat don't i?)

know thine enemy ;) :D

(ps: i gotta eat don't i?)

Yes - food doesn't grow on trees - it comes from the grocery store...

it comes from the grocery store...
for the moment